`
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`TEXARKANA DIVISION
`
`MAXELL, LTD.,
`
`
`
`v.
`
`APPLE INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`Defendant.
`
`Case No. 5:19-cv-0036-RWS
`
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`
`
`JOINT MOTION TO PARTIALLY AMEND DOCKET CONTROL ORDER
`
`
`Plaintiff Maxell, Ltd. and Defendant Apple Inc. (collectively the “Parties”) hereby jointly
`
`move to amend the current Docket Control Order (Dkt. No. 606) in the above-captioned matter
`
`with respect to the timing of certain pre-trial exchanges and filings only.
`
`Certain of the pre-trial exchange and filing deadlines in the current Docket Control Order
`
`were set based on an expectation that the parties would complete their identification of narrowed
`
`issues for trial in accordance with the framework ordered by the Court by January 28, 2021.1
`
`Dkt. No. 606. However, following issuance of the Court’s Order regarding narrowing of issues
`
`for trial on January 27, 2021 (Dkt. No. 619), the Parties determined that additional time was
`
`needed to complete their identification of narrowed issues for trial. Specifically, the Parties
`
`agreed that Maxell would narrow its asserted patents and claims for trial by February 2 and that
`
`Apple would identify preliminary representative products and narrow its prior art election for
`
`trial by February 2 and February 8, respectively. The slight change of the schedule with respect
`
`to narrowing necessitates that some additional deadlines flowing therefrom, primarily the
`
`deadline for exchange of narrowed pretrial disclosures and objections thereto, be adjusted
`
`1 The Docket Control Order at Dkt. No. 606 inadvertently referenced deadlines for this calendar year as occurring in
`2020 instead of 2021. That error is corrected in this filing and the attached Proposed Order.
`
`
`
`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 622 Filed 02/05/21 Page 2 of 7 PageID #: 31981
`
`slightly as well, as set forth below.
`
`
`
`The Parties also believe that the addition of several new deadlines is warranted.
`
`Specifically, the Parties propose adding deadlines for filing a representative product stipulation
`
`and a notice of compliance with the Dkt. No. 619. The Parties also propose adding deadlines for
`
`the exchange of drafts of the Amended Joint Final Pretrial Order, Amended Joint Proposed Jury
`
`Instructions, and Amended Form of the Verdict for jury trials, which will facilitate the
`
`finalization of those papers for filing by the currently set date.
`
`The newly proposed dates do not impact the dates currently set for the filing of the
`
`Pretrial Objections, Amended Joint Final Pretrial Order, Amended Joint Proposed Jury
`
`Instructions with citation to authority and Amended Form of the Verdict for jury trials. They also
`
`do not impact the date currently set for Jury Selection and Jury Trial.
`
`A table presenting the current deadlines and proposed amendments is set forth below:
`
`Original Date
`
`3 DAYS after
`conclusion of Trial
`
`
`March 22, 2021
`
`Court designated date –
`not flexible without good
`cause - Motion Required
`
`March 22, 2021
`
`Court designated date –
`not flexible without good
`cause - Motion Required
`
`Proposed
`Amended Date
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Event
`
`Parties to file Motion to Seal Trial Exhibits, if they
`wish to seal any highly confidential exhibits.
`
`EXHIBITS: See Order Regarding Exhibits below.
`9:00 a.m. JURY TRIAL before Judge Robert W.
`Schroeder III, Texarkana, Texas.
`
`For planning purposes, parties shall be prepared to
`start the evidentiary phase of trial immediately
`following jury selection.
`
`9:00 a.m. JURY SELECTION before Judge
`Robert W. Schroeder III, Texarkana, Texas.
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 622 Filed 02/05/21 Page 3 of 7 PageID #: 31982
`
`
`
`To Be Determined
`
`Court designated date –
`not flexible without good
`cause - Motion Required
`
`
`March 4, 2021
`
`[2.5 weeks before
`trial]
`March 1, 2021
`
`[3 weeks before trial]
`
`March 1, 2021
`
`[3 weeks before trial]
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PRETRIAL CONFERENCE before Judge
`Robert W. Schroeder III, Texarkana, Texas. (if
`necessary)
`
`Discuss trial logistics and voir dire procedure.
`Resolve any pending motions or objections.
`
`Lead trial counsel must attend the pretrial
`conference.
`
`File a Notice of Time Requested for (1) voir dire,
`(2) opening statements, (3) direct and cross
`examinations, and (4) closing arguments.
`
`File pretrial objections.
`
`The parties are ORDERED to meet and confer to
`resolve any disputes before filing any objection to
`pretrial disclosures.
`
`File Amended Joint Final Pretrial Order,
`Amended Joint Proposed Jury Instructions with
`citation to authority and Amended Form of the
`Verdict for jury trials.
`
`Parties shall use the pretrial order form on Judge
`Schroeder’s
`website.
`
`Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law
`with citation to authority for issues tried to the
`bench.
`
`Deadline for Parties to meet and confer regarding
`remaining pretrial objections.
`
`3
`
`February 24, 2021
`
`[3.5 weeks before
`trial]
`
`
`February 17, 2021
`
`[4.5 weeks before
`pretrial]
`
`February 25, 2021
`
`[3.5 weeks before
`trial]
`February 19, 2021 Apple to serve response to Maxell’s drafts of
`Amended Joint Final Pretrial Order, Amended Joint
`Proposed Jury Instructions, and Amended Form of
`the Verdict for jury trials.
`Parties identify exhibits and deposition designations
`for which they maintain pretrial objections.
`
`
`February 22, 2021
`
`[4 weeks before
`pretrial]
`
`
`
`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 622 Filed 02/05/21 Page 4 of 7 PageID #: 31983
`
`February 12, 2021
`
`[5 weeks before trial]
`
`
`
`February 4, 2021
`
`[6 weeks before
`pretrial]
`
`February 4, 2021
`
`[5 weeks before
`pretrial]
`
`February 15, 2021
`
`[4.5 weeks before
`trial]
`
`February 15, 2021
`
`[4.5 weeks before
`trial]
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`February 12, 2021
`[5 weeks before
`trial]
`
`February 10, 2021
`
`February 10, 2021
`[5 weeks before
`trial]
`February 8, 2021
`[5.5 weeks before
`trial]
`
`February 8, 2021
`[5.5 weeks before
`trial]
`
`
`
`Notice of Request for Daily Transcript or Real
`Time Reporting of Court Proceedings due.
`
`If a daily transcript or real time reporting of court
`proceedings is requested for trial or hearings, the
`party or parties making said request shall file a
`notice with the Court.
`
`Deadline to File Motions Requesting Leave to
`Designate Exhibits in Excess of 250.
`
`
`Exchange Narrowed Pretrial Disclosures (Witness
`List, Deposition Designations, and Exhibit List).
`Parties may withdraw, but not supplement,
`witnesses, deposition designations, and exhibits from
`those previously exchanged. Remaining deposition
`designations and exhibits shall maintain previously
`exchanged objections.
`
`Video and Stenographic Deposition Designation due.
`Each party who proposes to offer deposition
`testimony shall serve a disclosure identifying the line
`and page numbers to be offered.
`
`Maxell to serve drafts of Amended Joint Final
`Pretrial Order, Amended Joint Proposed Jury
`Instructions, and Amended Form of the Verdict for
`jury trials.
`File Notice of Compliance with Dkt. No. 619.
`
`File representative product stipulation.
`
`
`Apple to narrow its prior art invalidity challenges to
`one “ground” per patent, with a “ground” being one
`anticipatory reference or one obviousness
`combination, except that this narrowing will not
`apply to: (a) the prior art defenses to the three
`“navigation” patents (the ’317, ’498 and ’999
`patents); or (b) Apple’s § 101 challenges.
`Parties to meet and confer on draft representative
`product stipulation.
`
`4
`
`
`
`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 622 Filed 02/05/21 Page 5 of 7 PageID #: 31984
`
`
`
`
`
`February 5, 2021
`[6 weeks before
`trial]
`February 2, 2021
`[6 weeks before
`trial]
`
`January 28, 2021
`
`[7 weeks before trial]
`
`N/A
`
`
`
`Maxell to serve response to Apple’s draft
`representative product stipulation.
`
`Maxell to narrow its case to no more than six patents
`and 10 claims.
`
`Apple to serve draft representative product
`stipulation.
`Parties to complete identification of narrowed issues
`for trial in accordance with framework to be ordered
`by the Court.
`
`A proposed Docket Control Order is submitted herewith.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: February 5, 2021
`
`/s/ Jamie B. Beaber
`Geoff Culbertson
`Kelly Tidwell
`Patton, Tidwell & Culbertson, LLP
`2800 Texas Boulevard (75503)
`Post Office Box 5398
`Texarkana, TX 75505-5398
`Telephone: (903) 792-7080
`Facsimile: (903) 792-8233
`gpc@texarkanalaw.com
`kbt@texarkanalaw.com
`
`Jamie B. Beaber
`Alan M. Grimaldi
`Kfir B. Levy
`James A. Fussell, III
`Baldine B. Paul
`Tiffany A. Miller
`Saqib J. Siddiqui
`Bryan C. Nese
`William J. Barrow
`Alison T. Gelsleichter
`Clark S. Bakewell
`MAYER BROWN LLP
`1999 K Street, NW
`Washington, DC 20006
`Telephone: (202) 263-3000
`Facsimile: (202) 263-3300
`jbeaber@mayerbrown.com
`agrimaldi@mayerbrown.com
`
`/s/ Mark D. Fowler
`Harry L. Gillam, Jr.
`Texas Bar No. 07921800
`Melissa Richards Smith
`Texas Bar No. 24001351
`GILLAM & SMITH, LLP
`303 South Washington Avenue
`Marshall, TX 75670
`Telephone: (903) 934-8450
`Facsimile: (903) 934-9257
`Email: gil@gillamsmithlaw.com
`Email: melissa@gillamsmithlaw.com
`
`Mark D. Fowler (Pro Hac Vice)
`Brent K. Yamashita
`Christian Chessman
`DLA PIPER LLP (US)
`2000 University Ave.
`East Palo Alto, CA 94303-2214
`Tel: 650.833.2000
`Fax: 650.833.2001
`
`Sean C. Cunningham (Pro Hac Vice)
`Erin P. Gibson (Pro Hac Vice)
`Kevin Hamilton (Pro Hac Vice)
`David R. Knudson (Pro Hac Vice)
`DLA PIPER LLP (US)
`401 B Street, Suite 1700
`San Diego, CA 92101
`Tel: 619.699.2700
`
`5
`
`
`
`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 622 Filed 02/05/21 Page 6 of 7 PageID #: 31985
`
`klevy@mayerbrown.com
`jfussell@mayerbrown.com
`bpaul@mayerbrown.com
`tmiller@mayerbrown.com
`ssiddiqui@mayerbrown.com
`bnese@mayerbrown.com
`wbarrow@mayerbrown.com
`agelsleichter@mayerbrown.com
`cbakewell@mayerbrown.com
`
`Robert G. Pluta
`Amanda Streff Bonner
`MAYER BROWN LLP
`71 S. Wacker Drive
`Chicago, IL 60606
`(312) 782-0600
`rpluta@mayerbrown.com
`asbonner@mayerbrown.com
`
`Counsel for Plaintiff Maxell, Ltd.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Fax: 619.699.2701
`
`Michael Jay (Pro Hac Vice)
`DLA PIPER LLP (US)
`2000 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 400
`Los Angeles, CA 90067
`Tel: 310.595.3000
`Fax: 310.595.3300
`
`Aaron G. Fountain
`Zachary Loney
`DLA PIPER LLP (US)
`401 Congress Avenue, Suite 2500
`Austin, Texas 78701-3799
`Tel: 512.457.7000
`Fax: 512.457.7001
`
`Dawn M. Jenkins
`DLA PIPER LLP (US)
`1000 Louisiana, Suite 2800
`Houston, TX 77002-5005
`Tel: 713.425.8490
`Fax: 713.300.6012
`Paul Steadman (Pro Hac Vice)
`Stephanie Lim (Pro Hac Vice)
`DLA PIPER LLP (US)
`444 West Lake Street, Ste. 900
`Chicago, IL 60606
`Tel: 312.368.4000
`Fax: 312.236.7516
`
`Paul Steadman
`Stephanie Lim (Pro Hac Vice)
`DLA PIPER LLP (US)
`444 West Lake Street, Ste. 900
`Chicago, IL 60606
`Tel: 312.368.4000
`Fax: 312.236.7516
`
`Counsel for Defendant Apple Inc.
`
`6
`
`
`
`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 622 Filed 02/05/21 Page 7 of 7 PageID #: 31986
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned certifies that all counsel of record who are deemed to have consented to
`electronic service are being served this 5th day of February, 2021 with a copy of this document
`via the Court’s CM/ECF system per Local Rule CV-5(a)(3).
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Jamie B. Beaber
`Jamie B. Beaber
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`