throbber
Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 389-9 Filed 07/02/20 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 19148
`Case 5:19-cv-00036—RWS Document 389-9 Filed 07/02/20 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 19148
`
`EXHIBIT 4
`
`EXHIBIT 4
`
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 389-9 Filed 07/02/20 Page 2 of 6 PageID #: 19149
`
`Page 1
`
` UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
` EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
` TEXARKANA DIVISION
`--------------------------X
`MAXELL, LTD., :
` Plaintiff, : Case No.
` v. : 5:19-cv-00036-RWS
`APPLE INC., :
` Defendant. :
`--------------------------X
` Videotaped deposition of VIJAY MADISETTI Ph.D.
` Tuesday, October 22, 2019
` Atlanta, GA
` 8:57 a.m.
`
`Job No.: 170439
`Pages: 1 - 186
`Reported by: Giselle Mitchell-Margerum, RPR, CRI,
`CCR
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`1 2
`
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 389-9 Filed 07/02/20 Page 3 of 6 PageID #: 19150
`Page 38
`Page 39
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` V. MADISETTI
`different aspects of image and video processing.
`Do you consider any of those topics more relevant
`to the technology at issue in this case?
` A. I would generally say that they are all
`generally relevant. The whole area was in the area
`of image and video processing.
` Q. Got it. So, around the same section of
`your expert report -- around paragraphs 28 through
`31, you provide an opinion on the level of ordinary
`skill in the art. Do you see that?
` A. I do.
` Q. And it's your opinion that a person of
`ordinary skill in the art would be a person with a
`bachelor's of science degree in electrical or
`computer engineering, computer science, or an
`equivalent degree; and at least two years of
`experience working in the field of image/video
`processing.
` Is that correct?
` A. That's right.
` Q. And what do you mean by "working in the
`field of image/video processing?"
` A. They would be dealing with both the
`hardware and the software aspects of image and
`
`Page 40
`
` V. MADISETTI
` Q. So, as part of working in the field of
`image/video processing, what knowledge must a
`person know to qualify as a POSITA?
` A. Generally, familiarity with the types of
`processing that occurs with image and video
`acquisition; with post-processing with the
`different types of -- with the different types
`of -- improvement of the quality of the image;
`better storage; ability to convert it to different
`forms.
` Q. So if you were to, say, you know,
`interview a person to determine whether that person
`qualifies as a POSITA, or not, would you expect
`that person to know about the different types of
`image sensors that were, you know, available on the
`market?
` A. At some level, yes, they would be
`knowledgeable about some types of sensors.
` Q. So around -- I want to keep -- ask you to
`keep in mind that this patent was filed in early
`2000. Do you recall that?
` A. Yes.
` Q. So, around that time, would you expect a
`POSITA to know about different types of image
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` V. MADISETTI
`video processing.
` Q. So you would consider someone of ordinary
`skill in the art, as a bare minimum requirement, to
`have some experience in both the hardware and the
`software aspects of video image -- I'm sorry --
`video/image processing.
` Is that right?
` MR. NESE: Object to the form.
` A. No. The way I've said that in paragraph
`30 -- I mean, I think that two years of experience
`in the field of image/video processing is what I
`consider as the definition of a "POSITA" here.
` THE COURT REPORTER: Of a what?
` THE WITNESS: Of a person of ordinary
`skill in the art. P-O-S-I-T-A.
`BY MR. ZHOU:
` Q. So, during this deposition, if I use the
`phrase, "POSITA" -- P-O-S-I-T-A -- to refer to a
`person of ordinary skill in the art, around the
`time of the 493 Patent's filing, would you
`understand that?
` A. Yes, I would. It would refer to what I
`describe in paragraphs 28 through 31 of my
`declaration.
`
`Page 41
`
` V. MADISETTI
`sensors, like CCD sensors, and CMOS image sensors,
`and so forth?
` A. Yes.
` Q. Would you expect that person to know the
`differences between how a CCD sensor would work
`versus how a CMOS sensor would work?
` A. Yes.
` Q. Would you expect a person skilled in the
`art to know about how the pixels are arranged on
`the sensor?
` A. Yes.
` Q. In horizontal row, and vertical columns,
`and so forth?
` A. Yes.
` Q. And those would be common knowledge that
`you would expect a person skilled in the art to
`know, heading into -- you know, even before reading
`the 493 Patent. Right?
` A. Yes. They would be -- they would be
`knowledgeable as to those formats.
` Q. As part of working in image/video
`processing, would you expect a person skilled in
`the art to know about image signal processors and
`image signal processing algorithms?
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`11
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 389-9 Filed 07/02/20 Page 4 of 6 PageID #: 19151
`Page 42
`Page 43
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` V. MADISETTI
` A. Yes.
` Q. What would you expect a person skilled in
`the art to know in those aspects?
` A. Things like -- topics like interpolation,
`decimation. Topics like noise removal; pixel
`collection; various types of compression; storage
`types of techniques.
` Q. Right. So, I think the first thing you
`mentioned was "interpolation." Right?
` A. Yes. Interpolation, decimation and
`others.
` Q. So, interpolation refers to taking an
`image and trying to kind of increase the
`resolution -- pixel resolution of the image by
`interpolating between pixels. Is that, generally,
`correct?
` A. Now, as I said, I mean, one of -- it
`could be one of the uses. That's not a definition.
`"Interpolation" can be used in many, many ways.
` Q. So one example of a use for
`"interpolation" would be to take a low resolution
`image and try to increase the resolution by
`interpolating between pixels. Is that right?
` A. That's one example, yes.
`
`Page 44
`
` V. MADISETTI
` Q. And what years did you work on this Intel
`chipset?
` A. In the early 2000 time frame.
` Q. Early 2000, after the filing of the 493
`Patent?
` A. Around that time frame.
` Q. As part of working in image/video
`processing, would you expect a person skilled in
`the art to know about different types of display
`screens and display formats?
` A. Yes. Generally, again, at a high level.
` Q. For example, would you expect a person
`skilled in the art to know about the difference
`between CRT displays, and LCD displays, and active
`matrix displays, and so forth?
` A. At a high level, yes.
` Q. What about television display standards,
`like NTSC, and PAL, and so forth?
` A. At a high level, yes.
` Q. And what do you mean by a "high level?"
` A. Again, because it's signal processing,
`and image processing, at a very high level. They
`may not be intimately familiar with all aspects of
`it.
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` V. MADISETTI
` Q. And "decimation;" one example of a use
`for "decimation" would be to take a higher
`resolution image and reduce the resolution of that
`image. Is that right?
` A. That's -- one again -- one example of
`"decimation."
` Q. In your CV -- earlier in your CV, around
`paragraph 13, you had mentioned that you worked on
`image processing chipsets, like the Intel and
`MXP5800 family of image processing chipsets.
` Do you see that?
` A. Yes.
` Q. So, would you expect a person of ordinary
`skill in the art, as relevant to the 493 Patent, to
`know about different types of image signal
`processors available on the market, around the time
`of the patent's filing?
` A. At a high level, yes.
` Q. The product that you worked on -- the
`Intel MXP chipset -- was it capable of performing
`the general types of image/video processing you
`discussed earlier? Like interpolation, and
`decimation, and noise removal, and so forth?
` A. Yes. It was used in photocopiers.
`
`Page 45
`
` V. MADISETTI
` Q. But you expect them to know, at least,
`the general concept of, for example, NTSC display.
`Is that right?
` A. I would expect them to know the general
`aspects of TV broadcast and signal formats. Both
`progressive, as well as interlaced approaches.
`Because they have been around since the 1930s and
`'40s.
` So, I would expect them to be familiar
`that TV -- TV systems -- TV display systems would
`support both progressive and interlaced approaches.
` Q. So, going to paragraph 29, you say here
`that, as relating to the 493 Patent, the patent
`involves general principles, including the concepts
`of digital image and video processing for electric
`cameras.
` Do you see that?
` A. Yes.
` Q. What do you mean by "electric cameras?"
` A. Primarily, digital cameras and devices.
` Q. Is there a difference between electric
`cameras and digital cameras, in your mind?
` A. I would say that digital camera is an --
`digital camera is what is generally being referred
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`12
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 389-9 Filed 07/02/20 Page 5 of 6 PageID #: 19152
`Page 138
`Page 139
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` V. MADISETTI
`for interlacing. So where, I think, your expert
`has errored, or erred, is that he seems to state
`that vertical blanking period field -- vertical
`blanking period only applies to master scanning,
`which only applied to interlacing, and he is wrong.
` So you can have vertical blanking period
`in -- for the sake of progressing scanning and
`displays as well. And a simple book, for example,
`by Charles Poynton. The book is called "HD Video,"
`has, in chapter eight, a full description of how
`vertical blanking period is present in progressive
`displays and scanning.
` Q. Dr. Madisetti, what I asked you to
`explain is what a vertical blanking period is.
`Right? And your answer was, "it traces back to the
`first line." So what I'm asking you is, what is
`being traced back to the first line?
` A. The scan position.
` Q. The scan position of what? The
`electronic gun that's shooting at the CRT? Or what
`is being --
` A. It could be anything. For a digital
`sensor, or for a digital display. It could be the
`position. Depending on whether it's a CCD, or
`
`Page 140
`
` V. MADISETTI
`reads and successive line reads. Successive line
`reads is the horizontal blanking. Successive frame
`reads is the vertical blanking.
` Q. But in the context of interlace, it would
`be successful field? Or is it still successive
`frame?
` A. Successive field for interlaced. And for
`progressive, it's successive frame. But, again, I
`have to look at the specific way this is used.
` Q. And so, we talked about horizontal. We
`talked about vertical. Are those well understood
`directions to a person skilled in the art, in the
`context of image processing?
` A. Again, I'm not sure as to your question.
`I mean, the way the typical digital image sensors
`are read, are rows and columns. So, in the context
`of the example shown, they have used some examples
`to show how you could drive, say, an interlaced or
`a progressive TV system.
` But you don't need to have a TV display
`as a part -- you don't have -- necessarily have to
`have a particular type of display.
` Q. So, horizontal would be in the direction
`each line is being either read out, or being
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` V. MADISETTI
`whether it is a CMOS. It can have different types.
` Again, the examples are describing
`certain embodiments, but one of ordinary skill in
`the art would understand that this applies to CMOS;
`CCDs. It would have also applied to progressive
`and interlacing.
` Q. So, the horizontal scanning period, is it
`correct to understand that the horizontal
`scanning -- strike that.
` Is it correct to understand that the
`horizontal blanking period has a time gap between
`scanning of individual horizontal lines? Is that
`correct?
` A. Roughly, yes. Again, I'm not exactly
`sure how -- what additional qualification is needed
`there, but it's generally right.
` Q. And the vertical --
` A. And it doesn't matter. It applies to
`both interlacing and progressive.
` Q. And the vertical blanking period is the
`time gap between the last pixel on one field, or
`frame, and the first pixel in the next field, or
`frame. Is that correct?
` A. It's the time between successive frame
`
`Page 141
`
` V. MADISETTI
`scanned on to the display. And vertical would be
`the direction perpendicular to that? Is that your
`understanding?
` A. Again, those are, again, very loose
`terms. Some people say it depends on the type of
`scanning. So it could be zigzag. It could be
`angular. It could be moving in -- I'm not sure
`what you mean, perpendicular. But one refers to
`rows. The other refers to the entire set of rows.
` Q. So if I flip this iPad onto sideways, it
`doesn't change the direction of its scanning;
`right?
` A. You're talking about the camera?
` Q. So, I asked you what vertical -- the
`scanning period and vertical blanking period are,
`and you provided an explanation that uses the terms
`"horizontal" and "vertical."
` I'm just trying to understand what you
`mean by the horizontal and the vertical aspects, in
`the context of these two terms. Right?
` A. Yeah. But those terms are not part of
`the claims, which is why I was trying to look into
`the specification.
` Q. Sure.
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`36
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 389-9 Filed 07/02/20 Page 6 of 6 PageID #: 19153
`Page 142
`Page 143
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` V. MADISETTI
` A. The specification uses them as examples.
`My high level understanding is that the horizontal
`refers to reading a single row, and vertical refers
`to reading multiple rows.
` Q. Understood.
` A. And that's, again, a single embodiment,
`but I will not restrict it to a particular
`interlacing or progressive embodiment.
` Q. Understood. In paragraph 66 of your
`declaration, you provide -- you cite additional
`parts of the patent specification, as it relates to
`the effective scanning align term.
` Do you see that?
` A. Yes. I describe there, because it
`actually -- the patentee uses their own terms, that
`it refers to the effective scanning line number as
`the number of scanning lines actually displayed on
`the monitor.
` Q. So would you agree that the six -- strike
`that.
` Would you agree that the 493 Patent, at
`column one, lines 37 through 60 -- 37 through 43
`provides a description of the effective scanning
`lines term?
`
`Page 144
`
` V. MADISETTI
`section, which is column one, lines 37 to 43.
` So there is a specific embodiment that
`provides some support, but not necessarily the only
`support; nor is it the only embodiment.
` Q. So, column one, lines 37 to 43, isn't
`talking about a particular embodiment. Right?
`It's just giving a background of the technology;
`isn't it?
` A. I would disagree. I would say that
`column one, lines 30 to 32 -- sorry, line number 33
`to 34, specifically describe that -- that in the
`context of a general television system, on line
`number 33; then it gives a couple of examples, such
`as NTSC and PAL. So, it is talking about a
`specific example.
` Q. So it's your testimony here today that
`the paragraphs under the heading "Background of the
`Invention" describes specific embodiments of the
`claimed invention. Is that right?
` A. It describes the background of the
`invention and refers to certain claimed -- certain
`types of television systems as specific examples.
` Q. So, going to paragraph 66 again, in your
`declaration --
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` V. MADISETTI
` A. For one embodiment. But it is not
`limiting to NTSC. It can also apply, in a more
`general form, to progressive as well. And other
`types of displays.
` Q. So would you agree that 493 Patent, at
`column one, lines 37 through 43, provides
`description of one embodiment of the effective
`scanning line term?
` A. One specific embodiment with respect to a
`particular type of monitor, but it's not limiting.
`And one of ordinary skill in the art would
`understand that this definition would also apply to
`progressive displays as well.
` Q. And now, Maxell relied on this part of
`what you describe as a non-limiting description to
`derive its claim construction. Right?
` A. I don't know what Maxell did.
` Q. So you -- your opinion, in paragraph 66,
`is that the term actually displayed on a monitor
`comes from this portion of the specification.
`Right?
` A. This support -- support for the
`specification -- for that construction is also
`found among other sections in the background
`
`Page 145
`
` V. MADISETTI
` A. Yeah.
` Q. -- on the bottom of page 14?
` A. Yeah.
` Q. The portion you cite states that in the
`NTSC system, the number of effective scanning lines
`is about 240 lines.
` Do you see that?
` A. Yes.
` Q. And that is the number of scanning lines
`actually displayed on the monitor. Do you see
`that?
` A. Yes.
` Q. And in this embodiment, it's being
`equaled to the number of scanning lines in the
`vertical blanking period, subtracted from the total
`number of scanning lines in each field.
` Do you see that?
` A. Yes.
` Q. And this vertical blanking period is the
`same vertical blanking period we talked about
`around the last break we took. Is that right?
` A. The vertical blank period is the time
`that -- so, there are a number of lines that are
`not displayed. And the effective -- what this is
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`37
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket