throbber
Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 582 Filed 11/12/20 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 31084
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`TEXARKANA DIVISION
`
`MAXELL, LTD.
`
`
`
`V.
`
`§
`§
`§
`APPLE, INC.
`______________________________________________________________________________
`MINUTES FOR MOTIONS HEARING
`HELD BEFORE JUDGE ROBERT W. SCHROEDER III
`NOVEMBER 12, 2020
`
`CAUSE NO. 5:19-CV-00036-RWS
`
`
`§§
`
`ADJOURN: 4:47 p.m.
`OPEN: 10:23 a.m.
`_____________________________________________________________________________
`ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF: Geoffrey Culbertson, Jamie Beaber, Tripp Fussell, Bryan
`Nese, Kfir Levy and Kelly Tidwell
`
`ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT: Gil Gillam, Aaron Fountain, Michael Jay, Trey Cox,
`Christian Chessman, Mark Fowler and Sean Cunningham
`
`LAW CLERK:
`
`Susan Stradley
`
`COURTROOM DEPUTY:
`
`Betty Schroeder
`
`Kate McAlpine
`COURT REPORTER:
`______________________________________________________________________________
`
`10:23 a.m.
`
`Case called; parties make introductions and announce ready; Court welcomes
`everyone and gives comments; case continued until March, 2021
`
`10:27 a.m. Mr. Bryan Nese argues Maxell’s MIL (dkt. #547) #1
`
`10:35 a.m.
`
`Court questions Mr. Nese; Mr. Nese responds
`
`10:38 a.m. Mr. Aaron Fountain responds to argument
`
`10:42 a.m. Mr. Nese replies
`
`10:45 a.m. Mr. Fountain responds
`
`10:46 a.m. Mr. Tripp Fussell argues Maxell’s MIL #2
`
`10:47 a.m.
`
`Court questions Mr. Fussell; Mr. Fussell responds
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 582 Filed 11/12/20 Page 2 of 6 PageID #: 31085
`
`10:52 a.m.
`
`Court questions Mr. Fountain; Mr. Fountain responds
`
`10:55 a.m. Mr. Fountain responds to argument
`
`10:55 a.m. Mr. Fussell replies
`
`10:56 a.m.
`
`Court questions Mr. Fussell; Mr. Fussell responds
`
`10:57 a.m. Mr. Fountain responds
`
`10:58 a.m.
`
`Court questions Mr. Fountain; Mr. Fountain responds
`
`10:59 a.m. Mr. Jamie Beaber argues Maxell’s MIL #3
`
`11:03 a.m. Mr. Michael Jay responds to argument
`
`11:04 a.m.
`
`Court questions Mr. Beaber; Mr. Beaber responds
`
`11:05 a.m. Mr. Nese advises the Court that the parties are in agreement to Maxell’s MIL #4
`
`11:06 a.m. Mr. Jay responds
`
`11:07 a.m. Mr. Nese argues Maxell’s MIL #5
`
`11:10 a.m. Mr. Sean Cunningham responds to argument
`
`11:12 a.m.
`
`Court questions Mr. Cunningham; Mr. Cunningham responds
`
`11:13 a.m.
`
`Court questions Mr. Nese; Mr. Nese responds
`
`11:14 a.m. Mr. Beaber argues Maxell’s MIL #6
`
`11:21 a.m. Mr. Jay responds to argument
`
`11:25 a.m.
`
`Court questions Mr. Jay; Mr. Jay responds
`
`11:26 a.m. Mr. Beaber replies
`
`11:29 a.m.
`
`Court questions Mr. Beaber; Mr. Beaber responds
`
`11:30 a.m. Mr. Jay responds
`
`11:31 a.m. Mr. Beaber replies
`
`11:31 a.m. Mr. Fussell argues Maxell’s MIL #7
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 582 Filed 11/12/20 Page 3 of 6 PageID #: 31086
`
`11:35 a.m.
`
`Court questions Mr. Fussell; Mr. Fussell responds
`
`11:36 a.m. Mr. Jay responds
`
`11:38 a.m.
`
`Court questions Mr. Jay; Mr. Jay responds
`
`11:39 a.m. Mr. Fussell replies
`
`11:41 a.m.
`
`Court questions Mr. Jay; Mr. Jay responds
`
`11:42 a.m. Mr. Fussell replies
`
`11:43 a.m. Mr. Kfir Levy argues Maxell’s MIL #8
`
`11:48 a.m. Mr. Gil Gillam responds to argument
`
`11:50 a.m.
`
`Court questions Mr. Gillam; Mr. Gillam responds
`
`11:54 a.m. Mr. Levy replies
`
`11:55 a.m.
`
`Court questions Mr. Levy; Mr. Levy responds
`
`11:56 a.m. Mr. Gillam responds
`
`11:59 a.m.
`
`Court questions Mr. Gillam; Mr. Gillam responds
`
`12:01 p.m. Mr. Levy replies
`
`12:03 p.m. Mr. Levy advises the Court that the parties have an agreement as to Maxell’s MIL
`#9; Mr. Cunningham responds
`
`12:05 p.m. Mr. Fussell advises the Court of an issue regarding a 282 notice from Apple
`
`12:08 p.m. Mr. Jay responds
`
`12:09 p.m.
`
`Court responds and questions Mr. Fussell; Mr. Fussell responds
`
`12:12 p.m.
`
`Court responds
`
`12:13 p.m.
`
`Recess
`
`1:16 p.m.
`
`Mr. Cunningham argues Apple’s MIL (dkt. #548) # 1
`
`1:21 p.m.
`
`Mr. Levy responds to argument
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 582 Filed 11/12/20 Page 4 of 6 PageID #: 31087
`
`1:24 p.m
`
`Mr. Cunningham replies
`
`1:25 p.m.
`
`Mr. Levy responds
`
`1:27 p.m.
`
`Mr. Cunningham replies
`
`1:28 p.m.
`
`Mr. Levy responds
`
`1:28 p.m.
`
`Mr. Cunningham argues Apple’s MIL #2
`
`1:30 p.m.
`
`Mr. Levy responds to argument
`
`1:33 p.m.
`
`Mr. Cunningham replies
`
`1:35 p.m.
`
`Mr. Jay argues Apple’s MIL #3
`
`1:39 p.m.
`
`Mr. Levy responds to argument
`
`1:48 p.m.
`
`Mr. Jay replies
`
`1:51 p.m.
`
`Mr. Levy responds
`
`1:54 p.m.
`
`Mr. Jay argues Apple’s MIL #4
`
`1:57 p.m.
`
`Mr. Beaber responds to argument
`
`2:01 p.m.
`
`Court questions Mr. Beaber; Mr. Beaber responds
`
`2:04 p.m.
`
`Court questions Mr. Jay; Mr. Jay responds
`
`2:04 p.m.
`
`Mr. Christian Chessman argues Apple’s MIL #5
`
`2:07 p.m.
`
`Court questions Mr. Chessman; Mr. Chessman responds
`
`2:11 p.m.
`
`Mr. Levy responds to argument
`
`2:16 p.m.
`
`Court questions Mr. Levy; Mr. Levy responds
`
`2:18 p.m.
`
`Mr. Chessman replies
`
`2:19 p.m.
`
`Court questions Mr. Chessman; Mr. Chessman responds
`
`2:22 p.m.
`
`Mr. Levy responds
`
`2:25 p.m.
`
`Mr. Chessman argues Apple’s MIL #6
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 582 Filed 11/12/20 Page 5 of 6 PageID #: 31088
`
`2:27 p.m.
`
`Mr. Kelly Tidwell responds to argument
`
`2:36 p.m.
`
`Court questions Mr. Chessman; Mr. Chessman responds
`
`2:37 p.m.
`
`Court questions Mr. Tidwell; Mr. Tidwell responds
`
`2:38 p.m.
`
`Mr. Gillam argues Apple’s MIL #7
`
`2:40 p.m.
`
`Mr. Tidwell responds to argument
`
`2:41 p.m.
`
`Court questions Mr. Tidwell; Mr. Tidwell responds
`
`2:42 p.m.
`
`Mr. Gillam replies
`
`2:42 p.m.
`
`Mr. Chessman argues Apple’s MIL #8
`
`2:44 p.m.
`
`Court questions Mr. Chessman; Mr. Chessman responds
`
`2:47 p.m.
`
`Mr. Geoff Culbertson responds to argument
`
`2:48 p.m.
`
`Mr. Chessman argues Apple’s MIL #9
`
`2:50 p.m.
`
`Mr. Culbertson responds to argument
`
`2:51 p.m.
`
`Court questions Mr. Culbertson; Mr. Culbertson responds
`
`2:52 p.m.
`
`Mr. Chessman replies
`
`2:54 p.m.
`
`Mr. Culbertson responds
`
`2:55 p.m.
`
`Recess
`
`3:15 p.m.
`
`Mr. Beaber argues Maxell’s Motion to Disqualify DLA Piper (dkt. #554)
`
`335 p.m.
`
`Court questions Mr. Beaber; Mr. Beaber responds
`
`3:47 p.m.
`
`Mr. Trey Cox responds to argument
`
`3:51 p.m.
`
`Court questions Mr. Cox; Mr. Cox responds
`
`3:56 p.m.
`
`Court questions Mr. Cox; Mr. Cox responds
`
`4:16 p.m.
`
`Court questions Mr. Cox; Mr. Cox responds
`
`4:17 p.m.
`
`Mr. Beaber replies
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 582 Filed 11/12/20 Page 6 of 6 PageID #: 31089
`
`4:25 p.m.
`
`Court questions Mr. Beaber; Mr. Beaber responds
`
`4:30 p.m.
`
`Court questions Mr. Beaber; Mr. Beaber responds
`
`4:32 p.m.
`
`Mr. Cox responds
`
`4:39 p.m.
`
`Mr. Beaber replies
`
`4:43 p.m.
`
`Mr. Cox responds
`
`4:45 p.m.
`
`Mr. Beaber replies
`
`4:47 p.m.
`
`Recess
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket