`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`TYLER DIVISION
`
`
`
`
`Case No. 12-CV-00799-LED
`
`
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`
`INVENSYS SYSTEMS, INC.,
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`vs.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`EMERSON ELECTRIC CO. and
`MICRO MOTION INC., USA,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendants,
`
`and
`
`MICRO MOTION INC., USA,
`
`
`
`Counterclaim-Plaintiff,
`
`vs.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`INVENSYS SYSTEMS, INC.,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Counterclaim-Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`MICRO MOTION, INC.’S ANSWER TO
`INVENSYS SYSTEMS, INC.’S COUNTERCLAIMS
`
`Micro Motion, Inc. (“Micro Motion”) hereby responds to Plaintiff Invensys
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Systems, Inc.’s (”Invensys”) August 9, 2013 Counterclaims as follows:
`
`PARTIES, JURISDICTION, AND VENUE
`
`1.
`
`Micro Motion lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief about
`
`the truth of the allegations in this Paragraph and therefore denies them.
`
`2.
`
`Admitted.
`
`4828-7322-0629.1
`
`
`
`Case 6:12-cv-00799-JRG Document 70 Filed 09/03/13 Page 2 of 4 PageID #: 1784
`
`3.
`
`Micro Motion admits that Invensys purports to bring this action under Title 35 of
`
`the United States Code and that this Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this action. Micro
`
`Motion denies the remaining allegations in this Paragraph.
`
`4.
`
`Micro Motion admits the allegations in this Paragraph, and further denies that this
`
`venue is convenient.
`
`FIRST CLAIM
`
`(Declaratory Judgment of Non-Infringement of the Micro Motion Patents)
`
`5.
`
`Micro Motion repeats and incorporates herein by reference its responses to the
`
`preceding Paragraphs 1-4.
`
`6.
`
`7.
`
`Admitted.
`
`Denied.
`
`SECOND CLAIM
`
`(Declaratory Judgment of Invalidity of the Micro Motion Patents)
`
`8.
`
`Micro Motion repeats and incorporates herein by reference its responses to the
`
`preceding Paragraphs 1-4.
`
`9.
`
`10.
`
`11.
`
`Admitted.
`
`Denied.
`
`Denied.
`
`PRAYER FOR RELIEF
`
`
`
`
`
`The allegations in these Paragraphs do not call for a response from Micro Motion.
`
`However, Micro Motion denies that Invensys is entitled to any of the relief requested. Instead,
`
`Micro Motion respectfully prays for entry of judgment as described in Micro Motion’s July 15,
`
`2013 Amended Counterclaims.
`
`4828-7322-0629.1
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case 6:12-cv-00799-JRG Document 70 Filed 09/03/13 Page 3 of 4 PageID #: 1785
`
`DEMAND FOR A JURY TRIAL
`
`
`
`
`
`The allegations in this Paragraph do not call for a response from Micro Motion.
`
`However, Micro Motion also desires a trial by jury on all issues so triable and respectfully
`
`requests the same.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`/s/ Kadie M. Jelenchick
`Linda E.B. Hansen, WI Bar No. 1000660
`Richard S. Florsheim, WI Bar No. 1015905
`Jeffrey N. Costakos, WI Bar No. 1008225
`Kadie M. Jelenchick, WI Bar No. 1056506
`Matthew J. Shin, WI Bar No. 1090096
`Foley & Lardner LLP
`777 East Wisconsin Avenue
`Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53202
`Phone: (414) 271-2400
`Fax: (414) 297-4900
`Email: lhansen@foley.com
`rflorsheim@foley.com
`jcostakos@foley.com
`kjelenchick@foley.com
`mshin@foley.com
`
`
`
`
`Attorneys for Micro Motion, Inc.
`
`
`
`Dated: September 3, 2013
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Guy N. Harrison, State Bar No. 00000077
`Harrison Law Firm
`
`
`
`217 N. Center Street
`
`
`Longview, Texas 75606
`
`
`Phone: (903) 758-7361
`
`
`Fax: (903) 753-9557
`
`
`Email: guy@gnhlaw.com and
`
`
`cj-gnharrison@att.net
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4828-7322-0629.1
`
`3
`
`
`
`Case 6:12-cv-00799-JRG Document 70 Filed 09/03/13 Page 4 of 4 PageID #: 1786
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that on September 3, 2013, I electronically filed the foregoing
`
`document with the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such
`
`filing via electronic mail to all counsel of record.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Kadie M. Jelenchick
`Kadie M. Jelenchick
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4828-7322-0629.1
`
`4