throbber
Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 53-16 Filed 08/02/19 Page 1 of 27 PageID #: 1019
`Case 5:19-cv-00036—RWS Document 53-16 Filed 08/02/19 Page 1 of 27 PageID #: 1019
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT O
`
`EXHIBIT 0
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 53-16 Filed 08/02/19 Page 2 of 27 PageID #: 1020
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`TEXARKANA DIVISION
`
`
`MAXELL, LTD.,
`
`v.
`
`APPLE INC.,
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`Defendant.
`
`Civil Action No. 5:19-cv-00036
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`MAXELL, LTD.’S
`INITIAL AND ADDITIONAL DISCLOSURES
`
`Pursuant to the Docket Control Order (Dkt. No. 46), and in accordance with Fed. R. Civ.
`
`P. 26(a)(1) and Paragraphs 1 and 3 of the Discovery Order (Dkt. No. 42), Plaintiff Maxell, Ltd.
`
`(“Maxell”), through its undersigned counsel, provides the following initial and additional
`
`disclosures to Defendant Apple Inc. (“Apple” or “Defendant”).
`
`THE PARTIES
`
`These mandatory disclosures are based upon Maxell’s current knowledge and upon
`
`information that is reasonably available to Maxell at this time and within Maxell’s possession,
`
`custody, or control as of the present date. These disclosures represent a good faith effort to
`
`identify information Maxell reasonably believes is relevant to the claims and defenses in this
`
`case. Maxell has not completed its investigation, discovery, and evaluation of the facts and
`
`evidence that may ultimately be relevant to this case and reserves the right to supplement,
`
`amend, modify, or alter these disclosures consistent with Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(e) as new
`
`information becomes available.
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 53-16 Filed 08/02/19 Page 3 of 27 PageID #: 1021
`
`By making these disclosures, Maxell does not represent that every individual or entity
`
`identified herein necessarily possesses information that Maxell will use to support its claims and
`
`defenses, or that the individual or entity possesses relevant information. Nor does Maxell
`
`represent that it is identifying every document, tangible thing, or witness that it may use to
`
`support its claims and defenses.
`
`Nothing herein should be construed as an admission or acceptance by Maxell as to the
`
`admissibility or relevance of any document or fact referenced in these disclosures. These
`
`disclosures are further made without waiving in any way: (i) the right to object on the grounds
`
`of competency, privilege, the work product doctrine, relevancy, materiality, hearsay, undue
`
`burden, or any other proper ground, to the use of any such information for any purpose, in whole
`
`or in part, in this action or any other action or proceeding; and (ii) the right to object on any
`
`grounds, at any time, to any other discovery request or proceeding involving or relating to the
`
`subject matter of these disclosures. Maxell does not waive its right to assert any other objection
`
`authorized by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Local Rules of the Court, or any other
`
`applicable law or rule in response to interrogatories, requests for admissions, questions at
`
`depositions, or any other discovery requests involving or relating to the subject matter of these
`
`disclosures.
`
`Maxell reserves the right to continue its investigation and discovery of facts, witnesses,
`
`and documents, which may reveal additional information about the issues in this lawsuit. Maxell
`
`reserves the right at the time of trial to produce, refer to, and offer into evidence any additional
`
`documents, facts, and evidence from any source, and testimony from any witness that may be
`
`ascertained through their continuing discovery and trial preparation, notwithstanding the
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 53-16 Filed 08/02/19 Page 4 of 27 PageID #: 1022
`
`reference to witnesses, documents and information in these initial disclosures. All the
`
`disclosures set forth below are made subject to the above objections and qualifications.
`
`Maxell’s Disclosures
`
`I.
`
`Paragraph 1(a): “the correct names of the parties to this action;”
`
`The correct name of the Plaintiff is Maxell, Ltd. To the best of Maxell’s knowledge, the
`
`correct name of the Defendant in this case is Apple Inc.
`
`II.
`
`Paragraph 1(b): “the name, address, and telephone number of any potential parties;”
`
`
`
`III.
`
`Maxell is not currently aware of any other potential parties to the lawsuit.
`
`Paragraph 1(c): “the legal theories and, in general, the factual bases of the disclosing
`party’s claims or defenses (the disclosing party need not marshal all evidence that may be
`offered at trial);”
`
`
`
`The legal theories and the factual bases for Maxell’s claims are generally disclosed in
`
`Maxell’s Complaint for Patent Infringement, filed March 15, 2019 (Dkt. No. 1) and in Maxell’s
`
`P.R. 3-1 Disclosures, served June 12, 2019, which are all incorporated herein by reference.
`
`Maxell provides the following brief description of its legal theories and factual bases for its legal
`
`claims based upon information available to Maxell at this time. Full discovery has not yet begun,
`
`and Maxell expects to discover additional information that may be relevant to its legal theories
`
`and claims. Maxell, therefore, reserves the right to supplement, amend and/or correct the
`
`following disclosures as necessary to conform to the evidence obtained through discovery.
`
`Maxell’s infringement and damages claims will also be the subject of expert testimony, and
`
`Maxell will make the required expert disclosures according to the deadlines set forth in the
`
`Docket Control Order entered in this case. Those disclosures, when made, are also hereby
`
`incorporated by reference in their entirety.
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 53-16 Filed 08/02/19 Page 5 of 27 PageID #: 1023
`
`1.
`
`Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,748,317
`
`Maxell is the assignee of U.S. Patent No. 6,748,317 (“the ’317 Patent”). The ’317 Patent
`
`is duly issued, and the asserted claims of the ’317 Patent are valid and non-obvious. Maxell
`
`alleges that Apple makes, uses, imports, offers for sale, and/or sells Apple telecommunications
`
`technology that infringes upon the asserted claims of the ’317 Patent, and that Apple has induced
`
`others to infringe and contributed to the infringement by others of the asserted claims of the ’317
`
`Patent. Apple has been on notice of the ’317 Patent since at least June 25, 2013, and, at the latest,
`
`the service of Maxell’s Complaint in this case (Dkt. No. 1). Since at least June 25, 2013, Apple
`
`has also been aware of an objectively high likelihood that its actions constituted and continue to
`
`constitute infringement of the ’317 Patent, and that the ’317 Patent is valid. As such, Apple
`
`willfully infringes the ’317 Patent. Maxell is entitled to no less than a reasonable royalty for
`
`damages sustained due to Apple’s infringement of the ’317 Patent.
`
`Maxell further refers Apple to Maxell’s P.R. 3-1 disclosures.
`
`2.
`
`Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,580,999
`
`Maxell is the assignee of U.S. Patent No. 6,580,999 (“the ’999 Patent”). The ’999 Patent
`
`is duly issued, and the asserted claims of the ’999 Patent are valid and non-obvious. Maxell
`
`alleges that Apple makes, uses, imports, offers for sale, and/or sells Apple telecommunications
`
`technology that infringes upon the asserted claims of the ’999 Patent, and that Apple has induced
`
`others to infringe and contributed to the infringement by others of the asserted claims of the ’999
`
`Patent. Apple has been on notice of the ’999 Patent since, at the least, June 25, 2013, and, at the
`
`latest, the service of Maxell’s Complaint in this case (Dkt. No. 1). Since at least June 25, 2013,
`
`Apple has also been aware of an objectively high likelihood that its actions constituted and
`
`continue to constitute infringement of the ’999 Patent, and that the ’999 Patent is valid. As such,
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 53-16 Filed 08/02/19 Page 6 of 27 PageID #: 1024
`
`Apple willfully infringes the ’999 Patent. Maxell is entitled to no less than a reasonable royalty
`
`for damages sustained due to Apple’s infringement of the ’999 Patent.
`
`Maxell further refers Apple to Maxell’s P.R. 3-1 disclosures.
`
`3.
`
`Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 8,339,493
`
`
`
`Maxell is the assignee of U.S. Patent No. 8,339,493 (“the ’493 Patent”). The ’493 Patent
`
`is duly issued, and the asserted claims of the ’493 Patent are valid and non-obvious. Maxell
`
`alleges that Apple makes, uses, imports, offers for sale, and/or sells Apple telecommunications
`
`technology that infringes upon the asserted claims of the ’493 Patent, and that Apple has induced
`
`others to infringe and contributed to the infringement by others of the asserted claims of the ’493
`
`Patent. Apple has been on notice of the ’493 Patent since at least, June 25, 2013, and, at the
`
`latest, the service of Maxell’s Complaint in this case (Dkt. No. 1). Since at least June 25, 2013,
`
`Apple has also been aware of an objectively high likelihood that its actions constituted and
`
`continue to constitute infringement of the ’493 Patent, and that the ’493 Patent is valid. As such,
`
`Apple willfully infringes the ’493 Patent. Maxell is entitled to no less than a reasonable royalty
`
`for damages sustained due to Apple’s infringement of the ’493 Patent.
`
`Maxell further refers Apple to Maxell’s P.R. 3-1 disclosures.
`
`4.
`
`Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,116,438
`
`
`
`Maxell is the assignee of U.S. Patent No. 7,116,438 (“the ’438 Patent”). The ’438 Patent
`
`is duly issued, and the asserted claims of the ’438 Patent are valid and non-obvious. Maxell
`
`alleges that Apple makes, uses, imports, offers for sale, and/or sells Apple telecommunications
`
`technology that infringes upon the asserted claims of the ’438 Patent, and that Apple has induced
`
`others to infringe and contributed to the infringement by others of the asserted claims of the ’438
`
`Patent. Apple has been on notice of the ’438 Patent since at least, May 17, 2018, and, at the
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 53-16 Filed 08/02/19 Page 7 of 27 PageID #: 1025
`
`latest, the service of Maxell’s Complaint in this case (Dkt. No. 1). Since at least May 17, 2018,
`
`Apple has also been aware of an objectively high likelihood that its actions constituted and
`
`continue to constitute infringement of the ’438 Patent, and that the ’438 Patent is valid. As such,
`
`Apple willfully infringes the ’438 Patent. Maxell is entitled to no less than a reasonable royalty
`
`for damages sustained due to Apple’s infringement of the ’438 Patent.
`
`Maxell further refers Apple to Maxell’s P.R. 3-1 disclosures.
`
`5.
`
`Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,408,193
`
`
`
`Maxell is the assignee of U.S. Patent No. 6,408,193 (“the ’193 Patent”). The ’193 Patent
`
`is duly issued, and the asserted claims of the ’193 Patent are valid and non-obvious. Maxell
`
`alleges that Apple makes, uses, imports, offers for sale, and/or sells Apple telecommunications
`
`technology that infringes upon the asserted claims of the ’193 Patent, and that Apple has induced
`
`others to infringe and contributed to the infringement by others of the asserted claims of the ’193
`
`Patent. Apple has been on notice of the ’193 Patent since at least, May 17, 2018, and, at the
`
`latest, the service of Maxell’s Complaint in this case (Dkt. No. 1). Since at least May 17, 2018,
`
`Apple has also been aware of an objectively high likelihood that its actions constituted and
`
`continue to constitute infringement of the ’193 Patent, and that the ’193 Patent is valid. As such,
`
`Apple willfully infringes the ’193 Patent. Maxell is entitled to no less than a reasonable royalty
`
`for damages sustained due to Apple’s infringement of the ’193 Patent.
`
`
`
`
`
`Maxell further refers Apple to Maxell’s P.R. 3-1 disclosures.
`
`6.
`
`Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 10,084,991
`
`Maxell is the assignee of U.S. Patent No. 10,084,991 (“the ’991 Patent”). The ’991 Patent
`
`is duly issued, and the asserted claims of the ’991 Patent are valid and non-obvious. Maxell
`
`alleges that Apple makes, uses, imports, offers for sale, and/or sells Apple telecommunications
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 53-16 Filed 08/02/19 Page 8 of 27 PageID #: 1026
`
`technology that infringes upon the asserted claims of the ’991 Patent, and that Apple has induced
`
`others to infringe and contributed to the infringement by others of the asserted claims of the ’991
`
`Patent. Apple has been on notice of the ’991 Patent since at least, October 9, 2018, and, at the
`
`latest, the service of Maxell’s Complaint in this case (Dkt. No. 1). Since at least October 9, 2018,
`
`Apple has also been aware of an objectively high likelihood that its actions constituted and
`
`continue to constitute infringement of the ’991 Patent, and that the ’991 Patent is valid. As such,
`
`Apple willfully infringes the ’991 Patent. Maxell is entitled to no less than a reasonable royalty
`
`for damages sustained due to Apple’s infringement of the ’991 Patent.
`
`Maxell further refers Apple to Maxell’s P.R. 3-1 disclosures.
`
`7.
`
`Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,928,306
`
`
`
`Maxell is the assignee of U.S. Patent No. 6,928,306 (“the ’306 Patent”). The ’306 Patent
`
`is duly issued, and the asserted claims of the ’306 Patent are valid and non-obvious. Maxell
`
`alleges that Apple makes, uses, imports, offers for sale, and/or sells Apple telecommunications
`
`technology that infringes upon the asserted claims of the ’306 Patent, and that Apple has induced
`
`others to infringe and contributed to the infringement by others of the asserted claims of the ’306
`
`Patent. Apple has been on notice of the ’306 Patent since, at the least, May 17, 2018, and, at the
`
`latest, the service of Maxell’s Complaint in this case (Dkt. No. 1). Since at least May 17, 2018,
`
`Apple has also been aware of an objectively high likelihood that its actions constituted and
`
`continue to constitute infringement of the ’306 Patent, and that the ’306 Patent is valid. As such,
`
`Apple willfully infringes the ’306 Patent. Maxell is entitled to no less than a reasonable royalty
`
`for damages sustained due to Apple’s infringement of the ’306 Patent.
`
`Maxell further refers Apple to Maxell’s P.R. 3-1 disclosures.
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 53-16 Filed 08/02/19 Page 9 of 27 PageID #: 1027
`
`8.
`
`Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,329,794
`
`
`
`Maxell is the assignee of U.S. Patent No. 6,329,794 (“the ’794 Patent”). The ’794 Patent
`
`is duly issued, and the asserted claims of the ’794 Patent are valid and non-obvious. Maxell
`
`alleges that Apple makes, uses, imports, offers for sale, and/or sells Apple telecommunications
`
`technology that infringes upon the asserted claims of the ’794 Patent, and that Apple has induced
`
`others to infringe and contributed to the infringement by others of the asserted claims of the ’794
`
`Patent. Apple has been on notice of the ’794 Patent since at least May 17, 2018, and, at the latest,
`
`the service of Maxell’s Complaint in this case (Dkt. No. 1). Since at least May 17, 2018, Apple
`
`has also been aware of an objectively high likelihood that its actions constituted and continue to
`
`constitute infringement of the ’794 Patent, and that the ’794 Patent is valid. As such, Apple
`
`willfully infringes the ’794 Patent. Maxell is entitled to no less than a reasonable royalty for
`
`damages sustained due to Apple’s infringement of the ’794 Patent.
`
`Maxell further refers Apple to Maxell’s P.R. 3-1 disclosures.
`
`9.
`
`Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 10,212,586
`
`
`
`Maxell is the assignee of U.S. Patent No. 10,212,586 (“the ’586 Patent”). The ’586 Patent
`
`is duly issued, and the asserted claims of the ’586 Patent are valid and non-obvious. Maxell
`
`alleges that Apple makes, uses, imports, offers for sale, and/or sells Apple telecommunications
`
`technology that infringes upon the asserted claims of the ’586 Patent, and that Apple has induced
`
`others to infringe and contributed to the infringement by others of the asserted claims of the ’586
`
`Patent. Apple has been on notice of the ’586 Patent since at least October 9, 2018, and, at the
`
`latest, the service of Maxell’s Complaint in this case (Dkt. No. 1). Specifically, at least as early
`
`as October 9, 2018, Maxell placed Apple on notice of the ’586 Patent application, and of the fact
`
`that the claims of the application had already been allowed by the PTO. Since at least October 9,
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 53-16 Filed 08/02/19 Page 10 of 27 PageID #: 1028
`
`2018, Apple has also been aware of an objectively high likelihood that its actions would
`
`constitute infringement of the ’586 Patent upon its issuance, and, since at least February 19,
`
`2019, Apple has also been aware that the ’586 Patent is valid. As such, Apple willfully infringes
`
`the ’586 Patent. Maxell is entitled to no less than a reasonable royalty for damages sustained due
`
`to Apple’s infringement of the ’586 Patent.
`
`Maxell further refers Apple to Maxell’s P.R. 3-1 disclosures.
`
`10.
`
`Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,430,498
`
`
`
`Maxell is the assignee of U.S. Patent No. 6,430,498 (“the ’498 Patent”). The ’498 Patent
`
`is duly issued, and the asserted claims of the ’498 Patent are valid and non-obvious. Maxell
`
`alleges that Apple makes, uses, imports, offers for sale, and/or sells Apple telecommunications
`
`technology that infringes upon the asserted claims of the ’498 Patent, and that Apple has induced
`
`others to infringe and contributed to the infringement by others of the asserted claims of the ’498
`
`Patent. Apple has been on notice of the ’498 Patent since at least June 25, 2013, and, at the
`
`latest, the service of Maxell’s Complaint in this case (Dkt. No. 1). Since at least June 25, 2013,
`
`Apple has also been aware of an objectively high likelihood that its actions constituted and
`
`continue to constitute infringement of the ’498 Patent, and that the ’498 Patent is valid. As such,
`
`Apple willfully infringes the ’498 Patent. Maxell is entitled to no less than a reasonable royalty
`
`for damages sustained due to Apple’s infringement of the ’498 Patent.
`
`Maxell further refers Apple to Maxell’s P.R. 3-1 disclosures.
`
`IV.
`
`Paragraph 1(d): “the name, address, and telephone number of persons having
`knowledge of relevant facts, a brief statement of each identified person’s connection with
`the case, and a brief, fair summary of the substance of the information known by such
`person”
`
`Maxell identifies the following individuals, corporations, or business entities as
`
`potentially having knowledge of relevant facts:
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 53-16 Filed 08/02/19 Page 11 of 27 PageID #: 1029
`
`Name
`
`Kishiko
`Maruyama
`
`Address and Telephone
`Number
`Contact through
`undersigned counsel.
`
`Shigeru
`Shimada
`
`Contact through
`undersigned counsel.
`
`Toshiichirou
`Sasaki
`
`Contact through
`undersigned counsel.
`
`Connection to
`the Case
`Named inventor
`of the ’317,
`’999, and ’498
`Patents
`
`Named inventor
`of the ’317,
`’999, and ’498
`Patents
`
`Named inventor
`of the ’317,
`’999, and ’498
`Patents
`
`Summary of Information
`
`Conception and reduction to
`practice of the ’317, ’999,
`and ’498 Patents
`
`Conception and reduction to
`practice of the ’317, ’999,
`and ’498 Patents
`
`Conception and reduction to
`practice of the ’317, ’999,
`and ’498 Patents
`
`Takahiro
`Nakano
`
`Contact through
`undersigned counsel.
`
`Named inventor
`of the ’493
`Patent
`
`Conception and reduction to
`practice of the ’493 Patent
`
`Ryuji
`Nishimura
`
`Contact through
`undersigned counsel.
`
`Named inventor
`of the ’493
`Patent
`
`Conception and reduction to
`practice of the ’493 Patent
`
`Toshiro
`Kinugasa
`
`Contact through
`undersigned counsel.
`
`Named inventor
`of the ’493
`Patent
`
`Conception and reduction to
`practice of the ’493 Patent
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 53-16 Filed 08/02/19 Page 12 of 27 PageID #: 1030
`
`Name
`
`Jun Maeoka
`
`Address and Telephone
`Number
`Contact through
`undersigned counsel.
`
`Connection to
`the Case
`Named inventor
`of the ’438
`Patent
`
`Summary of Information
`
`Conception and reduction to
`practice of the ’438 Patent
`
`Yoshiaki
`Morimoto
`
`Contact through
`undersigned counsel.
`
`Named inventor
`of the ’438
`Patent
`
`Conception and reduction to
`practice of the ’438 Patent
`
`Motoaki
`Satoyama
`
`Contact through
`undersigned counsel.
`
`Named inventor
`of the ’438
`Patent
`
`Conception and reduction to
`practice of the ’438 Patent
`
`Koji Doi
`
`Contact through
`undersigned counsel.
`
`Named inventor
`of the ’438
`Patent
`
`Conception and reduction to
`practice of the ’438 Patent
`
`Shinya Iguchi
`
`Contact through
`undersigned counsel.
`
`Named inventor
`of the ’438
`Patent
`
`Conception and reduction to
`practice of the ’438 Patent
`
`Makoto
`Katagishi
`
`Contact through
`undersigned counsel.
`
`Named inventor
`of the ’193
`Patent
`
`Conception and reduction to
`practice of the ’193 Patent
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 53-16 Filed 08/02/19 Page 13 of 27 PageID #: 1031
`
`Name
`
`Address and Telephone
`Number
`Shirou Machida Contact through
`undersigned counsel.
`
`Connection to
`the Case
`Named inventor
`of the ’193
`Patent
`
`Summary of Information
`
`Conception and reduction to
`practice of the ’193 Patent
`
`Kazunori
`Iwabuchi
`
`Contact through
`undersigned counsel.
`
`Named inventor
`of the ’991
`Patent
`
`Conception and reduction to
`practice of the ’991 Patent
`
`Hiroki Mizosoe Contact through
`undersigned counsel.
`
`Named inventor
`of the ’991
`Patent
`
`Conception and reduction to
`practice of the ’991 Patent
`
`Mutsumi
`Shimoda
`
`Contact through
`undersigned counsel.
`
`Named inventor
`of the ’991
`Patent
`
`Conception and reduction to
`practice of the ’991 Patent
`
`Setiawan
`Bondan
`
`Contact through
`undersigned counsel.
`
`Named inventor
`of the ’991
`Patent
`
`Conception and reduction to
`practice of the ’991 Patent
`
`Manabu
`Sasamoto
`
`Contact through
`undersigned counsel.
`
`Named inventor
`of the ’991
`Patent
`
`Conception and reduction to
`practice of the ’991 Patent
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 53-16 Filed 08/02/19 Page 14 of 27 PageID #: 1032
`
`Name
`
`Masayuki
`Matsuda
`
`Address and Telephone
`Number
`Contact through
`undersigned counsel.
`
`Connection to
`the Case
`Named inventor
`of the ’306
`Patent
`
`Summary of Information
`
`Conception and reduction to
`practice of the ’306 Patent
`
`Tomohiro Esaki Contact through
`undersigned counsel.
`
`Named inventor
`of the ’306
`Patent
`
`Conception and reduction to
`practice of the ’306 Patent
`
`Kazuyuki
`Takizawa
`
`Contact through
`undersigned counsel.
`
`Named inventor
`of the ’306
`Patent
`
`Conception and reduction to
`practice of the ’306 Patent
`
`Akio
`Shinagawa
`
`Contact through
`undersigned counsel.
`
`Named inventor
`of the ’306
`Patent
`
`Conception and reduction to
`practice of the ’306 Patent
`
`Chikako
`Takada
`
`Contact through
`undersigned counsel.
`
`Named inventor
`of the ’306
`Patent
`
`Conception and reduction to
`practice of the ’306 Patent
`
`Shigeto Oeda
`
`Contact through
`undersigned counsel.
`
`Named inventor
`of the ’794
`Patent
`
`Conception and reduction to
`practice of the ’794 Patent
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 53-16 Filed 08/02/19 Page 15 of 27 PageID #: 1033
`
`Name
`
`Naoki Mori
`
`Address and Telephone
`Number
`Contact through
`undersigned counsel.
`
`Connection to
`the Case
`Named inventor
`of the ’794
`Patent
`
`Summary of Information
`
`Conception and reduction to
`practice of the ’794 Patent
`
`Hiromichi Ito
`
`Contact through
`undersigned counsel.
`
`Named inventor
`of the ’794
`Patent
`
`Conception and reduction to
`practice of the ’794 Patent
`
`Masayuki
`Hirabayashi
`
`Hideo
`Nishijima
`
`Antonelli,
`Terry, Stout &
`Kraus LLP
`
`Melvin Kraus
`
`Contact through
`undersigned counsel.
`
`Contact through
`undersigned counsel.
`
`Last known address:
`1300 N 17th Street
`Suite #1800
`Arlington, VA 22209
`(703) 312-6600
`Last known address:
`1300 N 17th Street
`#1800
`Arlington, VA 22209
`(703) 312-6600
`
`Named inventor
`of the ’586
`Patent
`Named inventor
`of the ’586
`Patent
`Prosecution
`counsel for the
`’493 and ’586
`Patents
`
`Prosecution
`counsel for the
`’493 Patent
`
`Conception and reduction to
`practice of the ’586 Patent
`
`Conception and reduction to
`practice of the ’586 Patent
`
`Prosecution history of the
`’493 and ’586 Patents
`
`Prosecution history of the
`’493 Patent
`
`Paul J.
`Skwierawski
`
`655 15th St. NW
`Washington, DC 20005
`(919) 238-4620
`
`Prosecution
`counsel for the
`’493 and ’586
`Patents
`
`Prosecution history of the
`’493 and ’586 Patents
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 53-16 Filed 08/02/19 Page 16 of 27 PageID #: 1034
`
`Name
`
`Mattingly &
`Malur, P.C. /
`Mattingly,
`Stanger &
`Malur, P.C. /
`Mattingly,
`Stanger, Malur
`& Brundidge,
`P.C.
`
`Daniel J.
`Stanger
`
`Address and Telephone
`Number
`1800 Diagonal Road
`Suite 210
`Alexandria, VA 22314
`(703) 684-1120
`
`Connection to
`the Case
`Prosecution
`counsel for the
`’317, ’999,
`’438, ’193,
`’991, and ’498
`Patents
`
`Summary of Information
`
`Prosecution history of the
`’317, ’999, ’438, ’193,
`’991, and ’498 Patents
`
`1925 Ballenger Avenue,
`Suite 560
`Alexandria, VA 22314
`(703) 684-1470
`
`Prosecution
`counsel for the
`’193 Patent
`
`Prosecution history of the
`’193 Patent
`
`Shrinath Malur
`
`1800 Diagonal Road
`Suite 210
`Alexandria, VA 22314
`(703) 684-1120
`
`Prosecution
`counsel for the
`’498 and ’438
`Patents
`
`Prosecution history of the
`’498 and ’438 Patents
`
`John R.
`Mattingly
`
`1800 Diagonal Road
`Suite 210
`Alexandria, VA 22314
`(703) 684-1120
`
`Prosecution
`counsel for the
`’317, ’999,
`’498, ’991, and
`’438 Patents
`
`Prosecution history of the
`’317, ’999, ’498, ’991, and
`’438 Patents
`
`Townsend and
`Townsend and
`Crew LLP /
`Kilpatrick
`Townsend &
`Stockton LLP
`
`Two Embarcadero
`Center, 8th Floor
`San Francisco, CA
`94111
`
`Prosecution
`counsel for the
`’306 Patent
`
`Prosecution history of the
`’306 Patent
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 53-16 Filed 08/02/19 Page 17 of 27 PageID #: 1035
`
`Name
`
`Robert C.
`Colwell
`
`Steve Y. Cho
`
`Neil D.
`Gershon
`
`McDermott
`Will & Emery
`
`Arthur J.
`Steiner
`
`Gene Z.
`Rubinson
`
`Address and Telephone
`Number
`Last known address:
`Two Embarcadero
`Center, 8th Floor, San
`Francisco, CA 94111
`6100 219th Street SW
`Suite 580
`Mountlake Terrace, WA
`98043
`(425) 348-3500
`
`1011 High Ridge Road
`Stamford, CT 06905
`(203) 329-0289
`
`500 N. Capitol Street
`NW
`Washington, DC 20001
`
`
`44 Canal Center Plaza
`Suite 305
`Alexandria, VA 22314
`(703) 519-9951
`
`Last known address:
`500 N. Capitol Street
`NW
`Washington, DC 20001
`(202) 756-8000
`
`Connection to
`the Case
`Prosecution
`counsel for the
`’306 Patent
`
`Prosecution
`counsel for the
`’306 Patent
`
`Prosecution
`counsel for the
`’306 Patent
`
`Prosecution
`counsel for the
`’794 Patent
`
`
`Prosecution
`counsel for the
`’794 Patent
`
`Summary of Information
`
`Prosecution history of the
`’306 Patent
`
`Prosecution history of the
`’306 Patent
`
`Prosecution history of the
`’306 Patent
`
`Prosecution history of the
`’794 Patent
`
`Prosecution history of the
`’794 Patent
`
`Prosecution
`counsel for the
`’794 Patent
`
`Prosecution history of the
`’794 Patent
`
`Michael E.
`Fogarty
`
`500 N. Capitol Street
`NW
`Washington, DC 20001
`(202) 756-8372
`
`Prosecution
`counsel for the
`’794 Patent
`
`Prosecution history of the
`’794 Patent
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 53-16 Filed 08/02/19 Page 18 of 27 PageID #: 1036
`
`Name
`
`Keith E. George
`
`Address and Telephone
`Number
`1090 Vermont Avenue
`NW,
`Suite 1200
`Washington, DC 20005
`(202) 808-7369
`
`Connection to
`the Case
`Prosecution
`counsel for the
`’794 Patent
`
`Summary of Information
`
`Prosecution history of the
`’794 Patent
`
`Baker Botts
`LLP
`
`Jonathan D.
`Cocks
`
`Henry Chen
`
`30 Rockefeller Plaza
`44th Floor
`New York, NY 10112-
`4498
`
`30 Rockefeller Plaza
`New York, New York
`10112-4498
`(212) 408-2500
`
`69 Charlton Street
`New York, NY 10014
`(646) 397-1251
`
`
`Prosecution
`counsel for the
`’586 Patent
`
`Prosecution
`counsel for the
`’586 Patent
`
`Prosecution history of the
`’586 Patent
`
`Prosecution history of the
`’586 Patent
`
`Prosecution
`counsel for the
`’586 Patent
`
`Prosecution history of the
`’586 Patent
`
`Tatsuya
`Yamamoto
`
`Contact through
`undersigned counsel.
`
`Employee of
`Maxell, Ltd.
`
`Koji Kaniwa
`
`Contact through
`undersigned counsel.
`
`Employee in
`the Optronics
`Division of
`Maxell, Ltd.
`
`Corporate information of
`Maxell, Ltd.; assignment
`and acquisition of the
`asserted patents; and
`Maxell research and
`development, products, and
`markets
`
`Corporate information of
`Maxell, Ltd.; assignment
`and acquisition of the
`asserted patents; and
`Maxell research and
`development, products, and
`markets
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 53-16 Filed 08/02/19 Page 19 of 27 PageID #: 1037
`
`Name
`
`Nobuyuki Kaji
`
`Address and Telephone
`Number
`Contact through
`undersigned counsel.
`
`Connection to
`the Case
`Employee of
`Maxell, Ltd.
`
`Kenji
`Nakamura
`
`Contact through
`undersigned counsel.
`
`Norio Kitagata
`
`Contact through
`undersigned counsel.
`
`Hitachi, Ltd.
`
`Satoshi Matsuo
`
`6-6 Marunouchi 1-
`chome, Chiyoda-ku,
`Tokyo, 100-8280 Japan
`+81-3-3258-1111
`Contact through
`undersigned counsel.
`
`Alan R.
`Loudermilk
`
`Contact through
`undersigned counsel.
`
`
`
`
`
`Summary of Information
`
`Corporate information of
`Maxell, Ltd.; assignment
`and acquisition of the
`asserted patents; and
`Maxell research and
`development, products, and
`markets
`
`Corporate information of
`Maxell, Ltd.; licensing of
`Maxell patents
`
`Corporate information of
`Maxell, Ltd.; assignment
`and acquisition of the
`Asserted Patents; and
`Maxell research and
`development, products, and
`markets
`
`Prior owner of the Asserted
`Patents.
`
`Employee in
`the IP
`Department of
`Maxell, Ltd.
`
`Employee in
`the Optronics
`Division of
`Maxell, Ltd.
`
`
`
`Employee of
`Hitachi, Ltd.
`
`Licensing of Maxell
`patents
`
`Licensing of Maxell
`patents
`
`Representative
`of Hitachi
`Maxell, Ltd. in
`licensing
`negotiations
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 53-16 Filed 08/02/19 Page 20 of 27 PageID #: 1038
`
`Name
`
`Heather Mewes
`
`Address and Telephone
`Number
`Principal Counsel, IP
`Transactions
`One Apple Park Way,
`Cupertino, CA 95014
`
`Connection to
`the Case
`Employee of
`Apple Inc.
`
`Summary of Information
`
`Licensing of Maxell
`patents
`
`Jayna Whitt
`
`One Apple Park Way,
`Cupertino, CA 95014
`
`Employee of
`Apple Inc.
`
`Licensing of Maxell
`patents
`
`Jeff Risher
`
`Faraday Future
`18455 S Figueroa St.
`Los Angeles, CA 90248
`
`Former
`employee of
`Apple Inc.
`
`Licensing of Maxell
`patents
`
`Maxell
`Corporation of
`America, Inc.
`
`Contact through
`undersigned counsel.
`
`
`
`Relationship between
`Maxell and Apple; prior
`negotiations between Maxell
`and Apple
`
`Intel
`Corporation
`
`2200 Mission College
`Blvd.
`Santa Clara, CA 95054-
`1549
`
`Component
`Supplier
`
`Skyworks
`Solutions, Inc.
`
`c/o Corporation Service
`Company
`84 State Street
`Boston, MA 02109
`
`Component
`Supplier
`
`Technical design and
`operation of implicated
`components, including
`without limitation modems,
`controllers, RF
`transceivers, and power
`management ICs
`
`Technical design and
`operation of implicated
`components, including
`without limitation GPS
`LNA, RF switches,
`amplifiers, power amplifier
`modules, and front-end
`modules
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 53-16 Filed 08/02/19 Page 21 of 27 PageID #: 1039
`
`Name
`
`Broadcom Inc.
`
`Address and Telephone
`Number
`1320 Ridder Park Drive
`San Jose, California
`95131
`
`Connection to
`the Case
`Component
`Supplier
`
`Dialog
`Semiconductor
`
`675 Campbell
`Technology Pkwy
`Suite 150
`Campbell, California
`95008
`
`Component
`Supplier
`
`Sony
`Corporation of
`America
`
`c/o Corporation Service
`Company
`80 State Street
`Albany, NY 12207
`
`Component
`Supplier
`
`Qorvo, Inc.
`
`7628 Thorndike Road
`Greensboro, NC 27409
`
`Component
`Supplier
`
`Qualcomm Inc.
`
`5775 Morehouse Dr.
`San Diego CA 92121
`
`Component
`Supplier
`
`Summary of Information
`
`Technical design and
`operation of implicated
`components, including
`without limitation front-
`end modules and power
`amplifier modules
`
`Technical design and
`operation of implicated
`components, including
`without limitation power
`management ICs
`
`Technical design and
`operation of implicated
`components, including
`without limitation image
`sensors
`
`Technical design and
`operation of implicated
`components, including
`without limitation front-
`end modules, power
`amplifiers, envelope
`trackers, and transmit
`modules
`
`Technical desig

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket