`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`TEXARKANA DIVISION
`
`Plaintiff
`
`Civil Action No. 5:19-cv-00036-RWS
`
`MAXELL, LTD.,
`
`v.
`
`APPLE INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`ORDER
`
`Before the Court is the parties’ proposed redacted version of the Order denying
`
`Maxell, Ltd.’s Opposed Motion for Sanctions (Docket Entry # 508). With one alteration to
`
`correct an error on the last page of the Court's sealed August 10, 2020 Order on Motion for
`
`Sanctions (Docket Entry # 497), the Court, having considered the parties' proposed publicly-
`
`available redacted version of the Order, is of the opinion the parties' redacted version should
`
`be entered by the Clerk of the Court. Accordingly, it is
`
`ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall edit the proposed publicly-available
`
`redacted version of the Court's August 10, 2020 Order on Motion for Sanctions (Docket Entry
`
`# 508-1) to change the word "Maxell's" in the first sentence at the top of page 25 to "Apple's,"
`
`thus changing the sentence to read as follows: "Having concluded that Apple’s failure to
`
`produce documents by the Patent Rule 3-4 deadline and the November 27, 2019 substantial
`
`completion of production date was not a result of Apple’s bad faith, and having further
`
`concluded sanctions would be improper in the interests of fairness and justice, the Court is of
`
`the opinion Maxell’s request for sanctions should be denied." It is further
`
`1
`
`
`
`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 509 Filed 08/25/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 27534
`
`ORDERED that with that alteration, the Clerk of the Court shall enter Docket Entry #
`
`508-1 on the docket as the publicly-available redacted, and corrected, version of Docket Entry
`# 497.
`
`
`IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`2
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
