Case 6:12-cv-00799-JRG Document 211 Filed 08/14/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 6122
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`TYLER DIVISION
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case No. 6:12-cv-00799-LED
`
`
`
`INVENSYS SYSTEMS, INC.,
`
`
`
`
`
`vs.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`EMERSON ELECTRIC CO. and
`MICRO MOTION INC., USA,
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendants,
`
`
`and
`
`MICRO MOTION INC., USA,
`
`
`
`Counterclaim-Plaintiff,
`
`vs.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`INVENSYS SYSTEMS, INC.,
`
`
`
`Counterclaim-Defendant.
`
`JOINT MOTION TO AMEND DOCKET CONTROL ORDER AND TO VACATE THE
`COURT’S ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION FOR INTERIM
`RELIEF OF EXPERT DISCOVERY DEADLINES
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Presently before the Court is Plaintiff Invensys Systems, Inc.’s Opposed Motion
`
`to Amend Docket Control Order, (Dkt. Nos. 182, 194), which seeks to modify the expert and
`
`dispositive motion deadlines in the Fourth Amended Docket Control Order, (Dkt. No. 103).
`
`Since the filing of Invensys’s Motion, the parties have met and conferred, and Defendants Micro
`
`Motion, Inc. and Emerson Electric Co. have agreed to withdraw their Opposition to the Motion,
`
`(Dkt. Nos. 188, 198). With Invensys’s Motion now moot, the parties agree and stipulate, subject
`
`4842-3835-9068.1
`
`

`
`Case 6:12-cv-00799-JRG Document 211 Filed 08/14/14 Page 2 of 6 PageID #: 6123
`
`to the Court’s approval, on an extension of various deadlines related to experts and dispositive
`
`motions, as follows:
`
`ORIGINAL
`DATE(S)
`
`PARTIES’
`AGREED-UPON
`PROPOSED
`AMENDED
`DATE(S)
`
`EVENT
`
`Response to Dispositive Motions (including Daubert
`motions) due. Responses to dispositive motions filed prior to
`the dispositive motion deadline, including Daubert motions,
`shall be due in accordance with Local Rule CV-56 and Local
`Rule CV-7. Motions to extend page limits will only be
`granted in exceptional circumstances.
`Dispositive Motions due from all parties and any other
`motions that may require a hearing (including Daubert
`motions) due. Motions shall comply with Local Rule CV-56
`and Local Rule CV-7. Motions to extend page limits will
`only be granted in exceptional circumstances.
`Parties to Identify Rebuttal Trial Witnesses.
`Parties to Identify Trial Witnesses; Amend Pleadings
`(after Markman Hearing). It is not necessary to file a Motion
`for Leave to Amend before the deadline to amend pleadings.
`It is necessary to file a Motion for Leave to Amend after the
`deadline. However, except as provided in Patent Rule 3-6, if
`the amendment would effect infringement contentions or
`invalidity contentions, a motion must be made pursuant to
`Patent Rule 3-6 irrespective of whether the amendment is
`made prior to this deadline.
`Deadline to File Letter Briefs for Summary Judgment
`Motions and Daubert Motions. See the Court’s website for
`further information.
`Expert Discovery Deadline.
`Parties designate rebuttal expert witnesses (non-construction
`issues), Rebuttal expert witness reports due. Refer to Local
`Rules for required information.
`Parties with burden of proof designate expert witnesses (non-
`construction issues). Expert witness reports due. Refer to
`Local Rules for required information.
`
`02/13/15
`
`04/13/15
`
`01/16/15
`
`03/16/15
`
`01/23/15
`
`03/23/15
`
`12/19/14
`
`02/19/15
`
`11/15/14
`
`01/22/15
`
`10/17/14
`
`12/19/14
`
`09/19/14
`
`11/19/14
`
`08/08/14
`
`10/03/14
`
`
`
`
`
`- 2 -
`
`

`
`Case 6:12-cv-00799-JRG Document 211 Filed 08/14/14 Page 3 of 6 PageID #: 6124
`
`The amendments and proposed extension neither affect any other case deadlines nor are they
`
`sought for the purposes of delay.
`
`The parties respectfully request that the Court enter the proposed Fifth Amended
`
`Docket Control Order, attached as Exhibit A. In addition, as there is no longer a dispute about
`
`the schedule, the requested interim relief that the Court granted with respect to expert discovery
`
`is unnecessary. Thus, the parties also respectfully request the Court vacate its Order Granting
`
`Joint Motion for Interim Relief of Expert Discovery Deadlines, (Dkt. No. 200).
`
`
`
`
`
`- 3 -
`
`

`
`Case 6:12-cv-00799-JRG Document 211 Filed 08/14/14 Page 4 of 6 PageID #: 6125
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/s/ Kadie M. Jelenchick
`
`
`
`Linda E.B. Hansen, WI Bar No. 1000660
`Richard S. Florsheim, WI Bar No. 1015905
`Jeffrey N. Costakos, WI Bar No. 1008225
`Kadie M. Jelenchick, WI Bar No. 1056506
`Foley & Lardner LLP
`777 East Wisconsin Avenue
`Milwaukee, WI 53202
`Telephone: 414.271.2400
`Facsimile: 414.297.4900
`Email: lhansen@foley.com
` rflorsheim@foley.com
` jcostakos@foley.com
` kjelenchick@foley.com
`
`
`Jason A. Berta, IL Bar No. 6295888
`Foley & Lardner LLP
`321 North Clark Street, Suite 2800
`Chicago, IL 60654
`Telephone: (312) 832-4500
`Facsimile: (312) 832-4700
`Email: jberta@foley.com
`
`Guy N. Harrison, State Bar No. 00000077
`Guy Harrison Law Offices
`217 N. Center Street
`Longview, TX 75601
`Telephone: 903.758.7361
`Facsimile: 903.753.9557
`Email: guy@gnhlaw.com
`
`ATTORNEYS FOR MICRO MOTION,
`INC. and EMERSON ELECTRIC CO.
`
`
`
`Dated: August 14, 2014
`
`
`
`
`- 4 -
`
`

`
`Case 6:12-cv-00799-JRG Document 211 Filed 08/14/14 Page 5 of 6 PageID #: 6126
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Todd S. Patterson
`Claudia Wilson Frost
`State Bar No. 21671300
`Jeffrey L. Johnson
`State Bar No. 24029638
`Dawn M. Jenkins
`State Bar No. 24074484
`DLA PIPER LLP
`1000 Louisiana, Suite 2800
`Houston, TX 77002
`Telephone: 713.425.8400
`Facsimile: 713.425.8401
`Email: Claudia.Frost@dlapiper.com
` Jeffrey.Johnson@dlapiper.com
` Dawn.Jenkins@dlapiper.com
`
`
`Nicholas G. Papastavros
`Daniel Rosenfeld
`DLA PIPER LLP
`33 Arch Street, 26th Floor
`Boston, MA 02110
`Telephone: 617.406.6000
`Facsimile: 617.406.6100
`Email: Nick.Papastavros@dlapiper.com
` Daniel.Rosenfeld@dlapiper.com
`
`
`Todd S. Patterson
`DLA PIPER LLP
`401 Congress Ave., Suite 2500
`Austin, TX 78701-3799
`Telephone: 512.457.7017
`Facsimile: 512.721.2217
`Email: todd.patterson@dlapiper.com
`
`ATTORNEYS FOR INVENSYS SYSTEMS,
`INC.
`
`
`
`
`
`- 5 -
`
`
`
`
`
`

`
`Case 6:12-cv-00799-JRG Document 211 Filed 08/14/14 Page 6 of 6 PageID #: 6127
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`
`
`The undersigned certifies that on August 14, 2014, all counsel of record who are
`
`
`
`deemed to have consented to electronic service are being served with a copy of this document via
`
`the Court’s CM/ECF system per Local Rule CV-5(a)(3).
`
`/s/ Kadie M. Jelenchick
`Kadie M. Jelenchick
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`- 6 -