Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 674 Filed 03/19/21 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 33540
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`TEXARKANA DIVISION
`
`MAXELL, LTD.,
`
`Plaintiff
`
`v.
`
`APPLE INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`NO. 5:19-cv-00036-RWS
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`APPLE INC.’S FINAL TRIAL WITNESS LIST
`
`Defendant Apple Inc. (“Apple”) hereby submits its final trial witness list pursuant to the
`
`Court’s Order on March 17, 2021 (Dkt. No. 665). Apple makes no representation that each of
`
`the witnesses on this list will ultimately be able to attend the trial. Apple does not know the
`
`precise nature or scope of the testimony and evidence that Maxell, Ltd. (“Maxell”) may seek to
`
`present at trial or what witnesses will be available to testify at trial. As such, Apple reserves the
`
`right to modify, amend or supplement this list throughout the balance of this case based on case
`
`developments, including but not limited to the right to (1) not call certain of the listed witnesses,
`
`(2) call live, or by deposition, any witness identified on Maxell’s witness lists as Defendant’s
`
`witness at trial, and (3) call any witnesses necessary to authenticate or lay the foundation for the
`
`introduction of documents to which Maxell objects (including but not limited to custodians of
`
`records or authors of prior art). Apple also reserves the right to supplement or modify this list in
`
`response to further rulings by the Court. At present, Apple intends to call by live testimony—
`
`whether in person or remote—all witnesses designated as “Will Call” in the table below. Apple
`
`nevertheless reserves all rights to call the witnesses by deposition, as identified in its deposition
`
`WEST\293138064.3
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`TEXARKANA DIVISION
`
`MAXELL, LTD.,
`
`Plaintiff
`
`v.
`
`APPLE INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`NO. 5:19-cv-00036-RWS
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`APPLE INC.’S FINAL TRIAL WITNESS LIST
`
`Defendant Apple Inc. (“Apple”) hereby submits its final trial witness list pursuant to the
`
`Court’s Order on March 17, 2021 (Dkt. No. 665). Apple makes no representation that each of
`
`the witnesses on this list will ultimately be able to attend the trial. Apple does not know the
`
`precise nature or scope of the testimony and evidence that Maxell, Ltd. (“Maxell”) may seek to
`
`present at trial or what witnesses will be available to testify at trial. As such, Apple reserves the
`
`right to modify, amend or supplement this list throughout the balance of this case based on case
`
`developments, including but not limited to the right to (1) not call certain of the listed witnesses,
`
`(2) call live, or by deposition, any witness identified on Maxell’s witness lists as Defendant’s
`
`witness at trial, and (3) call any witnesses necessary to authenticate or lay the foundation for the
`
`introduction of documents to which Maxell objects (including but not limited to custodians of
`
`records or authors of prior art). Apple also reserves the right to supplement or modify this list in
`
`response to further rulings by the Court. At present, Apple intends to call by live testimony—
`
`whether in person or remote—all witnesses designated as “Will Call” in the table below. Apple
`
`nevertheless reserves all rights to call the witnesses by deposition, as identified in its deposition
`
`WEST\293138064.3
`
`
`
`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 674 Filed 03/19/21 Page 2 of 7 PageID #: 33541
`
`designations or counter-designations. Apple includes in this list individuals who may be listed
`
`on Maxell’s witness list without prejudice to its right to object to Maxell’s presentation of those
`
`witnesses at trial and/or the admissibility of all or part of those witnesses’ testimony, or its right
`
`to move for the exclusion of those witnesses’ testimony. At this time, Apple identifies the
`
`following witnesses for trial:
`
`Witness; Employer;
`Topic of Testimony
`
`Will Call
`
`May Call
`
`May, But
`Probably Will
`Not Call
`
`Remote Live
`Testimony
`
`X
`
`X
`
`X
`
`X
`
`Dr. Gregory Abowd;
`Georgia Institute of
`Technology; facts related
`to prior art systems and
`references
`
`Dr. Alan Bovik;
`University of Texas;
`expert witness for U.S.
`Patent No. 8,339,493
`
`Kent Broddle; former
`Garmin engineer; facts
`related to prior art
`systems and references
`
`Tülen Erdem; New York
`University; Maxell’s
`offered expert witness
`relating to surveys
`
`Lance E. Gunderson;
`Echelon Analytics;
`expert witness for
`damages
`
`Norio Kitagata; Maxell;
`Maxell’s corporate
`representative on certain
`topics
`
`WEST\293138064.3
`
`2
`
`X
`
`X
`
`X
`
`
`
`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 674 Filed 03/19/21 Page 3 of 7 PageID #: 33542
`
`Witness; Employer;
`Topic of Testimony
`
`Will Call
`
`May Call
`
`May, But
`Probably Will
`Not Call
`
`Remote Live
`Testimony
`
`X
`
`X
`
`X
`
`X
`
`X
`
`X
`
`X
`
`X
`
`X
`
`X
`
`Marc Krochmal; Apple;
`accused Apple products
`and functionalities
`
`Alex Ledwith; Apple;
`accused Apple products
`and functionalities
`
`Dr. Vijay Madisetti;
`Georgia Institute of
`Technology; Maxell’s
`offered expert witness for
`U.S. Patent No.
`8,339,493
`
`Jun Maeoka; Hitachi,
`Ltd.; named inventor of
`asserted patent
`
`Andrew McMahon;
`Apple; accused Apple
`products and
`functionalities
`
`Dr. Daniel Menascé;
`George Mason
`University; expert
`witness for U.S. Patent
`Nos. 7,116,438and
`6,329,794
`
`Heather Mewes; Apple;
`Apple, pre-suit
`communications, patent
`licensing/acquisition
`
`Carla Mulhern; Analysis
`Group, Inc.; Maxell’s
`offered expert witness for
`damages
`
`WEST\293138064.3
`
`3
`
`
`
`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 674 Filed 03/19/21 Page 4 of 7 PageID #: 33543
`
`May, But
`Probably Will
`Not Call
`
`Remote Live
`Testimony
`
`X
`
`X
`
`X
`
`X
`
`X
`
`X
`
`Witness; Employer;
`Topic of Testimony
`
`Will Call
`
`May Call
`
`Jacob Munford;
`independent researcher;
`expert witness for
`publication and public
`accessibility of
`documents
`
`Kenji Nakamura; Maxell;
`Maxell’s corporate
`witness on certain topics
`
`Takahiro Nakano;
`Hitachi Industry &
`Control Solutions; named
`inventor of asserted
`patent
`
`Shigeto Oeda; Hitachi
`Industry & Control
`Solutions; named
`inventor of asserted
`patent
`
`Dr. Joseph Paradiso;
`Massachusetts Institute
`of Technology; expert
`witness for U.S. Patent
`Nos. 6,748,317,
`6,480,999, and 6,430,498
`
`Dr. Craig Rosenberg;
`Global Technica;
`Maxell’s offered expert
`witness for U.S. Patent
`Nos. 6,748,317,
`6,480,999, and 6,430,498
`
`Dr. Itamar Simonson;
`Stanford University;
`expert witness relating to
`surveys
`
`X
`
`X
`
`X
`
`WEST\293138064.3
`
`4
`
`
`
`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 674 Filed 03/19/21 Page 5 of 7 PageID #: 33544
`
`Witness; Employer;
`Topic of Testimony
`
`Will Call
`
`May Call
`
`May, But
`Probably Will
`Not Call
`
`Remote Live
`Testimony
`
`Robert Stoll; Faegre
`Drinker Biddle & Reath
`LLP; Maxell witness
`
`Steve Washio; Maxell
`Corporation of America;
`pre-suit communications
`
`Dr. Tim Williams; Beach
`Technologies, LLC;
`Maxell’s offered expert
`witness for U.S. Patent
`No. 7,116,438
`
`Dated: March 19, 2021
`
`WEST\293138064.3
`
`X
`
`X
`
`X
`
`By: /s/ Michael Jay
`
`Melissa R. Smith (TX #24001351)
`melissa@gilliamsmithlaw.com
`Gilliam & Smith, LLP
`303 South Washington Avenue
`Marshall, TX 75670
`Tel: 903.934.8450
`Fax: 903.934.9257
`
`Mark D. Fowler (Pro Hac Vice)
`Brent K. Yamashita
`Christian Chessman
`DLA PIPER LLP (US)
`2000 University Ave.
`East Palo Alto, CA 94303-2214
`Tel: 650.833.2000
`Fax: 650.833.2001
`
`Sean C. Cunningham (Pro Hac Vice)
`Erin P. Gibson (Pro Hac Vice)
`David R. Knudson (Pro Hac Vice)
`DLA PIPER LLP (US)
`401 B Street, Suite 1700
`San Diego, CA 92101
`Tel: 619.699.2700
`
`5
`
`
`
`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 674 Filed 03/19/21 Page 6 of 7 PageID #: 33545
`
`Fax: 619.699.2701
`
`Michael Jay (Pro Hac Vice)
`DLA PIPER LLP (US)
`2000 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 400
`Los Angeles, CA 90067
`Tel: 310.595.3000
`Fax: 310.595.3300
`
`Aaron G. Fountain
`Zachary Loney
`DLA PIPER LLP (US)
`401 Congress Avenue, Suite 2500
`Austin, Texas 78701-3799
`Tel: 512.457.7000
`Fax: 512.457.7001
`
`Dawn M. Jenkins
`DLA PIPER LLP (US)
`1000 Louisiana, Suite 2800
`Houston, TX 77002-5005
`Tel: 713.425.8490
`Fax: 713.300.6012
`
`Paul Steadman
`Stephanie Lim (Pro Hac Vice)
`DLA PIPER LLP (US)
`444 West Lake Street, Ste. 900
`Chicago, IL 60606
`Tel: 312.368.4000
`Fax: 312.236.7516
`
`Counsel for Defendant Apple Inc.
`
`WEST\293138064.3
`
`6
`
`
`
`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 674 Filed 03/19/21 Page 7 of 7 PageID #: 33546
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that all counsel of record who are deemed to have consented to electronic
`
`service are being served this 19th day of March, 2021 with a copy of this document via
`
`electronic mail.
`
`/s/ Michael Jay
`Michael Jay
`
`WEST\293138064.3
`
`7
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
