throbber
Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 622 Filed 02/05/21 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 31980
`
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`TEXARKANA DIVISION
`
`MAXELL, LTD.,
`
`
`
`v.
`
`APPLE INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`Defendant.
`
`Case No. 5:19-cv-0036-RWS
`
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`
`
`JOINT MOTION TO PARTIALLY AMEND DOCKET CONTROL ORDER
`
`
`Plaintiff Maxell, Ltd. and Defendant Apple Inc. (collectively the “Parties”) hereby jointly
`
`move to amend the current Docket Control Order (Dkt. No. 606) in the above-captioned matter
`
`with respect to the timing of certain pre-trial exchanges and filings only.
`
`Certain of the pre-trial exchange and filing deadlines in the current Docket Control Order
`
`were set based on an expectation that the parties would complete their identification of narrowed
`
`issues for trial in accordance with the framework ordered by the Court by January 28, 2021.1
`
`Dkt. No. 606. However, following issuance of the Court’s Order regarding narrowing of issues
`
`for trial on January 27, 2021 (Dkt. No. 619), the Parties determined that additional time was
`
`needed to complete their identification of narrowed issues for trial. Specifically, the Parties
`
`agreed that Maxell would narrow its asserted patents and claims for trial by February 2 and that
`
`Apple would identify preliminary representative products and narrow its prior art election for
`
`trial by February 2 and February 8, respectively. The slight change of the schedule with respect
`
`to narrowing necessitates that some additional deadlines flowing therefrom, primarily the
`
`deadline for exchange of narrowed pretrial disclosures and objections thereto, be adjusted
`
`1 The Docket Control Order at Dkt. No. 606 inadvertently referenced deadlines for this calendar year as occurring in
`2020 instead of 2021. That error is corrected in this filing and the attached Proposed Order.
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 622 Filed 02/05/21 Page 2 of 7 PageID #: 31981
`
`slightly as well, as set forth below.
`
`
`
`The Parties also believe that the addition of several new deadlines is warranted.
`
`Specifically, the Parties propose adding deadlines for filing a representative product stipulation
`
`and a notice of compliance with the Dkt. No. 619. The Parties also propose adding deadlines for
`
`the exchange of drafts of the Amended Joint Final Pretrial Order, Amended Joint Proposed Jury
`
`Instructions, and Amended Form of the Verdict for jury trials, which will facilitate the
`
`finalization of those papers for filing by the currently set date.
`
`The newly proposed dates do not impact the dates currently set for the filing of the
`
`Pretrial Objections, Amended Joint Final Pretrial Order, Amended Joint Proposed Jury
`
`Instructions with citation to authority and Amended Form of the Verdict for jury trials. They also
`
`do not impact the date currently set for Jury Selection and Jury Trial.
`
`A table presenting the current deadlines and proposed amendments is set forth below:
`
`Original Date
`
`3 DAYS after
`conclusion of Trial
`
`
`March 22, 2021
`
`Court designated date –
`not flexible without good
`cause - Motion Required
`
`March 22, 2021
`
`Court designated date –
`not flexible without good
`cause - Motion Required
`
`Proposed
`Amended Date
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Event
`
`Parties to file Motion to Seal Trial Exhibits, if they
`wish to seal any highly confidential exhibits.
`
`EXHIBITS: See Order Regarding Exhibits below.
`9:00 a.m. JURY TRIAL before Judge Robert W.
`Schroeder III, Texarkana, Texas.
`
`For planning purposes, parties shall be prepared to
`start the evidentiary phase of trial immediately
`following jury selection.
`
`9:00 a.m. JURY SELECTION before Judge
`Robert W. Schroeder III, Texarkana, Texas.
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 622 Filed 02/05/21 Page 3 of 7 PageID #: 31982
`
`
`
`To Be Determined
`
`Court designated date –
`not flexible without good
`cause - Motion Required
`
`
`March 4, 2021
`
`[2.5 weeks before
`trial]
`March 1, 2021
`
`[3 weeks before trial]
`
`March 1, 2021
`
`[3 weeks before trial]
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PRETRIAL CONFERENCE before Judge
`Robert W. Schroeder III, Texarkana, Texas. (if
`necessary)
`
`Discuss trial logistics and voir dire procedure.
`Resolve any pending motions or objections.
`
`Lead trial counsel must attend the pretrial
`conference.
`
`File a Notice of Time Requested for (1) voir dire,
`(2) opening statements, (3) direct and cross
`examinations, and (4) closing arguments.
`
`File pretrial objections.
`
`The parties are ORDERED to meet and confer to
`resolve any disputes before filing any objection to
`pretrial disclosures.
`
`File Amended Joint Final Pretrial Order,
`Amended Joint Proposed Jury Instructions with
`citation to authority and Amended Form of the
`Verdict for jury trials.
`
`Parties shall use the pretrial order form on Judge
`Schroeder’s
`website.
`
`Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law
`with citation to authority for issues tried to the
`bench.
`
`Deadline for Parties to meet and confer regarding
`remaining pretrial objections.
`
`3
`
`February 24, 2021
`
`[3.5 weeks before
`trial]
`
`
`February 17, 2021
`
`[4.5 weeks before
`pretrial]
`
`February 25, 2021
`
`[3.5 weeks before
`trial]
`February 19, 2021 Apple to serve response to Maxell’s drafts of
`Amended Joint Final Pretrial Order, Amended Joint
`Proposed Jury Instructions, and Amended Form of
`the Verdict for jury trials.
`Parties identify exhibits and deposition designations
`for which they maintain pretrial objections.
`
`
`February 22, 2021
`
`[4 weeks before
`pretrial]
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 622 Filed 02/05/21 Page 4 of 7 PageID #: 31983
`
`February 12, 2021
`
`[5 weeks before trial]
`
`
`
`February 4, 2021
`
`[6 weeks before
`pretrial]
`
`February 4, 2021
`
`[5 weeks before
`pretrial]
`
`February 15, 2021
`
`[4.5 weeks before
`trial]
`
`February 15, 2021
`
`[4.5 weeks before
`trial]
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`February 12, 2021
`[5 weeks before
`trial]
`
`February 10, 2021
`
`February 10, 2021
`[5 weeks before
`trial]
`February 8, 2021
`[5.5 weeks before
`trial]
`
`February 8, 2021
`[5.5 weeks before
`trial]
`
`
`
`Notice of Request for Daily Transcript or Real
`Time Reporting of Court Proceedings due.
`
`If a daily transcript or real time reporting of court
`proceedings is requested for trial or hearings, the
`party or parties making said request shall file a
`notice with the Court.
`
`Deadline to File Motions Requesting Leave to
`Designate Exhibits in Excess of 250.
`
`
`Exchange Narrowed Pretrial Disclosures (Witness
`List, Deposition Designations, and Exhibit List).
`Parties may withdraw, but not supplement,
`witnesses, deposition designations, and exhibits from
`those previously exchanged. Remaining deposition
`designations and exhibits shall maintain previously
`exchanged objections.
`
`Video and Stenographic Deposition Designation due.
`Each party who proposes to offer deposition
`testimony shall serve a disclosure identifying the line
`and page numbers to be offered.
`
`Maxell to serve drafts of Amended Joint Final
`Pretrial Order, Amended Joint Proposed Jury
`Instructions, and Amended Form of the Verdict for
`jury trials.
`File Notice of Compliance with Dkt. No. 619.
`
`File representative product stipulation.
`
`
`Apple to narrow its prior art invalidity challenges to
`one “ground” per patent, with a “ground” being one
`anticipatory reference or one obviousness
`combination, except that this narrowing will not
`apply to: (a) the prior art defenses to the three
`“navigation” patents (the ’317, ’498 and ’999
`patents); or (b) Apple’s § 101 challenges.
`Parties to meet and confer on draft representative
`product stipulation.
`
`4
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 622 Filed 02/05/21 Page 5 of 7 PageID #: 31984
`
`
`
`
`
`February 5, 2021
`[6 weeks before
`trial]
`February 2, 2021
`[6 weeks before
`trial]
`
`January 28, 2021
`
`[7 weeks before trial]
`
`N/A
`
`
`
`Maxell to serve response to Apple’s draft
`representative product stipulation.
`
`Maxell to narrow its case to no more than six patents
`and 10 claims.
`
`Apple to serve draft representative product
`stipulation.
`Parties to complete identification of narrowed issues
`for trial in accordance with framework to be ordered
`by the Court.
`
`A proposed Docket Control Order is submitted herewith.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: February 5, 2021
`
`/s/ Jamie B. Beaber
`Geoff Culbertson
`Kelly Tidwell
`Patton, Tidwell & Culbertson, LLP
`2800 Texas Boulevard (75503)
`Post Office Box 5398
`Texarkana, TX 75505-5398
`Telephone: (903) 792-7080
`Facsimile: (903) 792-8233
`gpc@texarkanalaw.com
`kbt@texarkanalaw.com
`
`Jamie B. Beaber
`Alan M. Grimaldi
`Kfir B. Levy
`James A. Fussell, III
`Baldine B. Paul
`Tiffany A. Miller
`Saqib J. Siddiqui
`Bryan C. Nese
`William J. Barrow
`Alison T. Gelsleichter
`Clark S. Bakewell
`MAYER BROWN LLP
`1999 K Street, NW
`Washington, DC 20006
`Telephone: (202) 263-3000
`Facsimile: (202) 263-3300
`jbeaber@mayerbrown.com
`agrimaldi@mayerbrown.com
`
`/s/ Mark D. Fowler
`Harry L. Gillam, Jr.
`Texas Bar No. 07921800
`Melissa Richards Smith
`Texas Bar No. 24001351
`GILLAM & SMITH, LLP
`303 South Washington Avenue
`Marshall, TX 75670
`Telephone: (903) 934-8450
`Facsimile: (903) 934-9257
`Email: gil@gillamsmithlaw.com
`Email: melissa@gillamsmithlaw.com
`
`Mark D. Fowler (Pro Hac Vice)
`Brent K. Yamashita
`Christian Chessman
`DLA PIPER LLP (US)
`2000 University Ave.
`East Palo Alto, CA 94303-2214
`Tel: 650.833.2000
`Fax: 650.833.2001
`
`Sean C. Cunningham (Pro Hac Vice)
`Erin P. Gibson (Pro Hac Vice)
`Kevin Hamilton (Pro Hac Vice)
`David R. Knudson (Pro Hac Vice)
`DLA PIPER LLP (US)
`401 B Street, Suite 1700
`San Diego, CA 92101
`Tel: 619.699.2700
`
`5
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 622 Filed 02/05/21 Page 6 of 7 PageID #: 31985
`
`klevy@mayerbrown.com
`jfussell@mayerbrown.com
`bpaul@mayerbrown.com
`tmiller@mayerbrown.com
`ssiddiqui@mayerbrown.com
`bnese@mayerbrown.com
`wbarrow@mayerbrown.com
`agelsleichter@mayerbrown.com
`cbakewell@mayerbrown.com
`
`Robert G. Pluta
`Amanda Streff Bonner
`MAYER BROWN LLP
`71 S. Wacker Drive
`Chicago, IL 60606
`(312) 782-0600
`rpluta@mayerbrown.com
`asbonner@mayerbrown.com
`
`Counsel for Plaintiff Maxell, Ltd.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Fax: 619.699.2701
`
`Michael Jay (Pro Hac Vice)
`DLA PIPER LLP (US)
`2000 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 400
`Los Angeles, CA 90067
`Tel: 310.595.3000
`Fax: 310.595.3300
`
`Aaron G. Fountain
`Zachary Loney
`DLA PIPER LLP (US)
`401 Congress Avenue, Suite 2500
`Austin, Texas 78701-3799
`Tel: 512.457.7000
`Fax: 512.457.7001
`
`Dawn M. Jenkins
`DLA PIPER LLP (US)
`1000 Louisiana, Suite 2800
`Houston, TX 77002-5005
`Tel: 713.425.8490
`Fax: 713.300.6012
`Paul Steadman (Pro Hac Vice)
`Stephanie Lim (Pro Hac Vice)
`DLA PIPER LLP (US)
`444 West Lake Street, Ste. 900
`Chicago, IL 60606
`Tel: 312.368.4000
`Fax: 312.236.7516
`
`Paul Steadman
`Stephanie Lim (Pro Hac Vice)
`DLA PIPER LLP (US)
`444 West Lake Street, Ste. 900
`Chicago, IL 60606
`Tel: 312.368.4000
`Fax: 312.236.7516
`
`Counsel for Defendant Apple Inc.
`
`6
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 622 Filed 02/05/21 Page 7 of 7 PageID #: 31986
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned certifies that all counsel of record who are deemed to have consented to
`electronic service are being served this 5th day of February, 2021 with a copy of this document
`via the Court’s CM/ECF system per Local Rule CV-5(a)(3).
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Jamie B. Beaber
`Jamie B. Beaber
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket