throbber
Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 66-29 Filed 08/27/19 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 3400
`Case 5:19-cv-00036—RWS Document 66-29 Filed 08/27/19 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 3400
`PUBLIC VERSION
`
`EXHIBIT 28
`
`EXHIBIT 28
`
`PUBLIC VERSION
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 66-29 Filed 08/27/19 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 3401
`8/15/2019
`Apple incentives: What lured the tech giant to expand in Austin? - Curbed Austin
`
`AUSTIN
`
`AUSTIN DEVELOPMENT NEWS
`
`
`
`AUSTIN NEWS
`
`How Austin landed the Apple deal
`
`1
`
`It takes a village to build a tech hub
`By Cindy Widner @CurbedAustin
` Dec 14, 2018, 12:56pm CST
`
`Courtesy of Apple
`
`Inexpensive talent, an abundance of land, and a low cost of living—all of those things
`being relative to, say, Silicon Valley—were likely the main drivers behind Apple’s
`decision, announced Thursday, to expand its Austin presence significantly with a new $1
`billion facility. Nevertheless, the kinds of incentives often crucial to luring big tech, while
`not on par with the sometimes ludicrous lures cast by some cities in hopes of landing
`Amazon’s HQ2, are not completely absent from the deal.
`
`While the 2012 deal for the first Austin Apple campus involved the commitment of an
`estimated $36 million in combined incentives from the state, Travis County, and the city,
`according to the Austin American-Statesman, the new campus will receive no financial
`incentives from the city of Austin.
`
`https://austin.curbed.com/2018/12/14/18141017/austin-apple-incentives-taxes-city-state-county
`
`1/2
`
`PUBLIC VERSION
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 66-29 Filed 08/27/19 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 3402
`8/15/2019
`Apple incentives: What lured the tech giant to expand in Austin? - Curbed Austin
`That doesn’t mean taxpayer money isn’t involved, however. The company is set to receive
`up to $25 million in taxpayer-funded grants from the state’s Texas Enterprise Fund,
`which offers companies incentives to close deals on major projects in the state, the
`Statesman reported. TEC funds, which are currently controlled by Texas Gov. Greg
`Abbott, are allocated based on a formula involving investment and job creation at the
`site.
`
`Curbed Austin Newsletter
`
`Email (required)
`
`By signing up, you agree to our Privacy Policy and European users agree to the data transfer policy.
`
`SUBSCRIBE
`
`In addition, according to a Friday Community Impact story, Apple is seeking a 15-year
`property tax abatement from Williamson County, which encompasses part of North
`Austin, including the area where the campus will be located. Under the agreement being
`considered, CI reported, the county would abate or reimburse 65 percent of its taxes for
`15 years in exchange for Apple’s $400 million purchase of the land, development of the
`campus, and the creation of 4,000 new jobs.
`
`• Apple plans $1 billion new campus, 5,000 more jobs [AAS]
`
`• Williamson County pursuing 15-year incentive deal for new Apple campus in Austin
`[CI]
`
`https://austin.curbed.com/2018/12/14/18141017/austin-apple-incentives-taxes-city-state-county
`
`2/2
`
`PUBLIC VERSION
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket