throbber
Case 6:12-cv-00799-JRG Document 130-2 Filed 03/20/14 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 3999
`Case 6:12—cv—00799—JRG Document 130-2 Filed 03/20/14 Page 1 of 3 Page|D #: 3999
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT P
`
`EXHIBIT P
`
`

`
`Case 6:12-cv-00799-JRG Document 130-2 Filed 03/20/14 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 4000
`ATTORNEYS AT LAW
`777 EAST WISCONSIN AVENUE
`MILWAUKEE, WI 53202-5306
`414.271.2400 TEL
`414.297.4900 FAX
`WWW.FOLEY.COM
`
`WRITER’S DIRECT LINE
`414.319.7324
`kjelenchick@foley.com E-MAIL
`
`CLIENT/MATTER NUMBER
`087886-0122
`
`December 24, 2013
`
`Via E-Mail
`
`Jeffrey Johnson
`DLA Piper LLP
`1000 Louisiana Street, Suite 2800
`Houston, TX 77002-5005
`
`Re:
`
`Invensys Systems, Inc. v Emerson Electric Co., et al.
`Case No. 12-cv-799-LED (E.D. Tex.)
`
`Dear Jeffrey:
`
`I write to respond to Mr. Papastavros’s December 10, 2013 letter requesting that
`Defendants produce to your attention “one (1) functional sample of each Micro Motion and/or
`Emerson Coriolis flowmeter,
`including the original packaging, software, and accompanying
`documentation … [for] Coriolis flowmeters containing a transmitter with an enhanced core
`processor and/or any reasonably similar component that (1) Micro Motion and/or Emerson Electric
`Co., or, alternatively, (2) Micro Motion and/or Emerson Process Management has ever used, made,
`sold, or offered for sale within the United States or imported into the United States, either directly or
`indirectly through distributors or other means.”
`
`As an initial matter, we were surprised by the request. It suggests that Invensys does
`not already have sample(s) of the accused flowmeters, which as you know, should have been
`obtained and investigated prior to the filing of this lawsuit to satisfy Invensys’s Rule 11 obligations.
`
`Moreover, there is nothing that prevents Invensys from purchasing the sought-after
`flowmeters directly from Micro Motion. To the extent Invensys would like to make such a purchase,
`I would be more than happy to arrange it. Please provide me the specific items you would like,
`where we should send them, and let me know to whom I should direct the invoice for payment.
`
`As part of Micro Motion’s discovery obligations, it will make a reasonable number of
`samples available for inspection at a mutually agreeable day and time in Boulder, Colorado. To the
`extent this is something that you are interested in, please let me know.
`
`Finally, attached please find a Notice of Rule 30(b)(6) Deposition directed to
`Invensys. At your first opportunity, please confirm that the deposition will be going forward as
`noticed at our Boston office on Thursday, January 16, 2014, so that we can make the appropriate
`arrangements.
`
`BOSTON
`BRUSSELS
`CHICAGO
`DETROIT
`
`JACKSONVILLE
`LOS ANGELES
`MADISON
`MIAMI
`
`MILWAUKEE
`NEW YORK
`ORLANDO
`SACRAMENTO
`
`SAN DIEGO
`SAN DIEGO/DEL MAR
`SAN FRANCISCO
`SHANGHAI
`
`SILICON VALLEY
`TALLAHASSEE
`TAMPA
`TOKYO
`WASHINGTON, D.C.
`
`4842-9830-3511.1
`
`

`
`Case 6:12-cv-00799-JRG Document 130-2 Filed 03/20/14 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 4001
`
`FOLEY & L ARDN ER LL P
`
`Jeffrey Johnson
`December 24, 2013
`Page 2
`
`Sincerely,
`
`/s/ Kadie M. Jelenchick
`
`Attachment
`
`cc: Service-invensyscoriolis@dlapiper.com
`
`4842-9830-3511.1

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket