throbber
Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 239-1 Filed 03/24/20 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 9328
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`TEXARKANA DIVISION
`
`MAXELL, LTD.,
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`
`vs.
`
`APPLE INC.,
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Civil Action No. 5:19-cv-00036-RWS
`
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`DECLARATION OF LUANN L. SIMMONS IN SUPPORT OF
`APPLE INC.’S MOTION TO STAY PENDING DETERMINATION OF
`INTER PARTES REVIEW OF THE PATENTS-IN-SUIT
`
`I, Luann L. Simmons, hereby declare as follows:
`
`1.
`
`I am an attorney at the law firm of O’Melveny & Myers LLP, counsel for
`
`Defendant Apple, Inc. (“Apple”) in this matter filed by Plaintiff Maxell, Ltd. (“Maxell”). I have
`
`personal knowledge of the facts stated herein and if called to testify could and would
`
`competently testify thereto.
`
`2.
`
`Attached as Exhibit A is a true and correct copy of the United States Patent
`
`Office’s Patent Trial and Appeal Board Statistics, which contains data valid as of February 29,
`
`2020. This document was retrieved from the USPTO’s website
`
`(https://www.uspto.gov/sites/default/files/documents/Trial_Statistics_2020_02_29.pdf) on
`
`March 18, 2020.
`
`3.
`
`Attached as Exhibit B is a true and correct copy of Lex Machina’s Patent Trial
`
`and Appeal Board Statistics for trials listing Apple Inc. as the Petitioner, which contains data
`
`1
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 239-1 Filed 03/24/20 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 9329
`
`
`
`valid as of March 19, 2020. This document was retrieved from Lex Machina’s website on March
`
`20, 2020.
`
`4.
`
`Attached as Exhibit C is a true and correct copy of Lex Machina’s Patent Trial and
`
`Appeal Board Statistics for trials listing Erise IP, PA as counsel for the Petitioner, which contains
`
`data valid as of March 19, 2020. This document was retrieved from Lex Machina’s website on
`
`March 20, 2020.
`
`5.
`
`Apple filed IPR2020-00199, challenging the validity of U.S. Patent No. 6,329,794
`
`on December 19, 2019, and the PTAB accorded the Petition a filing date on December 23, 2019.
`
`6.
`
`Apple filed IPR2020-00200, challenging the validity of U.S. Patent No. 10,084,991
`
`on December 19, 2019, and the PTAB accorded the Petition a filing date on January 16, 2020.
`
`7.
`
`Apple filed IPR2020-00201, challenging the validity of U.S. Patent No. 7,116,438
`
`on December 19, 2019, and the PTAB accorded the Petition a filing date on December 23, 2019.
`
`8.
`
`Apple filed IPR2020-00202, challenging the validity of U.S. Patent No. 10,212,586
`
`on December 19, 2019, and the PTAB accorded the Petition a filing date on January 16, 2020.
`
`9.
`
`Apple filed IPR2020-00203, challenging the validity of U.S. Patent No. 6,408,193
`
`on December 20, 2019, and the PTAB accorded the Petition a filing date on January 13, 2020.
`
`10.
`
`Apple filed IPR2020-00204, challenging the validity of U.S. Patent No. 6,928,306
`
`on December 20, 2019, and the PTAB accorded the Petition a filing date on January 10, 2020.
`
`11.
`
`Apple filed IPR2020-00407, challenging the validity of U.S. Patent No. 6,748,317
`
`on January 13, 2020, and the PTAB accorded the Petition a filing date on February 12, 2020.
`
`12.
`
`Apple filed IPR2020-00408, challenging the validity of U.S. Patent No. 6,430,498
`
`on January 13, 2020, and the PTAB accorded the Petition a filing date on February 12, 2020.
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 239-1 Filed 03/24/20 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 9330
`
`
`
`13.
`
`Apple filed IPR2020-00409, challenging the validity of U.S. Patent No. 6,580,999
`
`on January 13, 2020, and the PTAB accorded the Petition a filing date on February 12, 2020.
`
`14.
`
`Apple filed IPR2020-00507, challenging the validity of U.S. Patent No. 8,339,493
`
`on March 17, 2020, and the PTAB has not yet accorded the Petition a filing date.
`
`15.
`
`On June 12, 2019, Maxell served its Infringement Contentions, in which it
`
`asserted a total of 90 claims.
`
`16.
`
`After Apple produced source code for the accused products, Maxell served
`
`supplemental infringement contentions on March 13, 2020. The claim charts in Maxell’s
`
`Infringement Contentions (as amended on March 13, 2020) include over 3,700 pages.
`
`17.
`
`On November 6, 2019, Maxell made its Preliminary Election of Asserted Claims,
`
`reducing the number of asserted claims to 40.
`
`18.
`
`This case is in the early stages of discovery. Fact discovery is not yet complete,
`
`most fact depositions remain, and expert discovery has not yet commenced.
`
`19.
`
`On March 23, 2020, I was informed by counsel that Maxell opposes the
`
`concurrently filed Motion to Stay Pending Determination of Inter Partes Review of the Patents-
`
`in-Suit.
`
`I declare under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
`
`Executed in San Francisco, California, on this 24th day of March, 2020.
`
`
`
`/s/ Luann L. Simmons
`
`Luann L. Simmons
`
`
`
`3
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket