throbber
Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 111 Filed 10/23/19 Page 1 of 65 PageID #: 4802
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`TEXARKANA DIVISION
`
`MAXELL, LTD.,
`
`v.
`
`APPLE INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`Defendant.
`
`Case No. 5:19-cv-0036-RWS
`
`COMPLAINT AND DEMAND
`FOR JURY TRIAL
`
`FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
`
`Plaintiff Maxell, Ltd. (“Maxell”), by and through its undersigned counsel, files this
`
`complaint under 35 U.S.C. § 271 for Patent Infringement against Defendant Apple Inc. (“Apple”)
`
`and further alleges as follows, upon actual knowledge with respect to itself and its own acts, and
`
`upon information and belief as to all other matters.
`
`OVERVIEW
`
`1.
`
`This is an action for patent infringement by Maxell. Founded in 1961 as Maxell
`
`Electric Industrial Co., Ltd., Maxell is a leading global manufacturer of information storage media
`
`products, including magnetic tapes, optical discs, and battery products such as lithium ion
`
`rechargeable micro batteries and alkaline dry batteries, and the company has over 50 years of
`
`experience producing industry-leading recordable media and energy products for both the
`
`consumer and the professional markets. Maxell is also a leading manufacturer of projectors and
`
`lenses and additionally sells various other devices, such as Bluetooth headsets, wireless charging
`
`solutions, etc.
`
`1
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 111 Filed 10/23/19 Page 2 of 65 PageID #: 4803
`
`2.
`
`Maxell has built up an international reputation for excellence and reliability, for
`
`pioneering the power supplies and digital recording for today’s mobile and multi-media devices,
`
`and leading the electronics industry in the fields of storage media and batteries.
`
`3.
`
`Since being one of the first companies to develop alkaline batteries and Blu Ray
`
`camcorder discs, Maxell has always assured its customers of industry leading product innovation
`
`and is one of the world’s foremost suppliers of memory, power, audio, and visual goods.
`
`4.
`
`As more fully described below, in 2009 Hitachi, Ltd. assigned much of its
`
`intellectual property to Hitachi Consumer Electronics Co., Ltd., along with a significant portion of
`
`its Consumer Business Group, including manufacturing and research and development
`
`capabilities. Then, in 2013, Hitachi Consumer Electronics Co., Ltd. assigned the intellectual
`
`property, including many of the patents in this case, along with the related manufacturing and
`
`research and development capabilities, to Hitachi Maxell, Ltd., which later assigned the assets to
`
`Maxell as a result of a reorganization and name change. This was an effort to align the intellectual
`
`property with the licensing, business development, research and development, and manufacturing
`
`efforts of Maxell, including in the mobile and mobile-media device market. Maxell continues to
`
`sell products in the mobile device market including wireless charging solutions, wireless flash
`
`drives, multimedia players, storage devices, and headphones. Maxell also maintains intellectual
`
`property related to televisions, computer products, tablets, digital cameras, and mobile phones. As
`
`a mobile technology developer and industry leader, and due to its historical and continuous
`
`investment in research and development, including in this District, Maxell owns a portfolio of
`
`patents related to such technologies and actively enforces its patents through licensing and/or
`
`litigation. Maxell is forced to bring this action against Apple as a result of Apple’s knowing and
`
`ongoing infringement of Maxell’s patents as further described herein.
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 111 Filed 10/23/19 Page 3 of 65 PageID #: 4804
`
`5.
`
`Since at least June 2013, Apple has been aware of Maxell’s patents and has had
`
`numerous meetings and interactions regarding its infringement of these patents. These meetings
`
`included Apple’s representatives being provided with detailed information regarding Maxell’s
`
`patents, the developed technology, and Apple’s ongoing use of this patented technology. Through
`
`this process, Apple’s representatives requested and received detailed explanations regarding
`
`Maxell’s patents and allegations. Maxell believed that the parties could reach a mutually beneficial
`
`solution and to that end considered a potential business transaction and continued to answer
`
`multiple inquiries from Apple over the course of several years, including communicating with
`
`Apple as recently as late 2018. Apple elected, however, not to enter into an agreement and did not
`
`license Maxell’s patents. Instead, Apple continued, and continues today, to make, use, sell and
`
`offer for sale Maxell’s patented technology without license.
`
`6.
`
`Since 2014, Maxell has had regular and continuous business in the Eastern District
`
`of Texas. As a result of such business dealings and hopes to expand those and other business
`
`dealings, a Maxell affiliate, Maxell Research and Development America, LLC (“MRDA”), was
`
`founded in Marshall, Texas. Maxell and MRDA have and continue to regularly meet and work to
`
`expand the research and development activities, business, and investments being made by Maxell,
`
`MRDA, and their business partners in this District to further the goals of these companies.
`
`PARTIES
`
`7.
`
`Plaintiff Maxell, Ltd. is a Japanese corporation with a registered place of business
`
`at 1 Koizumi, Oyamazaki, Oyamazaki-cho, Otokuni-gun, Kyoto, Japan.
`
`8.
`
`On information and belief, Defendant Apple Inc. is a California corporation having
`
`a principal place of business located at One Apple Park Way Cupertino, California 95014. As of
`
`the filing of the original Complaint, Apple had regular and established places of business at 2601
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 111 Filed 10/23/19 Page 4 of 65 PageID #: 4805
`
`Preston Road, Frisco, Texas, and 6121 West Park Boulevard, Plano, Texas, as well as other
`
`locations in Texas. Apple offers and sells its products and/or services, including those accused
`
`herein of infringement, to customers and potential customers located in Texas, including in the
`
`judicial Eastern District of Texas. Apple may be served with process through its registered agent
`
`for service in Texas: CT Corporation System, 1999 Bryant Street, Suite 900, Dallas, Texas 75201.
`
`NATURE OF THE ACTION, JURISDICTION, AND VENUE
`
`9.
`
`Maxell brings this action for patent infringement under the patent laws of the United
`
`States, 35 U.S.C. § 271 et seq.
`
`10.
`
`This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action
`
`pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1338(a) because the action arises under the patent laws of the
`
`United States.
`
`11.
`
`This Court has personal jurisdiction over Apple. Apple conducts business and has
`
`committed acts of direct and indirect patent infringement in this District, the State of Texas, and
`
`elsewhere in the United States. Moreover, Apple is registered to do business in the State of Texas,
`
`has offices and facilities in the State of Texas and this District, and actively directs its activities to
`
`customers located in the State of Texas and this District.
`
`12.
`
`Venue is proper in this District pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1400(b). As of the filing of
`
`the original Complaint, Apple had regular and established places of business in this District,
`
`including Apple Stores located at 2601 Preston Road, Frisco, Texas and 6121 West Park
`
`Boulevard, Plano, Texas, and thus was deemed to reside in this District, has committed acts of
`
`infringement described herein in this District, and has purposely transacted business involving the
`
`accused devices in this District. Apple has not contested whether venue is proper in this District
`
`pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1400(b).
`
`4
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 111 Filed 10/23/19 Page 5 of 65 PageID #: 4806
`
`13.
`
`Six of the patents accused of infringement herein, including U.S. Patent Nos.
`
`6,748,317; 8,339,493; 7,116,438; 6,408,193; 6,928,306; and 6,329,794, were previously asserted
`
`in this District against Huawei Device Co., Ltd., Huawei Device USA, Inc., ZTE (USA), Inc., ZTE
`
`Corporation, and/or ASUSTeK Computer Inc. Further, U.S. Patent Nos. 6,580,999 and 6,430,498
`
`are the parents of the previously asserted U.S. Patent No. 6,748,317 and include similar subject
`
`matter as the one the Court is familiar with. During the course of these lawsuits, this Court heard
`
`from the parties and their experts regarding the technology at issue in these patents, construed
`
`numerous claim terms, and even conducted a jury trial, during which all patents were found to be
`
`valid and willfully infringed. Accordingly, this Court has substantial knowledge of and concerning
`
`the majority of the patents asserted in this lawsuit. Judicial economy further supports venue in this
`
`District.
`
`COUNT 1 - INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 6,748,317
`
`14. Maxell incorporates paragraphs 1-13 above by reference.
`
`15.
`
`U.S. Patent No. 6,748,317 (the “’317 Patent,” attached hereto at Exhibit 1) duly
`
`issued on June 8, 2004 and is entitled Portable terminal with the function of walking navigation.
`
`16. Maxell is the owner by assignment of the ’317 Patent and possesses all rights under
`
`the ’317 Patent, including the exclusive right to recover for past and future infringement.
`
`17.
`
`Eight years before Apple released its first GPS-enabled iPhone and five years
`
`before Google launched its first Maps product, the inventors of the ’317 Patent were experimenting
`
`with ways to deliver navigation services to the small sized screens of cellular phones that were
`
`available in 1999. At the time of the priority date of the ’317 Patent, even the Internet hosted map
`
`applications were geared to stationary desktop computers, not to mobile phones. The inventors of
`
`the ’317 Patent recognized the benefits of delivering mapping services to mobile phones and of
`
`5
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 111 Filed 10/23/19 Page 6 of 65 PageID #: 4807
`
`supplementing those services with real-time location information from the phones themselves.
`
`’317 Patent, 1:10-30. The inventors were interested in specifically improving mapping services on
`
`small screen phones within the narrow field of walking navigation. Id. at 1:31-43. The inventors
`
`recognized that simply providing a map on the phone was not enough because the small, text-
`
`based displays of the phones were ill-equipped to display full maps or to enable meaningful user
`
`interactions. Id. at 2:17-36. The inventors also recognized that there was a need to provide a
`
`solution that did not require the enormous amount of cost required to download maps in real-time
`
`from a server linked to a computer network and to process this map information in a format that is
`
`readable on the small screens of the phones. Id. at 1:53-2:4. The inventors also recognized that a
`
`car navigation system from that time frame also did not provide a useful solution because it could
`
`not be used by a pedestrian to guide his/her walk due to the size and the lack of preciseness required
`
`to provide accurate route information to a pedestrian. Id. at 1:31-43.
`
`18.
`
`It is against this backdrop that the inventors of the ’317 Patent set about to solve
`
`the problem arising specifically in the realm of computer networks that—at that time—lacked the
`
`ability to provide accurate and precise route guidance information to pedestrians in a device that
`
`would be portable and that would not require the cost of constantly downloading maps and
`
`processing this data over a computer network in real-time. Id. at 2:51-61.
`
`19.
`
`In order to solve this problem of computer, the inventors disclose a portable device
`
`with a particular combination of hardware components tailored for delivering mobile mapping
`
`services. The device includes a “[c]ellular antenna and … an infrared ray sensor” such as a “GSP
`
`[sic], PHS, or the like,” with which it can obtain “location information.” Id. at 5:66-6:2. The
`
`specification discloses that “location information” is “a latitude/longitude or coordinates and an
`
`altitude.” Id. at 5:62-64. Moreover, the device includes “a compass, a gyro, and such a sensor as a
`
`6
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 111 Filed 10/23/19 Page 7 of 65 PageID #: 4808
`
`clinometer,” with which it can obtain “direction information.” Id. at 6:2-12. The specification
`
`discloses that “direction information” is “the direction of the tip of the [device] or the orientation
`
`of the display screen.” Id. The ’317 Patent thus discloses a portable device with a specific
`
`combination of hardware that has a particular set of capabilities and in order to ensure that they
`
`did not preempt the concept of simply including a map on a computer, the inventors claimed a
`
`combination of “devices” within a “portable terminal with the function of walking navigation.”
`
`See e.g., id. at 10:42-57 (claim 1). Further, each of the claimed “devices” recites a specific function
`
`that as a whole solve the problem of the prior art devices that could not provide accurate and
`
`precise navigation information to pedestrians. Id.
`
`20.
`
`For example, claim 1 recites at least “a device for getting location information,” “a
`
`device for getting direction information denoting an orientation,” “an input device for inputting a
`
`destination,” and “a display” wherein the display specifically provides the claimed functionality
`
`of displaying positions of a “destination and a present place, and a relation of said direction and a
`
`direction from said present place to said destination.” Id. Further, the display also specifically
`
`provides the claimed functionality of changing the display “according to a change of said direction
`
`of said portable terminal orientation for walking navigation,” thus ensuring that the portable
`
`terminal can guide the pedestrian accurately in real-time in response to, for example, the pedestrian
`
`changing the direction he/she is walking. Independent claims 6 and 10 also recite similar
`
`combinations of hardware and also recite additional narrowing features (e.g., “a device connected
`
`to a server”). Id. at 11:6-21 and 11:34-51. Similarly, at least dependent claims 2, 3, 5, 7, and 11
`
`also provide additional narrowing features limiting the claims to specific improvements in the field
`
`providing navigation information on portable terminals. See id. at 10:58-64, 11:3-5, 11:21-22, and
`
`12:1-4.
`
`7
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 111 Filed 10/23/19 Page 8 of 65 PageID #: 4809
`
`21. When considered as a whole the combination of hardware recited in the claims of
`
`the ’317 Patent is directed to a specific novel and non-obvious portable terminal that includes
`
`specific functionality of providing guidance for walking navigation. Indeed, a jury in this
`
`jurisdiction made a determination that when considered as a whole, at least claims 1-3 of the ’317
`
`Patent are directed to a novel device and are not invalid over prior art.
`
`22.
`
`Further, the patentability of the ’317 Patent was challenged in IPR2018-00235,
`
`wherein the Patent Trial and Appeal Board was asked to consider the teachings of prior art (e.g.,
`
`U.S. Patent Nos. 5,781,150, 5,173,709, and 5,592,382, and Japanese Patent Application
`
`Publication No. H10-232992) in a challenge to the validity of claims 1-3, 6-8, 10, 15-17, and 20.
`
`In response, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board denied the petition, finding that the information
`
`presented does not “demonstrate a reasonable likelihood that Petitioner would prevail in showing
`
`that at least one of the challenged claims of the ’317 Patent is unpatentable.”
`
`23.
`
`Apple has directly infringed one or more claims of the ’317 Patent in this District
`
`and elsewhere in Texas, including at least claims 1-3, 5-15, 17, and 18 literally and/or under the
`
`doctrine of equivalents, by or through making, using, importing, offering for sale and/or selling its
`
`telecommunications technology, including by way of example a product known as the iPhone XS.
`
`24.
`
`The iPhone XS includes a screen for displaying information, at least a GPS
`
`chipset/cellular chipset/Wi-Fi chipset/iBeacon/compass/gyroscope for providing location and/or
`
`orientation information, “Maps” and “Find My Friends” software that allows users to access
`
`location information including the present location of the device and orientation of the device and
`
`use such information to provide walking navigation information and/or share location. The iPhone
`
`XS further uses location servers to provide walking navigation information, route information,
`
`and/or to provide its position to additional devices in order to allow users to walk to a particular
`
`8
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 111 Filed 10/23/19 Page 9 of 65 PageID #: 4810
`
`shared location. For example, the following excerpts from Apple’s websites provide non-limiting
`
`examples of the iPhone XS infringing at least claims 1-3, 5-15, 17, and 18 of the ’317 Patent:
`
`See https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT201493
`
`9
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 111 Filed 10/23/19 Page 10 of 65 PageID #: 4811
`
`See https://www.apple.com/ios/maps/
`
`10
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 111 Filed 10/23/19 Page 11 of 65 PageID #: 4812
`
`25.
`
`The foregoing features and capabilities of the iPhone XS, and Apple’s description
`
`and/or demonstration thereof, including in user manuals and advertising, reflect Apple’s direct
`
`infringement by satisfying every element of at least claims 1-3, 5-15, 17, and 18 of the ’317 Patent,
`
`under 35 U.S.C. § 271(a).
`
`26.
`
`On information and belief, Apple further infringes the ’317 Patent through
`
`additional products utilizing the same or reasonably similar functionalities as described above with
`
`respect to the iPhone XS (collectively, “the ’317 Accused Products”). The ’317 Accused Products
`
`include all iOS devices including “Maps” and/or “Find My Friends” applications, for example,
`
`Apple iPhones (e.g., iPhone XS (model no. A1920), iPhone XS Max (model no. A1921), iPhone
`
`XR (model no. A1984), iPhone X (model nos. A1865 and A1901), iPhone 8 Plus (model nos.
`
`A1864 and A1897), iPhone 8 (model nos. A1863 and A1905), iPhone 7 Plus (model nos. A1661
`
`and A1784), iPhone 7 (model nos. A1660 and A1778), iPhone 6s Plus (model nos. A1634 and
`
`A1687), iPhone 6s (model nos. A1633 and A1688), iPhone 6 Plus (model nos. A1522 and A1524),
`
`iPhone 6 (model nos. A1549 and A1586), iPhone SE (model nos. A1723 and A1662), iPhone 5s
`
`(model nos. A1453 and A1533), iPhone 5c (model nos. A1456 and A1532), iPhone 11 (model no.
`
`A2111), iPhone 11 Pro (model no. A2160), and iPhone 11 Pro Max (model no. A2161)); Apple
`
`iPads with cellular functionality and/or Apple iPads with Wi-Fi and Indoor Maps (e.g., iPad Air
`
`(model no. A1475), iPad mini 2 (model no. A1490), iPad Air 2 (model no. A1567), iPad Air 3
`
`(model nos. A2123 and 2153), iPad mini 3 (model no. A1600), iPad mini 4 (model no. A1550),
`
`iPad mini 5 (model nos. A2124 and A2126), iPad Pro (model no. A1709), iPad Pro (model no.
`
`A1652), iPad Pro (model nos. A1674 and A1675), iPad Pro (model no. A2013), iPad (5th
`
`generation) (model no. A1823), iPad (6th generation) (model no. A1954), iPad (7th generation)
`
`(model nos. A2200 and A2198), iPad Pro (2nd generation) (model no. A1671), and iPad Pro (3rd
`
`11
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 111 Filed 10/23/19 Page 12 of 65 PageID #: 4813
`
`generation) (model nos. A2014 and A1895)); and Apple Watches (Apple Watch Series 5 (model
`
`nos. A2092, A2093, A2094, and A2095), Apple Watch Series 4 (model nos. A1975, A1976,
`
`A1977, and A1978), Series 3 (model nos. A1860, A1861, A1858, and A1859), and Series 2 (model
`
`nos. A1757, A1758, A1816, and A1817)). For example, each of these products also include a
`
`“Maps” application, a “Find My Friends” application, and/or “Location” services as advertised on
`
`Apple’s website. Maxell reserves the right to discover and pursue any additional infringing
`
`devices that incorporate infringing functionalities. For the avoidance of doubt, the ’317 Accused
`
`Products are identified to describe Apple’s infringement and in no way limit the discovery and
`
`infringement allegations against Apple concerning other devices that incorporate the same or
`
`reasonably similar functionalities.
`
`27.
`
`Apple has indirectly infringed at least claims 1-3, 5-15, 17, and 18 of the ’317 Patent
`
`in this District and elsewhere in the United States by, among other things, actively inducing the
`
`use, offering for sale, selling, or importation of at least the ’317 Accused Products. Apple’s
`
`customers who purchase devices and components thereof and operate such devices and
`
`components in accordance with Apple’s instructions directly infringe one or more claims of the
`
`’317 Patent in violation of 35 U.S.C. § 271. Apple instructs its customers through at least user
`
`guides or websites, such as those located at: https://support.apple.com/en_US/manuals or
`
`https://www.apple.com/ios/maps/. Apple is thereby liable for infringement of the ’317 Patent
`
`pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 271(b).
`
`28.
`
`Apple has indirectly infringed at least claims 1-3, 5-15, 17, and 18 of the ’317
`
`Patent, by, among other things, contributing to the direct infringement of others, including
`
`customers of the ’317 Accused Products by making, offering to sell, or selling, in the United States,
`
`or importing a component of a patented machine, manufacture, or combination, or an apparatus
`
`12
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 111 Filed 10/23/19 Page 13 of 65 PageID #: 4814
`
`for use in practicing a patented process, constituting a material part of the invention, knowing the
`
`same to be especially made or especially adapted for use in infringement of the ’317 Patent, and
`
`not a staple article or commodity of commerce suitable for substantial non-infringing use.
`
`29.
`
`For example, the ’317 Accused Products include hardware (e.g., GPS chip, cellular
`
`chip, Wi-Fi chip, gyroscope, compass, A12 processor) and/or software (e.g., “Maps” or “Find My
`
`Friends”). These are components of a patented machine, manufacture, or combination, or an
`
`apparatus for use in practicing a patented process. Furthermore, such components are a material
`
`part of the invention and upon information and belief are not a staple article or commodity of
`
`commerce suitable for substantial non-infringing use. Thus, Apple is liable for infringement of the
`
`’317 Patent pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 271(c).
`
`30.
`
`Apple has been on notice of the ’317 Patent since, at least, June 25, 2013. By the
`
`time of trial, Apple will thus have known and intended (since receiving such notice), that its
`
`continued actions would actively induce and contribute to actual infringement of at least claims 1-
`
`3, 5-15, 17, and 18 of the ’317 Patent.
`
`31.
`
`Apple undertook and continued its infringing actions despite an objectively high
`
`likelihood that such activities infringed the ’317 Patent, which has been duly issued by the USPTO,
`
`and is presumed valid. For example, since, at least June 25, 2013, Apple has been aware of an
`
`objectively high likelihood that its actions constituted and continue to constitute infringement of
`
`the ’317 Patent, and that the ’317 Patent is valid. On information and belief, Apple could not
`
`reasonably, subjectively believe that its actions do not constitute infringement of the ’317 Patent,
`
`nor could it reasonably, subjectively believe that the patent is invalid. Despite that knowledge and
`
`subjective belief, and the objectively high likelihood that its actions constitute infringement, Apple
`
`has continued its infringing activities. As such, Apple willfully infringes the ’317 Patent.
`
`13
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 111 Filed 10/23/19 Page 14 of 65 PageID #: 4815
`
`32. Maxell has been damaged by Apple’s infringement of the ’317 Patent.
`
`COUNT 2 - INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 6,580,999
`
`33. Maxell incorporates paragraphs 1-32 above by reference.
`
`34.
`
`U.S. Patent No. 6,580,999 (the “’999 Patent,” attached hereto at Exhibit 2) duly
`
`issued on June 17, 2003 and is entitled Portable terminal with the function of walking navigation.
`
`35. Maxell is the owner by assignment of the ’999 Patent and possesses all rights under
`
`the ’999 Patent, including the exclusive right to recover for past and future infringement.
`
`36.
`
`The ’999 Patent is the parent of the ’317 Patent, and like claims of the ’317 Patent,
`
`claims of the ’999 Patent are also directed to a specific novel and non-obvious portable terminal
`
`that includes specific functionality of providing guidance for walking navigation. Further, claims
`
`1-2 and 6 of the ’999 Patent even include a “device for getting the location information of another
`
`portable terminal” (’999 Patent, 10:44-45), thus specifically claiming a portable terminal that can
`
`receive a location from another portable terminal and providing in real-time route guidance
`
`information to a pedestrian so that the pedestrian can walk to the location of the other portable
`
`terminal after receiving the location.
`
`37.
`
`Apple has directly infringed one or more claims of the ’999 Patent in this District
`
`and elsewhere in Texas, including at least claims 1-6 literally and/or under the doctrine of
`
`equivalents, by or through making, using, importing, offering for sale and/or selling its
`
`telecommunications technology, including by way of example a product known as the iPhone XS.
`
`38.
`
`The iPhone XS includes a screen for displaying information, at least a GPS
`
`chipset/cellular chipset/Wi-Fi chipset/iBeacon/compass/gyroscope for providing location and/or
`
`orientation information, “Maps” and “Find My Friends” software that allows users to access
`
`location information including the present location of the device and orientation of the device and
`
`14
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 111 Filed 10/23/19 Page 15 of 65 PageID #: 4816
`
`use such information to provide walking navigation information and/or share location. The iPhone
`
`XS further uses location servers to provide walking navigation information, route information,
`
`and/or to provide its position to additional devices in order to allow users to walk to a particular
`
`shared location. For example, the following excerpts from Apple’s websites provide non-limiting
`
`examples of the iPhone XS infringing at least claims 1-6 of the ’999 Patent:
`
`See https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT201493
`
`15
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 111 Filed 10/23/19 Page 16 of 65 PageID #: 4817
`
`See https://www.apple.com/ios/maps/
`
`39.
`
`The foregoing features and capabilities of the iPhone XS, and Apple’s description
`
`and/or demonstration thereof, including in user manuals and advertising, reflect Apple’s direct
`
`infringement by satisfying every element of at least claims 1-6 of the ’999 Patent, under 35 U.S.C.
`
`§ 271(a).
`
`40.
`
`On information and belief, Apple further infringes the ’999 Patent through
`
`additional products utilizing the same or reasonably similar functionalities as described above with
`
`respect to the iPhone XS (collectively, “the ’999 Accused Products”). The ’999 Accused Products
`
`include all iOS devices including “Maps” and/or “Find My Friends” applications, for example,
`
`Apple iPhones (e.g., iPhone XS (model no. A1920), iPhone XS Max (model no. A1921), iPhone
`
`XR (model no. A1984), iPhone X (model nos. A1865 and A1901), iPhone 8 Plus (model nos.
`
`A1864 and A1897), iPhone 8 (model nos. A1863 and A1905), iPhone 7 Plus (model nos. A1661
`
`16
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 111 Filed 10/23/19 Page 17 of 65 PageID #: 4818
`
`and A1784), iPhone 7 (model nos. A1660 and A1778), iPhone 6s Plus (model nos. A1634 and
`
`A1687), iPhone 6s (model nos. A1633 and A1688), iPhone 6 Plus (model nos. A1522 and A1524),
`
`iPhone 6 (model nos. A1549 and A1586), iPhone SE (model nos. A1723 and A1662), iPhone 5s
`
`(model nos. A1453 and A1533), iPhone 5c (model nos. A1456 and A1532), iPhone 11 (model no.
`
`A2111), iPhone 11 Pro (model no. A2160), and iPhone 11 Pro Max (model no. A2161)); Apple
`
`iPads with cellular functionality and/or Apple iPads with Wi-Fi and Indoor Maps (e.g., iPad Air
`
`(model no. A1475), iPad mini 2 (model no. A1490), iPad Air 2 (model no. A1567), iPad Air 3
`
`(model nos. A2123 and A2153), iPad mini 3 (model no. A1600), iPad mini 4 (model no. A1550),
`
`iPad mini 5 (model nos. A2124 and A2126), iPad Pro (model no. A1709), iPad Pro (model no.
`
`A1652), iPad Pro (model nos. A1674 and A1675), iPad Pro (model no. A2013), iPad (5th
`
`generation) (model no. A1823), iPad (6th generation) (model no. A1954), iPad (7th generation)
`
`(model nos. A2200 and A2198), iPad Pro (2nd generation) (model no. A1671), and iPad Pro (3rd
`
`generation) (model nos. A2014 and A1895); and Apple Watches (Apple Watch Series 5 (model
`
`nos. A2092, A2093, A2094, and A2095), Apple Watch Series 4 (model nos. A1975, A1976,
`
`A1977, and A1978), Series 3 (model nos. A1860, A1861, A1858, and A1859), and Series 2 (model
`
`nos. A1757, A1758, A1816, and A1817)). For example, each of these products also include a
`
`“Maps” application, a “Find My Friends” application, and/or “Location” services as advertised on
`
`Apple’s website. Maxell reserves the right to discover and pursue any additional infringing devices
`
`that incorporate infringing functionalities. For the avoidance of doubt, the ’999 Accused Products
`
`are identified to describe Apple’s infringement and in no way limit the discovery and infringement
`
`allegations against Apple concerning other devices that incorporate the same or reasonably similar
`
`functionalities.
`
`17
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 111 Filed 10/23/19 Page 18 of 65 PageID #: 4819
`
`41.
`
`Apple has indirectly infringed at least claims 1-6 of the ’999 Patent in this District
`
`and elsewhere in the United States by, among other things, actively inducing the use, offering for
`
`sale, selling, or importation of at least the ’999 Accused Products. Apple’s customers who purchase
`
`devices and components thereof and operate such devices and components in accordance with
`
`Apple’s instructions directly infringe one or more claims of the ’999 Patent in violation of 35
`
`U.S.C. § 271. Apple instructs its customers through at least user guides or websites, such as those
`
`located at: https://support.apple.com/en_US/manuals or https://www.apple.com/ios/maps/. Apple
`
`is thereby liable for infringement of the ’999 Patent pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 271(b).
`
`42.
`
`Apple has indirectly infringed at least claims 1-6 of the ’999 Patent, by, among
`
`other things, contributing to the direct infringement of others, including customers of the ’999
`
`Accused Products by making, offering to sell, or selling, in the United States, or importing a
`
`component of a patented machine, manufacture, or combination, or an apparatus for use in
`
`practicing a patented process, constituting a material part of the invention, knowing the same to be
`
`especially made or especially adapted for use in infringement of the ’999 Patent, and not a staple
`
`article or commodity of commerce suitable for substantial non-infringing use.
`
`43.
`
`For example, the ’999 Accused Products include hardware (e.g., GPS chip, cellular
`
`chip, Wi-Fi chip, gyroscope, compass, A12 processor) and/or software (e.g., “Maps” or “Find My
`
`Friends”). These are components of a patented machine, manufacture, or combination, or an
`
`apparatus for use in practicing a patented process. Furthermore, such components are a material
`
`part of the invention and upon information and belief are not a staple article or commodity of
`
`commerce suitable for substantial non-infringing use. Thus, Apple is liable for infringement of the
`
`’999 Patent pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 271(c).
`
`18
`
`

`

`Case 5:19-cv-00036-RWS Document 111 Filed 10/23/19 Page 19 of 65 PageID #: 4820
`
`44.
`
`Apple has been on notice of the ’999 Patent since, at least, June 25, 2013. By the
`
`time of trial, Apple will thus have known and intended (since receiving such notice), that its
`
`continued actions would actively induce and contribute to actual infringement of at least claims 1-
`
`6 of the ’999 Patent.
`
`45.
`
`Apple undertook and continued its infringing actions despite an objectively high
`
`likelihood that such activities infringed the ’999 Patent, which has been duly issued by the USPTO,
`
`and is presumed valid. For example, since, at least June 25, 2013, Apple has been aware of an
`
`objectively high likelihood that its actions constituted and continue to constitute infringement of
`
`the

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket