`Case 6:12—cv—00799—JRG Document 31-2 Filed 02/21/13 Page 1 of 4 Page|D #: 1374
`
`
`
`
` EXHIBIT B
`
`EXHIBIT B
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 6:12-cv-00799-JRG Document 31-2 Filed 02/21/13 Page 2 of 4 PageID #: 1375
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`TYLER DIVISION
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case No. 6:12-cv-00799-LED
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`Invensys Systems, Inc.,
`
`
`
`
`
`vs.
`
`
`
`
`
`Emerson Electric Co. and
`Micro Motion Inc., USA,
`
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`DECLARATION OF DR. RANDALL D. LEDFORD
`
`I, Dr. Randall D. Ledford, do hereby declare as follows:
`
`
`
`
`
`1.
`
`I am Senior Vice President and Chief Technology Officer of Emerson
`
`Electric Co. (“Emerson”), one of the defendants in the above-captioned matter. I have been
`
`employed at Emerson since 1997.
`
`2.
`
`Emerson is a Missouri corporation with its principal offices at 8000 West
`
`Florissant Avenue, St. Louis, Missouri. Emerson is a diversified global manufacturing and
`
`technology company offering a wide range of products and services.
`
`3.
`
`Emerson’s business is organized into five business platforms: (a) Emerson
`
`Process Management, (b) Emerson Industrial Automation, (c) Emerson Network
`
`Power, (d) Emerson Climate Technologies, and (e) Emerson Commercial & Residential
`
`Solutions.
`
`4.
`
`Prior to the start of my employment at Emerson, Emerson acquired 100% of the
`
`stock of Micro Motion, Inc. making Micro Motion, Inc. which is a Colorado corporation, an
`
`indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Emerson.
`
`4834-7407-3874.1
`
`
`
`Case 6:12-cv-00799-JRG Document 31-2 Filed 02/21/13 Page 3 of 4 PageID #: 1376
`
`5.
`
`I am aware of the above-captioned lawsuit, and am aware that certain
`
`Micro Motion, Inc. products have been accused of infringing patents allegedly owned by
`
`Invensys Systems, Inc.
`
`6.
`
`Emerson itself does not make, use, sell, offer for sale or import Coriolis
`
`flowmeters. In the fall of 2000, in an effort to harmonize marketing materials, Emerson directed
`
`a company-wide change and instructed its U.S. subsidiaries to include on their marketing
`
`materials the name of the Emerson business platform under which they operate. As such,
`
`Micro Motion, Inc., which is part of the Emerson Process Management business platform, was
`
`instructed to include the Emerson Process Management logo on Micro Motion, Inc.’s marketing
`
`materials. But Emerson itself does not offer for sale or sell any Coriolis flowmeters.
`
`7.
`
`Micro Motion, Inc. is the only Emerson subsidiary that manufactures or sells
`
`Coriolis flowmeters. Other than Micro Motion, Inc., no Emerson subsidiary is involved with any
`
`research and development, engineering, manufacturing, or marketing associated with Coriolis
`
`flowmeters.
`
`8.
`
`Emerson and Micro Motion, Inc. have separate payrolls, separate engineers, and
`
`separate headquarters in separate states.
`
`9.
`
`As the Senior Vice President and Chief Technology Officer of Emerson, if there
`
`was involvement by Emerson in the design and development of Micro Motion, Inc.’s products, I
`
`would likely be aware of that involvement; however, I am unaware of any such activities. While
`
`Emerson conducts various reviews of Micro Motion, Inc.’s strategic and financial plans, we do
`
`not direct the design or development of Micro Motion, Inc.’s products. The intent of the various
`
`reviews done by Emerson with Micro Motion, Inc. is to discuss the priorities and issues
`
`Micro Motion, Inc. faces and the programs it intends to pursue to achieve profitable sales growth
`
`4834-7407-3874.1
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case 6:12-cv-00799-JRG Document 31-2 Filed 02/21/13 Page 4 of 4 PageID #: 1377
`Case 6:12—cv—OO799—JRG Document 31-2 Filed 02/21/13 Page 4 of 4 Page|D #: 1377
`
`and improve its market position. To the extent new products may be discussed, such discussions
`
`are generally at a high level. Emerson does not dictate details about product functions and
`
`features. To my knowledge. Emerson does not and has never instructed or required
`
`Micro Motion, Inc. to include any specific feature or fiinctionality in its Coriolis flowrneters or
`
`otherwise directed Micro Motion, Inc. as to how its Coriolis flowmeters should be designed.
`
`Specifically. to my knowledge, Emerson does not and has never instructed or required
`
`Micro Motion, Inc. to use digital signal processing or any particular algorithm in its Coriolis
`
`flowmeters.
`
`I declare under penalty of perjury that th
`
`ore oing is true a
`
`corre t.
`
`Jm
`
`
`-
`
`
`
`r. R ndall D. Ledford
`
`Executed on February I Q . 2013
`
`4834-T407-3874.1