Case 6:14-cv-00982-KNM Document 115 Filed 08/26/15 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 708
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`TYLER DIVISION
`
`
`
`
`Civil Action No. 6:13-cv-507
`
`Consolidated Lead Case
`
`
`CELLULAR COMMUNICATIONS
`EQUIPMENT LLC,
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`HTC CORPORATION, et al.,
`Defendants.
`
`
`CELLULAR COMMUNICATIONS
`EQUIPMENT LLC,
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.,
`et al.,
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`CELLULAR COMMUNICATIONS
`EQUIPMENT LLC,
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`LG ELECTRONICS, INC., et al.,
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Civil Action No. 6:14-cv-759
`
`Civil Action No. 6:14-cv-982
`
`Consolidated Lead Case
`
`JOINT MOTION TO AMEND DOCKET CONTROL ORDERS
`AND FOR NEW TRIAL SETTINGS
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 6:14-cv-00982-KNM Document 115 Filed 08/26/15 Page 2 of 14 PageID #: 709
`
`
`
`Plaintiff Cellular Communications Equipment LLC and Defendants to each of the above-
`
`captioned actions (collectively, “the Parties”) have conferred regarding case deadlines and trial
`
`settings and, subject to the Court’s approval, agree to the schedule modifications set forth herein.
`
`Consolidated Case No. 6:13-cv-507
`
`Near the outset of this consolidated Case No. 6:13-cv-507 (the “507 cases”), Chief Judge
`
`Davis held a “special case management conference” and solicited scheduling proposals from the
`
`Parties including “[u]nique approaches leading to the early resolution of the case.” Dkt. No. 68.
`
`Accordingly, the Docket Control Order (Dkt No. 123) in the 507 cases established an
`
`unconventional schedule, intended to facilitate early resolution. Among other things, the Docket
`
`Control Order included multiple Markman hearings, a delay of fact discovery until forty-five
`
`days after the Court issued its first Markman Order, and a postponed deadline for “full document
`
`production.”
`
`Because the opening (but not the close) of fact discovery was contingent on issuance of a
`
`Markman order, the discovery period in this multi-patent, multi-defendant case has turned out to
`
`be shorter than expected. Although originally set for November 11, 2014, the initial Markman
`
`hearing was rescheduled to December 15, and the Court issued its initial Markman Order on
`
`March 9, 2015 (Dkt No. 363). Accordingly, fact discovery opened on April 23, 2015, and “full
`
`document production” was not due until June 8, 2015. The discovery deadline is October 23,
`
`2015, resulting in a brief, six-month discovery window.
`
`Additionally, as claim construction proceedings unfolded, multiple Defendants filed
`
`petitions for inter partes review (as will be detailed in relevant part in a joint motion to sever and
`
`stay relative to the ’174 patent that the Parties anticipate filing this week). In light of the
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 6:14-cv-00982-KNM Document 115 Filed 08/26/15 Page 3 of 14 PageID #: 710
`
`
`
`uncertainty surrounding the status of those petitions, the Parties met and conferred to agree on a
`
`framework for proceeding without contested motion practice concerning a litigation stay.
`
`To this end, the Parties agreed that should the PTAB institute inter partes review of all
`
`asserted claims of the ’820 patent based upon the petition filed by Apple Inc.,1 they would jointly
`
`move to stay the 507 cases entirely. Conversely, should the PTAB decline to institute inter
`
`partes review of all asserted claims of the ’820 patent based upon Apple’s petition, the stipulated
`
`stay would be limited to the ’174 patent, and the parties would go forward on the ’820 and ’8923
`
`patents.2
`
`In light of the possibility that the 507 cases would be stayed entirely, the Parties agreed to
`
`refrain from substantive discovery until after the determinative decision from the PTAB. This
`
`agreement was conditioned on the Parties’ agreement to seek extension of all necessary
`
`deadlines should litigation proceed, such that they have an adequate opportunity to complete
`
`discovery and prepare their case(s).
`
`On July 21, 2015, the PTAB declined to institute Apple’s requested inter partes review of
`
`’820 patent, meaning the Parties agree to move forward with the 507 cases as to all asserted
`
`claims of the ’820 and ’8923 patents. The Parties thus jointly file this motion to amend
`
`deadlines, consistent with their agreement and mutual reliance thereon.
`
`Further supportive of the requested schedule adjustments is the fact that there are several
`
`pending motions, the result of which will help shape these proceedings. For instance,
`
`
`1 Apple Inc. v. Cellular Communications Equipment LLC, No. IPR2015-00578 (P.T.A.B. filed
`Jan. 20, 2015). The PTAB had previously (on January 28, 2015) declined to institute inter partes
`review of the ’820 patent in NEC Corporation of America, et al. v. Cellular Communications
`Equipment LLC, No. IPR2014-01136 (P.T.A.B. filed Jul. 10, 2014).
`2 The ’174 patent is subject to pending inter partes review in Amazon.com, Inc., et al. v. Cellular
`Communications Equipment LLC, No. IPR2014-01134 (P.T.A.B. filed Jul. 10, 2014). This
`review is set for final hearing on August 26, 2015 and a decision from the PTAB is expected by
`January 15, 2016.
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case 6:14-cv-00982-KNM Document 115 Filed 08/26/15 Page 4 of 14 PageID #: 711
`
`
`
`Defendants responded to Plaintiff’s original complaints by moving to dismiss for failure to state
`
`claims for indirect infringement and willfulness. The Court ruled that the complaints sufficiently
`
`pleaded induced infringement and willfulness, but required Plaintiff to re-plead its contributory
`
`infringement case. Plaintiff did so, and Defendants filed a consolidated motion to dismiss
`
`Plaintiff’s contributory infringement allegations. The motion awaits a ruling; thus, Defendants
`
`have yet to file answers or counterclaims.
`
`Moreover, Plaintiff has moved to amend its infringement contentions. Defendants (save
`
`for AT&T and Dell) opposed. Plaintiff also moved to strike supplements/amendments to certain
`
`Defendants’ invalidity contentions. The outcome of these motions bears on fact discovery and
`
`expert reports.
`
`
`
`According to the agreed, proposed schedule below (also included as Exhibit A hereto),
`
`the Discovery Deadline would move from October 23, 2015 to February 18, 2016 in anticipation
`
`of a new trial setting in July 2016. The Parties submit that moving the trial from its April 11,
`
`2016 date set by Judge Davis is appropriate and necessary given the scope of these proceedings,
`
`the late date upon which discovery formally opened, and their mutual efforts to conduct this case
`
`efficiently in light of requested inter partes reviews.
`
`Event
`
`Current Deadline
`
`New Deadline
`
`Parties to File Motion to Seal Trial Exhibits, if
`they wish to seal any highly confidential exhibits.
`EXHIBITS: See order below regarding
`exhibits.
`
`9:00 a.m. JURY TRIAL as reached at the
`United States District Court, 211 W. Ferguson,
`3rd Floor, Courtroom of Judge Leonard Davis,
`Tyler, Texas.
`
`3 DAYS after
`conclusion of Trial
`
`
`3 DAYS after
`conclusion of Trial
`
`
`April 11, 2016
`
`To be set by Court
`
`
`9:00 a.m. JURY SELECTION at the United
`States District Court, 211 W. Ferguson, 3rd
`
`April 4, 2016
`
`To be set by Court.
`The parties propose
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`Case 6:14-cv-00982-KNM Document 115 Filed 08/26/15 Page 5 of 14 PageID #: 712
`
`
`
`Floor, Courtroom of Judge Leonard Davis,
`Tyler, Texas.
`
`
`
`mid-July3
`
`
`9:00 a.m. PRETRIAL CONFERENCE at the
`United States District Court, 211 W. Ferguson,
`3rd Floor, Courtroom of Judge Leonard Davis,
`Tyler, Texas.
`All pending motions will be heard.
`
`Parties to file estimates of the amount of time they
`request at jury selection and trial for (1) voir dire,
`(2) opening statements, (3) direct and cross
`examinations, and (4) closing arguments.
`
`March 24, 2016
`
`
`To be set by Court
`
`
`March 22, 2016
`
`
`July 1, 2016
`
`
`Responses to Motions in Limine due.
`
`March 17, 2016
`
`June 27, 2016
`
`Motions in Limine due. The parties are directed
`to confer and advise the Court on or before 3:00
`o’clock p.m. the day before the pre-trial
`conference which paragraphs are agreed to and
`those that need to be addressed at the pre-trial
`conference.
`
`Joint Pretrial Order, Joint Proposed Jury
`Instructions with citation to authority and
`Form of the Verdict for jury trials due.
`Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law
`with citation to authority for issues tried to the
`bench.
`
`Pretrial Objections due.
`
`Objections to Rebuttal Deposition Testimony
`due.
`
`Rebuttal Designations and Objections to
`Deposition Testimony due; Parties to Identify
`Rebuttal Trial Witnesses. Cross examination
`line and page numbers to be included. In video
`depositions, each party is responsible for
`preparation of the final edited video in accordance
`
`March 14, 2016
`
`
`June 23, 2016
`
`
`March 9, 2016
`
`
`June 20, 2016
`
`
`March 4, 2016
`
`June 16, 2016
`
`February 28, 2016
`
`June 13, 2016
`
`February 18, 2016
`
`
`June 6, 2016
`
`
`
`3 Apple notes that it is a party to a separate litigation—Rembrandt Patent Innovations, LLC v.
`Apple Inc., No. C 14-05094 WHA (N.D. Cal.)—involving the same lead trial counsel. Trial in
`that case has been set to commence July 11, 2016. To the extent possible, Plaintiff agrees to
`cooperate with Apple to schedule its trial in this matter to avoid that conflict.
`
`
`
`5
`
`

`

`Case 6:14-cv-00982-KNM Document 115 Filed 08/26/15 Page 6 of 14 PageID #: 713
`
`
`
`with their parties’ designations and the Court’s
`rulings on objections.
`
`Pretrial Disclosures due; Parties to Identify
`Trial Witnesses.
`Video and Stenographic Deposition Designation
`due. Each party who proposes to offer deposition
`testimony shall file a disclosure identifying the line
`and page numbers to be offered.
`Notice of Request for Daily Transcript or Real
`Time Reporting of Court Proceedings due. If a
`daily transcript or real time reporting of court
`proceedings is requested for trial or hearings, the
`party or parties making said request shall file a
`notice with the Court and email the Court
`Reporter, Shea Sloan, at
`shea_sloan@txed.uscourts.gov.
`
`Response to Dispositive Motions (including
`Daubert motions) due. Responses to dispositive
`motions filed prior to the dispositive motion
`deadline, including Daubert motions, shall be due
`in accordance with Local Rule CV-56 and Local
`Rule CV-7. Motions to extend page limits will
`only be granted in exceptional circumstances.
`
`Dispositive Motions due from all parties and
`any other motions that may require a hearing
`(including Daubert motions) due. Motions shall
`comply with Local Rule CV-56 and Local Rule
`CV-7. Motions to extend page limits will only be
`granted in exceptional circumstances.
`
`Amend Pleadings (after Markman Hearing). It is
`not necessary to file a Motion for Leave to Amend
`before the deadline to amend pleadings. It is
`necessary to file a Motion for Leave to Amend
`after the deadline. However, except as provided in
`Patent Rule 3-6, if the amendment would affect
`infringement contentions or invalidity contentions,
`a motion must be made pursuant to Patent Rule 3-6
`irrespective of whether the amendment is made
`prior to this deadline.
`
`Deadline to File Letter Briefs for Summary
`Judgment Motions and Daubert Motions. See
`
`
`
`6
`
`January 30, 2016
`
`May 26, 2016
`
`December 18, 2015
`
`
`May 9, 2016
`
`
`November 20, 2015
`
`
`April 18, 2016
`
`
`November 6, 2015
`
`
`March 25, 2016
`
`
`October 26, 2015
`
`March 7, 2016
`
`

`

`Case 6:14-cv-00982-KNM Document 115 Filed 08/26/15 Page 7 of 14 PageID #: 714
`
`
`
`the Court’s website for further information.
`
`
`
`
`
`Expert Discovery Deadline.
`
`Fact Discovery Deadline.
`
`Parties designate rebuttal expert witnesses (non-
`construction
`issues), Rebuttal expert witness
`reports due. Refer to Local Rules for required
`information.
`
`Parties with burden of proof designate expert
`witnesses
`(non-construction
`issues).
` Expert
`witness reports due. Refer to Local Rules for
`required information.
`Final Election of Asserted Prior Art pursuant to
`Paragraphs 3 and 5 of the Model Order
`Focusing Patent Claims and Prior Art to
`Reduce Costs.*
`
`Final Election of Asserted Claims pursuant to
`Paragraphs 3 and 5 of the Model Order
`Focusing Patent Claims and Prior Art to
`Reduce Costs.*
`
`October 23, 2015
`
`March 2, 2016
`
`October 23, 2015
`
`February 18, 2016
`
`October 28, 2015
`
`
`February 18, 2016
`
`
`September 28, 2015
`
`
`January 15, 2016
`
`
`August 31, 2015
`
`
`December 18, 2015
`
`
`August 31, 2015
`
`December 1, 2015
`
`Mediation Deadline.
`
`
`
`The Parties are aware that this is a complicated matter and that significant time has
`
`passed since the case management conference before Judge Davis. To this end, they submit that
`
`a follow-on case management conference may be in order and welcome at this juncture.
`
`Case No. 6:14-cv-759 and Consolidated Case No. 6:14-cv-982
`
`A number of the Parties to the 507 cases (including CCE, AT&T, T-Mobile, Verizon,
`
`Sprint, and LG) are parties to cases that this Court has set for trial in June and July 2016. See
`
`Dkt No. 63 in Case No. 6:14-cv-759 and Dkt No. 74 in Case No. 6:14-cv-982. Case No. 6:14-
`
`cv-759 includes the same patents as the 507 cases and two additional patents. In an effort to
`
`maintain the present ordering of the cases/trials, the parties to these cases have conferred and
`
`agreed to amended schedules that would culminate in trials of the 759 case in September 2016
`
`
`
`7
`
`

`

`Case 6:14-cv-00982-KNM Document 115 Filed 08/26/15 Page 8 of 14 PageID #: 715
`
`
`
`and the 982 cases in November 2016. These requested, amended schedules are included with
`
`this motion as Exhibits B and C, respectively.
`
`For the foregoing reasons, the Parties in each of the above-captioned cases jointly file this
`
`motion respectfully requesting that the Court enter the proposed orders attached hereto, which
`
`necessarily extend deadlines and reset trials.
`
`Dated: August 26, 2015
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/s/ Edward R. Nelson III
`Edward R. Nelson III
`ed@nelbum.com
`Texas State Bar No. 00797142
`S. Brannon Latimer
`brannon@nelbum.com
`Texas State Bar No. 24060137
`Thomas C. Cecil
`tom@nelbum.com
`Texas State Bar No. 24069489
`NELSON BUMGARDNER PC
`3131 West 7th Street, Suite 300
`Fort Worth, Texas 76107
`Phone: (817) 377-9111
`Fax: (817) 377-3485
`
`T. John Ward, Jr.
`Texas State Bar No. 00794818
`J. Wesley Hill
`Texas State Bar No. 24032294
`Claire Abernathy Henry
`Texas State Bar No. 24053063
`Ward & Smith Law Firm
`P.O. Box 1231
`1127 Judson Rd. Ste. 220
`Longview, Texas 75606-1231
`(903) 757-6400
`(903) 757-2323 (fax)
`jw@jwfirm.com
`wh@wsfirm.com
`claire@wsfirm.com
`
`ATTORNEYS FOR CELLULAR
`COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT LLC
`
`/s/ Christopher W. Kennerly
`Christopher W. Kennerly
`TX Bar No. 00795077
`chriskennerly@paulhastings.com
`Jonas P. Herrell
`CA Bar No. 279075
`jonasherrell@paulhastings.com
`PAUL HASTINGS LLP
`1117 S. California Ave.
`Palo Alto, CA 94304-1106
`Telephone: (650) 320-1800
`Facsimile: (650) 320-1900
`
`Jeffrey D. Comeau
`CA Bar No. 259679
`jeffreycomeau@paulhastings.com
`PAUL HASTINGS LLP
`4747 Executive Drive
`Twelfth Floor
`San Diego, CA 92121-3114
`Telephone: (858) 458-3000
`Facsimile: (858) 458-3005
`
`Trey Yarbrough
`TX Bar No. 22133500
`trey@yw-lawfirm.com
`YARBROUGH WILCOX, PLLC
`100 E. Ferguson St., Suite 1015
`Tyler, Texas 75702
`Telephone (903) 595-3111
`Facsimile (903) 595-019
`
`ATTORNEYS FOR
`AT&T MOBILITY LLC
`
`
`
`8
`
`

`

`Case 6:14-cv-00982-KNM Document 115 Filed 08/26/15 Page 9 of 14 PageID #: 716
`
`
`
`/s/ Hae-Chan Park
`Hae-Chan Park
`HPark@park-law.com
`H.C. PARK & ASSOCIATES, PLC
`1894 Preston White Drive
`Reston, VA 20191
`Telephone: (703) 288-5105
`Facsimile: (703) 288-5139
`
`Melissa R. Smith
`State Bar No. 24001351
`GILLAM & SMITH, LLP
`303 S. Washington Ave.
`Marshall, TX 75670
`Phone: (903) 934-8450
`Fax: (903) 934-9257
`melissa@gillamsmithlaw.com
`
`ATTORNEYS FOR PANTECH CO. LTD.
`AND PANTECH WIRELESS, INC.
`
`/s/ Robert W. Weber
`Robert W. Weber
`Texas State Bar No. 21044800
`SMITH WEBER, L.L.P.
`5505 Plaza Drive
`P.O. Box 6167
`Texarkana, TX 75505-6167
`Tele: (903) 223-5656
`Fax: (903) 223-5652
`Email: bweber@smithweber.com
`
`and
`
`Mark W. McGrory (pro hac vice)
`
`
`
`9
`
`/s/ Jennifer H. Doan
`Jennifer H. Doan
`Texas Bar No. 08809050
`Joshua R. Thane
`Texas Bar No. 24060713
`HALTOM & DOAN
`Crown Executive Center, Suite 100
`6500 Summerhill Road
`Texarkana, TX 75503
`Telephone: (903) 255-1000
`Facsimile: (903) 255-0800
`Email: jdoan@haltomdoan.com
`Email: jthane@haltomdoan.com
`
`J. David Hadden
`CA Bar No. 176148 (Admitted E.D. Tex)
`dhadden@fenwick.com
`Saina Shamilov
`CA Bar No. 215636 (Admitted E.D. Tex)
`sshamilov@fenwick.com
`Ravi R. Ranganath
`CA Bar No. 272981 (Admitted E.D. Tex)
`rranganath@fenwick.com
`FENWICK & WEST LLP
`Silicon Valley Center
`801 California Street
`Mountain View, California 94041
`Telephone: (650) 988-8500
`Facsimile: (650) 938-5200
`
`ATTORNEYS FOR AMAZON.COM, INC.
`
`/s/ Jamie B. Beaber
`Jamie B. Beaber (D.C. Bar No. 484186)
`Kfir B. Levy (D.C. Bar No. 989212)
`Michael W. Maas (D.C. Bar No. 493685)
`MAYER BROWN LLP
`1999 K Street, N.W.
`Washington, DC 20006-1101
`Telephone: (202) 263-3000
`Facsimile: (202) 263-3300
`jbeaber@mayerbrown.com
`klevy@mayerbrown.com
`mmaas@mayerbrown.com
`
`Robert G. Pluta (IL Bar No. 6278255)
`
`

`

`Case 6:14-cv-00982-KNM Document 115 Filed 08/26/15 Page 10 of 14 PageID #: 717
`
`
`
`ROUSE HENDRICKS GERMAN MAY PC
`1201 Walnut, 20th Floor
`Kansas City, MO 64106
`Tel: (816) 471-7700
`Fax: (816) 471-2221
`Email: MarkM@rhgm.com
`
`ATTORNEYS FOR SPRINT SOLUTIONS,
`INC., SPRINT SPECTRUM L.P., AND
`BOOST MOBILE, LLC
`
`/s/ Douglas J. Dixon
`John C. Hueston (pro hac vice)
`Douglas J. Dixon (pro hac vice)
`IRELL & MANELLA LLP
`840 Newport Center Dr., Ste. 840
`Newport Beach, CA 92660
`Phone: (949) 760-0991
`Fax: (949) 760-5200
`JHueston@irell.com
`DDixon@irell.com
`
`Ellisen S. Turner (pro hac vice)
`Benjamin Haber (pro hac vice)
`IRELL & MANELLA LLP
`1800 Avenue of the Stars, Ste. 900
`Los Angeles, CA 90067
`Phone: (310) 277-1010
`Fax: (310) 203-7199
`ETurner@irell.com
`BHaber@irell.com
`
`Melissa R. Smith
`State Bar No. 24001351
`
`MAYER BROWN LLP
`71 S. Wacker Drive
`Chicago, IL 60606
`Telephone: (312) 782-0600
`Facsimile: (312) 701-7711
`rpluta@mayerbrown.com
`
`Michael E. Jones
`State Bar No. 10929400
`mikejones@potterminton.com
`Allen F. Gardner
`State Bar No. 24043679
`allengardner@potterminton.com
`POTTER MINTON P.C.
`110 N. College Avenue, Suite 500
`Tyler, Texas 75702
`Telephone: (903) 597-8311
`Facsimile: (903) 593-0846
`
`ATTORNEYS FOR LG ELECTRONICS,
`INC. AND LG ELECTRONICS U.S.A.,
`INC.
`
`/s/ Roger Fulghum
`Roger Joseph Fulghum
`(TX Bar No. 00790724)
`Tammy M Pennington Rhodes
`(TX Bar No. 24051182)
`Baker Botts LLP
`910 Louisiana Street
`One Shell Plaza
`Houston, TX 77002-4995
`Telephone: 713/229-1707
`Facsimile: 713/229-2707
`Email: roger.fulghum@bakerbotts.com
`Email: tammy.pennington@bakerbotts.com
`
`Deron R Dacus (TX Bar No. 00790553)
`T Shannon Marie Dacus (TX Bar No.
`00791004)
`The Dacus Firm, PC
`821 ESE Loop 323
`Suite 430
`Tyler, TX 75701
`Telephone: 903/705-1117
`Facsimile: 9037051117
`
`
`
`10
`
`

`

`Case 6:14-cv-00982-KNM Document 115 Filed 08/26/15 Page 11 of 14 PageID #: 718
`
`
`
`GILLAM & SMITH, LLP
`303 S. Washington Ave.
`Marshall, TX 75670
`Phone: (903) 934-8450
`Fax: (903) 934-9257
`melissa@gillamsmithlaw.com
`
`ATTORNEYS FOR T-MOBILE USA, INC.
`AND T-MOBILE US, INC.
`
`/s/ Michael E. Jones
`Michael E. Jones
`State Bar No. 10929400
`Patrick C. Clutter, IV
`State Bar No. 24036374
`mikejones@potterminton.com
`patrickclutter@potterminton.com
`POTTER MINTON, P.C.
`110 N. College Ave., Suite 500
`Tyler, Texas 75702
`Telephone: (903) 597-8311
`Facsimile: (903) 593-0846
`
`Charles B. Molster, III
`Virginia State Bar No. 23613
`Thomas M. Dunham
`D.C. Bar No. 448407
`Corrine M. Saylor
`D.C. Bar No. 997638 (Pro Hac Vice)
`cmolster@winston.com
`tdunham@winston.com
`csaylor@winston.com
`WINSTON &STRAWN LLP
`1700 K Street, N.W.
`Washington, D.C. 20006-3817
`Telephone: (202) 282-5000
`Facsimile: (202) 282-5100
`
`ATTORNEYS FOR CELLCO
`PARTNERSHIP D/B/A/ VERIZON
`WIRELESS
`
`/s/ Mark C. Scarsi
`Mark C. Scarsi (admitted Pro Hac Vice)
`mscarsi@mibank.com
`Miguel Ruiz (admitted Pro Hac Vice)
`
`Email: ddacus@dacusfirm.com
`Email: sdacus@dacusfirm.com
`
`ATTORNEYS FOR DELL INC.
`
`
`/s/ Inge Larish
`Inge Larish
`inge.larish@pillsburylaw.com
`TX State Bar No. 00796924
`Steven A. Moore (Pro Hac Vice)
`steve.moore@pillsburylaw.com
`California State Bar No. 232114
`Nicole S. Cunningham (Pro Hac Vice)
`nicole.cunningham@pillsburylaw.com
`California State Bar No. 234390
`PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW
`PITTMAN LLP
`501 West Broadway, Suite 1100
`San Diego, CA 92101
`Telephone: 619-544-3119
`Facsimile: 619-236-1995
`
`ATTORNEYS FOR HTC
`CORPORATION, HTC AMERICA, INC.
`AND ZTE (USA) INC.
`
`
`/s/ Michael E. Jones
`Kevin Johnson
`kevinjohnson@quinnemanuel.com
`Victoria Maroulis
`
`
`
`11
`
`

`

`Case 6:14-cv-00982-KNM Document 115 Filed 08/26/15 Page 12 of 14 PageID #: 719
`
`
`
`mruiz@milbank.com
`Ashlee N. Lin (admitted Pro Hac Vice)
`ashlee.lin@milbank.com
`Michael Sheen (admitted Pro Hac Vice)
`msheen@milbank.com
`MILBANK, TWEED, HADLEY & MCCLOY
`LLP
`601 South Figueroa Street, 30th Floor
`Los Angeles, California 90017-5735
`Telephone: (213) 892-4000
`Facsimile: (213) 629-5063
`
`Thomas C. Mavrakakis (Bar No. 00791209)
`Michael T. Pieja (admitted Pro Hac Vice)
`Brian C. Kwok (admitted Pro Hac Vice)
`MAVRAKAKIS LAW GROUP LLP
`One Palo Alto Square, 2nd Floor
`3000 El Camino Real
`Palo Alto, CA 94306
`Tel: (650) 804-7800
`Fax: (650) 852-9224
`mav@mavllp.com
`mpieja@mavllp.com
`bkwok@mavllp.com
`
`Howard E. Levin (admitted Pro Hac Vice)
`MAVRAKAKIS LAW GROUP LLP
`180 N. LaSalle Street, Suite 2215
`Chicago, IL 60601
`Tel: (312) 216-1620
`Fax: (312) 216-1621
`hlevin@mavllp.com
`
`Eric H. Findlay (Bar No. 00789886)
`efindlay@findlaycraft.com
`FINDLAY CRAFT PC
`102 N. College Avenue, Suite 900
`Tyler, TX 75702
`Phone: (903) 534-1100
`Fax: (903) 534-1137
`
`ATTORNEYS FOR APPLE INC.
`
`/s/ Charles T. Steenburg
`Richard L. Wynne
`Texas State Bar No. 24003214
`
`victoriamaroulis@quinnemanuel.com
`Ray Zado
`rayzado@quinnemanuel.com
`QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
`SULLIVAN LLP
`555 Twin Dolphin Dr., 5th Floor
`Redwood Shores, CA 94065
`Tel: 650-801-5000
`Fax: 650-801-5100
`
`Marissa Ducca
`marissaducca@quinnemanuel.com
`QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
`SULLIVAN LLP
`777 6th Street NW, 11th Floor
`Washington, D.C. 20009
`Tel:202-538-8109
`Fax: 202-538-8100
`
`Michael E. Jones
`State Bar No. 10929400
`mikejones@potterminton.com
`Allen F. Gardner
`State Bar No. 24043679
`allengardner@potterminton.com
`POTTER MINTON
`A Professional Corporation
`110 N. College, Suite 500
`Tyler, Texas 75702
`Tel: (903) 597-8311
`Fax: (903) 593-0846
`
`ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT,
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.
`AND SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
`AMERICA, INC.
`
`
`/s/ Jose L. Patiño
`Jose L. Patiño (CA Bar No. 149568)
`
`jpatino@foley.com
`
`
`
`12
`
`

`

`Case 6:14-cv-00982-KNM Document 115 Filed 08/26/15 Page 13 of 14 PageID #: 720
`
`Christopher C. Bolten (CA Bar No. 268284)
`
`cbolten@foley.com
`Wendy W. Cheung (CA Bar No. 285802)
` wcheung@foley.com
`FOLEY & LARDNER LLP
`3579 Valley Centre Drive, Suite 300
`San Diego, CA 92130-3302
`Telephone:
`858.847.6700
`Facsimile:
`858.792.6773
`
`Cynthia J. Rigsby (WI Bar No. 1025479)
`
`crigsby@foley.com
`Michelle A. Moran (WI Bar No. 1073953)
` mmoran@foley.com
`FOLEY & LARDNER LLP
`777 E. Milwaukee Avenue
`Milwaukee, WI 53202-2400
`Telephone:
`414.271.2400
`Facsimile:
`414.297.4900
`
`ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT
`KYOCERA COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
`
`
`
`richard.wynne@tklaw.com
`
`THOMPSON & KNIGHT LLP
`One Arts Plaza
`1722 Routh St., Suite 1500
`Dallas, TX 75201
`Telephone: 214.969.1386
`Fax: 214.880.3267
`
`Michael N. Rader (pro hac vice)
`Charles T. Steenburg (pro hac vice)
`Chelsea A. Loughran (pro hac vice)
`W. Brett Morrison (pro hac vice)
`mrader@wolfgreenfield.com
`csteenburg@wolfgreenfield.com
`cloughran@wolfgreenfield.com
`wmorrison@wolfgreenfield.com
`
`WOLF, GREENFIELD & SACKS, P.C.
`600 Atlantic Avenue
`Boston, MA 02210-2206
`Telephone: 617-646-8000
`Facsimile: 617-646-8646
`
`ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT SONY
`MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS (USA)
`INC.
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE
`
`In accordance with Local Rule CV-7(h), the undersigned certifies that counsel for CCE
`
`conferred with counsel for all Defendants. The Parties are in agreement as to the relief sought
`
`and, therefore, jointly bring this motion.
`
`
`
`/s/ Edward R. Nelson III
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`13
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 6:14-cv-00982-KNM Document 115 Filed 08/26/15 Page 14 of 14 PageID #: 721
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing was served on all parties of record
`
`on August 26, 2015 via the Court’s CM/ECF system.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Edward R. Nelson III
`
`
`14
`
`