throbber
Case 6:12-cv-00799-JRG Document 30 Filed 02/21/13 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 1352
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`TYLER DIVISION
`
`
`
`
`Case No. 12-CV-00799-LED
`
`
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`
`INVENSYS SYSTEMS, INC.,
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`vs.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`EMERSON ELECTRIC CO. and
`MICRO MOTION INC., USA,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendants,
`
`and
`
`MICRO MOTION INC., USA,
`
`
`
`Counterclaim-Plaintiff,
`
`vs.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`INVENSYS SYSTEMS, INC.,
`
`
`
`
`Counterclaim-Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`EMERSON ELECTRIC CO.’S NOTICE OF JOINDER IN MICRO MOTION INC.’S
`MOTION TO TRANSFER VENUE UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a)
`
`Defendant Emerson Electric Co. (“Emerson”) hereby
`
`joins
`
`in Defendant and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Counterclaim-Plaintiff Micro Motion, Inc.’s Motion to Transfer Venue Pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
`
`1404(a) (“Motion,” Dkt. Nos. 14, 14-1, and 14-2).
`
`
`
`Emerson notes that it is not a proper defendant in this case as demonstrated by the
`
`attached declarations of Dr. Randall D. Ledford and Andrew Dudiak. Emerson itself does not
`
`make, use, sell, offer for sale, or import Coriolis flowmeters. (See Ex. A, 2-18-13 R. Ledford
`
`Decl. ¶ 6.) Further, Micro Motion, Inc., which is an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of
`
`4826-8436-8146.1
`
`

`
`Case 6:12-cv-00799-JRG Document 30 Filed 02/21/13 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 1353
`
`
`Emerson, is the only Emerson subsidiary that manufactures or sells Coriolis flowmeters. (Ex. A,
`
`2-18-13 R. Ledford Decl. ¶¶ 4, 7; Ex. B, 2-21-13 A. Dudiak Decl. ¶¶ 2, 5.) Other than Micro
`
`Motion, Inc., no Emerson subsidiary is involved with any research and development,
`
`engineering, manufacturing, or marketing associated with Coriolis flowmeters. (Ex. A, 2-18-13
`
`R. Ledford Decl. ¶ 7.) Emerson and Micro Motion, Inc. have separate payrolls, separate
`
`engineers, and separate headquarters. (Ex. A, 2-18-13 R. Ledford Decl. ¶ 8; see also Ex. B, 2-
`
`21-13 A. Dudiak Decl. ¶ 2.) While Emerson conducts various reviews of Micro Motion, Inc.’s
`
`strategic and financial plans, Emerson does not direct the design or development of Micro
`
`Motion, Inc.’s products. (Ex. A, 2-18-13 R. Ledford Decl. ¶ 9; Ex. B, 2-21-13 A. Dudiak Decl.
`
`at ¶¶ 8-10.) In particular, Emerson does not dictate details about the functions and features of
`
`Micro Motion, Inc.’s products. (Ex. A, 2-18-13 R. Ledford Decl. ¶ 9; Ex. B, 2-21-13 A. Dudiak
`
`Decl. at ¶ 8-10.)
`
`
`
`While Emerson believes it is not a properly named defendant in this case and intends to
`
`seek dismissal, Emerson nonetheless believes that this case should be transferred to the District
`
`of Colorado for the reasons Micro Motion, Inc. stated in its Motion, including: this case has no
`
`significant connection with this judicial district; the District of Colorado is more convenient and
`
`less costly for the majority of relevant witnesses; compulsory process will be available for
`
`witnesses in Colorado; access to relevant evidence will be easier in Colorado; and the District of
`
`Colorado has a strong interest in resolving this case.
`
`
`
` Accordingly, Emerson joins in Micro Motion, Inc.’s Motion, and for the reasons set forth
`
`in Micro Motion, Inc.’s Motion, which is supported by the brief in support of Micro Motion,
`
`Inc.’s Motion and accompanying papers, all pleadings and documents on file with the Court, any
`
`reply memoranda that may be filed, the argument of counsel, and any documentary evidence
`
`4826-8436-8146.1
`
`2
`
`

`
`Case 6:12-cv-00799-JRG Document 30 Filed 02/21/13 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 1354
`
`
`which may be presented at the time of the hearing, Emerson hereby requests that this Court
`
`transfer this case to the District of Colorado.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
`/s/Matthew J. Shin
`
`Linda E.B. Hansen, WI Bar No. 1000660
`Richard S. Florsheim, WI Bar No. 1015905
`Jeffrey N. Costakos, WI Bar No. 1008225
`Kadie M. Jelenchick, WI Bar No. 1056506
`Matthew J. Shin, WI Bar No. 1090096
`Foley & Lardner LLP
`777 East Wisconsin Avenue
`Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53202
`Phone: (414) 271-2400
`Fax: (414) 297-4900
`Email: lhansen@foley.com
`
`rflorsheim@foley.com
`
`jcostakos@foley.com
`
`kjelenchick@foley.com
`
`mshin@foley.com
`
`Guy N. Harrison
`State Bar No. 00000077
`Harrison Law Firm
`217 N. Center Street
`Longview, Texas 75606
`Phone: (903) 758-7361
`Fax: (903) 753-9557
`Email: guy@gnhlaw.com and
`
`cj-gnharrison@att.net
`
`Attorneys for Defendant
`Emerson Electric Co.
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
` Dated: February 21, 2013
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`I hereby certify that on February 21, 2013, I electronically filed the foregoing document
`
`with the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing via
`
`electronic mail to all counsel of record.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/Matthew J. Shin
`Matthew J. Shin
`
`4826-8436-8146.1
`
`3

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket