throbber
Case 6:14-cv-00982-KNM Document 103 Filed 08/03/15 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 652
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`TYLER DIVISION
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:14-cv-982-JRG
`LEAD CASE
`
`CELLULAR COMMUNICATIONS
`EQUIPMENT LLC,
`
` Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`LG ELECTRONICS, INC., ET AL.,
`
` Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`SONY MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS (USA) INC.’S UNOPPOSED
`MOTION TO AMEND THE DOCKET CONTROL ORDER
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 6:14-cv-00982-KNM Document 103 Filed 08/03/15 Page 2 of 5 PageID #: 653
`
`
`
`I.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`Defendant Sony Mobile Communications (USA) Inc. (“Sony Mobile”) files this
`
`unopposed motion to amend the Court’s June 15, 2015 Docket Control Order (D.I. 74) to
`
`reschedule the June 13, 2016 pretrial conference in light of a conflicting Jewish religious holiday
`
`observed by Sony Mobile’s lead counsel, Michael N. Rader.
`
`After consulting with all parties regarding their availability, Sony Mobile respectfully
`
`requests that the Court reschedule the pretrial conference for any date between June 21, 2016 and
`
`June 24, 2016 that is convenient for the Court. Plaintiff Cellular Communications Equipment
`
`LLC (“CCE”) does not oppose this motion, nor do any of the other consolidated defendants,
`
`namely Kyocera Communications, Inc., Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless, LG
`
`Electronics, Inc. and LG Electronics U.S.A, Inc., T-Mobile USA, Inc. and T-Mobile US, Inc.,
`
`AT&T Mobility LLC and Sprint Solutions, Inc., Sprint Spectrum L.P., and Boost Mobile, LLC.
`
`As discussed more fully below and in the August 3, 2015 Declaration of Attorney
`
`Michael N. Rader (“Rader Decl.”), good cause exists for Sony Mobile’s requested amendment to
`
`the Docket Control Order.
`
`II.
`
`RELEVANT PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
`
`
`
`On June 12, 2015, the parties filed their Motion for Adoption and Entry of a Proposed
`
`Docket Control Order, setting forth a proposed schedule that complied with the Court’s sample
`
`docket control order and the suggested docket control order provided to the parties at the May
`
`29, 2015 Scheduling Conference. (D.I. 72, 74). Prior to filing that motion, counsel for Sony
`
`Mobile informed the parties that June 13, 2016, the scheduled date for the pretrial conference,
`
`fell on a Jewish holiday observed by Sony Mobile’s lead counsel, and that as a result Sony
`
`Mobile would need to move the Court to amend the Docket Control Order. (Rader Decl. ¶ 5).
`
`
`
`1
`
`

`

`Case 6:14-cv-00982-KNM Document 103 Filed 08/03/15 Page 3 of 5 PageID #: 654
`
`
`
`As of the June 12, 2015 filing of the Proposed Docket Control Order, Sony Mobile was
`
`still in the process of consulting with all parties concerning its proposed motion to amend and
`
`determining a list of alternate dates when counsel for all parties would be available for the
`
`pretrial conference. After several weeks of subsequent correspondence, Sony Mobile secured
`
`statements of non-opposition from all parties with respect to this motion. (Rader Decl. ¶¶ 6-7).
`
`Accordingly, Sony Mobile hereby respectfully requests that this Court reschedule the
`
`June 13, 2016 pretrial conference to any date on or between June 21, 2016 and June 24, 2016
`
`that is convenient for the Court’s schedule. If none of these dates are convenient for the Court,
`
`Sony Mobile’s counsel is available to consult with the Court’s clerk and with counsel for all
`
`parties to determine a date that works for the Court and for all parties.
`
`III. GOOD CAUSE EXISTS FOR SONY MOBILE’S REQUEST
`
`
`
`Good cause exists for Sony Mobile’s motion. As explained in Attorney Rader’s
`
`declaration, the Jewish calendar includes both solar and lunar elements, and thus Jewish holidays
`
`fall out on different dates in the Gregorian calendar from one year to the next. In 2016, the
`
`Jewish holiday of Shavuot falls on June 12-13. The Shavuot holiday is a major holiday on the
`
`Jewish calendar, on which Jewish law prohibits work and travel. (Rader Decl. ¶¶ 3-4).
`
`
`
`As lead counsel for Sony Mobile, it is crucial that Mr. Rader attend the pretrial
`
`conference. Mr. Rader’s immovable religious conflict establishes good cause for rescheduling
`
`the pretrial conference.
`
`
`
`As noted above, the motion is unopposed. Counsel for Plaintiff CCE and all of the
`
`consolidated defendants have confirmed that any date on or between June 21, 2016 and June 24,
`
`2016 would be acceptable as an alternative pretrial conference date. (Rader Decl. ¶ 8).
`
`
`
`- 2 -
`
`

`

`Case 6:14-cv-00982-KNM Document 103 Filed 08/03/15 Page 4 of 5 PageID #: 655
`
`
`
`Accordingly, Sony Mobile respectfully requests that the Court amend the Docket Control
`
`Order (D.I. 74) and reschedule the June 13, 2015 pretrial conference in this case to any day
`
`falling on or between June 21, 2016 and June 24, 2016. A proposed order is attached. If none
`
`of the aforementioned dates are convenient for the Court, Sony Mobile’s counsel is available to
`
`consult with the Court’s clerk and with counsel for all parties to determine a date that works for
`
`the Court and all parties.
`
`
`
`Dated: August 3, 2015
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted by,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Michael N. Rader
`Michael N. Rader (admitted pro hac vice)
`Charles T. Steenburg (admitted pro hac vice)
`Chelsea A. Loughran (admitted pro hac vice)
`W. Brett Morrison (admitted pro hac vice)
`WOLF, GREENFIELD & SACKS, P.C.
`600 Atlantic Avenue
`Boston, MA 02210
`Tel: (617) 646-8000
`Fax: (617) 646-8646
`mrader@wolfgreenfield.com
`csteenburg@wolfgreenfield.com
`chelsea.loughran@wolfgreenfield.com
`w.brett.morrison@wolfgreenfield.com
`
`Richard L. Wynne
`Texas State Bar No. 24003214
`THOMPSON & KNIGHT LLP
`One Arts Plaza
`1722 Routh St., Suite 1500
`Dallas, TX 75201
`Telephone: 214.969.1386
`Fax: 214.880.3267
`
`COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT SONY MOBILE
`COMMUNICATIONS (USA) INC.
`
`
`
`- 3 -
`
`

`

`Case 6:14-cv-00982-KNM Document 103 Filed 08/03/15 Page 5 of 5 PageID #: 656
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing document was filed
`electronically in compliance with Local Rule CV-5 on this August 3, 2015. As of this date all
`counsel of record have consented to electronic service and are being served with a copy of this
`document through the Court’s CM/ECF system under Local Rule CV-5(a)(3)(A).
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Chelsea A. Loughran
`
`Chelsea A. Loughran
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`- 4 -
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket