Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 53-1 Filed 08/02/19 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 861
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`TEXARKANA DIVISION
`
`MAXELL, LTD.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`vs.
`
`APPLE INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`
` Civil Action No. 5:19-cv-00036-RWS
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`DECLARATION OF MICHAEL JAYNES IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT APPLE
`INC.’S MOTION TO TRANSFER VENUE UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a)
`
`I, Michael Jaynes, hereby declare as follows:
`
`1.
`
`I am over 18 years of age and competent to make this declaration. If called to testify
`
`as a witness in this matter, I could and would testify truthfully to each of the statements in this
`
`declaration.
`
`2.
`
`I am employed as a
`
` at Apple Inc. (“Apple”) in Sunnyvale,
`
`California.
`
`
`
`3.
`
`I understand that Maxell, Ltd. (“Maxell”) filed the above captioned patent
`
`infringement lawsuit against Apple in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
`
`Texas (“EDTX”). I provide this declaration in support of Apple’s Motion to Transfer Venue Under
`
`28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) to the Northern District of California (“NDCA”). Unless otherwise indicated
`
`below, the statements in this declaration are based on my personal knowledge, my review of
`
`corporate records maintained by Apple in the ordinary course of business, and/or my discussions
`
`with Apple employees.
`
`1
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`TEXARKANA DIVISION
`
`MAXELL, LTD.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`vs.
`
`APPLE INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`
` Civil Action No. 5:19-cv-00036-RWS
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`DECLARATION OF MICHAEL JAYNES IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT APPLE
`INC.’S MOTION TO TRANSFER VENUE UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a)
`
`I, Michael Jaynes, hereby declare as follows:
`
`1.
`
`I am over 18 years of age and competent to make this declaration. If called to testify
`
`as a witness in this matter, I could and would testify truthfully to each of the statements in this
`
`declaration.
`
`2.
`
`I am employed as a
`
` at Apple Inc. (“Apple”) in Sunnyvale,
`
`California.
`
`
`
`3.
`
`I understand that Maxell, Ltd. (“Maxell”) filed the above captioned patent
`
`infringement lawsuit against Apple in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
`
`Texas (“EDTX”). I provide this declaration in support of Apple’s Motion to Transfer Venue Under
`
`28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) to the Northern District of California (“NDCA”). Unless otherwise indicated
`
`below, the statements in this declaration are based on my personal knowledge, my review of
`
`corporate records maintained by Apple in the ordinary course of business, and/or my discussions
`
`with Apple employees.
`
`1
`
`
`
`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 53-1 Filed 08/02/19 Page 2 of 9 PageID #: 862
`
`4.
`
`I have reviewed a copy of the Complaint filed in this lawsuit. I understand that
`
`Maxell accuses Apple of infringing ten patents: U.S. Patent Nos. 6,748,317 (the “’317 patent”);
`
`6,580,999 (the “’999 patent”); 8,339,493 (the “’493 patent”); 7,116,438 (the “’438 patent”);
`
`6,408,193 (the “’193 patent”); 10,084,991 (the “’991 patent”); 6,928,306 (the “’306 patent”);
`
`6,329,794 (the “’794 patent”); 10,212,586 (the “’586 patent”); and 6,430,498 (the “’498 patent”)
`
`(collectively, the “Asserted Patents”).
`
`5.
`
`I understand that Maxell’s Complaint identifies the following products as allegedly
`
`infringing one or more of the Asserted Patents: (a) iPhone XS, iPhone XS Max, iPhone XR,
`
`iPhone X, iPhone 8 Plus, iPhone 8, iPhone 7 Plus, iPhone 7, iPhone 6s Plus, iPhone 6s, iPhone 6
`
`Plus, iPhone 6, iPhone SE, iPhone 5s, and iPhone 5c; (b) iPad Pro (12.9-inch 3rd generation), iPad
`
`Pro (11-inch), iPad Pro (12.9-inch 2nd generation), iPad Pro (10.5-inch), iPad Pro (9.7-inch), iPad
`
`Pro (12.9-inch), iPad Air 2, iPad Air, iPad mini 4, iPad mini 3, iPad mini 2, iPad (6th generation),
`
`and iPad (5th generation) ; (c) MacBook, MacBook Pro, MacBook Air, iMac, Mac mini, Mac Pro,
`
`and iMac Pro; (d) iPod touch 5th and 6th generations; and (e) Apple Watch Series 1, 2, 3, and 4,
`
`and Apple Watch 1st generation (collectively, the “Accused Products”).
`
`6.
`
`Apple is a California corporation, founded in 1976. Apple’s global headquarters is
`
`in Cupertino, California.
`
`7.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 53-1 Filed 08/02/19 Page 3 of 9 PageID #: 863
`
`
`
`
`
`
`8.
`
`I understand from the Complaint that Maxell alleges that certain Accused Products
`
`infringe the ’498, ’999, and ’317 patents. Complaint ¶¶ 14-46, 148-162. Despite the vagueness
`
`of the allegations, for purposes of the motion to transfer, I understand Maxell’s allegations to
`
`accuse technology relating to walking navigation features in Apple Maps and Find My Friends as
`
`allegedly infringing the ’498, ’999, and ’317 patents (“Accused Navigation Technology”).
`
`9.
`
`I understand from the Complaint that Maxell alleges that certain Accused Products
`
`infringe the ’493 patent. Complaint ¶¶ 47-61. Despite the vagueness of the allegations, for
`
`purposes of the motion to transfer, I understand Maxell’s allegations to accuse technology relating
`
`to cameras with image sensors and/or image stabilization as allegedly infringing the ’493 patent
`
`(“Accused Camera Technology”).
`
`10.
`
`I understand from the Complaint that Maxell alleges that certain Accused Products
`
`infringe the ’794 patent. Complaint ¶¶ 118-134. Despite the vagueness of the allegations, for
`
`purposes of the motion to transfer, I understand Maxell’s allegations to accuse technology relating
`
`to low power mode as allegedly infringing the ’794 patent (“Accused Power Management
`
`Technology”).
`
`11.
`
`I understand from the Complaint that Maxell alleges that certain Accused Products
`
`infringe the ’193 patent. Complaint ¶¶ 75-91. Despite the vagueness of the allegations, for
`
`purposes of the motion to transfer, I understand Maxell’s allegations to accuse technology relating
`
`to controlling the gain and bias power settings for CDMA data transmission as allegedly infringing
`
`the ’193 patent (“Accused CDMA Technology”).
`
`3
`
`
`
`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 53-1 Filed 08/02/19 Page 4 of 9 PageID #: 864
`
`12.
`
`I understand from the Complaint that Maxell alleges that certain Accused Products
`
`infringe the ’991 and ’306 patents. Complaint ¶¶ 92-117. Despite the vagueness of the allegations,
`
`for purposes of the motion to transfer, I understand Maxell’s allegations to accuse technology
`
`relating to notifications and alerts for telephone calls and FaceTime video calls as allegedly
`
`infringing the ’991 and ’306 patents (“Accused Notifications Technology”).
`
`13.
`
`I understand from the Complaint that Maxell alleges that certain Accused Products
`
`infringe the ’438 and ’586 patents. Complaint ¶¶ 62-74, 135-147. Despite the vagueness of the
`
`allegations, for purposes of the motion to transfer, I understand Maxell’s allegations to accuse
`
`technology relating to authenticating Apple devices and allowing data communication between
`
`authenticated Apple devices as allegedly infringing the ’438 and ’586 patents (“Accused
`
`Authentication Technology”).
`
`14.
`
`The “Accused Navigation Technology,” “Accused Camera Technology,”
`
`“Accused Power Management Technology,” “Accused CDMA Technology, “Accused
`
`Notifications Technology,” and “Accused Authentication Technology” are collectively referred to
`
`as the “Accused Technology.”
`
`15.
`
`16.
`
`17.
`
`Apple sells or has sold the Accused Products throughout the United States.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`
`
`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 53-1 Filed 08/02/19 Page 5 of 9 PageID #: 865
`
`
` None are in
`
`EDTX.
`
`18.
`
`19.
`
`Apple regularly conducts business in NDCA involving the Accused Products.
`
`As of the date of this declaration, Apple operates approximately 270 retail stores in
`
`the United States, more than 50 of which are in California, including 19 retail stores in NDCA. As
`
`of the date of this declaration, Apple does not maintain any retail stores, corporate offices, or any
`
`other type of facility in EDTX. Maxell’s Complaint identifies two Apple retail stores in EDTX,
`
`both of which closed on or about April 12, 2019. I am not aware of any employee in EDTX who
`
`has been involved in the research, design, development, or marketing of the Accused Technology
`
`or Accused Products. To the extent that any of the Accused Products are sold or used in EDTX,
`
`they are and were sold and used nationwide, and are not used in any manner differently in Texas
`
`than they are used elsewhere.
`
`20.
`
`I am not aware of any relevant business documents or records concerning the
`
`research, development, marketing, and/or financials of the Accused Products that are kept in
`
`EDTX, and I am unaware of any other evidence located there. I am unaware of any Apple
`
`employee with information relevant to this case who resides in EDTX.
`
`21.
`
`Based on Apple’s current understanding of Maxell’s infringement allegations, the
`
`primary design, development, and implementation of the Accused Technology in the Accused
`
`Products take place in or around Cupertino, California, as explained below.
`
`Accused Navigation Technology
`
`22.
`
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`
`
`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 53-1 Filed 08/02/19 Page 6 of 9 PageID #: 866
`
` None are located in EDTX.
`
` None are located in EDTX.
`
`23.
`
`24.
`
` None are located in EDTX.
`
`Accused Camera Technology
`
`25.
`
` None are located in EDTX.
`
`Accused Power Management Technology
`
`26.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`located in EDTX.
`
` None are
`
`6
`
`
`
`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 53-1 Filed 08/02/19 Page 7 of 9 PageID #: 867
`
`
`Accused CDMA Technology
`
`27.
`
`28.
`
` None are located in EDTX.
`
`Accused Notifications Technology
`
` None are located in EDTX.
`
`29.
`
`30.
`
` None are located in EDTX.
`
` None are located in EDTX.
`
`7
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 53-1 Filed 08/02/19 Page 8 of 9 PageID #: 868
`
`
`Accused Authentication Technology
`
`31.
`
`32.
`
` None are located in EDTX.
`
`Documents and Source Code Relating to Accused Technology
`
` None are located in EDTX.
`
`33.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Sales, Financial, Marketing Information Related to Accused Products and Technology
`
`34.
`
`I am knowledgeable about the sales and financial information concerning the
`
`Accused Products.
`
` None are located in EDTX. I work and live in NDCA.
`
`35.
`
`8
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 53-1 Filed 08/02/19 Page 9 of 9 PageID #: 869
`case 5:19'°V'00036W9 °f 9 Page'” ii 869
`
`are located in ED’I‘X.
`
`36.
`
`I am not aware of any relevant Apple documents or anticipated witnesses located
`
`in ED'l‘X. To my knowledge. Apple does not have any employees in EDTX with any information
`
`relevant to this case.
`
`I declare under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
`
`Executed in Sunnyvale. California. on thisDLL day 01 JL l 9. 2019.
`
`A ‘ ”it;
`
`.
`
`'f’
`
`
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
