throbber
Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 447-12 Filed 07/27/20 Page 1 of 18 PageID #: 25081
`Case 5:19-cv-00036—RWS Document 447-12 Filed 07/27/20 Page 1 of 18 PageID #: 25081
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT 11
`EXHIBIT 11
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 447-12 Filed 07/27/20 Page 2 of 18 PageID #: 25082
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
` IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
` FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`
` TEXARKANA DIVISION
`
`- - - - - - - - - - - - -x
`
` MAXELL, LTD., :
`
` Plaintiff, :
`
` v. : No. 5:19-cv-00036-RWS
`
` APPLE, INC., :
`
` Defendant. :
`
`- - - - - - - - - - - - -x
`
` - - -
`
` Thursday, June 18, 2020
`
` - - -
`
`REMOTE TELEPHONIC deposition of ROBERT L. STOLL,
`
`beginning at 9:03 a.m., before Christina S. Hotsko,
`
`RPR, CRR, when were present on behalf of the
`
`respective parties:
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`866 299-5127
`
`Page 1
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 447-12 Filed 07/27/20 Page 3 of 18 PageID #: 25083
`
` A P P E A R A N C E S
`O n b e h a l f o f P l a i n t i f f :
` B R Y A N C . N E S E , E S Q U I R E
` M a y e r B r o w n , L L P
` 1 9 9 9 K S t r e e t , N o r t h w e s t
` W a s h i n g t o n , D . C . 2 0 0 0 6
` ( 2 0 2 ) 2 6 3 - 3 2 6 6
` b n e s e @ m a y e r b r o w n . c o m
` L U I Z M I R A N D A , E S Q U I R E
` M a y e r B r o w n , L L P
` 7 1 S W a c k e r D r i v e
` C h i c a g o , I l l i n o i s 6 0 6 0 6
` ( 3 1 2 ) 7 0 1 - 8 8 7 3
` l m i r a n d a @ m a y e r b r o w n . c o m
`
`O n b e h a l f o f D e f e n d a n t :
` D A V I D A L M E L I N G , E S Q U I R E
` O ' M e l v e n y & M y e r s , L L P
` T w o E m b a r c a d e r o C e n t e r , 2 8 t h F l o o r
` S a n F r a n c i s c o , C a l i f o r n i a 9 4 1 1 1 - 3 8 2 3
` ( 4 1 5 ) 9 8 4 - 8 9 5 9
` d a l m e l i n g @ o m m . c o m
`
`1
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`1 0
`
`1 1
`
`1 2
`
`1 3
`1 4
`1 5
`1 6
`1 7
`1 8
`1 9
`2 0
`2 1
`2 2
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`866 299-5127
`
`Page 2
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 447-12 Filed 07/27/20 Page 4 of 18 PageID #: 25084
`
` C O N T E N T S
`EXAMINATION BY: PAGE
` Counsel for Defendant 06
` Counsel for Plaintiff 229
`
`STOLL DEPOSITION EXHIBITS: * PAGE
` Exhibit 235 Expert Report of Robert L. Stoll 37
` Exhibit 236 Article, On the Way to a Better 87
` Patent System
`
` Exhibit 237 USPTO and Federal District 94
` Courts, A Joint Conference
` between the USPTO and the
` Berkeley Center for Law &
` Technology, 6 June 2011
`
` Exhibit 238 Article, Patently Practical 96
` Advice: The Impact of Recent
` Supreme Court and Federal
` Circuit Cases on Patent Law and
` How They Affect the Advice We
` Give Our Clients
` Exhibit 239 NavTalk Owner's Manual and 126
` Reference Guide
`
` Exhibit 240 Declaration of David Ayres 137
`
` Exhibit 241 Excel Spreadsheet, Garmin 147 149
`
` Exhibit 242 Deposition of L. Kent Broddle 156
`
` Exhibit 243 Service Manual, MVC-FD83/FD88 175
`
` Exhibit 244 Image, Sony Digital Still Camera 190
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`
`5 6
`
`7
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`866 299-5127
`
`Page 3
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 447-12 Filed 07/27/20 Page 5 of 18 PageID #: 25085
`
`STOLL DEPOSITION EXHIBITS: * PAGE
`
` Exhibit 245 MVC-FD88 Camera 192
`
` Exhibit 246 Article, Keeping Track of Your 201
`
` Magazine Subscriptions
`
` Exhibit 247 Article, Premature Magazine 203
`
` Renewal Notices"
`
` Exhibit 248 Opening Report of Dr. Alan Bovik 207
`
` Exhibit 249 Opinion from Eastern District of 215
`
` Texas, Genband US LLC v.
`
` Metaswitch Networks Corp.,
`
` 7 Jan 2016
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
` Exhibit 250 Decision from Western District 220
`
`10
`
` of Michigan, Magna Electronics,
`
` Inc., v. TRW Automotive Holdings
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
` Corp., 29 Jan 2016
`
` * (Exhibits attached to transcript.)
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`866 299-5127
`
`Page 4
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 447-12 Filed 07/27/20 Page 6 of 18 PageID #: 25086
`
` P R O C E E D I N G S
`
`Whereupon,
`
` ROBERT L. STOLL,
`
`being first duly sworn or affirmed to testify to
`
`the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the 08:13:20
`
`truth, was examined and testified as follows:
`
` MR. ALMELING: Perhaps we can begin with
`
`appearances. This is David Almeling of
`
`O'Melveny & Myers representing the defendant.
`
` MR. NESE: This is Bryan Nese with Mayer 09:03:43
`
`Brown, LLP, representing Maxell Limited and the
`
`witness. I'm joined today by my colleague from
`
`Mayer Brown, Luiz Miranda.
`
` MR. ALMELING: Counsel, there are various
`
`agreements the parties have reached before the 09:04:08
`
`deposition regarding the conduct of the
`
`deposition. I'll discuss those in questioning.
`
`But before we begin, is there anything that you
`
`would like to put on the record?
`
` MR. NESE: Not at this time. 09:04:14
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`866 299-5127
`
`Page 5
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 447-12 Filed 07/27/20 Page 7 of 18 PageID #: 25087
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
` EXAMINATION BY COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT
`
`BY MR. ALMELING:
`
` Q. Mr. Stoll, please state your full name.
`
` A. Robert Louis Stoll.
`
` Q. Please state your work address. 09:04:25
`
` A. 1500 K Street, Northwest, Washington,
`
`D.C., 20005.
`
` Q. Please state your home address.
`
` A. 2153 California Street, number 504,
`
`Washington, D.C., 20008. 09:04:47
`
` Q. You understand that you are oath today,
`
`correct?
`
` A. Correct.
`
` Q. Is there any reason that you cannot give
`
`truthful and accurate testimony today? 09:05:04
`
` A. None of which I'm aware.
`
` Q. You received a link to a file containing
`
`exhibits for this deposition yesterday evening,
`
`correct?
`
` A. That is correct. 09:05:19
`
` Q. After receiving that link, have you
`
`conferred with either Maxell or Maxell's counsel
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`866 299-5127
`
`Page 6
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 447-12 Filed 07/27/20 Page 8 of 18 PageID #: 25088
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`regarding the exhibits other than for the sole
`
`purpose of confirming that you received them?
`
` A. No.
`
` Q. After receiving that link, did you review
`
`any of the exhibits before this deposition began? 09:05:39
`
` A. I opened my report just to make sure that
`
`they opened.
`
` Q. You understand that, while testifying
`
`today but not including breaks, you may not
`
`access, look at, or use any information or 09:05:58
`
`materials other than the exhibits in the link, a
`
`clean hard copy of your report, and the patents
`
`and the prior art references about which you
`
`opine.
`
` Do you understand that? 09:06:12
`
` A. I didn't know that I could look at the
`
`references, too, if they weren't available, but I
`
`do now.
`
` Q. Do you understand that in addition to
`
`what I just previously stated, while testifying 09:06:26
`
`today -- and again, not including breaks -- you
`
`may not communicate with anyone else including
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`866 299-5127
`
`Page 7
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 447-12 Filed 07/27/20 Page 9 of 18 PageID #: 25089
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`to be an expert?
`
` A. Field of process before the Patent and
`
`Trademark Office, for example, public
`
`accessibility and prior art. And that's probably
`
`the field that I'm most engaged for. 09:19:10
`
` Inequitable conduct issues. Prosecution
`
`laches issues.
`
` Q. Other than the items that you just
`
`mentioned, do you believe that you're an expert in
`
`any subject? 09:19:28
`
` A. I mean, I have a background, a degree, in
`
`chemical engineering, but I would not be able to
`
`generally say I'm an expert in every field of
`
`chemical engineering.
`
` Q. Do you believe you're an expert in any 09:19:45
`
`field of chemical engineering?
`
` A. Not at this late date.
`
` Q. So to be clear, the only fields in which
`
`you consider yourself to be an expert are the
`
`process before the PTO and the subprocesses to 09:19:59
`
`that you answered in response to my previous
`
`question; is that correct?
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`866 299-5127
`
`Page 19
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 447-12 Filed 07/27/20 Page 10 of 18 PageID #: 25090
`
`1
`
`2
`2
`
`3
`3
`
`4
`4
`
`5
`5
`
`6
`6
`
`7
`7
`
`8
`8
`
`9
`9
`
`10
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
` A. That's where I'm an expert. Yes.
`
` Q. You are not an expert in any of the
`Q. You are not an expert in any of the
`
`technologies claimed in any of the asserted
`technologies claimed in any of the asserted
`
`patents, correct?
`patents, correct?
`
` A. That is correct. 09:20:19
`A. That is correct.
`09:20:19
`
` Q. You are not a POSITA in any of the
`Q. You are not a POSITA in any of the
`
`technologies claimed in any of the asserted
`technologies claimed in any of the asserted
`
`patents, correct?
`patents, correct?
`
` A. I am not a person having ordinary skill
`A. I am not a person having ordinary skill
`
`in the art of this technology. 09:20:33
`in the art of this technology.
`
` Q. You are not an expert in power management
`
`or power control in wireless communication
`
`systems, correct?
`
` A. That is correct.
`
` Q. You are not an expert in communication 09:20:47
`
`systems, GPS systems, or wireless communications,
`
`including signal processing and wireless
`
`communication in mobile device, correct?
`
` MR. NESE: Objection to form.
`
`BY MR. ALMELING: 09:21:10
`
` Q. Mr. Stoll, you can go ahead and answer.
`
` A. I said "correct."
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`866 299-5127
`
`Page 20
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 447-12 Filed 07/27/20 Page 11 of 18 PageID #: 25091
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
` Q. I believe your counsel objected because I
`
`gave a serial list. I did so in the interest of
`
`time; however, I will break it out so that it does
`
`not elicit an objection.
`
` MR. ALMELING: Counsel, I'm going to give 09:21:23
`
`a couple of other laundry lists in the interest of
`
`time. If you want to object, I will break them
`
`out, but it will be your choice.
`
`BY MR. ALMELING:
`
` Q. Mr. Stoll, you are not an expert in 09:21:33
`
`communications systems, correct?
`
` A. That is correct.
`
` Q. You are not an expert in GPS systems,
`
`correct?
`
` A. That is correct. 09:21:42
`
` Q. You are not an expert in wireless
`
`communications, correct?
`
` A. That is correct.
`
` Q. You are not an expert in signal
`
`processing for wireless communications in mobile 09:21:53
`
`devices, correct?
`
` A. Yes.
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`866 299-5127
`
`Page 21
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 447-12 Filed 07/27/20 Page 12 of 18 PageID #: 25092
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`11
`
`12
`12
`
`13
`13
`
`14
`14
`
`15
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
` Q. And by "yes," you mean correct?
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. You are not an expert in video
`
`processing, image processing, or audio signal
`
`processing, correct? 09:22:12
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. You are not an expert in any aspect of
`
`electronic cameras or devices that function as
`
`electronic cameras, correct?
`
` A. Yes. 09:22:23
`
` Q. You are not an expert in library science
`Q. You are not an expert in library science
`
`or information science, including materials
`or information science, including materials
`
`acquisitions for libraries, library records, or
`acquisitions for libraries, library records, or
`
`library cataloging, correct?
`library cataloging, correct?
`
` A. Yes. 09:22:36
`A. Yes.
`
` Q. You are not an expert in economics,
`
`marketing, or financial records, correct?
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. You are not an expert in electronics
`
`design, manufacturing, label, or packaging, 09:22:47
`
`including hardware and software, correct?
`
` A. Yes.
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`866 299-5127
`
`Page 22
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 447-12 Filed 07/27/20 Page 13 of 18 PageID #: 25093
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
` Q. You are not an expert in analyzing sales
`
`data for electronic records, correct?
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. You are not an expert in corporate
`
`structure or organization, correct? 09:23:03
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. In your career, approximately how many
`
`cases have you been retained as an expert witness?
`
`And I understand that this is in your CV, so I'm
`
`not looking for an exact number. I'm just looking 09:23:24
`
`for a ballpark.
`
` A. Around 30.
`
` Q. In those approximately 30 cases, in how
`
`many of them have you testified at trial?
`
` A. Under five. I'm not sure how many, but 09:23:38
`
`that's also on my CV.
`
` Q. In those approximately 30 cases, in
`
`approximately how many have you been retained as
`
`an expert on PTO practice and procedure issues?
`
` A. Most of them. 09:23:52
`
` Q. Do you recall testifying on any topic in
`
`the approximately 30 cases in which you have
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`866 299-5127
`
`Page 23
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 447-12 Filed 07/27/20 Page 14 of 18 PageID #: 25094
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`your work in the role of commissioner as being too
`
`favorable to patent owners?
`
` A. No.
`
` Q. Do you think that that criticism is
`
`accurate? 09:32:21
`
` A. I don't know that that criticism exists.
`
`And I think I was pretty wildly lauded as being a
`
`very good commissioner for patents.
`
` Q. If there was -- and I recognize that you
`
`testified that you did not hear it -- but assume 09:32:44
`
`for the following questions that you were
`
`criticized by at least some for being too
`
`favorable to patent owners during your tenure as
`
`commissioner.
`
` Do you believe that criticism could be 09:32:57
`
`accurate?
`
` A. I don't even know what that means.
`
` Q. In your entire career, you have never
`
`been an employee in any capacity at any company,
`
`correct? 09:33:13
`
` A. No, I have not been an employee at any
`
`particular company.
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`866 299-5127
`
`Page 31
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 447-12 Filed 07/27/20 Page 15 of 18 PageID #: 25095
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`13
`
`14
`14
`
`15
`15
`
`16
`16
`
`17
`17
`
`18
`18
`
`19
`19
`
`20
`20
`
`21
`21
`
`22
`22
`
` Q. You have never worked at either Sony or
`
`Garmin, correct?
`
` A. No.
`
` Q. You have not obtained a master's degree
`
`in library science from any credited university, 09:33:30
`
`correct?
`
` A. I have not obtained a master's degree in
`
`library science from any credited or uncredited
`
`university.
`
` Q. You have never served as a publicly 09:33:40
`
`elected library board director, correct?
`
` A. Correct.
`
` Q. You do not have experience working as a
`Q. You do not have experience working as a
`
`librarian, library cataloger, professional
`librarian, library cataloger, professional
`
`archivist, or library director, correct? 09:33:55
`archivist, or library director, correct?
`09:33:55
`
` A. That is correct.
`A. That is correct.
`
` Q. You do not know what qualifications are
`Q. You do not know what qualifications are
`
`required to become a certified librarian in any
`required to become a certified librarian in any
`
`state, correct?
`state, correct?
`
` A. Correct. 09:34:13
`A. Correct.
`09:34:13
`
`Q. You have not studied library or
` Q. You have not studied library or
`
`information science in any formal university
`information science in any formal university
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`866 299-5127
`
`Page 32
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 447-12 Filed 07/27/20 Page 16 of 18 PageID #: 25096
`
`
`
`11
`
`2
`2
`
`3
`3
`
`4
`4
`
`5
`5
`
`6
`6
`
`7
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`
`
`study, correct?study, correct?
`
` A. That's correct.
`A. That's correct.
`
` Q. You have no personal experience of
`Q. You have no personal experience of
`
`writing or contributing to library policy
`writing or contributing to library policy
`
`documents that dictate circulation and public 09:34:26
`documents that dictate circulation and public
`09:34:26
`
`access rules, correct?
`access rules, correct?
`
` A. I believe that's correct.
`A. I believe that's correct.
`
` Q. You are not familiar with the creation or
`
`syntax of MARC-21 records, correct?
`
` A. That is correct. 09:34:44
`
` Q. You have no familiarity, or even
`
`awareness, of cataloging standards such as
`
`MARC-21, AARC-2, or RDA, correct?
`
` A. That is correct.
`
` Q. You have no familiarity or even awareness 09:35:04
`
`of the difference between public catalog records,
`
`MARC-21 records, and item-level records, correct?
`
` A. That is correct.
`
` Q. You've never worked at an accounting
`
`firm, correct? 09:35:22
`
` A. That is correct.
`
` Q. You have never worked at the University
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`866 299-5127
`
`Page 33
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 447-12 Filed 07/27/20 Page 17 of 18 PageID #: 25097
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`of Pittsburgh, Carnegie Mellon University, Georgia
`
`Tech, or any other university, correct?
`
` A. That's correct.
`
` Q. As part of your work on this case, you
`
`have not talked with or otherwise communicated 09:35:46
`
`with any of inventors on any of the asserted
`
`patents, correct?
`
` A. Not that I'm aware of.
`
` Q. As part of your work on this case, you
`
`have not talked with or otherwise communicated 09:35:57
`
`with anyone at Maxell, correct?
`
` A. Not that I am aware of.
`
` Q. As part of your work on this case, you
`
`have not talked with or otherwise communicated
`
`with anyone at Sony or Garmin, correct? 09:36:06
`
` A. Not that I am aware of.
`
` Q. As part of your work on this case, you
`
`have not talked with or otherwise communicated
`
`with anyone at the University of Pittsburgh,
`
`Carnegie Mellon University, or Georgia Tech, 09:36:21
`
`correct?
`
` A. Not that I'm aware of.
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`866 299-5127
`
`Page 34
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 447-12 Filed 07/27/20 Page 18 of 18 PageID #: 25098
`
` DECLARATION
`
` I hereby declare I am the deponent in the within
`
` matter; that I have read the foregoing transcript and
`
` know the contents thereof; and I declare that the same
`
` is true of my knowledge except as to the matters which
`
` are therein stated upon my information or belief, and as
`
` to those matters, I believe them to be true.
`
` I declare under the penalties of perjury
`
` under the laws of the United States that the
`
` foregoing is true and correct.
`
` This declaration is executed this _______ day
`
` of _______________________, 20___, at
`
` ________________________________, _____________.
`
` _________________________________
`
` ROBERT L. STOLL
`
`1
`
`2 3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`866 299-5127
`
`Page 237
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket