throbber
Case 6:12-cv-00799-JRG Document 92-1 Filed 12/11/13 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 2490
`Case 6:12—cv—00799—JRG Document 92-1 Filed 12/11/13 Page 1 of 3 Page|D #: 2490
`
`EXHIBIT A
`
`EXHIBIT A
`
`

`
`Case 6:12-cv-00799-JRG Document 92-1 Filed 12/11/13 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 2491
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`TYLER DIVISION
`
`C.A. No.: 6:12-cv-00799-LED
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`§§
`

`
`§§
`

`
`§§
`

`
`INVENSYS SYSTEMS, INC.
`
`v.
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`EMERSON ELECTRIC CO. and
`MICRO MOTION INC., USA,
`
`Defendants.
`
`DECLARATION OF ROBERT ARIAS
`
`I, Robert Arias, do hereby declare as follows:
`
`I am over 18 years of age, of sound mind, and capable of
`My name is Robert Arias.
`I have personal knowledge of the facts set forth in this
`making this declaration.
`declaration, and they are all true and correct.
`
`I am a Product Sales Executive for Plaintiff Invensys Systems, Inc. (“Invensys”). I work
`in Houston, Texas.
`
`I am responsible for business development and strategic planning for Invensys’s North
`American sales of Coriolis flowmeters and Vortex flowmeters.
`
`Prior to joining Invensys in June 2012, I was a self-employed consultant serving clients
`in the energy and oil and gas industry sectors. My consulting services involved sourcing
`systems integration and programming products for my clients.
`
`While working as a consultant, I assisted my clients in sourcing Coriolis flowmeters,
`including Micro Motion, Inc. (“Micro Motion”) branded products. In this capacity, I was
`contacted by representatives of Emerson Process Management (“EPM”) who offered me
`(on behalf of my clients) access to their full suite of products, including Micro Motion
`and Rosemount branded products.
`
`Specifically, EPM representatives contacted me about purchasing Micro Motion Elite
`Coriolis flowmeters for my clients.
`
`Sales negotiations and discussions of my clients’ technical requirements were conducted
`by EPM representatives, not by representatives of Micro Motion or other EPM brands.
`
`When my clients desired to purchase products across multiple EPM brands (such as
`Micro Motion and Rosemount, Inc.), I would contact an EPM purchasing agent. A single
`purchase order for the differently branded products would then be issued from EPM.
`
`1.
`
`2.
`
`3.
`
`4.
`
`5.
`
`6.
`
`7.
`
`8.
`
`

`
`Case 6:12-cv-00799-JRG Document 92-1 Filed 12/11/13 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 2492
`
`9. When my clients needed to service or repair a Micro Motion Elite Coriolis flowmeter,
`most requests were handled by an EPM representative. Micro Motion technicians only
`became involved when major or complex technical repairs were required.
`
`10. EPM certified technicians visited my clients on-site to "prove up" (calibrate) Micro
`Motion Elite Coriolis meters after they had been installed.
`
`11. Emerson also recently participated in a sales demonstration of the accused Coriolis
`flowmeters for a major oil and gas customer. (Because of a non-disclosure agreement,
`the identity of this customer is confidential.) Several flowmeter manufacturers, including
`both Invensys and Emerson, were invited to demonstrate their products to the oil and gas
`company. The presenter for Emerson identified himself as a representative of EPM. He
`was assisted by someone who identified himself as a representative of Micro Motion.
`The Micro Motion representative focused primarily on the technical aspects of the
`demonstration (i.e., setting up and operating the flowmeter), and the EPM representative
`was the person who primarily communicated with the attendees from the potential
`customer. The representatives from both EPM and Micro Motion actively participated in
`all aspects of the demonstration, however. During the demonstration, the Micro Motion
`flowmeter was actually used to measure oil flow from an oil and gas well, including
`during the presence of entrained gas. As a result of this sales demonstration, Emerson
`was awarded a portion of the oil and gas company's business. Invensys was not awarded
`a portion of the business.
`
`12.
`
`I am familiar with the way that EPM promotes, markets, and sells its branded products
`in the oil and gas and energy industry sectors, including Micro Motion Elite Coriolis
`flowmeters. EPM provides "integrated solutions" to customers by offering suites of
`products that meet a wide array of customer needs. EPM leverages its infrastructure to
`market, promote, and sell its multiple brands (including Micro Motion branded products).
`
`13. EPM's marketing strategy is built around this ability to offer "integrated solutions" to its
`customers across a number of branded products. This offering is attractive to customers
`because it allows them to obtain a variety of products from a single source, rather than
`sourcing the products from a multitude of suppliers.
`
`14. On /1////;0/3
` , I called 1-800-654-7768, the number for the North American
`Response Center listed in the brochure titled "On-Site Flow Calibration Service" (Ex. P).
`The line was answered "Emerson Process Management."
`
`I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on
`/2////go/5

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket