throbber
Case 6:12-cv-00799-JRG Document 133 Filed 03/27/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 4019
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`TYLER DIVISION
`
`Case No. 6:12-cv-00799-LED
`
`INVENSYS SYSTEMS, INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`vs.
`
`EMERSON ELECTRIC CO. and
`MICRO MOTION INC., USA,
`
`Defendants.
`
`and
`
`MICRO MOTION INC., USA,
`
`Counterclaim-Plaintiff,
`
`vs.
`
`INVENSYS SYSTEMS, INC.,
`
`Counterclaim-Defendant.
`
`EMERSON ELECTRIC CO.’S AND MICRO MOTION, INC.’S APPLICATION FOR
`ISSUANCE OF A LETTER OF REQUEST TO THE CENTRAL AUTHORITY OF THE
`UNITED KINGDOM FOR INTERNATIONAL JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE PURSUANT
`TO THE HAGUE CONVENTION OF 18 MARCH 1970 ON THE TAKING OF
`EVIDENCE ABROAD IN CIVIL OR COMMERCIAL MATTERS
`
`4818-1675-6505.
`
`

`
`Case 6:12-cv-00799-JRG Document 133 Filed 03/27/14 Page 2 of 6 PageID #: 4020
`
`Defendant Emerson Electric Co. (“Emerson”) and Defendant and Counterclaim-Plaintiff
`
`Micro Motion, Inc. (“Micro Motion”), pursuant to Article 1 of the Hague Convention of March
`
`18, 1970 on the Taking of Evidence Abroad in Civil or Commercial Matters (“Hague
`
`Convention”) and Rule 28(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, hereby submit this
`
`Application for Issuance of a Letter of Request to obtain evidence that is located in the United
`
`Kingdom to be used in the above-captioned case pending before this Court.
`
`Emerson and Micro Motion have learned that at least three individuals residing in the
`
`United Kingdom—Manus Henry, David W. Clarke, and Mayela E. Zamora, all of whom are
`
`listed co-inventors of one or more of the patents asserted by Plaintiff and Counterclaim-
`
`Defendant Invensys Systems, Inc. (“Invensys”) in this lawsuit—and the University of Oxford
`
`each have information relevant to this litigation. Specifically, it has been made known that each
`
`of the seven claimed patented inventions asserted by Invensys were conceived, developed, and/or
`
`reduced to practice through a relationship between Invensys and the University of Oxford.
`
`In
`
`addition, the relevant work performed by the three aforementioned alleged co-inventors was
`
`performed during their employment and research time with the University of Oxford. However,
`
`except for Manus Henry, none of the co-inventors has produced any documents in this case
`
`despite requests made by Emerson and Micro Motion for relevant documents and information
`
`from those individuals. The University of Oxford has also not produced any documents in this
`
`case despite similar requests directed to Invensys for documents from the University.
`
`Emerson and Micro Motion understand that the alleged co-inventors and the University
`
`of Oxford cannot be compelled to provide evidence in the absence of compliance with the Hague
`
`Convention. Accordingly, Emerson and Micro Motion request
`
`that
`
`this Court
`
`issue the
`
`accompanying Letter of Request, and that the executed Letter of Request be returned to counsel
`
`2
`
`

`
`Case 6:12-cv-00799-JRG Document 133 Filed 03/27/14 Page 3 of 6 PageID #: 4021
`
`for Emerson and Micro Motion for delivery to the proper authorities in the United Kingdom
`
`under the appropriate procedure.
`
`In an effort to obtain the relevant information as expeditiously as possible, counsel for
`
`Emerson and Micro Motion has attempted to seek this information without resorting to the
`
`Hague Convention by making specific requests for the relevant information and documents from
`
`counsel for Invensys. Counsel for Emerson and Micro Motion eventually served upon counsel
`
`for Invensys a subpoena requesting the information. On each of these occasions, counsel for
`
`Invensys has refused, for the most part, to provide the requested discovery from the named co-
`
`inventors and from the University of Oxford.
`
`Invensys has produced certain documents from
`
`Manus Henry. However, because this production is voluntary, Emerson and Micro Motion
`
`cannot be certain that Invensys has produced all requested documents in Dr. Henry’s possession,
`
`custody, or control. As to the remaining inventors and the University of Oxford, Invensys has
`
`indicated that such information must be acquired through use of the Hague Convention. To the
`
`extent Invensys now produces the requested materials and the alleged co-inventors voluntarily
`
`make themselves available for deposition, Emerson and Micro Motion will withdraw this
`
`Application.
`
`3
`
`

`
`Case 6:12-cv-00799-JRG Document 133 Filed 03/27/14 Page 4 of 6 PageID #: 4022
`
`Dated: March 27, 2014
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`Guy N. Harrison, State Bar No. 00000077
`Harrison Law Firm
`217 N. Center Street
`Longview, Texas 75601
`Phone: (903) 758-7361
`Fax: (903) 753-9557
`Email: guy@gnhlaw.com
`
`/s/ Kadie M. Jelenchick
`Linda E.B. Hansen, WI Bar No. 1000660
`Richard S. Florsheim, WI Bar No. 1015905
`Jeffrey N. Costakos, WI Bar No. 1008225
`Kadie M. Jelenchick, WI Bar No. 1056506
`Matthew J. Shin, WI Bar No. 1090096
`Foley & Lardner LLP
`777 East Wisconsin Avenue
`Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53202
`Phone: (414) 271-2400
`Fax: (414) 297-4900
`Email: lhansen@foley.com
`rflorsheim@foley.com
`jcostakos@foley.com
`kjelenchick@foley.com
`mshin@foley.com
`
`Attorneys for Defendant Emerson Electric
`Co. and Defendant and Counterclaim-
`Plaintiff Micro Motion, Inc.
`
`4
`
`

`
`Case 6:12-cv-00799-JRG Document 133 Filed 03/27/14 Page 5 of 6 PageID #: 4023
`
`CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE
`
`I, Kadie M. Jelenchick, counsel for Defendant Emerson Electric Co. and Defendant and
`
`Counterclaim-Plaintiff Micro Motion, Inc., hereby certify that I have consulted with counsel for
`
`Plaintiff and Counterclaim-Defendant Invensys Systems, Inc. in an attempt to avoid making the
`
`aforementioned Application. These discussions resulted in an impasse.
`
`/s/ Kadie M. Jelenchick
`Kadie M. Jelenchick
`
`5
`
`

`
`Case 6:12-cv-00799-JRG Document 133 Filed 03/27/14 Page 6 of 6 PageID #: 4024
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that on March 27, 2014, I electronically filed the foregoing document
`
`with the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing via
`
`electronic mail to all counsel of record.
`
`/s/ Kadie M. Jelenchick
`Kadie M. Jelenchick
`
`6

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket