Case 6:14-cv-00982-KNM Document 103-2 Filed 08/03/15 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 659
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`TYLER DIVISION
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:14-cv-982-JRG
`LEAD CASE
`
`CELLULAR COMMUNICATIONS
`EQUIPMENT LLC,
`
` Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`LG ELECTRONICS, INC., ET AL.,
`
` Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`[PROPOSED] ORDER AMENDING THE DOCKET CONTROL ORDER
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Before the Court is Sony Mobile Communications (USA) Inc.’s (“Sony Mobile’s”)
`
`Unopposed Motion to Amend the Docket Control Order.
`
`Sony Mobile’s request is set forth in the table below.
`
`Current Date Proposed Date Event
`
`July 11, 2016
`
`
`
`June 13, 2016 Any date on or
`between
`June 21, 2016
`and
`June 24, 2016
`
`June 8, 2016
`
`
`
`*Jury Selection – 9:00 a.m. in Tyler, Texas before Judge
`Rodney Gilstrap
`
`*Pretrial Conference – 9:00 a.m. in Marshall, Texas before
`Judge Rodney Gilstrap
`
`*Notify Court of Agreements Reached During Meet and
`Confer
`
`The parties are ordered to meet and confer on any
`outstanding objections or motions in limine. The parties
`shall advise the Court of any agreements reached no later
`than 1:00 p.m. three (3) business days before the pretrial
`conference.
`
`1
`
`
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`TYLER DIVISION
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:14-cv-982-JRG
`LEAD CASE
`
`CELLULAR COMMUNICATIONS
`EQUIPMENT LLC,
`
` Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`LG ELECTRONICS, INC., ET AL.,
`
` Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`[PROPOSED] ORDER AMENDING THE DOCKET CONTROL ORDER
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Before the Court is Sony Mobile Communications (USA) Inc.’s (“Sony Mobile’s”)
`
`Unopposed Motion to Amend the Docket Control Order.
`
`Sony Mobile’s request is set forth in the table below.
`
`Current Date Proposed Date Event
`
`July 11, 2016
`
`
`
`June 13, 2016 Any date on or
`between
`June 21, 2016
`and
`June 24, 2016
`
`June 8, 2016
`
`
`
`*Jury Selection – 9:00 a.m. in Tyler, Texas before Judge
`Rodney Gilstrap
`
`*Pretrial Conference – 9:00 a.m. in Marshall, Texas before
`Judge Rodney Gilstrap
`
`*Notify Court of Agreements Reached During Meet and
`Confer
`
`The parties are ordered to meet and confer on any
`outstanding objections or motions in limine. The parties
`shall advise the Court of any agreements reached no later
`than 1:00 p.m. three (3) business days before the pretrial
`conference.
`
`1
`
`
`
`Case 6:14-cv-00982-KNM Document 103-2 Filed 08/03/15 Page 2 of 5 PageID #: 660
`
`
`
`Current Date Proposed Date Event
`
`June 6, 2016
`
`May 30, 2016
`
`
`
`
`
`May 23, 2016
`
`
`
`May 23, 2016
`
`May 9, 2016
`
`May 2, 2016
`
`April 4, 2016
`
`April 4, 2016
`
`March 14,
`2016
`
`February 22,
`2016
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`*File Joint Pretrial Order, Joint Proposed Jury Instructions,
`Joint Proposed Verdict Form, and Responses to Motions in
`Limine
`
`*File Notice of Request for Daily Transcript or Real Time
`Reporting.
`
`If a daily transcript or real time reporting of court
`proceedings is requested for trial, the party or parties making
`said request shall file a notice with the Court and e-mail the
`Court
`Reporter,
`Shelly
`Holmes,
`at
`shelly_holmes@txed.uscourts.gov.
`
`File Motions in Limine
`
`The parties shall limit their motions in limine to issues that if
`improperly introduced at trial would be so prejudicial that the
`Court could not alleviate the prejudice by giving appropriate
`instructions to the jury.
`
`Serve Objections to Rebuttal Pretrial Disclosures
`
`Serve Objections to Pretrial Disclosures; and Serve Rebuttal
`Pretrial Disclosures
`
`(Witness List, Deposition
`Serve Pretrial Disclosures
`Designations, and Exhibit List) by the Party with the Burden
`of Proof
`
`*File Dispositive Motions or Motions to Strike Expert
`Testimony (including Daubert Motions)
`
`No dispositive motion or motion to strike expert testimony
`(including a Daubert motion) may be filed after this date
`without leave of the Court.
`
`Deadline to Complete Expert Discovery
`
`Serve Disclosures for Rebuttal Expert Witnesses
`
`Deadline to Complete Fact Discovery and File Motions to
`Compel Discovery
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case 6:14-cv-00982-KNM Document 103-2 Filed 08/03/15 Page 3 of 5 PageID #: 661
`
`
`
`Current Date Proposed Date Event
`
`February 22,
`2016
`
`February 8,
`2016
`
`January 18,
`2016
`
`December 28,
`2015
`
`December 7,
`2015
`
`November 23,
`2015
`
`November 16,
`2015
`
`November 9,
`2015
`
`October 26,
`2015
`
`October 26,
`2015
`
`October 12,
`2015
`
`October 5,
`2015
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Serve Disclosures for Expert Witnesses by the Party with the
`Burden of Proof
`
`*Deadline to File Letter Briefs Regarding Dispositive
`Motions
`
`Deadline to Complete Mediation
`
`The parties are responsible for ensuring that a mediation
`report is filed no later than 5 days after the conclusion of
`mediation.
`
`Comply with P.R. 3-7 (Opinion of Counsel Defenses)
`
`*Claim Construction Hearing – 1:30 p.m. in Marshall,
`Texas before Judge Rodney Gilstrap
`
`*Comply with P.R. 4-5(d) (Joint Claim Construction Chart)
`
`*Comply with P.R. 4-5(c) (Reply Claim Construction Brief)
`
`Comply with P.R. 4-5(b) (Responsive Claim Construction
`Brief)
`
`Comply with P.R. 4-5(a) (Opening Claim Construction
`Brief) and Submit Technical Tutorials (if any)
`
`Good cause must be shown to submit technical tutorials after
`the deadline to comply with P.R. 4-5(a).
`
`Deadline to Substantially Complete Document Production
`and Exchange Privilege Logs
`
`Counsel is expected to make good faith efforts to produce all
`required documents as soon as they are available and not
`wait until the substantial completion deadline.
`
`Comply with P.R. 4-4 (Deadline to Complete Claim
`Construction Discovery)
`
`File Response to Amended Pleadings
`
`3
`
`
`
`Case 6:14-cv-00982-KNM Document 103-2 Filed 08/03/15 Page 4 of 5 PageID #: 662
`
`
`
`Current Date Proposed Date Event
`
`September 21,
`2015
`
`September 14,
`2015
`
`August 24,
`2015
`
`August 3,
`2015
`
`July 10, 2015
`
`June 19, 2015
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`June 12, 2015
`
`
`
`June 5, 2015
`
`June 1, 2015
`
`May 15, 2015
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`*File Amended Pleadings
`
`It is not necessary to seek leave of Court to amend pleadings
`prior to this deadline unless the amendment seeks to assert
`additional patents.
`
`Comply with P.R. 4-3 (Joint Claim Construction Statement)
`
`Comply with P.R. 4-2 (Exchange Preliminary Claim
`Constructions)
`
`Comply with P.R. 4-1 (Exchange Proposed Claim Terms)
`
`Comply with P.R. 3-3 & 3-4 (Invalidity Contentions)
`
`*File Proposed Protective Order and Comply with
`Paragraphs 1 & 3 of the Discovery Order (Initial and
`Additional Disclosures)
`
`The Proposed Protective Order shall be filed as a separate
`motion with the caption indicating whether or not the
`proposed order is opposed in any part.
`
`*File Proposed Docket Control Order and Proposed
`Discovery Order
`
`The Proposed Docket Control Order and Proposed Discovery
`Order shall be filed as separate motions with the caption
`indicating whether or not the proposed order is opposed in
`any part.
`
`Join Additional Parties
`
`*File Notice of Mediator
`
`Comply with P.R. 3-1 & 3-2 (Infringement Contentions)
`
`4
`
`
`
`Case 6:14-cv-00982-KNM Document 103-2 Filed 08/03/15 Page 5 of 5 PageID #: 663
`
`
`
`After consideration of Sony Mobile’s Motion and the accompanying August 3, 2015
`
`Declaration of Michael N. Rader, the Court finds that good cause exists to amend the Docket
`
`Control Order and to reschedule the pretrial conference in this case from June 13, 2016 to
`
`___________.
`
`
`
`
`
`IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
