throbber
Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 447-10 Filed 07/27/20 Page 1 of 53 PageID #: 24997
`Case 5:19-cv-00036—RWS Document 447-10 Filed 07/27/20 Page 1 of 53 PageID #: 24997
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT 9
`EXHIBIT 9
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 447-10 Filed 07/27/20 Page 2 of 53 PageID #: 24998
`
`Transcript of the Testimony of Paradiso,
`Joseph A.
`Date: June 16, 2020
`
`Case: 0027559-00428 - [Apple] Maxell_Depo
`
`THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL
`INFORMATION
`ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY
`
`Ace-Federal Reporters, Inc.
`Phone: 202-347-3700
`Fax: 202-737-3638
`Email: info@acefederal.com
`Internet: www.acefederal.com
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 447-10 Filed 07/27/20 Page 3 of 53 PageID #: 24999
`
`Page 2
` Deposition of JOSEPH A. PARADISO, called
`for examination pursuant to notice of
`deposition, on Tuesday, June 16, 2020, at 11:05
`a.m., before CARMEN SMITH, a Notary Public
`within and for the District of Columbia, when
`were present on behalf of the respective
`parties:
`
` SAQIB J. SIDDIQUI, ESQ.
` Mayer Brown LLP
` 1999 K Street, NW
` Washington, DC 20006
` 202-263-3000
` ssiddiqui@mayerbrown.com
` On behalf of Plaintiff Maxell
`
` MARK LIANG, ESQ.
` O'Melveny & Myers LLP
` Two Embarcadero, 28th Floor
` San Francisco, California 94111
` 415-984-8882
` mliang@omm.com
` On behalf of Defendant Apple
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`
`89
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`Page 1
` IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
` FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
` TEXARKANA DIVISION
`
`- - - - - - - - - - - - -x
`MAXELL, LTD., :
` Plaintiff, : Civil Action Number
` vs. : 5:19-civ-00036
`APPLE INC., :
` Defendant. :
`- - - - - - - - - - - - -x
`
` CONFIDENTIAL
` ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY
`
` DEPOSITION OF JOSEPH A. PARADISO
`
` Telephonic Deposition
` Tuesday, June 16, 2020
`
`REPORTED BY:
` CARMEN SMITH
`
`Page 3
`
`Page 4
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` P R O C E E D I N G S
`Whereupon,
` JOSEPH A. PARADISO
`was called as a witness and, having first been
`duly sworn, was examined and testified as
`follows:
` EXAMINATION
` BY MR. SIDDIQUI:
` Q Good morning, Dr. Paradiso. How are
`you doing today? 11:05:46
` A I'm doing well. How are you doing?
` Q Good, good, good. Can you please
`just state your full name for the record.
` A My name is Joseph A. Paradiso.
` Q And can you provide your office 11:05:58
`address, please.
` A My home office or my office at MIT?
` Q Home office works.
` A Okay. That's 77 Shepherd Road in
`Medford, Massachusetts. That's where I am now. 11:06:18
` Q Perfect. I believe we have met
`before in person for a deposition, so I'm sure
`you -- you're aware of the basic rules for
`depositions. We're doing it a little bit
`differently this time, over the phone. But 11:06:35
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`just wanted to -- so that's why it's even more
`important that can you please speak audibly for
`the court reporter and enunciation is really
`important, and try to keep that in mind that
`she's -- you know, these are technical terms, 11:06:53
`so try to like -- I'm sure she will slow you
`down, but like -- and slow me down, but just
`keep that in mind, please, as a courtesy, that
`would be great.
` If you don't understand a question or 11:07:04
`if I'm not clear, please let me know. You
`know, it could be that I just -- connection
`dropped or something like that. So just let's
`keep all that in mind.
` I'll do the best not to interrupt you 11:07:17
`and it would be good if you do the same, and
`let's try not to speak over each other, also
`giving your counsel time to object.
` Is there any reason you cannot
`testify truthfully today? 11:07:33
` A No, there's no reason.
` Q Since your last deposition for this
`case, have you been deposed again?
` A No.
` Q Okay. I'd like to -- oh, one -- 11:07:49
`
`1 (Pages 1 to 4)
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 447-10 Filed 07/27/20 Page 4 of 53 PageID #: 25000
`
`Page 5
`
`Page 6
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`sorry, before we get started, the parties had
`some agreement with respect to these remote
`depositions we're conducting as part of that.
`Were you able to receive files, a collection of
`exhibits yesterday? 11:08:12
` A Yes, there's a folder on my desktop
`waiting, so it's there.
` Q Perfect. Were you able to download
`everything correctly?
` A It seems. We will find out, but the 11:08:20
`download went smoothly.
` Q Okay. Perfect. And I take it from
`your answers that you didn't take a look at the
`exhibits, so that's part of the parties'
`agreement. I appreciate that, thank you so 11:08:35
`much.
` A I did not. Thank you.
` Q Can you -- in the list of exhibits,
`can you please turn to, there's a document
`dated 20-25-07 Paradiso RPT, Exhibit A- -- 11:08:48
` A That's my invalidity report; correct?
` Q No, I'm going to a portion of that,
`which is the CV that was -- the CV to your
`report.
` A Yes, I do -- that was sent to us also 11:09:13
`
`Page 7
`didn't add some of my newer committees. I went
`through much more carefully a couple months
`ago, a month ago, and fleshed that out. Of
`course, we've published more papers, we have
`more patents allowed. So there's always more 11:10:32
`to add in the CV. And I still have to add info
`on the students that have graduated with me,
`students I've read on different thesis. There
`are many of those that will take some time.
` But in terms of publications, in 11:10:47
`terms of talks, in terms of, you know, patents,
`committees, it's more or less up-to-date.
`There's always more, but it's -- it's a decent
`snapshot.
` Q Sounds good. Did you do anything to 11:11:00
`prepare for today's deposition?
` A Oh, I reviewed the material.
` Q Did you meet with anybody in person?
` A No.
` MR. LIANG: I'll just step in here 11:11:16
`and just caution the witness not to disclose
`any privileged communications with counsel.
`But otherwise, you can discuss just generally
`who you met with, how long and other facts.
` THE WITNESS: Sure. I met with 11:11:30
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`on paper, and I always prefer paper because I
`hate looking at things. I believe your witness
`did the same. So I have it here. It's much
`easier for me to flip through, so if that
`works, that's fine. So I have an Exhibit A 11:09:26
`open.
` Q Yeah, that's not a problem. I assume
`you don't have any annotations or anything like
`that?
` A No, there's nothing like that. I 11:09:36
`think the vanilla stuff that the attorneys gave
`me is here with no modification.
` Q Sure. I think -- so do you have in
`front of you Exhibit A of your report, which is
`your CV? 11:09:50
` A Yes, I do.
` Q Is this the most recent and complete
`version of your CV?
` A This is the most recent one that I've
`completed. 11:09:59
` Q Okay. Have there been -- have there
`been any changes to your CV since we last spoke
`for claim construction deposition?
` A Oh, the CV that I gave you at that
`time had very coarse additions for papers. I 11:10:14
`
`Page 8
`
`nobody in person.
` BY MR. SIDDIQUI:
` Q Okay. Did you speak with anybody
`over the phone or --
` A Yes. 11:11:37
` Q -- or via video conference?
` A Yes, few of us are meeting in person
`now. But I spoke with some of the attorneys
`from OMM the last few days.
` Q When you say "last few days," can you 11:11:53
`tell me roughly how many -- which days you're
`talking about?
` A Oh, a couple of days, maybe Friday,
`maybe Sunday.
` Q You're not sure? 11:12:12
` A Friday and Sunday, yes. Friday and
`Sunday I did speak with attorneys.
` Q Okay. And who did you speak with, do
`you recall?
` A I spoke with the attorneys that are 11:12:24
`on the call now, Mark Liang and Luann Simmons.
` Q Did you speak with anybody else?
` A Those are the attorneys that I --
`that I spoke with.
` Q Sure. Did you speak with anybody 11:12:37
`
`2 (Pages 5 to 8)
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 447-10 Filed 07/27/20 Page 5 of 53 PageID #: 25001
`
`Page 9
`
`Page 10
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`from Apple?
` A No, I didn't.
` Q Did you speak with Dr. Kotzin, who is
`Apple's expert for the IPR of these patents?
` A I have never spoken with him. 11:12:51
` Q Okay. Did you review any of
`Dr. Rosenberg's expert reports as part of your
`preparation?
` A I reviewed his expert reports, not as
`part of my preparation necessarily. I have 11:13:07
`reviewed his rebuttal report as well, and I
`don't know if I'd say that was for my
`preparation either.
` Q Okay. Did you review the declaration
`of Dr. Kotzin that he submitted to the PTAB 11:13:22
`with respect to these patents?
` A I have looked at it, but I have not
`closely reviewed it, as I don't really use it
`very much in my opinions. I don't really use
`it at all, I don't think. 11:13:35
` Q And did you -- did you review
`Dr. Kotzin's declaration submitted in the PTAB
`prior to submitting your validity report in
`this case?
` A I flipped through, but I haven't 11:13:45
`
`Page 11
`
` A Yes, I recognize my rebuttal report
`to the infringement.
` Q Did you write this document?
` A Yes, I did.
` MR. LIANG: Objection, form. 11:15:12
`Objection; calls for privileged information and
`we object, under the discovery order.
` BY MR. SIDDIQUI:
` Q Who helped you prepared this
`document, Dr. Paradiso? 11:15:20
` MR. LIANG: Objection. Objection;
`calls for privileged information under the
`discovery order.
` THE WITNESS: This document contains
`all of my opinions, and I own this document. 11:15:28
`This is my document.
` BY MR. SIDDIQUI:
` Q How long did you spend preparing this
`document?
` A Oh, this document, I did this 11:15:37
`document over several weeks.
` Q Do you have a rough estimate of how
`much time you spent on drafting this report?
` A Oh, many tens of hours. I don't
`remember exactly how many. 11:15:54
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`looked at it.
` Q Can we go to -- I believe we're going
`to turn to your noninfringement rebuttal
`report, please.
` A Sure. 11:14:04
` Q It's in the folder, but if you'd
`prefer to refer to it in paper, that's
`completely fine.
` A Yeah. I have that here.
` Q Let me know when you're ready. 11:14:12
` A I have it here.
` MR. SIDDIQUI: Okay. Perfect.
` So for, I think just to clarify, for
`the record, I would like to mark Dr. Paradiso's
`CV as Paradiso Exhibit 1. 11:14:24
` (Paradiso Exhibit 1 identified.)
` MR. SIDDIQUI: And I would like to
`mark Dr. Paradiso's "REBUTTAL EXPERT REPORT
`REGARDING NON-INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT
`NUMBERS 6,748,317, 6,580,999, 6,430,498" as 11:14:40
`Paradiso Exhibit 2.
` (Paradiso Exhibit 2 identified.)
` BY MR. SIDDIQUI:
` Q Dr. Paradiso, do you recognize
`Paradiso Exhibit 2? 11:14:59
`
`Page 12
`
` Q And what's your current billing rate?
` A $600 an hour.
` Q And when you say "many tens of
`hours," do you include the time you spent
`reviewing Dr. Rosenberg's infringement report 11:16:09
`in that time, or are you just talking about the
`time you spent on actually writing the rebuttal
`report?
` A That's the time I spent developing
`the arguments in this report and putting it 11:16:19
`together, yes. Rosenberg's infringement
`report, that was a while back when it was
`served, but yeah, that would be -- that would
`be included in those.
` Q Did you -- did you study everything 11:16:39
`in Dr. Rosenberg's report prior to drafting
`your rebuttal report?
` A I went through it. I went through
`it.
` Q Did you feel like you had enough 11:16:50
`time --
` MR. LIANG: If we could pause, you're
`not putting my objections in. Objection to the
`last two questions. And also, just -- we'll
`just try to pause before answering, maybe that 11:17:09
`
`3 (Pages 9 to 12)
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 447-10 Filed 07/27/20 Page 6 of 53 PageID #: 25002
`
`Page 13
`
`will help.
` Okay. Go ahead.
` BY MR. SIDDIQUI:
` Q Did you study everything cited in
`Dr. Rosenberg's report prior to drafting your 11:17:25
`rebuttal report?
` A What does that mean?
` MR. LIANG: Objection.
` BY MR. SIDDIQUI:
` Q Did you study everything cited in 11:17:37
`Dr. Rosenberg's report prior to drafting your
`rebuttal report?
` A I looked at the entire report.
` MR. LIANG: Objection; form.
`Objection; form. 11:17:55
` BY MR. SIDDIQUI:
` Q Dr. Paradiso, there's a question
`pending.
` A Can you repeat the question?
` Q Sure. Did you study everything cited 11:18:12
`in Dr. Rosenberg's report prior to drafting
`your rebuttal report?
` A Everything that I talk about in my
`rebuttal report that refers to Professor
`Rosenberg I did study. 11:18:23
`
`Page 15
`
` Q Sure, no problem.
` When would you say you started
`drafting your rebuttal report and stopped
`reviewing all the materials and had formed
`opinions on noninfringement? 11:19:50
` MR. LIANG: Objection; form.
` And I'm going to caution the witness,
`arguably calls for privileged information.
` THE WITNESS: And I really can't
`answer that because it's just very hard to 11:20:00
`remember.
` BY MR. SIDDIQUI:
` Q Okay. Can you please turn to
`paragraph 49 of your report.
` A Sure. Yes. 11:20:09
` Q Is it correct that this paragraph
`explains that you reviewed source code as part
`of your drafting your rebuttal report?
` A Yes, I did.
` Q And is it correct that you reviewed 11:20:36
`source code from May 23rd to May 27th?
` A Yes, that's correct.
` Q Did you review the source code in a
`facility, or were you able to review it at your
`home? 11:20:52
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`Page 14
`
` Q So if it's not in your rebuttal
`report, that means you didn't study it?
` A Not necessarily, no.
` MR. LIANG: Objection.
` Not trying to coach the witness, but 11:18:40
`Joe, if you could just pause after the
`question, I think that will just help the court
`reporter.
` THE WITNESS: Of course. Sorry.
` BY MR. SIDDIQUI: 11:18:52
` Q So, for example, did you look at all
`the schematics and all the technical
`specifications and data sheets for all the
`accused products that are cited in
`Dr. Rosenberg's report? 11:19:08
` MR. LIANG: Objection; form.
` THE WITNESS: In my report, I discuss
`what I looked at in Rosenberg's report.
` BY MR. SIDDIQUI:
` Q Sure. Would you like me to call you 11:19:21
`Paradiso? Because you keep referring to
`Dr. Rosenberg as Rosenberg.
` A Oh, sorry. You tend to think of the
`report as the adjective. But yes,
`Dr. Rosenberg's report. 11:19:34
`
`Page 16
`
` A Unfortunately, I was not able to --
`I'm sorry. I was not able to go to -- I was
`not able to go to a facility because we are on
`lockdown. That was the original plan. So I
`did review it at my home. 11:21:07
` MR. LIANG: There was an objection
`made. I'll just caution everybody to just
`pause again between statements, it will be
`easier to put in an objection.
` BY MR. SIDDIQUI: 11:21:25
` Q Yeah, I mean, Dr. Paradiso, I'm
`asking the questions, so that refers to you.
`So I have no objection to you pausing once I
`ask a question so your counsel has time to
`object. 11:21:40
` A Yes.
` Q So when -- when were you first
`retained in this case, do you recall?
` A I was retained in the fall. It was
`some months, I believe, before you and I met 11:22:00
`when I filed the original declaration.
` Q And so was there any particular
`reason you decided not to review source code
`from fall all the way up to May 23rd?
` MR. LIANG: Objection to form, also 11:22:17
`
`4 (Pages 13 to 16)
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 447-10 Filed 07/27/20 Page 7 of 53 PageID #: 25003
`
`Page 17
`
`Page 18
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`calls for privileged information.
` BY MR. SIDDIQUI:
` Q Dr. Paradiso, you did not want to
`review the source code prior to May 23rd?
` MR. LIANG: Objection to form, calls 11:22:39
`for privileged information.
` THE WITNESS: Yeah, this refers to
`discussions with counsel.
` BY MR. SIDDIQUI:
` Q So at no point did you decide that it 11:22:48
`would be important for you to know how the
`accused products work and for you to look at
`the source code prior to May 23rd?
` MR. LIANG: Objection; form and calls
`for privileged information. 11:23:01
` THE WITNESS: This refers to
`discussions with counsel.
` BY MR. SIDDIQUI:
` Q So when you were reviewing the source
`code in your home from May 23rd to 27th, did 11:23:14
`you have a Webcam activated where counsel was
`able to watch you while you were reviewing
`code?
` MR. LIANG: Objection.
` THE WITNESS: I did not. 11:23:26
`
`Page 19
` THE WITNESS: Oh, I don't -- Mark, go
`ahead.
` MR. LIANG: Just objection to form.
` THE WITNESS: Oh, I don't remember.
` BY MR. SIDDIQUI: 11:25:00
` Q Do you know that there are multiple
`files in each source code directory?
` A Yes, there are.
` Q And you think you had sufficient time
`to go through each of the 90 directories in 11:25:10
`those four days?
` A The files that I went through, the
`directories that I went through, are in tables
`in my report.
` Q So you didn't look through all of the 11:25:25
`source code files, just some source code files
`in these directories?
` MR. LIANG: Objection; form.
` THE WITNESS: I looked through the
`source code directories that I talk about in 11:25:33
`the tables in my report that I present.
` BY MR. SIDDIQUI:
` Q So I think we're mixing up
`directories and source code files. Did you
`look at all the source code files within these 11:25:45
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` BY MR. SIDDIQUI:
` Q And on May 23rd to 27th, roughly how
`much time did you spend reviewing source code?
` A Oh, I spent, again, some tens of
`hours, maybe 20, 30 hours. I don't remember 11:23:43
`exactly.
` Q And while you were reviewing source
`code, were you working on your -- were you
`writing your rebuttal report as well?
` A I was editing it. 11:23:59
` MR. LIANG: Objection to form.
` BY MR. SIDDIQUI:
` Q You were editing your report while
`writing your expert report; is that correct?
`Sorry, you were editing your report while you 11:24:14
`were reviewing source code; is that correct?
` A It's difficult to remember exactly
`when I did what because I was doing so many
`things. But there very well may have been some
`overlap. 11:24:24
` Q So on pages 16 to 18, there's roughly
`90 source code directories listed. And so how
`much time did you spend reviewing each source
`code directory?
` MR. LIANG: Objection. 11:24:47
`
`Page 20
`
`directories?
` MR. LIANG: Objection to form.
` THE WITNESS: No, I looked at the
`source code files that were representative of
`location or maps or the issues that were at 11:25:55
`stake.
` BY MR. SIDDIQUI:
` Q Do you recall what -- sorry, go
`ahead. I apologize, I didn't mean to cut you
`off. 11:26:08
` A Again, it's all listed there in the
`report.
` Q Yeah. I see a list of source code
`directories, but you're saying you looked at
`source code files that were representative of 11:26:21
`location. Do you know what you mean by
`representative?
` A It says it right here. So in
`particular, I verify that GreenTorch does not
`have the files that -- some of the files which 11:26:38
`were mentioned, and I talk about what they are,
`some of them aren't being used, and that
`several of the files are used by Apple
`Messaging, not by Find line, Find My Friends.
` And later on in the declaration, I 11:26:57
`
`5 (Pages 17 to 20)
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 447-10 Filed 07/27/20 Page 8 of 53 PageID #: 25004
`
`Page 21
`
`looked through core location files, and I
`looked at the data structures and the objects
`that are brought in for looking at location,
`determining location to see if there's any hint
`of using heading information or compass or 11:27:10
`gyro, and there's absolutely not. I even
`looked in these places for any indication of
`heading or compass or gyro being used, and I
`found nothing. And that's what I say.
` Q Okay. And with respect to Find My 11:27:28
`Friend source code that you say is not being
`used and it's being used for messaging, what in
`the source code indicated to you that the Find
`My Friend source code is being used for only
`Find My Friends messaging app? 11:27:57
` A During my calls, and I'm going
`through my report now with Mr. Lopatin, he
`informed me that, for instance, the source code
`in the first table was not used in Find line
`starting in iOS 13. It moved to GreenTorch, 11:28:47
`was put into Swift Dash at that time so it
`isn't even an objective C file. And I
`confirmed that and I mention the files that are
`not there are not used.
` And then when I talked also with 11:29:07
`
`Page 23
` THE WITNESS: I don't really recall
`exactly what the directory name is. I looked
`at all of them that are called here.
` BY MR. SIDDIQUI:
` Q Let's look at page -- 11:30:41
` A Actually, you can see, it's true.
`IOS Find My Friends, and then there's a tag on
`it, and then you go down, Daemon iOS 9 through
`13, for example to the top. And then it's
`different for the different ones. 11:30:58
` Q So is it your opinion that the source
`code included within directories that have Find
`My Friends in the title are not being used by
`Find My Friends application; is that correct?
` A Yes, that's correct. Those routines 11:31:12
`are not being used by the Find My Friends
`location in these versions that I cite.
` Q And what in the source code review
`led you to believe it?
` A The applications aren't in the 11:31:29
`directory. You don't see the files in those
`directories. So FMFDataManager.m isn't there.
` Q But it is there, find my --
`FMFDataManager.m is within the directory Find
`My Friends-175/Daemon? 11:31:54
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`Page 22
`Mr. Lopatin, he told me that these source code
`files are only used for Apple messaging and not
`for Find My Friends, and I looked to see if I
`could see these files used or included, and I
`didn't. 11:29:29
` Q What does find my -- Find My Friends
`or -- denote to you? Does Find My Friends
`denote to you it's a messaging app or is it a
`Find My Friends application?
` MR. LIANG: Objection; form. 11:29:45
` THE WITNESS: Find My Friends is an
`application, I believe, it says here.
` BY MR. SIDDIQUI:
` Q Okay. And so is it your opinion that
`the source code for Find My Friends, which is 11:29:57
`the name of the directory, not used for the
`Find My Friends application?
` MR. LIANG: Objection; form.
` THE WITNESS: The source code that I
`explicitly cite here in this table is not used 11:30:13
`in the Find My Friends application.
` BY MR. SIDDIQUI:
` Q Okay. But the name of the directory
`is Find My Friends; correct?
` MR. LIANG: Objection to form. 11:30:28
`
`Page 24
`
` A It's not included in the header file
`at this point. It could -- I'm slightly -- I'd
`have to refresh, but it's not used or it's not
`there.
` Q So Dr. Paradiso, I believe it's 11:32:08
`there, so let's rule that out. And because
`perhaps you're mixing GreenTorch with the other
`iOSes. So I think, you know, just I believe
`that's why you list them on page 53, these
`files that are listed under paragraph 53 of 11:32:31
`your report are, in fact, within these Find My
`Friends directories.
` So assuming that's true, can you tell
`me what led you to believe that these source
`code files listed on page 19 of your report 11:32:45
`that are within the directory Find My Friends
`are not used for Find My Friends applications?
` MR. LIANG: Objection to form.
` THE WITNESS: Can you tell -- can you
`tell me which -- you said page 53, but I don't 11:32:59
`see anything on 53, any table.
` BY MR. SIDDIQUI:
` Q I apologize. I meant paragraph 53.
` A Paragraph 53. Yes, yes. I don't
`believe they're included in the -- in the Find 11:33:15
`
`6 (Pages 21 to 24)
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 447-10 Filed 07/27/20 Page 9 of 53 PageID #: 25005
`
`Page 25
`My Friends header files. They aren't used in
`the program. You see no evidence of them being
`included or used.
` Q Okay. So if the files are there
`within the directory, then -- then would you 11:33:29
`change your opinion?
` MR. LIANG: Objection; form.
` THE WITNESS: I don't think I would.
` BY MR. SIDDIQUI:
` Q So I don't understand the basis of -- 11:33:44
`I think you're saying that because the files
`are not there, you don't -- you didn't see any
`evidence of them being used.
` A Yes. Yeah, they are not being used,
`they're not being included and used in the 11:34:01
`software and/or they're not there. If they're
`there, they're not being used.
` Q And what is your basis for believing
`that they are not being used?
` MR. LIANG: Objection to form. 11:34:12
` THE WITNESS: They're not included in
`the software. The software doesn't link to
`them.
` BY MR. SIDDIQUI:
` Q But they are included in the source 11:34:20
`
`Page 27
`you don't mind, can you please provide me your
`basis for asserting that the source code files
`included within directories entitled Find My
`Friends are not being executed in the accused
`products Find My Friends application. 11:36:05
` MR. LIANG: Object to form.
` THE WITNESS: I believe because you
`can't -- you don't see it in the header file
`that is used to put this together.
` BY MR. SIDDIQUI: 11:36:17
` Q Which header file is that?
` A I don't recall.
` MR. LIANG: Objection; form.
` BY MR. SIDDIQUI:
` Q So sitting here today, you can't 11:36:24
`recall which header file you looked at to form
`your basis that these source code files that
`are made available by Apple in this case under
`Find My Friends directory for iOS 9 through 10,
`11, 12 are not being executed; is that correct? 11:36:45
` MR. LIANG: Object to form.
` THE WITNESS: Yes, that's correct.
`But I was very confident when I made this
`table.
` BY MR. SIDDIQUI: 11:36:58
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`Page 26
`
`code. What is your basis for saying they're
`not included in the software?
` MR. LIANG: Objection to form.
` THE WITNESS: In this -- the software
`build -- let me again review here, see if it's 11:34:31
`clearer. Oh, here.
` Yes, I believe in the software that
`actually calls these routines, puts these
`routines together, you don't see them called
`out, they're not in the header files, they're 11:35:16
`not being used. They're being used by
`Messenger, they're not being used by Fine Line.
` BY MR. SIDDIQUI:
` Q I understand that is your opinion,
`but I would like to see what evidence that 11:35:30
`opinion is based on.
` MR. LIANG: Objection to form.
` BY MR. SIDDIQUI:
` Q And so you have not explained here
`what forms your belief that they're not being 11:35:38
`executed.
` MR. LIANG: Objection to form.
` THE WITNESS: I thought I did.
` BY MR. SIDDIQUI:
` Q So I apologize, Dr. Paradiso, so if 11:35:49
`
`Page 28
`
` Q Okay. Did anybody -- any other
`expert or consultant assist you in your source
`code review?
` A I had a source code expert that I did
`speak with. 11:37:09
` Q Do you recall his name?
` A Andrew Mayo.
` Q Have you ever worked with Mr. Mayo
`before?
` A No, I have not. 11:37:20
` Q Are you familiar with Mr. Mayo?
` A No, I am not.
` Q Do you know what his credentials are?
` A He appears to be very familiar with
`Apple code. 11:37:34
` Q And was counsel present on the call
`that you spoke with Mr. Mayo?
` A Yes, they were.
` MR. LIANG: Objection.
` I'll just caution the witness, this 11:37:45
`is veering into privileged -- seeking
`privileged communications protected under the
`discovery order. So don't divulge contents of
`the discussion. You can say who was on, how
`long it was, when you talked with us, and we'll 11:38:06
`
`7 (Pages 25 to 28)
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 447-10 Filed 07/27/20 Page 10 of 53 PageID #: 25006
`
`Page 29
`
`Page 30
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`leave it there.
` BY MR. SIDDIQUI:
` Q Dr. Paradiso, so when did you speak
`with Dr. -- or Mr. Mayo? Sorry, I actually
`don't remember. Do you know if he -- let's 11:38:15
`strike that.
` Do you know if it's Mr. Mayo or
`Dr. Mayo?
` A I don't

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket