throbber
Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 348-9 Filed 06/18/20 Page 1 of 49 PageID #: 12391
`Case 5:19-cv-00036—RWS Document 348-9 Filed 06/18/20 Page 1 of 49 PageID #: 12391
`
`EXHIBIT 26
`
`EXHIBIT 26
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 348-9 Filed 06/18/20 Page 2 of 49 PageID #: 12392
`Defendant’s Invalidity Contentions
`Exhibit D1
`
`
`Invalidity of U.S. Patent No. 6,408,193
`by
`U.S. Patent No. 5,548,616 to Mucke, et al. (“Mucke”)
`
`
`The excerpts cited herein are exemplary. For any claim limitation, Defendant may rely on excerpts cited for any other limitation and/or
`additional excerpts not set forth fully herein to the extent necessary to provide a more comprehensive explanation for a reference’s
`disclosure of a limitation. Where an excerpt refers to or discusses a figure or figure items, that figure and any additional descriptions
`of that figure should be understood to be incorporated by reference as if set forth fully therein.
`
`Except where specifically noted otherwise, this chart applies the apparent constructions of claim terms as used by Plaintiff in its
`infringement contentions; such use, however, does not imply that Defendant adopts or agrees with Plaintiff’s constructions in any way.
`
`U.S. Patent No. 6,408,193 (“the ’193 Patent”) claims priority to Japanese Application No. 10-318689, filed November 10, 1998. For
`purposes of these invalidity contentions, Defendant applies the November 10, 1998, priority date for the ’193 Patent. However,
`Defendant reserves the right to contest Plaintiff’s reliance on the November 10, 1998, priority date, should the priority date become an
`issue in this proceeding.
`
`Mucke was filed on September 9, 1994 and issued on August 20, 1996. As such, Mucke qualifies as prior art with regard to the ’193
`Patent under 35 U.S.C. §§ 102(a), 102(b), and 102(e) (pre-AIA). Using Plaintiff’s interpretation of the claims, Mucke anticipates claims
`1, 6, and 7 under 35 U.S.C. §§ 102(a), 102(b), and 102(e).
`
`Alternatively, Mucke renders obvious claims 1, 6, and 7 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) in view of the knowledge of a person having ordinary
`skill in the art.
`
`Alternatively Mucke in view of Japanese Unexamined Patent Application Publication JP H10-0285059 to Nakayama (“Nakayama”)
`renders obvious claims 1, 6, and 7 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a). Nakayama was published on October 23, 1998. As such, Nakayama
`qualifies as prior art with regard to the ’193 Patent under at least 35 U.S.C. § 102(a) (pre-AIA).
`
`Alternatively Mucke in view of U.S. Patent No. 6,118,988 to Choi renders obvious claims 1, 6, and 7 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a). Choi
`was filed on July 31, 1998. As such, Choi qualifies as prior art with regard to the ’193 Patent under at least 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) (pre-
`AIA).
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 348-9 Filed 06/18/20 Page 3 of 49 PageID #: 12393
`Defendant’s Invalidity Contentions
`Exhibit D1
`
`
`Mucke
`
`To the extent the preamble is limiting, Mucke teaches this limitation. In particular, Mucke’s invention
`relates to “radiotelephones that are compatible with a code division, multiple access (CDMA)
`protocol.” Mucke at 1:9-11. Such radiotelephones are “cellular telephones”:
`
`
`In the preferred embodiment of this invention the spread spectrum radiotelephone 10 operates in
`accordance with the TIA/EIA Interim Standard, Mobile Station-Base Station Compatibility
`Standard for Dual-Mode Wideband Spread Spectrum Cellular System, TIA/EIA/IS-95 (Jul. 1993).
`Id. at 4:19-24.
`Mucke teaches that radiotelephone 10 includes an antenna 12:
`
`
`The radiotelephone 10 includes an antenna 12 for receiving RF signals from a cell site, hereafter
`referred to as a base station (not shown), and for transmitting RF signals to the base station.
`Mucke at 4:27-30; see also FIG. 1 (schematically depicting antenna 12):
`
`
`U.S. Patent No.
`6,408,193
`Claim 1
`[1(pre)] A cellular
`telephone adapted to be
`used in a CDMA system,
`comprising:
`
`[1(a)] an antenna for
`receiving a first
`communication signal and
`a transmitting power
`control signal from a cell-
`site station and
`transmitting a second
`communication signal to
`the cell-site station,
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 348-9 Filed 06/18/20 Page 4 of 49 PageID #: 12394
`Defendant’s Invalidity Contentions
`Exhibit D1
`
`
`
`
`
`Antenna 12 receives signals sent by the base station, including both “speech” (communication signal)
`and “signaling” information:
`
`
`The radiotelephone 10 includes an antenna 12 for receiving RF signals from a cell site, hereafter
`referred to as a base station (not shown), and for transmitting RF signals to the base station. When
`operating in the digital (spread spectrum or CDMA) mode the RF signals are phase modulated to
`convey speech and signalling information.
`Id. at 30-32.
`
`This “signaling information” includes transmit power control information in the form of “transmitter
`power control bits”:
`The received RF signals are converted to base band in the receiver and are applied to a phase
`demodulator 26 which derives in-phase (I) and quadrature (Q) signals from the received signal.
`
`3
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 348-9 Filed 06/18/20 Page 5 of 49 PageID #: 12395
`Defendant’s Invalidity Contentions
`Exhibit D1
`
`
`The I and Q signals are converted to digital representations by suitable A/D converters and applied
`to a three finger (F1-F3) demodulator 30, each of which includes a local PN generator. The output
`of the demodulator 28 is applied to a combiner 30 which outputs a signal, via a deinterleaver and
`decoder 32, to the controller 20. The digital signal input to the controller 20 is expressive of speech
`samples or signalling information. The further processing of this signal by the controller 20 is not
`germane to an understanding of this invention and is not further described, except to note that the
`signalling information will include transmitter power control bits that are sent from the base station
`as a continuous stream to the radiotelephone 10.
`Id. at 4:45-61.
`
`Antenna 12 also transmits signals to the base station:
`The radiotelephone 10 includes an antenna 12 for receiving RF signals from a cell site, hereafter
`referred to as a base station (not shown), and for transmitting RF signals to the base station.
`Id. at 4:27-30.
`Mucke teaches that the receiver 14 and the transmitter 16 are both coupled through antenna 12, and are
`therefore necessarily duplexed:
`
`
`[1(b)] a duplexer
`connected to said antenna,
`
`[1(c)] a receiver connected
`to said antenna through
`said duplexer for
`converting said first
`
`
`
`Coupled to the antenna 12 are a gain controlled receiver 14 and a gain controlled transmitter 16
`for receiving and for transmitting, respectively, the phase modulated RF signals.
`Mucke at 4:32-35; see also FIG. 1, supra.
`
`Additionally, Mucke teaches a CMDA telephone, which the ’193 Patent admits includes a duplexer:
`
`
`The typical standard for the CDMA cellular telephone system enacted in the U.S. is TIA IS-95
`(hereinafter IS-95). An example of a transmitter applying IS-95 is shown in FIG. 11. In this
`example, a modulated signal converted into a transmitting frequency band is supplied to a variable
`amplitude amplifier 230 and the output of the variable amplitude amplifier 230 is further amplified
`by a power amplifier means 250 and transmitted to an antenna 450 through a duplexer 400.
`’193 Patent at 1:24-32.
`Mucke teaches that the received signal is first converted to base band, then I-Q demodulated, then
`converted from analog to digital, then pseudeonoise demodulated, then combined. The resulting
`“signal” is passed to deinterleaver/decoder before being passed to the controller:
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 348-9 Filed 06/18/20 Page 6 of 49 PageID #: 12396
`Defendant’s Invalidity Contentions
`Exhibit D1
`
`
`communication signal into
`a voice signal code, and
`
`The received RF signals are converted to base band in the receiver and are applied to a phase
`demodulator 26 which derives in-phase (I) and quadrature (Q) signals from the received signal.
`The I and Q signals are converted to digital representations by suitable A/D converters and applied
`to a three finger (F1-F3) demodulator 30, each of which includes a local PN generator. The output
`of the demodulator 28 is applied to a combiner 30 which outputs a signal, via a deinterleaver and
`decoder 32, to the controller 20.
`Mucke at 4:45-54; see also FIG. 1:
`
`
`Mucke’s received RF signals are modulated to convey “speech and signalling information”:
`The radiotelephone 10 includes an antenna 12 for receiving RF signals from a cell site, hereafter
`referred to as a base station (not shown), and for transmitting RF signals to the base station. When
`operating in the digital (spread spectrum or CDMA) mode the RF signals are phase modulated to
`convey speech and signalling information
`Id. at 4:27-32.
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 348-9 Filed 06/18/20 Page 7 of 49 PageID #: 12397
`Defendant’s Invalidity Contentions
`Exhibit D1
`
`
`The ultimate result of Mucke’s process of demodulating, deinterleaving and decoding is a “digital
`signal […] expressive of speech samples” (i.e., a voice signal code):
`
`
`[1(d)] for outputting a
`power control signal
`derived from said
`transmitting power control
`signal sent from said cell-
`site station,
`
`[1(e)] an encoder/decoder
`apparatus connected to said
`receiver and
`
`The output of the demodulator 28 is applied to a combiner 30 which outputs a signal, via a
`deinterleaver and decoder 32, to the controller 20. The digital signal input to the controller 20 is
`expressive of speech samples or signalling information.
`Id. at 4:51-55.
`Mucke further teaches that the signal sent to the controller via the demodulating and decoding process
`described with reference to element [1(c)] supra includes the information needed to derive the power
`control bits:
`
`
`The digital signal input to the controller 20 is expressive of speech samples or signalling
`information. The further processing of this signal by the controller 20 is not germane to an
`understanding of this invention and is not further described, except to note that the signalling
`information will include transmitter power control bits that are sent from the base station as a
`continuous stream to the radiotelephone 10.
`Mucke at 4:54-61.
`Mucke teaches this claim limitation under Plaintiff’s interpretation. In particular, Mucke teaches that
`codec 22 (an enCOder/DECoder apparatus) is connected to the receiver:
`
`
`Coupled to the antenna 12 are a gain controlled receiver 14 and a gain controlled transmitter 16
`for receiving and for transmitting, respectively, the phase modulated RF signals. A frequency
`synthesizer 18 provides the required frequencies to the receiver and transmitter under the control
`of a controller 20. The controller 20 is comprised of a slower speed MCU for interfacing, via a
`codec 22, to a speaker 22a and a microphone 22b, and also to a keyboard and a display 24.
`Mucke at 4:32-40; see also FIG. 1 (depicting codec 22 (red box) connected (red line) via controller 20
`and deinterleaver/decoder 32 to receiver (blue box)):
`
`
`
`6
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 348-9 Filed 06/18/20 Page 8 of 49 PageID #: 12398
`Defendant’s Invalidity Contentions
`Exhibit D1
`
`
`
`
`
`Mucke also teaches this limitation to the extent that the limitation “an encoder/decoder apparatus” is
`governed by 35 U.S.C. § 112(6). Mucke’s codec 22 is structure that performs the claimed functions of
`“encoding” and “decoding” Id.
`Mucke teaches speaker 22a and microphone 22b, which are acoustic transducers for (respectively)
`converting a (output) voice signal code into an audio (output) signal and an audio input signal in an
`input voice code signal:
`Coupled to the antenna 12 are a gain controlled receiver 14 and a gain controlled transmitter 16
`for receiving and for transmitting, respectively, the phase modulated RF signals. A frequency
`synthesizer 18 provides the required frequencies to the receiver and transmitter under the control
`of a controller 20. The controller 20 is comprised of a slower speed MCU for interfacing, via a
`codec 22, to a speaker 22a and a microphone 22b, and also to a keyboard and a display 24.
`Mucke at 4:32-40; see also FIG. 1:
`
`[1(f)] an acoustic
`transducer for converting
`said voice signal code into
`an audio signal for driving
`said acoustic transducer
`and converting an audio
`input signal from said
`acoustic transducer into an
`input voice code signal,
`
`
`
`7
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 348-9 Filed 06/18/20 Page 9 of 49 PageID #: 12399
`Defendant’s Invalidity Contentions
`Exhibit D1
`
`
`[1(g)] a transmitter
`connected to said
`encoder/decoder apparatus
`and to said antenna
`through said duplexer for
`converting said input voice
`code signal into said
`second communication
`signal, and
`
`
`Mucke teaches a transmitter, connected to the codec and to the antenna, that generates an output
`communication signal:
`
`
`An input to the transmitter 16 (vocoded speech and/or signaling information) is derived from the
`controller 20 via a convolutional encoder, interleaver, Walsh modulator, PN modulator, and I-Q
`modulator, which are shown generally as the block 46.
`Mucke at 5:11-15; see also FIG. 1:
`
`
`
`8
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 348-9 Filed 06/18/20 Page 10 of 49 PageID #: 12400
`Defendant’s Invalidity Contentions
`Exhibit D1
`
`
`Mucke further elaborates on the structure of this transmitter in FIG. 3:
`
`
`
`
`
`9
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 348-9 Filed 06/18/20 Page 11 of 49 PageID #: 12401
`Defendant’s Invalidity Contentions
`Exhibit D1
`
`
`
`
`
`Additionally, Nakayama teaches this limitation. In particular, Nakayama discloses a “transmission
`circuit” “suitably implemented in […] a mobile telephone.” Nakayama at ¶¶ [0003], [0001].
`
`This transmission circuit is depicted in FIG. 1 (where the “transmitter” corresponds to “high-frequency
`substrate 61,” the “antenna” corresponds to “antenna 23,” and “duplexer” is part of to “baseband
`processing circuit 15”):
`
`
`
`
`10
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 348-9 Filed 06/18/20 Page 12 of 49 PageID #: 12402
`Defendant’s Invalidity Contentions
`Exhibit D1
`
`
`
`Nakayama depicts this transmitter 61 being connected to antenna 23 and to baseband processing circuit
`15 (which includes duplexing functionality because it duplexes signals input signals from microphone
`14 output signals for speaker 25 for transmission/reception via antenna 23):
`
`
`After reception, the electromagnetic wave of the target signal is demodulated in the high frequency
`processing circuit 17, made into a baseband signal, and made into an electric signal representing
`a voice after a predetermined processing determined corresponding to the communication system
`by the baseband processing circuit 15 is performed. The electric signal is output as a voice from
`the speaker 25.
`Nakayama at ¶ [0022].
`
`
`When performing communication from the communicator 11 to another communicator, the
`operator of the communicator 11 inputs phone numbers and the like of other communicators by
`operating a key provided on the operation part 13, and inputs a voice via the microphone 14. The
`baseband processing circuit 15 performs predetermined processing determined corresponding to
`
`11
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 348-9 Filed 06/18/20 Page 13 of 49 PageID #: 12403
`Defendant’s Invalidity Contentions
`Exhibit D1
`
`
`the communication system to an electrical signal representing the voice given from the
`microphone 14, adds a data signal related to further input phone numbers and the like, and
`generates and delivers a baseband signal to the high frequency processing circuit 17.
`Nakayama at ¶ [0020].
`
`Baseband processing circuit 15 also includes the claimed encoder/decoder functionality:
`
`
`After reception, the electromagnetic wave of the target signal is demodulated in the high frequency
`processing circuit 17, made into a baseband signal, and made into an electric signal representing
`a voice after a predetermined processing determined corresponding to the communication system
`by the baseband processing circuit 15 is performed. The electric signal is output as a voice from
`the speaker 25.
`Nakayama at ¶ [0022].
`
`
`When performing communication from the communicator 11 to another communicator, the
`operator of the communicator 11 inputs phone numbers and the like of other communicators by
`operating a key provided on the operation part 13, and inputs a voice via the microphone 14. The
`baseband processing circuit 15 performs predetermined processing determined corresponding to
`the communication system to an electrical signal representing the voice given from the
`microphone 14, adds a data signal related to further input phone numbers and the like, and
`generates and delivers a baseband signal to the high frequency processing circuit 17.
`Nakayama at ¶ [0020].
`
`Nakayama additionally describes how many of these components are known in the prior art. See FIG.
`5 (depicting transmission circuit 1 connected to antenna 6):
`
`
`
`12
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 348-9 Filed 06/18/20 Page 14 of 49 PageID #: 12404
`Defendant’s Invalidity Contentions
`Exhibit D1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The motivation to combine Nakayama’s controller-controlled gain and bias data into the cellular
`telephone of Mucke would be to increase the power efficiency of the transmitter in Mucke’s cellular
`telephone by minimizing the current consumption of the power amplifier (see Nakayama at ¶ [0012]
`“the level control circuit includes storing means for correlating the reference signal level and a
`predetermined reference bias voltage for minimizing electrical current consumption of the
`amplification means when outputting the target signal…”) Doing so would be the use of a known
`technique to improve a similar device in the same way.
`Mucke teaches this claim limitation under Plaintiff’s interpretation. In particular, Mucke teaches that
`controller 20 is connected to both the receiver and the transmitter as shown in FIG. 1. These teachings
`are further elaborated in the embodiment shown in FIG. 3, where controller 20 is “digital control block
`66,” and in FIG. 5, where controller is “digital control block 90,” both of which controls the TX-VGA
`[Transmission Variable Gain Amplifier]:
`
`
`Reference is now made to FIG. 3 for a description of a CDMA analog AGC system. The RX gain
`control is comprised of two loops. The first loop is essentially analog and comprises the RX-VGA
`
`13
`
`[1(h)] a controller
`connected to said receiver
`and said transmitter for
`controlling an amplitude of
`said transmitter,
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 348-9 Filed 06/18/20 Page 15 of 49 PageID #: 12405
`Defendant’s Invalidity Contentions
`Exhibit D1
`
`
`52, I/Q demodulator 62, detector 56, and integrator 58. The first loop is used for coarse AGC
`setting. The second loop is essentially digital and comprises the RX-VGA 52, I/Q modulator 62,
`A/D converter 64, digital control block 66, AGC-REF signal 68, and the integrator 58. The AGC-
`REF signal 68 is a feedback signal from the digital loop to the integrator 58. The second, digital
`loop is used to correct offset errors in the first, analog loop. In the circuit of FIG. 3 the RX-VGA
`52 and TX-VGA [Transmission Variable Gain Amplifier] 50 each have a variable gain range of 80
`dB…
`Mucke at 7:1-13; see also FIG. 1 (depicting “Controller MCU/DSP 20”):
`
`
`
`Mucke also teaches this limitation to the extent that the limitation “a controller … for controlling an
`amplitude of said transmitter” is governed by 35 U.S.C. § 112(6). Mucke’s controller 20 and/or ASIC
`(digital control block) 66 is structure that performs the claimed function of “controlling an amplitude
`of said transmitter.” Id.
`
`
`14
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 348-9 Filed 06/18/20 Page 16 of 49 PageID #: 12406
`Defendant’s Invalidity Contentions
`Exhibit D1
`
`
`Additionally, Nakayama teaches this limitation. In particular, Nakayama teaches “integrated circuit
`63,” which is connected to the receiver (via baseband processing circuit 15) and to the transmitter (via
`baseband processing circuit 15 and the various control lines for controlling the transmitter). See FIG.
`1:
`
`
`
`
`Nakayama further discloses that this controller controls an amplitude of the transmitter, at least via
`“attenuation control part 42”:
`
`
`The central processing unit 26 includes a designation part 41, attenuation control part 42, and
`bias-voltage control part 43. The central processing unit 26 is realized, for example, in a
`microcomputer, and the parts 41 to 43 are, respectively, virtual circuits realized by arithmetic
`
`
`
`15
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 348-9 Filed 06/18/20 Page 17 of 49 PageID #: 12407
`Defendant’s Invalidity Contentions
`Exhibit D1
`
`
`processing of the central processing unit 26. Moreover, the parts 41 to 43 may, respectively, be
`individually realized by independent circuit components.
`Nakayama at ¶ [0024].
`
`The motivation to combine Nakayama’s controller-controlled gain and bias data into the cellular
`telephone of Mucke would be to increase the power efficiency of the transmitter in Mucke’s cellular
`telephone by minimizing the current consumption of the power amplifier (see Nakayama at ¶ [0012]
`“the level control circuit includes storing means for correlating the reference signal level and a
`predetermined reference bias voltage for minimizing electrical current consumption of the
`amplification means when outputting the target signal…”). Doing so would be the use of a known
`technique to improve a similar device in the same way.
`Mucke’s teaches that the transmitter as depicted in FIGs. 3, (and as elaborated in FIGs 5, 6 and 11)
`includes a variable gain amplifier (TX-VGA 50) and a power amplifier (TX power amp 102):
`
`
`[1(i)] wherein said
`transmitter includes a
`variable amplitude
`amplifier and a power
`amplifier,
`
`FIG. 5 is a block diagram that illustrates a first embodiment of the digital AGC system, specifically
`an all digital AGC control system. The two variable gain amplifiers VGAs 50 and 52 are controlled
`directly from the digital block 90.
`Mucke at 8:27-31.
`
`
`A bias control block 106 also receives the TX-GSET signal and is used to generate a bias signal
`for a TX power amplifier 102. The operation of the blocks 102 and 106 is described in greater
`detail in FIGS. 9 and 11.
`Id. at 7:50-53; see also FIG. 3:
`
`
`
`
`16
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 348-9 Filed 06/18/20 Page 18 of 49 PageID #: 12408
`Defendant’s Invalidity Contentions
`Exhibit D1
`
`
`
`
`
`Additionally, Nakayama teaches this limitation. In particular, Nakayama teaches that the amplitude of
`the transmitted power can be controlled via “variable attenuator 18” (red box below) and fixed-gain
`“amplifier 19”:
`First, the target signal is attenuated by the variable attenuator 18 of a varying attenuation of a
`signal level and further amplified by the amplifier 19. The gain of the amplifier 19 is, for example,
`always constant, and the signal level of the target signal when output from the amplifier 19 is
`proportional to the signal level of the target signal when output from the variable attenuator 18.
`Therefore, the signal level of the target signal is adjusted to a reference signal level described
`hereafter.
`Nakayama at ¶ [0021]. Nakayama further teaches that a variable gain amplifier can be used instead of
`a variable attenuator:
`Furthermore, the detailed configuration and behavior of each circuit part of the communicator 11
`is exemplary, and circuit parts having other configurations and behaviors may be used. For
`example, a variable gain amplifier having variable gain may be used instead of the variable
`attenuator.
`
`17
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 348-9 Filed 06/18/20 Page 19 of 49 PageID #: 12409
`Defendant’s Invalidity Contentions
`Exhibit D1
`
`
`Id. at ¶ [0056].
`
`Nakayama further discloses that the transmitter includes a power amplifier 19 (blue box below):
`
`
`Furthermore, the reference bias voltage corresponding to the maximum reference transmission
`power within the adjustment period W1 of the attenuation and the reference bias voltage
`corresponding to the designated transmission power after the attenuation has been determined are
`imparted to the power amplifier 19.
`Id. at [0051]. Nakayama also discloses that power amplifier 19 is a variable-bias amplifier:
`
`
`A bias voltage of the amplifier 19 is imparted by a method described hereafter, and the value thereof
`is variable.
`Id. at [0021].
`
`These components are depicted in FIG. 1:
`
`
`
`18
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 348-9 Filed 06/18/20 Page 20 of 49 PageID #: 12410
`Defendant’s Invalidity Contentions
`Exhibit D1
`
`
`
`These components are additionally described with reference to FIG. 5 (prior art):
`
`
`FIG. 5 is a block diagram expressing an electrical configuration of the transmission circuit 1
`described above. The signal level of a target signal which is an electrical signal to be transmitted
`differs from a reference signal level which can emit the electromagnetic wave of the transmission
`power from an antenna. This target signal is first attenuated by a variable attenuator 3 having a
`variable attenuation rate, then amplified by a power amplifier 4 having a variable bias voltage,
`and thereby the signal level thereof is adjusted to the reference signal level. This target signal is
`then imparted from the power amplifier 4 to an antenna 6 via a directional coupler 5 and
`transmitted from the antenna 6 as an electromagnetic wave.
`Nakayama at ¶ [0003]; see also FIG. 5 below:
`
`
`
`19
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 348-9 Filed 06/18/20 Page 21 of 49 PageID #: 12411
`Defendant’s Invalidity Contentions
`Exhibit D1
`
`
`
`
`The motivation to combine Nakayama’s controller-controlled gain and bias data into the cellular
`telephone of Mucke would be to increase the power efficiency of the transmitter in Mucke’s cellular
`telephone by minimizing the current consumption of the power amplifier (see Nakayama at ¶ [0012]
`“the level control circuit includes storing means for correlating the reference signal level and a
`predetermined reference bias voltage for minimizing electrical current consumption of the
`amplification means when outputting the target signal …”). Doing so would be the use of a known
`technique to improve a similar device in the same way.
`Mucke teaches that “digital block 90” can be implemented as an ASIC (as depicted in FIG. 3) or as a
`“high speed processing device.” Either of these would be the claimed “central processing unit.”:
`
`
`20
`
`[1(j)] said controller
`includes a central
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 348-9 Filed 06/18/20 Page 22 of 49 PageID #: 12412
`Defendant’s Invalidity Contentions
`Exhibit D1
`
`
`processing unit and a
`memory,
`
`FIG. 5 is a block diagram that illustrates a first embodiment of the digital AGC system, specifically
`an all digital AGC control system. The two variable gain amplifiers VGAs 50 and 52 are controlled
`directly from the digital block 90. In a presently preferred embodiment of this invention the digital
`block 90 is embodied within an Application Specific Integrated Circuit (ASIC). It should be realized
`that discrete integrated circuits could be used as well, as could a suitably programmed high speed
`processing device.
`Mucke at 8:27-36.
`
`Similarly, in the high-level block diagram of FIG. 1, Mucke specifies that “Controller 20” includes an
`MCU (MicroController Unit) and a DSP (Digital Signal Processor), either of which would be the
`claimed “central processing unit”:
`The controller 20 is comprised of a slower speed MCU for interfacing, via a codec 22, to a speaker
`22a and a microphone 22b, and also to a keyboard and a display 24. In general, the MCU is
`responsible for the overall control and operation of the radiotelephone 10. The controller 20 is
`also preferably comprised of a higher speed digital signal processor (DSP) suitable for real-time
`processing of received and transmitted signals.
`Id. at 4:38-44
`
`Mucke further teaches that “digital block 90” includes “slope table 90a” which is characterized as a
`“look up table” and is implemented by “storage registers.” Slope table 90a is thus the claimed
`“memory”:
`Correction of the VGA slopes can be accomplished either by multiplication or by table look up. A
`look up table (90a) is not presently preferred due to the required number of gates to implement the
`storage registers for the look up values.
`Id. at 8:56-59; see also FIG. 5:
`
`
`
`21
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 348-9 Filed 06/18/20 Page 23 of 49 PageID #: 12413
`Defendant’s Invalidity Contentions
`Exhibit D1
`
`
`
`Additionally, Nakayama teaches this limitation. In particular, Nakayama teaches that the control circuit
`(“integrated circuit 63”) includes a “central processing unit 26” and a “memory 45":
`Additionally, it is possible to, among the circuit parts implemented in the baseband circuit board
`62, integrate the central processing unit 26, the reference power source 20, the analog/digital
`conversion circuits 32, 34, 35, the temperature sensor 33, the memory 45, and the digital/analog
`conversion circuits 47 and 48 to make a single integrated circuit (LSI) 63.
`Nakayama at ¶ [0055]; see also FIG. 1 (depicting controller (red box), central processing circuit (blue
`box) and memory (green box)):
`
`
`
`
`
`22
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 348-9 Filed 06/18/20 Page 24 of 49 PageID #: 12414
`Defendant’s Invalidity Contentions
`Exhibit D1
`
`
`
`The motivation to combine Nakayama’s controller-controlled gain and bias data into the cellular
`telephone of Mucke would be to increase the power efficiency of the transmitter in Mucke’s cellular
`telephone by minimizing the current consumption of the power amplifier (see Nakayama at ¶ [0012]
`“the level control circuit includes storing means for correlating the reference signal level and a
`predetermined reference bias voltage for minimizing electrical current consumption of the
`amplification means when outputting the target signal…”). Doing so would be the use of a known
`technique to improve a similar device in the same way.
`Mucke teaches this claim limitation. In particular, Mucke teaches that controller 20 (implemented as
`digital block 66 or digital block 90) controls the transmitter, at least by virtue of providing the power
`control bits used to generate the “Tx Gain Set” signal as depicted in FIG. 1, the TX Gain Adj signal as
`shown in FIG. 3, and the digital TX-VGA signal as depicted in FIG. 5. See FIGs 1, 3, and 5, supra.
`
`The controller further controls the transmitter such that an open-loop power control process is
`performed, at open loop power control block 38:
`
`23
`
`[1(k)] said controller
`controls said transmitter so
`that an open-loop power
`control is performed and
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 348-9 Filed 06/18/20 Page 25 of 49 PageID #: 12415
`Defendant’s Invalidity Contentions
`Exhibit D1
`
`
`
`
`The output of the receiver AGC block 34 is also applied to a TX open loop power control block 38.
`A TX closed loop control block 40 inputs the received transmitter power control bits from controller
`20. An adder 42 adds the output of the TX open loop control block 38 to the output of the TX closed
`loop control block 40 and generates a sum signal which is the TX-GAIN signal that is selectively
`applied, via a limiter 43 (FIGS. 7 and 8), to the transmitter 16 to control the output power thereof.
`Preferably this signal is slope corrected as required for the transmitter amplifier.
`Mucke at 5:1-10; see also FIG. 1:
`
`
`
`The controller controls this open-loop power control process at least because it provides the
`RX_SLOPE and AGC-REF signals that are used to calculate the time-delayed RX-GSET signal that is
`added to the closed loop power control signal at summer 60 (corresponding to adder 42 in FIG. 1):
`
`
`
`24
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 348-9 Filed 06/18/20 Page 26 of 49 PageID #: 12416
`Defendant’s Invalidity Contentions
`Exhibit D1
`
`
`
`Mucke further discloses an embodiment where the entire process of calculating the TX-VGA signal
`(i.e., both open loop and closed loop power control) is performed by digital block 90 (i.e., by the
`controller; see element [1(j)] supra):
`
`
`
`
`
`25
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 348-9 Filed 06/18/20 Page 27 of 49 PageID #: 12417
`Defe

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket