throbber
Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 485-10 Filed 08/05/20 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 26742
`Case 5:19-cv-00036—RWS Document 485-10 Filed 08/05/20 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 26742
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT I
`
`EXHIBIT I
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 485-10 Filed 08/05/20 Page 2 of 5 PageID #: 26743
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT
`COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT
`OF TEXAS TEXARKANA DIVISION
`
`MAXELL, LTD.,
`
`v.
`
`APPLE INC.,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case No. 5:19-cv-00036-RWS
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`MAXELL, LTD.’S FINAL ELECTION OF ASSERTED CLAIMS
`
`Pursuant to the Docket Control Order (D.I. 46) and the Order Focusing Patent
`
`Claims and Prior Art to Reduce Costs (D.I. 44), Plaintiff Maxell, Ltd. (“Maxell”) hereby
`
`provides its Final Election of Asserted Claims:
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`’317 Patent: Claims 1 and 17
`
`’999 Patent: Claim 3
`
`’498 Patent: Claims 3 and 13
`
`’193 Patent: Claims 1 and 6
`
`’306 Patent: Claims 12 and 15
`
`’438 Patent: Claims 1, 2, and 4
`
`’991 Patent: Claim 4
`
`’794 Patent: Claims 1 and 14
`
`’493 Patent: Claims 5 and 6
`
`’586 Patent: Claims 7, 16, and 17
`
`As evidenced by Apple’s ongoing document and source code productions, Maxell has been
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 485-10 Filed 08/05/20 Page 3 of 5 PageID #: 26744
`
`prejudiced in making this election without having reviewed highly relevant technical documents
`
`and source code (e.g., FaceTime code, Express Transit code, Modem design specifications,
`
`documents describing cellular functionalities stored in the RFC repository, complete Dialog
`
`Objective Specifications, Camera Hardware specifications, complete Bluetooth/WiFi technical
`
`specifications etc). See e.g., Maxell’s Motion to Compel (Dkt. No. 197) and Maxell’s Motion for
`
`Sanctions (Dkt. No. 210). Accordingly, Maxell reserves the right to seek relief to supplement
`
`these disclosures once Apple has completed its discovery obligations and once Maxell has had an
`
`opportunity to review all of Apple’s discovery.
`
`
`Dated: March 17, 2020
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`By: /s/ Jamie B. Beaber
`Geoff Culbertson
`Kelly Tidwell
`Patton, Tidwell & Culbertson, LLP
`2800 Texas Boulevard (75503)
`Post Office Box 5398
`Texarkana, TX 75505-5398
`Telephone: (903) 792-7080
`Facsimile: (903) 792-8233
`gpc@texarkanalaw.com
`kbt@texarkanalaw.com
`
`Jamie B. Beaber
`Alan M. Grimaldi
`Kfir B. Levy
`James A. Fussell, III
`Baldine B. Paul
`Tiffany A. Miller
`Saqib J. Siddiqui
`Bryan C. Nese
`William J. Barrow
`Alison T. Gelsleichter
`Clark S. Bakewell
`MAYER BROWN LLP
`1999 K Street, NW
`Washington, DC 20006
`Telephone: (202) 263-3000
`Facsimile: (202) 263-3300
`jbeaber@mayerbrown.com
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 485-10 Filed 08/05/20 Page 4 of 5 PageID #: 26745
`
`agrimaldi@mayerbrown.com
`klevy@mayerbrown.com
`jfussell@mayerbrown.com
`bpaul@mayerbrown.com
`tmiller@mayerbrown.com
`ssiddiqui@mayerbrown.com
`bnese@mayerbrown.com
`wbarrow@mayerbrown.com
`agelsleichter@mayerbrown.com
`cbakewell@mayerbrown.com
`
`Robert G. Pluta
`Amanda Streff Bonner
`MAYER BROWN LLP
`71 S. Wacker Drive
`Chicago, IL 60606
`(312) 782-0600
`rpluta@mayerbrown.com
`asbonner@mayerbrown.com
`
`Counsel for Plaintiff Maxell, Ltd.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 485-10 Filed 08/05/20 Page 5 of 5 PageID #: 26746
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`The undersigned certifies that all counsel of record who are deemed to have
`
`consented to electronic service are being served this 17th day of March, 2020, with a copy
`
`of this document via electronic mail.
`
`/s/ Jamie B. Beaber
`Jamie B. Beaber
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket