throbber
Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 539 Filed 10/08/20 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 28232
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`TEXARKANA DIVISION
`
`MAXELL, LTD.
`
`
`
`V.
`
`§
`§
`§
`APPLE, INC.
`______________________________________________________________________________
`MINUTES FOR MOTIONS HEARING
`HELD BEFORE JUDGE ROBERT W. SCHROEDER III
`OCTOBER 8, 2020
`
`CAUSE NO. 5:19-CV-00036-RWS
`
`
`§§
`
`ADJOURN: 5:49 p.m.
`OPEN: 9:59 a.m.
`_____________________________________________________________________________
`ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF: Geoffrey Culbertson, Jamie Beaber, Bryan Nese, Kfir Levy,
` Saqib Siddiqui and William Barrow
`
`ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT: Gil Gillam, Aaron Fountain, Brent Yamashita, Christian
`Chessman, Mark Fowler, Michael Jay, Sean Cunningham,
`and Paul Steadman
`
`LAW CLERK:
`
`Susan Stradley
`
`COURTROOM DEPUTY:
`
`Betty Schroeder
`
`Kate McAlpine
`COURT REPORTER:
`______________________________________________________________________________
`
`9:59 a.m.
`
`Case called; parties make introductions and announce ready; Court welcomes
`everyone and gives preliminary comments
`
`10:01 a.m. Mr. Mark Fowler argues defendant’s Renewed Motion to Stay Pending
`Determination of Inter Partes Review of the Patents-in-Suite (dkt. #48)
`
`10:05 a.m.
`
`Court questions Mr. Fowler; Mr. Fowler responds
`
`10:10 a.m. Mr. Geoff Culbertson responds to argument
`
`10:11 a.m.
`
`Court questions Mr. Culbertson; Mr. Culbertson responds
`
`10:14 a.m.
`
`Court questions Mr. Culbertson; Mr. Culbertson responds
`
`10:17 a.m. Mr. Fowler replies
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 539 Filed 10/08/20 Page 2 of 5 PageID #: 28233
`
`10:19 a.m. Mr. Culbertson responds
`
`10:21 a.m. Mr. Saqib Siddiqui argues plaintiff’s Motion for No Invalidity because
`Cyberguide Alleged Prior Art (dkt. #382)
`
`10:28 a.m.
`
`Court questions Mr. Siddiqui; Mr. Siddiqui responds
`
`10:34 a.m. Mr. Paul Steadman responds to argument
`
`10:40 a.m. Mr. Siddiqui replies
`
`10:41 a.m. Mr. Steadman responds
`
`10:42 a.m. Mr. Fowler argues defendant’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment/Enhanced
`Damages (dkt. #368)
`
`10:58 a.m.
`
`Court questions Mr. Fowler; Mr. Fowler responds
`
`11:05 a.m. Mr. Kfir Levy responds to argument
`
`11:20 a.m. Mr. Fowler replies
`
`11:25 a.m. Mr. Levy responds
`
`11:28 a.m. Mr. Siddiqui argues plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of No
`Invalidity in View of the Garmin Nav Talk Alleged Prior Art (dkt. #383)
`
`11:40 a.m. Mr. Steadman responds to argument
`
`11:45 a.m. Mr. Siddiqui replies
`
`11:48 a.m. Mr. Michael Jay argues defendant’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of
`Non-Infringement (dkt. #372)
`
`12:03 p.m.
`
`Court questions Mr. Jay; Mr. Jay responds
`
`12:05 p.m. Mr. Bryan Nese responds to argument
`
`12:19 p.m. Mr. Jay replies
`
`12:23 p.m. Mr. Nese responds
`
`12:24 p.m.
`
`Court questions Mr. Nese; Mr. Nese responds
`
`12:26 p.m.
`
`Recess
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 539 Filed 10/08/20 Page 3 of 5 PageID #: 28234
`
`1:29 p.m.
`
`Mr. Nese argues plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of No
`Invalidity (dkt. #370)
`
`1:41 p.m.
`
`Mr. Brent Yamashita responds to argument
`
`1:47 p.m.
`
`Mr. Nese replies
`
`1:48 p.m.
`
`Mr. Yamashita responds
`
`1:50 p.m.
`
`Mr. Sean Cunningham argues defendant’s Motion to Exclude the Testimony of
`Robert L. Stoll (dkt. #357)
`
`2:05 p.m.
`
`Mr. Nese responds to argument
`
`2:08 p.m.
`
`Court questions Mr. Nese; Mr. Nese responds
`
`2:14 p.m.
`
`Mr. Cunningham replies
`
`2:16 p.m.
`
`Mr. Nese responds
`
`2:18 p.m.
`
`Mr. Levy argues plaintiff’s Motion to Strike Mr. Gunderson’s Use of Offers Made
`in Licensing Negotiations and Exclude Testimony (dkt. #361)
`
`2:29 p.m.
`
`Mr. Cunningham responds to argument
`
`2:35 p.m.
`
`Mr. Levy responds
`
`2:37 p.m.
`
`COURTROOM SEALED
`
`2:39 p.m.
`
`Mr. Gil Gillam argues defendant’s Daubert Motion to Exclude Opinions and
`Testimony of Plaintiff’s Damages Expert Ms. Carla Mulhern (dkt. #362)
`
`2:52 p.m.
`
`Mr. Levy responds to argument
`
`3:10 p.m.
`
`Mr. Gillam replies
`
`3:18 p.m.
`
`Mr. Levy responds
`
`3:23 p.m.
`
`Mr. Gillam replies
`
`3:25 p.m.
`
`Mr. Levy responds
`
`3:26 p.m.
`
`Recess
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 539 Filed 10/08/20 Page 4 of 5 PageID #: 28235
`
`3:40 p.m.
`
`COURTROOM UNSEALED
`
`3:41 p.m.
`
`3:42 p.m.
`
`Mr. Siddiqui and Mr. Fowler advise the Court which motions the parties will
`submit on the briefing
`
`Mr. Siddiqui argues plaintiff’s Motion to Strike Portion’s of Defendant Apple
`Inc.’s Rebuttal Expert Reports Based on Untimely Claim Construction Positions
`(dkt. #369)
`
`3:59 p.m.
`
`Mr. Jay responds to argument
`
`4:05 p.m.
`
`Court questions Mr. Jay; Mr. Jay responds
`
`4:09 p.m.
`
`Mr. Siddiqui replies
`
`4:12 p.m.
`
`Mr. Jay argues defendant’s Daubert Motion to Exclude Testimony and Opinions
`of Maxell’s Experts for Improper Application of the Court’s Claim Construction
`(dkt. #358)
`
`4:19 p.m.
`
`Mr. Siddiqui responds to argument
`
`4:28 p.m.
`
`Mr. William Barrow argues plaintiff’s Motion to Strike Portions of Defendant
`Apple Inc.’s Rebuttal Expert Report of Dr. Menasce Regarding Non-Infringement
`(dkt. #364)
`
`4:39 p.m.
`
`Mr. Aaron Fountain responds to argument
`
`4:41 p.m.
`
`Court questions Mr. Fountain; Mr. Fountain responds
`
`4:55 p.m.
`
`Mr. Barrow replies
`
`4:59 p.m.
`
`Mr. Fountain responds
`
`5:01 p.m.
`
`Mr. Christian Chessman argues defendant’s Motion for Partial Summary
`Judgment of Subject Matter Ineligibility Under 35 U.S.C. § 101 (dkt. #359)
`
`5:10 p.m.
`
`Court questions Mr. Chessman; Mr. Chessman responds
`
`5:25 p.m.
`
`Court questions Mr. Chessman; Mr. Chessman responds
`
`5:27 p.m.
`
`Mr. Siddiqui responds to argument
`
`5:35 p.m.
`
`Court questions Mr. Siddiqui; Mr. Siddiqui responds
`
`5:3 p.m.
`
`Mr. Chessman replies
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 539 Filed 10/08/20 Page 5 of 5 PageID #: 28236
`
`5:39 p.m.
`
`Mr. Siddiqui responds
`
`5:40 p.m.
`
`Mr. Yamashita argues defendant’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of
`Subject Matter Ineligibility Under 35 U.S.C. § 101 (dkt. 360)
`
`5:43 p.m.
`
`Mr. Barrow responds to argument
`
`5:48 p.m.
`
`Mr. Yamashita replies
`
`5:49 p.m.
`
`
`Recess
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket