throbber
Case 6:12-cv-00799-JRG Document 92-10 Filed 12/11/13 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 2525
`Case 6:12—cv—00799—JRG Document 92-10 Filed 12/11/13 Page 1 of 2 Page|D #: 2525
`
`EXHIBIT J
`
`EXHIBIT J
`
`

`
`Case 6:12-cv-00799-JRG Document 92-10 Filed 12/11/13 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 2526
`Truck Loading / Unloading with Micro Motion
`emersonprocessxperts.com/2013/10/truck-loading-unloading-with-micro-motion/
`
`Emerson’s Todd Fortman and an engineer with a distributor shared an application story around truck loading and
`unloading. Their abstract:
`
`A Wisconsin based chemical distributor required an accurate and efficient truck loading and unloading
`solution. With over fifty chemicals needing to be loaded into twenty to thirty multi-compartment trucks daily,
`they required a flexible and robust solution. The plant desired a system that would minimize operator error and
`provide a safe solution in a Class I / Division I environment. The solution would need to be able to handle air
`in the system, as a blow down process was required.
`
`They opened their presentation describing some of the challenges with truck loading. Entrained air is a common issue in
`this application. The distributor recently opened a new truck loading facility of chemicals where the source chemicals
`come in via rail.
`
`Key project requirements for bulk loading and unloading were accuracy, reliability, temperature correction, ease of use
`for operators, and improved integration with the site PLCs. Positive Displacement (PD) meters with air eliminators had
`historically been used for load/unload measurement. The measurement devices are located in Class 1 Division 1 areas.
`
`The distributor became aware of Coriolis flow and density measurement technology. They performed extensive testing
`with fluids with entrained air rand from 5-20% void fraction. These tests were much tougher than the application would
`require. The Micro Motion meter technology performed best with an average error across this range of entrained air of
`0.5% versus 5% with other devices tested. This amounts to 5 pounds per thousand pounds instead of 50 pounds.
`
`Meters were preferable to truck scales since the bays were dual-use between trucks and rail cars.
`
`Coriolis technology is fundamentally a mass flow measurement technology. Density is measured by the frequency of
`vibration of the tubes in the meter. The Micro Motion web site has an excellent theory of operation section if you are
`unfamiliar with how this technology works.
`
`24 2-inch Elite Micro Motion meters with enhanced core processors and 1700 transmitters were used in the solution.
`There is a pump at the tank which pumps through the meter to the loading arm. A three-way valve sets where the flow is
`inbound to the tank, or outbound to the railcar or truck. The application was optimized for entrained air which includes a
`vertical flow installation, and elbow and control valve after the meter to add back pressure as required and operating the
`2″ meter in its upper range.
`
`Related Posts:
`
`Impact of Reduce Uncertainty of Flow Measurement in Development of Rocket Liquid Propellants Engines
`Combine your knowledge on Temperature Measurement with the experts and the new Rosemount Temperature
`Handbook
`Industrial Energy Team Peels Reliability like an Onion-Part II
`
`Posted Tuesday, October 1st, 2013 under , .
`
`Tags: , , , , ,

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket