`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`OF THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`TEXARKANA DIVISION
`
`No. 5:19CV36-RWS
`
`§§
`
`§
`§
`§
`
`MAXELL, LTD.
`
`V.
`
`APPLE INC.
`
`ORDER GRANTING PARTIALLY OPPOSED MOTION FOR LEAVE
`TO EXCEED PAGE LIMIT FOR ATTACHMENTS TO REPLY
`
`Maxell, Ltd.’s Opposed Motion to Compel (Docket Entry # 197) has been referred to the
`
`undersigned United States Magistrate Judge for decision in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636. The
`
`following motion is before the Court:
`
`Maxell, Ltd.’s Partially Opposed Motion for Leave to Exceed Page Limit for
`Attachments to its Reply in Support of Motion to Compel (Docket Entry # 243).
`
`The Court, having reviewed the motion and without waiting for the response-time to run,1 is of the
`
`opinion the request for an additional eight pages of exhibits is reasonable and may assist the Court
`
`in its review of the motion to compel. Accordingly, it is
`
`ORDERED that Maxell, Ltd.’s Partially Opposed Motion for Leave to Exceed Page Limit
`
`for Attachments to its reply in Support of Motion to Compel (Docket Entry # 243) is hereby
`
`GRANTED.
`
`1 Pursuant to Local Rule CV-7(e), a party has fourteen days (twenty-one days for summary judgment motions)
`in which to file a response to a motion, after which the Court will consider the submitted motion for decision. Any party
`may separately move for an order of the Court lengthening or shortening the response period.
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
