throbber
Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 212-4 Filed 03/06/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 8847
`Case 5:19-cv-00036—RWS DocumeBUmqVfiflédCOU/OBIZO Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 8847
`
`EXHIBIT C
`
`EXHIBIT C
`
`PUBLIC VERSION
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 212-4 Filed 03/06/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 8848
`
`Miller, Tiffany A.
`From:
`Sent:
`To:
`
`Cc:
`Subject:
`
`Pensabene, Marc J. <mpensabene@omm.com>
`Tuesday, February 18, 2020 3:24 PM
`Siddiqui, Saqib; Silverman, Daniel; Levy, Kfir B.; Simmons, Luann L.;
`'melissa@gillamsmithlaw.com'; Beasley, Tony; Moon, Bo; Gore, Laura Bayne; Zhou,
`Vincent; #Maxell-Apple; 'Bobby Lamb'; Godfrey, Kristin; bstevens@wscllp.com;
`hcannom@wscllp.com; jquilici@orrick.com; Williamson, Brett J.
`FW-CLIENT-Maxell-Apple-Service; 'Geoff Culbertson'
`RE: Maxell Ltd. v. Apple Inc. (Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS) - Interrogatory Response No. 12
`
`**EXTERNAL SENDER** 
`
`Saqib,
`
`You are not correct in your understanding. As clearly stated in our response to interrogatory 12, the February
`6 supplement included source code made available for inspection as of January 31. We will be providing a
`further supplemental response in view of the recently produced code.
`
`Best
`Marc
`
`
`From: Siddiqui, Saqib <SSiddiqui@mayerbrown.com>  
`Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2020 2:57 PM 
`To: Silverman, Daniel <dsilverman@omm.com>; Pensabene, Marc J. <mpensabene@omm.com>; Levy, Kfir B. 
`<KLevy@mayerbrown.com>; Simmons, Luann L. <lsimmons@omm.com>; 'melissa@gillamsmithlaw.com' 
`<melissa@gillamsmithlaw.com>; Beasley, Tony <tbeasley@omm.com>; Moon, Bo <bmoon@omm.com>; Gore, Laura 
`Bayne <lbayne@omm.com>; Zhou, Vincent <vzhou@omm.com>; #Maxell‐Apple <maxellapple@omm.com>; 'Bobby 
`Lamb' <wrlamb@gillamsmithlaw.com>; Godfrey, Kristin <kgodfrey@omm.com>; bstevens@wscllp.com; 
`hcannom@wscllp.com; jquilici@orrick.com; Williamson, Brett J. <bwilliamson@omm.com> 
`Cc: FW‐CLIENT‐Maxell‐Apple‐Service <Maxell‐Apple‐Service@mayerbrown.com>; 'Geoff Culbertson' 
`<gpc@texarkanalaw.com> 
`Subject: RE: Maxell Ltd. v. Apple Inc. (Case 5:19‐cv‐00036‐RWS) ‐ Interrogatory Response No. 12  

`
`[EXTERNAL MESSAGE]
`
`Counsel,
`
`We are in receipt of Apple’s Third Supplemental Response to Interrogatory No. 12 dated February 6, 2020. It is our
`understanding from your letter dated February 14, 2020, that Apple considers its February 6th Supplemental Response as
`complete and final and will not be supplementing its response to this interrogatory again (with the exception of the third-
`party source code relating to the
` functionality).
`
`Please let us know if our understanding is incorrect and whether Apple intends to supplement again because as you know
`this interrogatory response provides the key that ties the source code to the accused products.
`
`Best,
`Saqib
`
`
`1
`
`PUBLIC VERSION
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket