Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 53-2 Filed 08/02/19 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 870
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`TEXARKANA DIVISION
`
`MAXELL, LTD.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`vs.
`
`APPLE INC.,
`
` Civil Action No. 5:19-cv-00036-RWS
`
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`DECLARATION OF LUANN SIMMONS IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT
`APPLE INC.’S MOTION TO TRANSFER VENUE UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a)
`
`I, Luann L. Simmons, hereby declare as follows:
`
`1.
`
`I am an attorney at the law firm of O’Melveny & Myers LLP, counsel for Defendant
`
`Apple, Inc. (“Apple”) in this matter filed by Plaintiff Maxell, Ltd. (“Maxell”). I have personal
`
`knowledge of the facts stated herein and if called to testify could and would competently testify
`
`thereto.
`
`2.
`
`Attached as Exhibit A is an excerpt of a true and correct copy of the United States
`
`Securities and Exchange Commission’s Form 10-K for Intel Corporation for the fiscal year ending
`
`December 29, 2018.
`
`3.
`
`Attached as Exhibit B is an excerpt of a true and correct copy of the United States
`
`Securities and Exchange Commission’s Form 10-K for QUALCOMM Incorporated for the fiscal
`
`year ending on September 30, 2018.
`
`4.
`
`Attached as Exhibit C are true and correct copies of the United States Patent and
`
`Trademark Office’s assignment abstract records for U.S. Patent Nos. 6,748,317, 6,580,999,
`
`1
`
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`TEXARKANA DIVISION
`
`MAXELL, LTD.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`vs.
`
`APPLE INC.,
`
` Civil Action No. 5:19-cv-00036-RWS
`
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`DECLARATION OF LUANN SIMMONS IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT
`APPLE INC.’S MOTION TO TRANSFER VENUE UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a)
`
`I, Luann L. Simmons, hereby declare as follows:
`
`1.
`
`I am an attorney at the law firm of O’Melveny & Myers LLP, counsel for Defendant
`
`Apple, Inc. (“Apple”) in this matter filed by Plaintiff Maxell, Ltd. (“Maxell”). I have personal
`
`knowledge of the facts stated herein and if called to testify could and would competently testify
`
`thereto.
`
`2.
`
`Attached as Exhibit A is an excerpt of a true and correct copy of the United States
`
`Securities and Exchange Commission’s Form 10-K for Intel Corporation for the fiscal year ending
`
`December 29, 2018.
`
`3.
`
`Attached as Exhibit B is an excerpt of a true and correct copy of the United States
`
`Securities and Exchange Commission’s Form 10-K for QUALCOMM Incorporated for the fiscal
`
`year ending on September 30, 2018.
`
`4.
`
`Attached as Exhibit C are true and correct copies of the United States Patent and
`
`Trademark Office’s assignment abstract records for U.S. Patent Nos. 6,748,317, 6,580,999,
`
`1
`
`
`
`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 53-2 Filed 08/02/19 Page 2 of 4 PageID #: 871
`
`
`8,339,493, 7,116,438, 6,408,193, 6,928,306, 6,329,794, 10,212,586, and 6,430,498, printed from
`
`the website of the United States Patent and Trademark Office on July 11, 2019.
`
`5.
`
`Attached as Exhibit D is an excerpt of a true and correct copy of the trial transcript
`
`from Maxell, Ltd. v. ZTE USA, Inc., No. 5:16-cv-00179-RWS (E.D. Tex.), dated June 28, 2018.
`
`6.
`
`Attached as Exhibit E is a true and correct copy of the public records of all
`
`businesses associated with 511 N Washington Ave., Marshall, TX 75670, printed from
`
`clustrmaps.com on July 8, 2019.
`
`7.
`
`Attached as Exhibit F is a true and correct copy of the public records of all
`
`businesses associated with 3 Garret Mountain Plaza, Woodland Park, NJ 07424, printed from
`
`clustrmaps.com on July 9, 2019.
`
`8.
`
`Attached as Exhibit G is a true and correct copy of the Confidentiality Agreement
`
`[SLL1]between Apple Inc. and Maxell Corporation of America, dated and signed by Maxell
`
`Corporation of America on November 21, 2013.
`
`9.
`
`Attached as Exhibit H is a compilation of Google Maps printouts showing the
`
`distances from Apple’s headquarters to the Northern District of California’s Courthouse in San
`
`Francisco, CA, to the Northern District of California’s Courthouse in Oakland, CA, to the Northern
`
`District of California’s Courthouse in San Jose, CA, and to the Eastern District of Texas’s
`
`Courthouse in Texarkana, TX, printed from Google Maps on July 9, 2019.
`
`10.
`
`Attached as Exhibit I is a compilation of Google Maps printouts showing the
`
`distances from Intel’s headquarters to the Northern District of California’s Courthouse in San
`
`Francisco, CA, to the Northern District of California’s Courthouse in Oakland, CA, to the Northern
`
`District of California’s Courthouse in San Jose, CA, and to the Eastern District of Texas’s
`
`Courthouse in Texarkana, TX, printed from Google Maps on July 9, 2019.
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 53-2 Filed 08/02/19 Page 3 of 4 PageID #: 872
`
`
`11.
`
`Attached as Exhibit J is a compilation of Google Maps printouts showing the
`
`distances from San Jose, CA, Santa Clara, CA, and San Francisco, CA, amongst which Qualcomm
`
`has seven offices, to the Northern District of California’s Courthouse in San Francisco, CA, to the
`
`Northern District of California’s Courthouse in Oakland, CA, to the Northern District of
`
`California’s Courthouse in San Jose, CA, and to the Eastern District of Texas’s Courthouse in
`
`Texarkana, TX, printed from Google Maps on July 9, 2019.
`
`12.
`
`Attached as Exhibit K is a compilation of Google Maps printouts showing the
`
`distances from the locations of the named inventors (i.e., Chigasaki, JP; Fujisawa, JP; Hiratsuka,
`
`JP; Hitachinaka, JP; Iwaki, JP; Kawasaki, JP; Kodaira, JP; Sagamihara, JP; Tokyo, JP; Yamato,
`
`JP; Yokohama, JP) shown on the face of the patents-in-suit to Tokyo, JP, printed from Google
`
`Maps on July 11, 2019.
`
`13.
`
`Attached as Exhibit L is a true and correct copy of a list of non-stop flights from
`
`the Tokyo region (Narita International Airport or Haneda Airport) to the San Francisco Bay Area
`
`(San Francisco International Airport or San Jose International Airport), printed from Matrix
`
`Airfare Search on July 11, 2019.
`
`14.
`
`Attached as Exhibit M is a true and correct copy of a list of flights from the Tokyo
`
`region (Narita International Airport or Haneda Airport) to the Texarkana Regional Airport sorted
`
`by duration, printed from Matrix Airfare Search on July 9, 2019.
`
`15.
`
`Attached as Exhibit N is a true and correct copy of the Cover Pleading of Plaintiff
`
`Maxell, Ltd.’s Patent Rule 3-1 and 3-2 Disclosure of Asserted Claims and Infringement
`
`Contentions Against Defendant Apple Inc., served in this case on June 12, 2019.
`
`16.
`
`Attached as Exhibit O is a true and correct copy of Maxell, Ltd.’s Initial and
`
`Additional Disclosures, served in this case on July 10, 2019.
`
`3
`
`
`
`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 53-2 Filed 08/02/19 Page 4 of 4 PageID #: 873
`
`
`17.
`
`Attached as Exhibit P is a true and correct copy of Apple Inc.’s Initial and
`
`Additional Disclosures, served in this case on July 10, 2019.
`
`18.
`
`Attached as Exhibit Q is an excerpt of a true and correct copy of the deposition
`
`transcript of Maxell employee Kenji Nakamura dated December 15, 2017, as produced by Maxell
`
`in this case and bearing bates numbers MAXELL_APPLE0095914-915 and -938.
`
`I declare under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
`
`
`
`Executed in San Francisco, California, on this 31st day of July, 2019.
`
`
`
`/s/ Luann L. Simmons
`
`Luann L. Simmons
`
`
`
`4
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
