Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 641-2 Filed 03/03/21 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 32649
`Case 5:19-cv-00036—RWS Document 641-2 Filed 03/03/21 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 32649
`
`
`
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT B
`APPLE INC. WITNESS LIST
`
`APPLE INC. WITNESS LIST
`
`EXHIBIT B
`
`
`Case 5:19-cv-00036—RWS Document 641-2 Filed 03/03/21 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 32649
`
`
`
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT B
`APPLE INC. WITNESS LIST
`
`APPLE INC. WITNESS LIST
`
`EXHIBIT B
`
`
`
`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 641-2 Filed 03/03/21 Page 2 of 9 PageID #: 32650
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`TEXARKANA DIVISION
`
`MAXELL, LTD.,
`
`Plaintiff
`
`v.
`
`APPLE INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`NO. 5:19-cv-00036-RWS
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`APPLE INC.’S NARROWED TRIAL WITNESS LIST
`
`Defendant Apple Inc. (“Apple”) hereby submits its narrowed trial witness list pursuant to
`
`the Amended Docket Control Order (Dkt. No. 283) and the parties’ recent narrowing of issues in
`
`this case. Apple makes no representation that each of the witnesses on this list will ultimately be
`
`able to attend the trial. Apple does not know the precise nature or scope of the testimony and
`
`evidence that Maxell, Ltd. (“Maxell”) may seek to present at trial or what witnesses will be
`
`available to testify at trial. As such, Apple reserves the right to modify, amend or supplement
`
`this list throughout the balance of this case based on case developments, including but not
`
`limited to the right to (1) not call certain of the listed witnesses, (2) call live, or by deposition,
`
`any witness identified on Maxell’s witness lists as Defendant’s witness at trial, (3) call any
`
`witnesses necessary to authenticate or lay the foundation for the introduction of documents to
`
`which Maxell objects (including but not limited to custodians of records or authors of prior art),
`
`and (4) seek leave to present witnesses through alternative methods due to the on-going COVID-
`
`19 pandemic. Apple also reserves the right to supplement or modify this list in response to
`
`rulings by the Court (including on any motions). Apple reserves all rights to call the witnesses
`
`WEST\293138064.1
`
`
`
`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 641-2 Filed 03/03/21 Page 3 of 9 PageID #: 32651
`
`by deposition, as identified in its deposition designations or counter-designations. Apple
`
`includes in this list individuals who may be listed on Maxell’s witness list without prejudice to
`
`its right to object to Maxell’s presentation of those witnesses at trial and/or the admissibility of
`
`all or part of those witnesses’ testimony, or its right to move for the exclusion of those witnesses’
`
`testimony. At this time, Apple identifies the following witnesses for trial:
`
`Witness; employer; topic of
`testimony
`
`Will Call
`
`May Call
`
`May, But
`Probably Will
`Not Call
`
`Dr. Gregory Abowd; Georgia
`Institute of Technology; facts related
`to prior art systems and references
`
`Daniel Borges; Apple; accused Apple
`products and functionalities
`
`Dr. Alan Bovik; University of Texas;
`expert witness for U.S. Patent No.
`8,339,493
`
`Kent Broddle; former Garmin
`engineer; facts related to prior art
`systems and references
`
`Dr. Michael Brogioli; Polymathic
`Consulting; Maxell’s offered expert
`witness for U.S. Patent No. 6,329,794
`
`Frank Casanova; Apple; Apple, sales
`and marketing, surveys
`
`Patrick Coleman; Apple; accused
`Apple products and functionalities
`
`Tülen Erdem; New York University;
`Maxell’s offered expert witness
`relating to surveys
`
`X
`
`X
`
`X
`
`X
`
`X
`
`X
`
`X
`
`X
`
`WEST\293138064.1
`
`2
`
`APPLE INC.’S TRIAL WITNESS LIST
`NO. 5:19-CV-00036-RWS
`
`
`
`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 641-2 Filed 03/03/21 Page 4 of 9 PageID #: 32652
`
`Witness; employer; topic of
`testimony
`
`Will Call
`
`May Call
`
`May, But
`Probably Will
`Not Call
`
`X
`
`X
`
`X
`
`X
`
`Lance E. Gunderson; Echelon
`Analytics; expert witness for
`damages
`
`Masayuki Hirabayashi; Maxell;
`named inventor of asserted patent
`
`Dr. Paul Hubel; Apple; accused
`Apple products and functionalities
`
`Michael Jaynes; Apple; sales and
`other financial information related to
`the accused Apple products
`
`Norio Kitagata; Maxell; Maxell’s
`corporate representative on certain
`topics
`
`Marc Krochmal; Apple; accused
`Apple products and functionalities
`
`Alex Ledwith; Apple; accused Apple
`products and functionalities
`
`Scott Lopatin; Apple; accused Apple
`products and functionalities
`
`Adam Machalek; Apple; accused
`Apple products and functionalities
`
`Dr. Vijay Madisetti; Georgia Institute
`of Technology; Maxell’s offered
`expert witness for U.S. Patent No.
`8,339,493
`
`Jun Maeoka; Hitachi, Ltd.; named
`inventor of asserted patent
`
`X
`
`X
`
`X
`
`X
`
`X
`
`X
`
`X
`
`WEST\293138064.1
`
`3
`
`APPLE INC.’S TRIAL WITNESS LIST
`NO. 5:19-CV-00036-RWS
`
`
`
`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 641-2 Filed 03/03/21 Page 5 of 9 PageID #: 32653
`
`Witness; employer; topic of
`testimony
`
`Will Call
`
`May Call
`
`May, But
`Probably Will
`Not Call
`
`X
`
`X
`
`X
`
`X
`
`X
`
`Dr. Andrew Mayo; technology
`consultant; expert witness for U.S.
`Patent No. 8,339,493
`
`Robert Mayor; Apple; accused Apple
`products and functionalities
`
`Andrew McMahon; Apple; accused
`Apple products and functionalities
`
`Dr. Daniel Menascé; George Mason
`University; expert witness for U.S.
`Patent Nos. 7,116,438and 6,329,794
`
`Heather Mewes; Apple; Apple, pre-
`suit communications, patent
`licensing/acquisition
`
`Carla Mulhern; Analysis Group, Inc.;
`Maxell’s offered expert witness for
`damages
`
`Jacob Munford; independent
`researcher; expert witness for
`publication and public accessibility
`of documents
`
`Patrick Murphy; ServiceNow Inc.;
`pre-suit communications between
`Apple and Hitachi/Maxell
`
`Kenji Nakamura; Maxell; Maxell’s
`corporate witness on certain topics
`
`Takahiro Nakano; Hitachi Industry &
`Control Solutions; named inventor of
`asserted patent
`
`X
`
`X
`
`X
`
`X
`
`X
`
`WEST\293138064.1
`
`4
`
`APPLE INC.’S TRIAL WITNESS LIST
`NO. 5:19-CV-00036-RWS
`
`
`
`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 641-2 Filed 03/03/21 Page 6 of 9 PageID #: 32654
`
`Witness; employer; topic of
`testimony
`
`Will Call
`
`May Call
`
`May, But
`Probably Will
`Not Call
`
`X
`
`X
`
`Shigeto Oeda; Hitachi Industry &
`Control Solutions; named inventor of
`asserted patent
`
`Dr. Joseph Paradiso; Massachusetts
`Institute of Technology; expert
`witness for U.S. Patent Nos.
`6,748,317, 6,480,999, and 6,430,498
`
`Dr. Craig Rosenberg; Global
`Technica; Maxell’s offered expert
`witness for U.S. Patent Nos.
`6,748,317, 6,480,999, and 6,430,498
`
`Dr. Itamar Simonson; Stanford
`University; expert witness relating to
`surveys
`
`Robert Stoll; Faegre Drinker Biddle
`& Reath LLP; Maxell witness
`
`Steve Washio; Maxell Corporation of
`America; pre-suit communications
`
`BJ Watrous1; Apple; Apple, patent
`licensing/acquisition
`
`Dr. Tim Williams; Beach
`Technologies, LLC; Maxell’s offered
`expert witness for U.S. Patent No.
`7,116,438
`
`X
`
`X
`
`X
`
`X
`
`X
`
`X
`
`1 As set forth in Apple’s Opposition Motion for Leave to Conduct Two Depositions After the
`Fact Deposition Deadline (Dkt. No. 307), if Apple intends to call Mr. Watrous to testify at trial,
`Apple will give Maxell an opportunity to take his deposition after the pandemic subsides, as the
`parties previously agreed. Id. at 2.
`
`5
`
`APPLE INC.’S TRIAL WITNESS LIST
`NO. 5:19-CV-00036-RWS
`
`WEST\293138064.1
`
`
`
`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 641-2 Filed 03/03/21 Page 7 of 9 PageID #: 32655
`
`Dated: February 16, 2021
`
`By: /s/ Michael Jay
`
`Melissa R. Smith (TX #24001351)
`melissa@gilliamsmithlaw.com
`Gilliam & Smith, LLP
`303 South Washington Avenue
`Marshall, TX 75670
`Tel: 903.934.8450
`Fax: 903.934.9257
`
`Mark D. Fowler (Pro Hac Vice)
`Brent K. Yamashita
`Christian Chessman
`DLA PIPER LLP (US)
`2000 University Ave.
`East Palo Alto, CA 94303-2214
`Tel: 650.833.2000
`Fax: 650.833.2001
`
`Sean C. Cunningham (Pro Hac Vice)
`Erin P. Gibson (Pro Hac Vice)
`Kevin Hamilton (Pro Hac Vice)
`David R. Knudson (Pro Hac Vice)
`DLA PIPER LLP (US)
`401 B Street, Suite 1700
`San Diego, CA 92101
`Tel: 619.699.2700
`Fax: 619.699.2701
`
`Michael Jay (Pro Hac Vice)
`DLA PIPER LLP (US)
`2000 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 400
`Los Angeles, CA 90067
`Tel: 310.595.3000
`Fax: 310.595.3300
`
`Aaron G. Fountain
`Zachary Loney
`DLA PIPER LLP (US)
`401 Congress Avenue, Suite 2500
`Austin, Texas 78701-3799
`Tel: 512.457.7000
`Fax: 512.457.7001
`
`WEST\293138064.1
`
`6
`
`APPLE INC.’S TRIAL WITNESS LIST
`NO. 5:19-CV-00036-RWS
`
`
`
`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 641-2 Filed 03/03/21 Page 8 of 9 PageID #: 32656
`
`Dawn M. Jenkins
`DLA PIPER LLP (US)
`1000 Louisiana, Suite 2800
`Houston, TX 77002-5005
`Tel: 713.425.8490
`Fax: 713.300.6012
`
`Paul Steadman (Pro Hac Vice)
`Stephanie Lim (Pro Hac Vice)
`DLA PIPER LLP (US)
`444 West Lake Street, Ste. 900
`Chicago, IL 60606
`Tel: 312.368.4000
`Fax: 312.236.7516
`
`Luann L. Simmons (Pro Hac Vice)
`lsimmons@omm.com
`O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP
`Two Embarcadero Center
`28th Floor
`San Francisco, CA 94111
`Tel: 415.984.8700
`Fax: 415.984.8701
`
`Counsel for Defendant Apple Inc.
`
`WEST\293138064.1
`
`7
`
`APPLE INC.’S TRIAL WITNESS LIST
`NO. 5:19-CV-00036-RWS
`
`
`
`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 641-2 Filed 03/03/21 Page 9 of 9 PageID #: 32657
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that all counsel of record who are deemed to have consented to electronic
`
`service are being served this 16th day of February, 2021 with a copy of this document via
`
`electronic mail.
`
`Dated: February 16, 2021
`
`
`
`/s/ Michael Jay
`Michael Jay
`
`WEST\293138064.1
`
`8
`
`APPLE INC.’S TRIAL WITNESS LIST
`NO. 5:19-CV-00036-RWS
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
