throbber
Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 66-39 Filed 08/27/19 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 3481
`Case 5:19-cv-00036—RWS Document 66-39 Filed 08/27/19 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 3481
`PUBLIC VERSION
`
`EXHIBIT 38
`
`EXHIBIT 38
`
`PUBLIC VERSION
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 66-39 Filed 08/27/19 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 3482
`8/22/2019
`Samsung to manufacture iPhone chips for Apple again, report says - The Washington Post
`The Washington Post
`
`Innovations
`
`Samsung to manufacture iPhone chips for Apple again, report says
`
` Add to list
`
`By Alex Schiffer
`July 18, 2017
`After a five-year hiatus, Samsung Electronics will return to manufacturing chips for Apple’s new iPhone in
`2018, according to a report from the Korea Herald.
`
`The South Korea-based electronic company was a primary producer of iPhone chips until 2013, when Apple
`awarded its rival Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC) exclusive production rights. In 2011,
`Apple sued Samsung over patent infringement, and the company cut down the number of components it got
`from its competitor from that time.
`
`The Herald, which relied on unnamed sources, reported that Samsung’s chances at producing iPhone chips
`again picked up in June when Kwon Oh-hyun, one of Samsung’s three co-chief executives who is in charge of
`chips among other things, visited the Apple headquarters in California last month. Samsung announced in
`March that it would purchase specialized machines, reportedly in an attempt to produce seven-nanometer
`processors for the iPhone and regain Apple’s business.
`
`Sources told the Herald that Samsung’s ties to organic light-emitting diodes, an LED used in phones, is what
`caused Apple to get Samsung back into the mix for processors. Samsung is the world leader in OLED
`manufacturing, with 95 percent market share, and will probably be the lone OLED supplier for the upcoming
`iPhone.
`
`TSMC will still play a role in supplying chips for next year’s iPhones, according to the Herald. It also said
`Samsung will share some iPhone orders next year that “have been monopolized by TSMC.” It plans to complete
`its tests on the new chip-making machines in the near future before seeking Apple’s approval.
`
`Samsung had one of its most profitable quarters in company history earlier in the year, with $8.7 billion in
`operating profit, a 48 percent increase from the previous year. Total revenue for the quarter was $44.5 billion,
`with the majority of business coming in semiconductor and display divisions. At the time of its announcement,
`the company also said that demand for chips and memory had increased over the course of the quarter.
`
`https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/innovations/wp/2017/07/18/samsung-to-manufacture-iphone-chips-for-apple-again-report-says/
`
`1/2
`
`PUBLIC VERSION
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 66-39 Filed 08/27/19 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 3483
`8/22/2019
`Samsung to manufacture iPhone chips for Apple again, report says - The Washington Post
`Apple and Samsung didn’t respond to requests for comment.
`
`Alex Schiffer
`Alex Schiffer covered business, finance and technology for The Washington Post. He left The Post in August 2017. Follow 
`
`https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/innovations/wp/2017/07/18/samsung-to-manufacture-iphone-chips-for-apple-again-report-says/
`
`2/2
`
`PUBLIC VERSION
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket