throbber
Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 46 Filed 07/09/19 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 567
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`TEXARKANA DIVISION
`
`MAXELL, LTD.,
`
`v.
`
`APPLE INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`Defendant.
`
`Case No. 5:19-cv-0036-RWS
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`DOCKET CONTROL ORDER
`
`It is hereby ORDERED that the following schedule of deadlines is in effect until
`
`further order of this Court:
`
`3 DAYS after
`conclusion of Trial
`
`Parties to file Motion to Seal Trial Exhibits, if they wish to seal
`any highly confidential exhibits.
`
`October 26, 2020
`
`Court designated date – not
`flexible without good cause
`- Motion Required
`
`October 26, 2020
`
`Court designated date – not
`flexible without good cause
`- Motion Required
`
`October 6, 2020
`
`EXHIBITS: See Order Regarding Exhibits below.
`
`9:00 a.m. JURY TRIAL before Judge Robert W. Schroeder III,
`Texarkana, Texas.
`
`For planning purposes, parties shall be prepared to start the
`evidentiary phase of trial immediately following jury selection.
`
`9:00 a.m. JURY SELECTION before Judge Robert W.
`Schroeder III, Texarkana, Texas.
`
`10:00 a.m. PRETRIAL CONFERENCE before Judge Robert W.
`Schroeder III, Texarkana, Texas.
`
`Discuss trial logistics and voir dire procedure. Resolve any pending
`motions or objections.
`
`Lead trial counsel must attend the pretrial conference.
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 46 Filed 07/09/19 Page 2 of 12 PageID #: 568
`
`September 29, 2020
`
`[1 week before
`pretrial]
`
`File a Notice of Time Requested for (1) voir dire, (2) opening
`statements, (3) direct and cross examinations, and (4) closing
`arguments.
`
`September 29, 2020
`
`File Responses to Motions in Limine.
`
`[1 week before
`pretrial]
`
`September 22, 2020
`
`File Motions in Limine and pretrial objections.
`
`[2 weeks before
`pretrial]
`
`The parties are ORDERED to meet and confer to resolve any
`disputes before filing any motion in limine or objection to pretrial
`disclosures.
`
`September 22, 2020
`
`[2 weeks before
`pretrial]
`
`File Joint Final Pretrial Order, Joint Proposed Jury Instructions
`with citation to authority and Form of the Verdict for jury trials.
`
`Parties shall use the pretrial order form on Judge Schroeder’s
`website.
`
`Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law with citation to
`authority for issues tried to the bench.
`
`September 15, 2020
`
`Exchange Objections to Rebuttal Deposition Testimony.
`
`3 weeks before
`pretrial]
`
`September 8, 2020
`
`[4 weeks before
`pretrial]
`
`September 8, 2020
`
` [4 weeks before
`pretrial]
`
`Notice of Request for Daily Transcript or Real Time Reporting
`of Court Proceedings due.
`
`If a daily transcript or real time reporting of court proceedings is
`requested for trial or hearings, the party or parties making said
`request shall file a notice with the Court.
`
`Exchange Rebuttal Designations and Objections to Deposition
`Testimony.
`
`For rebuttal designations, cross examination line and page numbers
`to be included.
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 46 Filed 07/09/19 Page 3 of 12 PageID #: 569
`
`In video depositions, each party is responsible for preparation of the
`final edited video in accordance with their parties’ designations and
`the Court’s rulings on objections.
`
`August 25, 2020
`
` [6 weeks before
`pretrial]
`
`Exchange Pretrial Disclosures (Witness List, Deposition
`Designations, and Exhibit List) by the Party with the Burden of
`Proof.
`
`September 15, 2020
`
`Court designated date – not
`flexible without good cause
`- Motion Required
`
`June 9, 2020
`
`Court designated date – not
`flexible without good cause
`– Motion Required
`
`Video and Stenographic Deposition Designation due. Each party
`who proposes to offer deposition testimony shall serve a disclosure
`identifying the line and page numbers to be offered.
`
`10:00 a.m. HEARING ON ANY REMAINING DISPOSITIVE
`MOTIONS (INCLUDING DAUBERT MOTIONS) before Judge
`Robert W. Schroeder III, Texarkana, Texas.
`
`Any Remaining Dispositive Motions1 due from all parties and
`any other motions that may require a hearing (including
`Daubert motions).
`
`Motions shall comply with Local Rule CV-56 and Local Rule CV-7.
`Motions to extend page limits will only be granted in exceptional
`circumstances. Exceptional circumstances require more than
`agreement among the parties.
`
`For each motion filed, the moving party shall provide the Court with
`one (1) copy of the completed briefing (opening motion, response,
`reply, and if applicable, surreply), excluding exhibits, in a three-ring
`binder appropriately tabbed. All documents shall be double-sided
`and must include the CM/ECF header. These copies shall be
`delivered to Judge Schroeder’s chambers in Texarkana as soon as
`briefing has completed.
`
`Respond to Amended Pleadings.
`
`June 2, 2020
`
`Parties to Identify Rebuttal Trial Witnesses.
`
`1 I.e. any motions on issues other than indefiniteness.
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 46 Filed 07/09/19 Page 4 of 12 PageID #: 570
`
`
`
`[1 week before
`dispositive motions]
`
`
`
`May 26, 2020
`
` [2 weeks before
`dispositive motions]
`
`Parties to Identify Trial Witnesses; Amend Pleadings (after
`Markman Hearing).
`
`It is not necessary to file a Motion for Leave to Amend before the
`deadline to amend pleadings. It is necessary to file a Motion for
`Leave to Amend after the deadline. However, except as provided in
`Patent Rule 3-6, if the amendment would affect infringement
`contentions or invalidity contentions, a motion must be made
`pursuant to Patent Rule 3-6 irrespective of whether the amendment
`is made prior to this deadline.
`
`May 26, 2020
`
`Expert Discovery Deadline.
`
`[2 weeks before
`dispositive motions]
`
`May 5, 2020
`
`[5 weeks before
`dispositive motions]
`
`Parties designate rebuttal expert witnesses (non-construction issues),
`rebuttal expert witness reports due. Refer to Local Rules for
`required information.
`
`If, without agreement, a party serves a supplemental expert report
`after the rebuttal expert report deadline has passed, the serving party
`must file notice with the Court stating service has occurred and the
`reason why a supplemental report is necessary under the
`circumstances.
`
`April 7, 2020
`
`[9 weeks before
`dispositive motions]
`
`Parties with burden of proof designate expert witnesses (non-
`construction issues). Expert witness reports due. Refer to Local
`Rules for required information.
`
`April 7, 2020
`
`Final Election of Asserted Prior Art.
`
`[9 weeks before
`dispositive motions]
`
`March 31, 2020
`
`Fact discovery deadline.
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 46 Filed 07/09/19 Page 5 of 12 PageID #: 571
`
`
`
`[10 weeks before
`dispositive motions]
`
`March 17, 2020
`
`Final Election of Asserted Claims.
`
`[12 weeks before
`dispositive motions]
`
`January 29, 2020
`
`Comply with P.R. 3-7. (Opinion of Counsel Defenses)
`
`[3 weeks after
`Markman hearing]
`
`January 8, 2020
`
`Court designated date – not
`flexible without good cause
`– Motion Required
`
`Markman Hearing and hearing on any Motion for Summary
`Judgment of Indefiniteness at 10:00 a.m. before Judge Robert
`W. Schroeder III, Texarkana, Texas.
`
`December 20, 2019
`
`P.R. 4-5(d) Chart due.
`
`[2 weeks before
`Markman hearing]
`
`December 16, 2019
`
`[~3 weeks before
`Markman hearing]
`
`
`
`The parties are to meet and confer and jointly submit a claim
`construction chart on computer disk in Word format listing each
`party’s proposed construction for each of the terms to be addressed
`at the Markman hearing, including any terms purported to be
`indefinite. The parties should prioritize and list the terms in order of
`most importance; the Court will address the terms in the prioritized
`order presented in the claim construction chart.
`
`Parties to file a notice with the Court stating the estimated amount of
`time requested for the Markman Hearing. The Court will notify the
`parties if it is unable to accommodate this request.
`
`Comply with P.R. 4-5(c) - Reply brief and supporting evidence
`regarding claim construction due. Plaintiff is to provide the Court
`with one (1) copy of the completed Markman briefing in its entirety
`(opening brief, response, and reply) and exhibits in a three-ring
`binder appropriately tabbed. All documents SHALL be double-
`sided and must include the CM/ECF header. These copies shall be
`delivered to Judge Schroeder’s chambers in Texarkana as soon as
`briefing has completed.
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 46 Filed 07/09/19 Page 6 of 12 PageID #: 572
`
`
`
`December 9, 2019
`
`[~4 weeks before
`Markman hearing]
`
`November 18, 2019
`
`[~7 weeks before
`Markman hearing]
`
`November 18, 2019
`
`[~7 weeks before
`Markman hearing]
`
`If a technical advisor has been appointed the moving party is to
`provide their Markman brief on disk or CD along with a hard copy,
`tabbed and bound with exhibits to the advisor.
`
`Comply with P.R. 4-5(b) - Responsive claim construction brief and
`supporting evidence due.
`
`Comply with P.R. 4-5(a) - The party claiming patent infringement
`shall serve and file an opening brief and any evidence supporting its
`claim construction.
`
`Briefing shall comply with Local Rules CV-7 and 56 and Patent
`Rule 4-5(e). Motions to extend page limits will only be granted in
`exceptional circumstances. Exceptional circumstances require more
`than joint agreement among the parties.
`
`Tutorials due. Deadline for parties, if they desire, to provide Court
`with tutorials concerning technology involved in patent(s). The
`parties shall submit one (1) copy of their tutorials to the Court. If a
`technical advisor has been appointed, each party that provides a
`tutorial shall provide a copy to the advisor.
`
`Preliminary Election of Asserted Prior Art.
`
`Proposed Technical Advisors due if one has not already been
`appointed. Parties to provide name, address, phone number, and
`curriculum vitae for up to three agreed technical advisors and
`information regarding the nominees’ availability for Markman
`hearing or a statement that an agreement could not be reached. If the
`parties cannot agree on a technical advisor, they shall not submit any
`proposed technical advisors to the Court. If the parties feel a
`technical advisor is unnecessary, they shall alert the Court at this
`time.
`
`November 6, 2019
`
`Discovery Deadline - Claim Construction Issues.
`
`[9 weeks before
`Markman hearing]
`
`Preliminary Election of Asserted Claims.
`
`November 6, 2019
`
`Respond to Amended Pleadings.
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 46 Filed 07/09/19 Page 7 of 12 PageID #: 573
`
`
`
`[9 weeks before
`Markman hearing]
`
`October 23, 2019
`
`[11 weeks before
`Markman hearing]
`
`October 16, 2019
`
`[12 weeks before
`Markman hearing]
`
`October 4, 2019
`
`Amended Pleadings (pre-claim construction) due from all
`parties, including inequitable conduct allegations.
`
`It is not necessary to file a Motion for Leave to Amend before the
`deadline to amend pleadings. It is necessary to file a Motion for
`Leave to Amend after the deadline. However, if the amendment
`would affect infringement contentions or invalidity contentions, a
`motion must be made pursuant to Patent Rule 3-6(b) irrespective of
`whether the amendment is made prior to this deadline.
`
`Comply with P.R. 4-3 (a) - Filing of Joint Claim Construction and
`Prehearing Statement.
`
`In the P.R. 4-3 filing, the parties shall list the most significant terms
`according to the parties’ priorities, which were agreed upon during
`the P.R. 4-2 meet and confer, indicating which of those terms will be
`case or claim dispositive. A maximum of 25 terms will be
`construed, unless parties have received other instruction from the
`Court. If the parties cannot agree to the most important 25 terms,
`the parties shall identify the terms that were agreed upon and then
`divide the remainder evenly between Plaintiff(s) and Defendant(s).
`
`The nonmoving party subject to an indefiniteness challenge must
`provide a preliminary identification of any expert testimony it
`intends to rely on in its response to the moving party’s indefiniteness
`challenge pursuant to P.R. 4-3(b).
`
`Comply with P.R. 4-3(b) (other than responses to indefiniteness)
`- Each party shall also simultaneously serve a disclosure of expert
`testimony consistent with Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(B(i)-(ii) or
`26(a)(2)(C) for any expert on which it intends to rely to support its
`proposed claim construction or indefiniteness position or to oppose
`any other party’s proposed claim construction.
`
`September 27, 2019
`
`Parties to meet and confer regarding their proposed claim
`constructions.
`
`September 25, 2019
`
`Comply with P.R. 4-2 - Exchange of Preliminary Claim
`Constructions and Extrinsic Evidence.
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 46 Filed 07/09/19 Page 8 of 12 PageID #: 574
`
`
`
`[15 weeks before
`Markman hearing]
`
`Privilege Logs to be exchanged by parties (or a letter to the Court
`stating that there are no disputes as to claims of privileged
`documents).
`
`September 4, 2019
`
`[18 weeks before
`Markman hearing]
`
`August 14, 2019
`
`[8 weeks after
`scheduling
`conference]
`
`July 10, 2019
`
`June 26, 2019
`
`[1 week after
`scheduling
`conference]
`
`Comply with P.R. 4-1 - Exchange Proposed Terms and Claim
`Elements for Construction.
`
`Comply with P.R. 3-3 and 3-4 - Invalidity Contentions due.
`Thereafter, except as provided in Patent Rule 3-6(a), it is necessary
`to obtain leave of Court to add and/or amend invalidity contentions,
`pursuant to Patent Rule 3-6(b).
`
`Defendant shall assert any counterclaims. After this deadline, leave
`of Court must be obtained to assert any counterclaims.
`
`Comply with Paragraphs 1 & 3 of the Discovery Order (Initial and
`Additional Disclosures)
`
`Defendant shall join additional parties. It is not necessary to file a
`motion to join additional parties prior to this date. Thereafter, it is
`necessary to obtain leave of Court to join additional parties.
`
`June 24, 2019
`
`Mediation
`
`[3 days after
`scheduling
`conference]
`
`Parties are encouraged, but not required, to mediate cases.
`
`If the parties agree to mediate, they shall jointly file a motion with a
`proposed order attached. The motion shall indicate whether the
`parties agree upon a mediator and shall include a mediation
`deadline. The parties shall confirm the mediator’s availability in
`light of the proposed deadline. If the parties cannot agree on a
`mediator, they may request the Court appoint a mediator.
`
`If the parties do not agree to mediate, they shall file a notice so
`indicating.
`
`June 12, 2019
`
`Comply with P.R. 3-1 and P.R. 3-2 - Disclosure of Asserted
`Claims and Infringement Contentions due. Thereafter, except as
`provided in Patent Rule 3-6(a), it is necessary to obtain leave of
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 46 Filed 07/09/19 Page 9 of 12 PageID #: 575
`
`
`
`
`
`[1 week before
`scheduling
`conference]
`
`Court to add and/or amend infringement contentions, pursuant to
`Patent Rule 3-6(b).
`
`Plaintiff shall join additional parties. It is not necessary to file a
`motion to join additional parties prior to this date. Thereafter, it is
`necessary to obtain leave of Court to join additional parties.
`
`Plaintiff shall add new patents and/or claims for patents-in-suit. It is
`not necessary to file a motion to add additional patents or claims
`prior to this date. Thereafter, it is necessary to obtain leave of Court
`to add patents or claims.
`
`Parties’ estimated
`number of trial days
`
`10 days.
`
`In the event that any of these dates fall on a weekend or Court holiday, the deadline
`
`is modified to be the next Court business day.
`
`The parties are directed to Local Rule CV-7(d), which provides in part that “[a]
`
`party’s failure to oppose a motion in the manner prescribed herein creates a presumption
`that the party does not controvert the facts set out by movant and has no evidence to offer
`in opposition to the motion.”
`
`A party may request an oral hearing on a motion filed with the Court. Any such
`request shall be included in the text or in a footnote on the first page of the motion or any
`responsive pleading thereto. The Court does not hold telephonic hearings absent unusual
`circumstances.
`
`
`Other Limitations
`
`(a)
`
`(b)
`
`The following excuses will not warrant a continuance or justify a failure to
`comply with the discovery deadline:
`(i) The fact that there are motions for summary judgment or motions to
`dismiss pending;
`(ii) The fact that one or more of the attorneys is set for trial in another court
`on the same day, unless the other setting was made prior to the date of
`this order or was made as a special provision for the parties in the other
`case;
`(iii) The failure to complete discovery prior to trial, unless the parties can
`demonstrate that it was impossible to complete discovery despite their
`good faith effort to do so.
`Amendments to the Docket Control Order (“DCO”): Any motion to alter any
`date on the DCO shall take the form of a motion to amend the DCO. The motion
`shall include a chart in the format of the DCO that lists all of the remaining
`dates in one column (as above) and the proposed changes to each date in an
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 46 Filed 07/09/19 Page 10 of 12 PageID #: 576
`
`
`
`
`
`(c)
`
`additional adjacent column (if there is no change for a date the proposed date
`column should remain blank or indicate that it is unchanged). The motion to
`amend the DCO shall also include a proposed DCO in traditional two-column
`format that incorporates the requested changes and that also lists all remaining
`dates. In other words, the DCO in the proposed order should be complete such
`that one can clearly see all the remaining deadlines rather than needing to also
`refer to an earlier version of the DCO.
`Indefiniteness: In lieu of early motions for summary judgment, the parties are
`directed to include any arguments related to the issue of indefiniteness in their
`Markman briefing, subject to the local rules’ normal page limits.
`(d) Motions in Limine: Each side is limited to one (1) motion in limine addressing
`no more than ten (10) disputed issues. In addition, the parties may file a joint
`motion in limine addressing any agreed issues. The Court views motions in
`limine as appropriate for those things that will create the proverbial “skunk in
`the jury box,” e.g., that, if mentioned in front of the jury before an evidentiary
`ruling can be made, would be so prejudicial that the Court could not alleviate
`the prejudice with an appropriate instruction. Rulings on motions in limine do
`not exclude evidence, but prohibit the party from offering the disputed
`testimony prior to obtaining an evidentiary ruling during trial.
`Exhibits: Each side is limited to designating 250 exhibits for trial absent a
`showing of good cause. The parties shall use the exhibit list sample form on
`Judge Schroeder’s website.
`Deposition Designations: Each side is limited to designating no more than ten
`(10) hours of deposition testimony for use at trial absent a showing of good
`cause. As trial approaches, if either side needs to designate more than ten (10)
`hours, the party may file a motion for leave and show good cause. All
`depositions to be read into evidence as part of the parties’ case-in-chief shall be
`EDITED so as to exclude all unnecessary, repetitious, and irrelevant testimony;
`ONLY those portions which are relevant to the issues in controversy shall be
`read into evidence.
`(g) Witness Lists: The parties shall use the sample form on Judge Schroeder’s
`website.
`
`(e)
`
`(f)
`
`ORDER REGARDING EXHIBITS, EXHIBIT LISTS AND WITNESS LISTS:
`
`
`A.
`
`
`On the first day of trial, each party is required to have:
`
`(1) One copy of their respective original exhibits on hand. Each exhibit shall
`be properly labeled with the following information: Identified as either
`Plaintiff’s or Defendant’s Exhibit, the Exhibit Number and the Case
`Number.
`(2) Three hard copies of each party’s exhibit list and witness list on hand.
`(3) One copy of all exhibits on USB Flash Drive(s) or portable hard drive(s).
`This shall be tendered to the Courtroom Deputy at the beginning of trial.
`(4) One copy of all expert reports on CD. This shall be tendered to the
`Courtroom Deputy at the beginning of trial.
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 46 Filed 07/09/19 Page 11 of 12 PageID #: 577
`
`
`
`B.
`
`
`
`C.
`
`
`D.
`
`
`E.
`
`
`
`
`
`The parties shall follow the process below to admit exhibits.
`
`(1) On the first day of trial, each party shall tender a preadmitted list of exhibits it
`plans to admit into evidence. This list shall include all exhibits which are NOT
`objected to or to which the Court has already overruled an objection. To the
`extent there are exhibits with outstanding objections for which the parties need
`a ruling from the Court, those exhibits should be separately included on the list
`and designated accordingly to reflect a pending objection. Parties shall entitle
`the list “[Plaintiff’s/Defendant’s] List of Preadmitted Exhibits.” If, during the
`course of the day’s testimony, a party wishes to offer an objected exhibit into
`evidence, the party may move for admission at the time it wishes to use that
`exhibit with a witness. The Court will then hear the opposing party’s objection
`and will rule on the objection at that time.
`
`(2) On each subsequent day of trial, the Court will commence by formally
`admitting all of the exhibits that were either unobjected to or allowed over
`objection and used during the previous day’s trial. The Court will ask for these
`exhibits to be read into the record and formally admitted into evidence at the
`beginning of that trial day. These will be the exhibits deemed admitted at trial.
`The parties shall keep a separate running list of all exhibits admitted throughout
`the course of trial.
`
`(3) At the conclusion of evidence, each party shall read into the record any exhibit
`that was used but not previously admitted during the course of trial and then
`tender its final list of every admitted exhibit, entitled “[Plaintiff’s/Defendant’s]
`Final List of All Admitted Exhibits.” To the extent there are exhibits that were
`not admitted during the course of trial, but for which there is agreement that
`they should be provided to the jury, the parties must inform the Court of those
`exhibits at the conclusion of evidence. The Court will then determine whether
`those exhibits will be allowed into the jury room for deliberations.
`
`At the conclusion of evidence, each party shall be responsible for pulling those
`exhibits admitted at trial and shall tender those to the Courtroom Deputy, who will
`verify the exhibits and tender them to the jury for their deliberations. One
`representative from each side shall meet with the Courtroom Deputy to verify the
`exhibit list.
`
`At the conclusion of trial, all boxes of exhibits shall be returned to the respective
`parties and the parties are instructed to remove these exhibits from the courtroom.
`
`Within five business days of the conclusion of trial, each party shall submit to the
`Courtroom Deputy:
`
`(1)
`
`A Final Exhibit List of Exhibits Admitted During Trial in Word format.
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 46 Filed 07/09/19 Page 12 of 12 PageID #: 578
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(2)
`
`(3)
`
`Two CD(s) containing admitted unsealed trial exhibits in PDF format. If
`the Court ordered any exhibits sealed during trial, the Sealed Exhibits shall
`be submitted on a separate CD. If tangible or over-sized exhibits were
`admitted, such exhibits shall be substituted with a photograph in PDF
`format.
`A disk containing the transcripts of Video Depositions played during trial,
`along with a copy of the actual video deposition.
`
`.
`
`
`
`____________________________________
`ROBERT W. SCHROEDER III
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
`
`SIGNED this 9th day of July, 2019.
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket