Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 438-3 Filed 07/24/20 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 24177
`Case 5:19-cv-00036—RWS DocumerlylffiEI-é \fEingngF4/20 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 24177
`
`EXHIBIT B
`EXHIBIT B
`
`PUBLIC VERSION
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 438-3 Filed 07/24/20 Page 2 of 6 PageID #: 24178
`Case 5:19-cv-00036—RWS DocumerlylffiEI-é @ngngng Page 2 of 6 PageID #: 24178
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`     
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`     
`TEXARKANA DIVISION
` 
`
`   
`
` 
`MAXELL, LTD.,
`
`
`
`Us.
`
`
` 
`APPLE INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`DECLARATION OF DR. JOSEPH A. PARADISO IN SUPPORT OF
`        
`APPLE INC.’S PROPOSED CLAIM CONSTRUCTIONS
`    
`
`PUBLIC VERSION
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 438-3 Filed 07/24/20 Page 3 of 6 PageID #: 24179
`
`        
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`            
`
`               
`
`                
`
`
`
`           
`
`    Maxell, Ltd. v. Apple Inc.    
`
`              
`
`             
`
`            
`
`        
`
`
`
`             
`
`                
`
`                 
`
`              
`
`                
`
`                
`
`               
`
` 
`
`
`
`           
`
`            
`
`             
`
`            
`
`     inter partes     
`
`
`
`PUBLIC VERSION
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 438-3 Filed 07/24/20 Page 4 of 6 PageID #: 24180
`
`M
`
`e goa 0 tie Asserteo Nav1gat10n Patents 1s to a01 1tate wa 1ng nav1gat10n,
`
`i.e., providing location information to a walking user. [’498 Patent at 1:10-13. To achieve
`
`I' I‘0V1 I 111g
`
`et al. “Cyberguide: A Mobile Context—Aware Tour Guide,” Baltzer ournals (Sept. 23, 1996)
`
`(“Abowd”) at 8 (APL-MAXELL_00713087) (“Indoors, however, GPS signals are weak or not
`
`e’ ); Starner, et a .
`
`ocation and messaging system,” | EEE (1997) (“Starner”) at 1 (“Unfortunately, the radio
`
`ocatlon 1n orrnatlon 1n oors or 1n nv1ron1nents W ere s1gna s are o-cstructe. W!
`
`https://resenv.media.1nit.edu/#Projects#the-uberbadge).
`
`PUBLIC VERSION
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 438-3 Filed 07/24/20 Page 5 of 6 PageID #: 24181
`
`1
`
`se, 111 conjunction Wit
`
`‘P ‘
`
`to ota1n ocation 111 orn1at10n
`
`__!
`
`u
`
`r0111 eing e ect1ve moors an propos1ng a so utiont at incorporates t1e use 0 a
`
`ystem o in rare. recelvers an. transn11tters);
`
`‘ now: at 8—9 (notlng t e same pro em an propos1ng as a so ut10nt1e use 0 111 rare
`
`ens1ng’ ).
`
`SE
`
`|
`
`ave a so een 1n orme t at t1e Patent Tria an ‘ ppea Boar: accopte 1n
`
`IPR2019-0007l (ASUSTek Computer Inc, et al. v. Maxell, Ltd.) the construction that Apple now
`
`proposes. There, the Petitioner ASUSTek proposed the same construction offered by Apple
`
`here, an Maxe
`
`:1: not alspute 1t.
`
`(Sept. 1999) (not1ngt e use 0 111 rare 1eceivers an transmltteis or ‘1nter101 ocatlon
`
`tructure 1s “a Wire ess or ce lular antenna, a GPS, a PHS, or the like; such a data receiver as an
`
`0 o 0
`
`Bl!
`
`'nformation denoting a present place of said portable terminal” . 11d that the corresponding
`
`PUBLIC VERSION
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 438-3 Filed 07/24/20 Page 6 of 6 PageID #: 24182
`Case 5:19-cv-00036—RWS DocumerlylffiEI-é @ngngng Page 6 of 6 PageID #: 24182
`
`infrared ray sensor. or the like; and a CPU for analyzing received data; or equivalents thereof." I
`
`disagree with Maxell that the way it has phrased its proposed corresponding structure is how a
`
`POSITA would have understood the invention. Particularly. it appears that Maxell contends that
`
`any of the following list of individual components: ( 1) GPS, (2) antenna, or (3) PHS could each
`
`individually be combined with both a CPU and a “data receiver” to perform the function of
`
`"getting location information denoting a present place of said portable terminal." This is
`
`incorrect as. for example. an antenna could not be combined with a CPU to get location
`
`information. This is further incorrect because. under Maxell‘s proposed construction, any "data
`
`receiver" could be used in place of an infrared ray sensor, and not all "data receivers” were
`
`capable of obtaining location information in the manner that infrared ray sensors were. For
`
`example, a POSITA would consider a USB port to be a “data receiver,“ and a USB port was
`
`never used, by itself. for location determination. Moreover, the only example of a data receiver
`
`disclosed by the Asserted Navigation Patents’ specification is an infrared ray sensor.
`
`35.
`
`I declare under the penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of
`
`America that the foregoing is true and correct.
`
`Executed on 4th day of October. 2019,
`
`/
`
`Joseph A. Paradiso
`
`l3
`
`PUBLIC VERSION
`
`