throbber
Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 302-1 Filed 04/30/20 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 10241
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`MAXELL, LTD.,
`
`v.
`
`APPLE INC.,
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`TEXARKANA DIVISION
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`Case No. 5:19-cv-00036-RWS
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`DECLARATION OF SAQIB J. SIDDIQUI IN SUPPORT OF MAXELL’S OPPOSITION
`TO APPLE’S RENWED MOTION TO COMPEL INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS
`
`I, Saqib J. Siddiqui, hereby declare and state as follows:
`
`1.
`
`I am an attorney at Mayer Brown LLP, counsel for Maxell, Ltd. (“Maxell”) in the
`
`above-captioned lawsuit. I have personal knowledge of the statements herein, and, if called to do
`
`so, I could and would testify competently as to the same.
`
`2.
`
`Maxell has deposed several Apple engineers regarding produced Apple source
`
`code. When questioned regarding particular source code projects, which are at a higher level than
`
`the files cited in Maxell’s SSICs,
`
`
`
`, as shown in the following excerpts:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`PUBLIC VERSION
`
`PUBLIC VERSION
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 302-1 Filed 04/30/20 Page 2 of 5 PageID #: 10242
`Case 5:19-cv-00036—RWS Document 302-1 Filed 04/30/20 Page 2 of 5 PageID #: 10242
`
`PUBLIC VERSION
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`PUBLIC VERSION
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 302-1 Filed 04/30/20 Page 3 of 5 PageID #: 10243
`
`
`
`3.
`
`Apple produced source code on at least and March 10, 13, 18, and April 6, 2020.
`
`
`
`
`
`Apple also produced documents that aid in the understanding of code following Maxell’s service
`
`of its SSICs, such as
`
` (produced on
`
`March 31 and April 17, 2020). Apple still has not produced source code for
`
`
`
`During a meet and confer held on April 2, 2020, Apple’s counsel stated the following:
`
`
`4.
`
`The following is a true and correct excerpt of Maxell’s SSICs for element 5(e) of
`
`the ’493 Patent:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`.
`
`5.
`
`The following is a true and correct excerpt of Maxell’s SSICs for element 5(d) of
`
`
`
`the ’493 Patent:
`
`6.
`
`The following is a true and correct excerpt of Maxell’s SSICs for element 1(f) of
`
`
`
`the ’794 Patent:
`
`
`
`3
`
`PUBLIC VERSION
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 302-1 Filed 04/30/20 Page 4 of 5 PageID #: 10244
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`7.
`
`The following chart contains the claim language for claim elements 1(d), 5(e), and
`
`10(f) of the ’493 Patent:
`
`1(d): wherein during
`monitoring in a static image
`mode, the signal processing
`unit generates the image
`signals by mixing or culling
`signal charges accumulated in
`the N number of vertically
`arranged pixel lines to provide
`pixel lines only at pixel
`intervals of K1 pixels;
`
`5(e): wherein when monitoring
`the image in the static image
`mode, the signal processing unit
`generates the image signals by
`using pixel lines that have been
`mixed or culled from the N
`number of vertically arranged
`pixel lines to only include pixel
`lines separated from one
`another by intervals of a first
`distance; and
`
`10(f): upon selecting the operation of
`monitoring the image in the static
`image mode, using the signal
`processing unit to generate the image
`signals by using pixel lines which
`have been mixed or culled from the
`N number of vertically arranged
`pixel lines of the image sensing
`device to provide only pixel lines
`separated from one another by
`intervals of a [first] distance; and
`
`8.
`
`The following exchange was held during a 3/31/20 meet and confer:
`
`MR. BEABER: Louann, a quick question. Does Apple have anything internal that they
`either have used in the past or would be willing to use? Since I think it sounds like the
`preference is an Apple platform, I'm just wondering, Apple is a high-tech company, do
`they have any proposed solutions that maybe you can propose to us instead of us trying
`to find other options and spending a lot of time and resources and not knowing whether,
`you know, they are acceptable to Apple?
`
`MS. SIMMONS: T
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`9.
`
`At deposition, Apple engineers testified that t
`
`
`
`. For example, on 4/17/20, Apple’s designee
`
` testified:
`
`.
`
`
`
`4
`
`PUBLIC VERSION
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 302-1 Filed 04/30/20 Page 5 of 5 PageID #: 10245
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`10.
`
`The following is a true and correct excerpt of a letter received from Apple’s
`
`counsel, Marc Pensabene, on April 27, 2020:
`
`
`
`I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the
`
`above is true and correct and that this Declaration was executed on April 28, 2020 in
`
`Washington, D.C.
`
`Dated: April 28, 2020
`
`
`
`By:
`
`_______________________
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Saqib J. Siddiqui
`
`5
`
`PUBLIC VERSION
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket