`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`TEXARKANA DIVISION
`
`
`MAXELL LTD.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`APPLE INC,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`
`
`
`ORDER
`
`CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:19-CV-00036-RWS
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Apple has moved for a protective order regarding certain Maxell Rule 30(b)(6) topics.
`
`Docket No. 228. The Court’s Standing Order only allows Maxell to file a response to Apple’s
`
`motion—i.e., Apple is not afforded an opportunity to reply. Moreover, under the standing order,
`
`the parties must meet and confer within 72 hours of the Court setting Apple’s motion for a hearing
`
`and promptly notify the Court of the results of that meeting by filing a joint report of no more than
`
`two pages. Given the current climate, including General Order 20-03, it is
`
`ORDERED that Apple may file a reply brief in support of its motion for a protective order
`
`within seven days of this order. It is further
`
`ORDERED that the parties must meet and confer within 72 hours of service of Apple’s
`
`reply or within 10 days of this order, whichever is sooner. It is finally
`
`ORDERED the parties shall promptly notify the Court of the result of that meeting by
`
`filing a joint report of no more than two pages.
`
`
`
`.
`
`
`
`____________________________________
`ROBERT W. SCHROEDER III
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
`
`So ORDERED and SIGNED this 15th day of April, 2020.
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
