`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`TYLER DIVISION
`
`C.A. No. 6:12-cv-799-LED
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`§§
`
`§
`
`§§
`
`§
`
`§§
`
`§
`
`§§
`
`§§
`
`§
`
`§§
`
`§§
`
`§
`
`INVENSYS SYSTEMS, INC.,
`
`v.
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`EMERSON ELECTRIC CO. and
`MICRO MOTION INC., USA,
`
`and
`
`Defendants.
`
`MICRO MOTION INC., USA,
`
`v.
`
`Counterclaim-Plaintiff,
`
`INVENSYS SYSTEMS, INC.,
`
`Counterclaim-Defendant.
`
`ORDER
`
`Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Invensys Systems, Inc.’s Motion to Defer Rebuttal
`
`Invalidity Expert Report on Defendants’ New Prior Art References. After considering the
`
`parties’ arguments and the applicable law, the Court is of the opinion that the pending motion
`
`should be GRANTED. Invensys will not be required to prepare a rebuttal report addressing the
`
`newly asserted prior art references in Defendants’ invalidity report unless and until the Court
`
`determines that Defendants’ properly disclosed those references.
`
`It is so ORDERED.
`
`EAST\83696337.4