throbber
Case 6:12-cv-00799-JRG Document 14-1 Filed 01/10/13 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 427
`Case 6:12—cv—OO799—JRG Document 14-1 Filed 01/10/13 Page 1 of 2 Page|D #: 427
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`TYLER DIVISION
`
`Case No. 12-CV-007'99
`
`INVENSYS SYSTEMS, INC,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`VS.
`
`EMERSON ELECTRIC CO. and
`
`MICRO MOTION INC., USA,
`
`Defendants,
`
`and
`
`MICRO MOTION INC., USA,
`
`Counterclaim-Plaintiff,
`
`VS.
`
`INVENSYS SYSTEMS, INC.,
`
`Counterclaim-Defendant.
`
`DECLARATION OF ANDREW DUDIAK
`
`I, Andrew Dudiak, do hereby declare as follows:
`
`1.
`
`2.
`
`3.
`
`4.
`
`I am the Vice President of Marketing for Micro Motion, Inc. (“Micro Motion”) and make
`this declaration on its behalf and in support of its Motion to Transfer Venue Pursuant to
`28 U.S.C.§ l404(a).
`
`I work at the headquarters of Micro Motion, which is located in Boulder, Colorado, and is
`where the great majority of Micro Motion’s employees work.
`
`Micro Motion was incorporated in Colorado in 1973, and is a wholly-owned subsidiary
`of Emerson Electric Co.
`
`Micro Motion’s engineering, marketing, sales, finance, and administrative functions and
`personnel are centered in Boulder, Colorado. Boulder is where all decisions pertaining to
`the pricing, marketing, and sales of the accused products occur.
`
`4852676237 232.1
`
`

`
`Case 6:12-cv-00799-JRG Document 14-1 Filed 01/10/13 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 428
`Case 6:12—cv—OO799—JRG Document 14-1 Filed 01/10/13 Page 2 of 2 Page|D #: 428
`
`The products accused of infringement in this case are known as Coriolis flowmeters, and
`they were conceived of, designed, and developed in Boulder, Colorado.
`Coriolis
`flowmeters can measure the flow, mass, density, temperature, and viscosity of various
`materials.
`
`The employees associated with the conception, design, and development of the accused
`products are located in Boulder, Colorado.
`For example, Richard Maginnis,
`the
`Engineering Manager for the accused products, and Craig McAnally, an engineer who
`works on the accused products, work at Micro Motion’s Boulder, Colorado headquarters.
`
`All of Micro Motion’s U.S. engineers work at Micro Motion’s Boulder, Colorado
`headquarters.
`The engineering documents related to the design, development, and
`manufacture of the accused products are generally located in Boulder, Colorado.
`
`The products accused of infringement are manufactured in Boulder, Colorado and outside
`the United States. Micro Motion does not manufacture any products in Texas.
`
`Micro Motion’s Coriolis flowmeters are sold nationwide and across much of the world.
`
`The marketing, sales, and financial documents relating to the accused products are
`located in Boulder, Colorado. All of the people knowledgeable about those documents
`are also located in Boulder, Colorado.
`
`Although Micro Motion has sold products in Texas, Micro Motion does not own or lease
`any offices, facilities, or land in the Eastern District of Texas.
`
`Micro Motion has some employees in Texas, of whom approximately two are located in
`the Eastern District of Texas, and work out of a Beaumont, Texas office of a third-party
`sales representative, Scallon Controls. These employees are involved in sales and service
`of Micro Motion products and have no specific knowledge relating to the issues involved
`in this lawsuit. Micro Motion does not expect to call any of its Texas-based employees
`as witnesses.
`
`Micro Motion’s document collection efforts in this matter will primarily take place in its
`Boulder, Colorado headquarters.
`
`I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
`
`10.
`
`11.
`
`I2.
`
`13.
`
`Dated:
`
`January 10, 2013
`
`"-
`
`'\
`
`4852-8762-72 82.1

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket