throbber
Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 343-8 Filed 06/03/20 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 11358
`Case 5:19-cv-00036—RWS Document 343-8 Filed 06/03/20 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 11358
`
`EXHIBIT 7
`
`EXHIBIT 7
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 343-8 Filed 06/03/20 Page 2 of 7 PageID #: 11359
`
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`TEXARKANA DIVISION
`
`MAXELL, LTD.,
`
`
`
`Plaintiff
`
`Civil Action NO. 5:19-cv-00036-RWS
`
`v.
`
`APPLE INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`APPLE’S FINAL ELECTION OF PRIOR ART
`
`Pursuant to the Court’s Order Focusing Patent Claims and Prior Art to Reduce Costs (D.I.
`
`44) and Docket Control Order (D.I. 46, 232), Defendant Apple Inc. (“Apple”) hereby discloses
`
`its Final Election of Prior Art for the elected claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,329,794 (“’794
`
`patent”), 6,408,193 (“’193 patent”), 6,430,498 (“’498 patent”), 6,580,999 (“’999 patent”),
`
`6,748,317 (“’317 patent”), 6,928,306 (“’306 patent”), 7,116,438 (“’438 patent”), 8,339,493
`
`(“’493 patent”), 10,212,586 (“’586 patent”), and 10,084,991 (“’991 patent”) (collectively, the
`
`“Asserted Patents”) disclosed by Plaintiff Maxell, Ltd. (“Maxell”).
`
`Maxell’s Infringement Contentions wholly fail to put Apple on notice of Plaintiff’s
`
`theories of infringement for reasons set forth in, for example, Apple’s Motion to Compel
`
`Compliant Infringement Contentions under P.R. 3-1(g) (D.I. 123, 154), the Court’s Order
`
`Granting Apple’s Motion to Compel (D.I. 204), and Apple’s letter to Maxell on this issue sent on
`
`March 31, 2020. As of the date of this disclosure, Apple has yet to receive infringement
`
`contentions compliant with the local Patent Rules that set forth Maxell’s infringement theories
`
`1
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 343-8 Filed 06/03/20 Page 3 of 7 PageID #: 11360
`
`
`with respect to the source code produced by Apple. Thus, Apple’s election of prior art is based
`
`only on information known to date, including Apple’s current understanding of Maxell’s
`
`deficient infringement contentions. Apple reserves the right to amend its election of prior art as
`
`appropriate, including in response to any further amendments and/or supplement to Maxell’s
`
`Infringement Contentions (if any is permitted by the Court) or to any disclosure of infringement
`
`theories in Maxell’s expert reports for which Apple has not received fair notice.
`
`The Court’s Order Focusing Patent Claims and Prior Art to Reduce Costs states: “For
`
`purposes of [the] Final Election of Asserted Prior Art, each obviousness combination counts as a
`
`separate prior art reference.” D.I. 204 at 2. Pursuant to the Court’s Order, Apple discloses the
`
`following election of prior art.
`
`
`
`Final Election of Asserted Prior Art
`
`The ’317, ’498, and ’999 Patents:
`
`1.
`
`2.
`
`3.
`
`4.
`
`The CyberGuide system (“CyberGuide”)1 in combination with U.S. Patent No.
`6,067,502 to Hayashida et al. (“Hayashida”).
`
`Hayashida in combination with Japanese Patent Publication No. JPH10-197277 to
`Maruyama et al. (“Maruyama”)2.
`
`The Garmin NavTalk system (“NavTalk”) in combination with Hayashida.
`
`NavTalk in combination with Maruyama.
`
`
`1 The Court’s Focusing Order specifies that “a prior art instrumentality (such as a device or
`process) and associated references that describe that instrumentality shall count as one
`reference.” D.I. 44 at 1 n. 1. Accordingly, nothing about this election should be read to limit the
`sources of evidence on which Apple intends to rely to prove that such instrumentalities/systems
`are invalidating prior art.
`2 Apple has produced certified translations of all non-English publications identified in its Final
`Election of Prior Art and intends to rely on said translations at trial.
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 343-8 Filed 06/03/20 Page 4 of 7 PageID #: 11361
`
`
`The ’493 Patent:
`
`5.
`
`6.
`
`7.
`
`8.
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,903,162 (“Juen ’162”)3 in combination with U.S. Patent No.
`6,563,535 (“Anderson ’535”).
`
`Juen ’162 and Anderson ’535 in combination with U.S. Patent No. 5,444,482
`(“Misawa ’482”).
`
`The Sony MVC-FD83/MVC-FD88 digital cameras (“MVCFD83”).
`
`MVCFD83 in combination with Misawa ’482.
`
`The ’794 Patent:
`
`9.
`
`U.S. Patent No. 6,363,266 to Nonogaki (“Nonogaki”) in combination with U.S.
`Patent No. 5,870,685 (“Flynn ’685”).
`
`10.
`
`Japanese Utility Model Publication No. U306314 to Tagoshi (“Tagoshi”).
`
`The ’193 Patent:
`
`11.
`
`U.S. Patent No. 5,548,616 (“Mucke ’616”) in combination with Japanese Patent
`Application Publication No. H10-285059 (“Nakayama ’059”).
`
`12.
`
`U.S. Patent No. 6,236,863 (“Waldroup ’863”) in combination with Mucke ’616.
`
`The ’306 Patent:
`
`13.
`
`14.
`
`15.
`
`U.S. Patent No. 6,122,347 (“Borland ’347”).
`
`Borland ’347 in combination with U.S. Patent No. 6,763,105 (“Miura ’105”).
`
`International Patent Publication No. WO 1996/027974 (“Van der Salm ’974”) in
`combination with Miura ’105.4
`
`
`3 Apple served an interrogatory seeking Maxell’s contention as to whether it disputes that Juen
`’162 qualifies as prior art to the ’493 Patent. Maxell did not dispute the prior art status of Juen
`’162. See Maxell’s Objections and Responses to Apple’s Interrogatory No. 20 (served March
`30, 2020). To the extent Maxell contests the prior art status of Juen ’162, Apple also elects
`Japanese Patent Application Publication No. H10-108121, published on April 24, 1998 (“Juen
`’121”), which was filed by the same inventor and contains the same disclosure as Juen ’162. The
`Court’s Focusing Order specifies that “closely related work of a single prior artist” counts as a
`single reference. D.I. 44 at 1 n. 1.
`4 Apple has filed a petition for inter partes review of the ’306 patent. See IPR2020-00204. If the
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board institutes IPR2020-00204, Apple will withdraw the Van der Salm
`’974 and Miura ’105 combination from this litigation and will not present the Van der Salm ’974
`and Miura ’105 combination in the district court trial.
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 343-8 Filed 06/03/20 Page 5 of 7 PageID #: 11362
`
`
`The ’991 Patent:
`
`16.
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,565,680 (“Asmussen ’680”) in combination with U.S. Patent
`Application Publication No. 2003/0041333 (“Allen ’333”).
`
`The ’438 Patent:
`
`17.
`
`18.
`
`Japanese Patent Publication No. 2003-006110 (“Yamazaki ’110”).
`
`Yamazaki ’110 in combination with U.S. Patent Application Publication No.
`2003/0149874 (“Balfanz ’874”).
`
`The ’586 Patent:
`
`19.
`
`20.
`
`U.S. Patent No. 6,871,063 (“Schiffer ’063”).
`
`Schiffer ’063 in combination with U.S. Patent Application Publication No.
`2006/0041746 (“Kirkup ’746”).
`
`
`
`
`
`April 7, 2019
`
`
`/s/ Luann L. Simmons
`
`
`
`Luann L. Simmons (Pro Hac Vice)
`lsimmons@omm.com
`O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP
`Two Embarcadero Center
`28th Floor
`San Francisco, CA 94111
`Telephone: 415-984-8700
`Facsimile: 415-984-8701
`
`Xin-Yi Zhou (Pro Hac Vice)
`vzhou@omm.com
`O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP
`400 S. Hope Street
`Los Angeles, CA 90071
`Telephone: 213-430-6000
`Facsimile: 213-430-6407
`
`Marc J. Pensabene (Pro Hac Vice)
`mpensabene@omm.com
`Laura Bayne Gore (Pro Hac Vice)
`lbayne@omm.com
`O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP
`Times Square Tower, 7 Times Square
`
`4
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 343-8 Filed 06/03/20 Page 6 of 7 PageID #: 11363
`
`
`New York, NY 10036
`Telephone: 212-326-2000
`Facsimile: 212-326-2061
`
`Bo Moon (Pro Hac Vice)
`bmoon@omm.com
`O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP
`610 Newport Center Drive, 17th Floor
`Newport Beach, CA 92660
`Telephone: 949-823-6900
`Facsimile: 949-823-6994
`
`Melissa R. Smith (TX #24001351)
`melissa@gilliamsmithlaw.com
`GILLIAM & SMITH, LLP
`303 South Washington Avenue
`Marshall, Texas 75670
`Telephone: (903) 934-8450
`Facsimile: (903) 934-9257
`
`Attorneys for Defendant Apple Inc.
`
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 343-8 Filed 06/03/20 Page 7 of 7 PageID #: 11364
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that all counsel of record who are deemed to have consented to electronic
`
`service are being served this 7th day of April, 2020 with a copy of this document via electronic
`
`mail.
`
`Dated: April 7, 2020
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Kristin Godfrey
`Kristin Godfrey
`
`
`
`
`
`6
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket