throbber
Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 112 Filed 10/28/19 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 5062
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`TEXARKANA DIVISION
`
`
`MAXELL LTD.,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`APPLE INC,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:19-CV-00036-RWS
`
`
`
`
`
`
`










`
`
`
`
`JOINT SUPPLEMENTAL PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`This Joint Supplemental Protective Order is in supplementation to the parties’
`
`previous Agreed Protective Order. Docket No. 45. The Parties anticipate disclosure of
`
`confidential information belonging to Intel Corporation (“Intel”), a non-party to the action,
`
`and have agreed to these supplemental provisions. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED:
`
`A.
`
`Scope
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1.
`This Supplemental Protective Order sets forth additional restrictions
`governing the disclosure of Protected Material that constitutes or includes confidential
`or proprietary information or trade secrets of Intel (“Intel Protected Material”).
`
`2.
`Except as supplemented or amended herein, the provisions of the
`Protective Order will apply to Intel Protected Material. In the event of a conflict
`between the Protective Order and this Supplemental Protective Order, the terms of this
`Supplemental Protective Order will govern.
`
`3.
`Except as expressly stated otherwise, all terms used in this Supplemental
`Protective Order have the same meaning as used in the Protective Order.
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 112 Filed 10/28/19 Page 2 of 5 PageID #: 5063
`
`B.
`
`Designation of Intel Protected Material
`
`4.
`
`In supplementation to Paragraph 7 of the Protective Order:
`
`(a) A producing Party must designate Intel Protected Material as
`“INTEL CONFIDENTIAL,” “INTEL CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS’ EYES
`ONLY,” or “INTEL CONFIDENTIAL - OUTSIDE ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY -
`SOURCE CODE.” The respective protections provided in the Protective Order for
`materials designated “CONFIDENTIAL,” “CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES
`ONLY,” or “CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY – SOURCE CODE”
`shall apply, as amended by this Supplemental Protective Order to Intel Protected
`Material.
`
`(b) Any portion of a transcript relating to Intel Protected Material shall
`be deemed “INTEL CONFIDENTIAL - OUTSIDE ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY -
`SOURCE CODE.” If a Party desires to modify that classification, it must provide a
`copy of the relevant portion of the transcript to Intel. Paragraph 13 of the Protective
`Order will govern any such requests.
`
`C.
`
`Additional Restrictions Concerning the Handling of Intel Source
`Code
`
`5. Where Intel is not the Producing Party, any request by a Receiving Party
`for printouts of Intel Source Code pursuant to Paragraph 11(c)(v) of the Protective
`Order, must be forwarded to Intel. On receipt of such request, Intel shall then have the
`rights of a “Producing Party” under that paragraph to object to the request.
`
`6.
`The printed copy sets of Intel Source Code must be kept at all times in
`the offices of Outside Counsel of the Receiving Party. They are prohibited from being
`kept, stored, or reviewed at the offices of the Receiving Party’s outside consultants or
`experts. On request by a Receiving Party, Intel will work with the Receiving Party to
`identify one or more offices of Intel’s outside counsel that could host printed copy sets
`for review by the outside consultants or experts.
`
`7.
`- OUTSIDE
`INTEL CONFIDENTIAL
`as
`Items designated
`ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY - SOURCE CODE may be transported only by hand by
`a person authorized to have access under Paragraph 10 of the Protective Order. If an
`authorized person is taking that material on a flight, it must be carried on the plane and
`may not be checked. Intel Source Code Material may not be shipped by courier, such as
`Federal Express.
`
`D. Prosecution and Development Bars.
`
`8. With regard to persons who receive items designated “INTEL
`
`Page 2 of 5
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 112 Filed 10/28/19 Page 3 of 5 PageID #: 5064
`
`CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” or “INTEL CONFIDENTIAL -
`ATTORNEYS’ EYES’ONLY SOURCE CODE,” the subject matter of the
`prosecution bar in Paragraph 6(b)(i) and (ii) of the Protective Order shall be
`“technology directed to 3G and 4G wireless modem protocol software and hardware
`for mobile handset.”
`
`9. The final sentence of Paragraph 6(b) will not apply to items designated
`“INTEL CONFIDENTIAL
`- ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” or “INTEL
`CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS’ EYES’ ONLY SOURCE CODE.” Instead, for
`persons who receive such items, the prosecution bar will apply to patents, patent
`applications, specifications, and claims that claim priority prior to one year after the
`earlier of (a) the final resolution of this action, including all appeals and (b) the date on
`which Intel receives written notice that the person is withdrawing from the Protective
`Order and the Supplemental Protective Order and will no longer have access to any
`material designated “INTEL CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” or
`“INTEL CONFIDENTIAL - OUTSIDE ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY SOURCE
`CODE,” as well as any materials that contain or disclose Intel Source Code Material.
`
`10. Before receiving items “INTEL CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS’ EYES
`ONLY” or “INTEL CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS’ EYES’ ONLY SOURCE
`CODE,” an outside consultant or expert or Shadow Juror must execute and deliver to
`Intel the “Certification of Outside Consultant” attached as Exhibit A agreeing not to
`perform hardware, software or product development work for commercial purposes on
`3G and 4G wireless modem protocol software and hardware for mobile handset until
`one year after the earlier of (a) the final resolution of this action, including all appeals
`and (b) the date on which Intel receives written notice that the person is withdrawing
`from the Protective Order and the Supplemental Protective Order and will no longer
`have access to any material designated “INTEL CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS’
`EYES ONLY,” or “INTEL CONFIDENTIAL - OUTSIDE ATTORNEYS’ EYES
`ONLY SOURCE CODE,” as well as any materials that contain or disclose Intel Source
`Code Material.
`
`E.
`
`Other Provisions
`
`11. With regard to Intel Protected Material, the following terms shall include
`Intel even if Intel was not the party that produced that material:
`
`a.
`
`“Producing Party,” as used in Paragraph 6(b), 6(e)(iv), 7(d)(ii), 8(b)(ix),
`9(b)(ix), 10(b)(viii), 10(c)(viii), 12, 13(b), 15(a), 18(a), and 19(b) of the
`Protective Order.
`
`b.
`
`“the producing Party,” as used in Paragraph 6(c) of the Protective Order.
`
`Page 3 of 5
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 112 Filed 10/28/19 Page 4 of 5 PageID #: 5065
`
`c.
`
`d.
`
`e.
`
`“the Party,” as used in Paragraph 8(b)(iii), 9(b)(i), 9(b)(ii), 9(b)(vii),
`10(b)(i), 10(b)(ii), 10(b)(vi), 12(a)(iii), 12(b)(v), and 12(f).
`
`“the Parties,” as used in Paragraph 11(c)(v) and 12(e) of the Protective
`Order.
`
`“every Party who has produced such Discovery Material,” as used in
`Paragraph 14(a) of the Protective Order.
`
`12. To the extent that a Receiving Party is authorized under the Protective Order
`and this Supplemental Protective Order to transport or transmit electronic copies of
`Intel Designated Material, only the following methods may be used: (1) encrypted email
`using an encryption tool that has a passphrase of at least 20 characters in length and
`using at least 128-bit Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) cipher option; (ii) a secure
`FTP site that implements 256 bit AES encryption over SSL and utilizes access controls,
`and the files containing the information are encrypted using a key length of at least 20
`characters and 256 bit AES encryption and are removed from the Secure FTP site within
`3 days; and
`(iii) hand-delivery, where the data is stored on an encrypted hard-drive using at least
`AES 128-bit hardware encryption algorithm and a removable hardware key or an RFID
`secured card.
`
`13. A Receiving Party that wants to file or otherwise submit Intel Designated
`Material must file the materials under seal and must immediately notify Intel.
`
`Page 4 of 5
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`.
`
`
`
`____________________________________
`ROBERT W. SCHROEDER III
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
`
`So ORDERED and SIGNED this 28th day of October, 2019.
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 112 Filed 10/28/19 Page 5 of 5 PageID #: 5066
`
`Exhibit A
`
`CERTIFICATION OF OUTSIDE CONSULTANT
`REGARDING PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`I,
`
`1.
`
`, state:
`
`I have read the Supplemental Protective Order for Intel
`
`Confidential Information and understand and will abide by its terms.
`
`2.
`
`I agree not to perform hardware, software or product development
`
`work for commercial purposes on 3G and 4G wireless modem protocol software and
`
`hardware for mobile handset until one year after the earlier of (a) the final resolution
`
`of this action, including all appeals and (b) the date on which Intel receives written
`
`notice that I am withdrawing from the Protective Order and the Supplemental
`
`Protective Order and will no longer have access to any material designated “INTEL
`
`CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” or “INTEL CONFIDENTIAL -
`
`OUTSIDE ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY SOURCE CODE,” as well as any materials
`
`that contain or disclose Intel Source Code Material.
`
`I state under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States that the
`
`foregoing is true and correct.
`
`Executed on
`
`, 20 . ________________________
` Signature
`
`Page 5 of 5
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket