throbber
Case 5:16-cv-00179-RWS Document 291-12 Filed 08/28/18 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 18716
`Case 5:16-cv-00179—RWS Document 291-12 Filed 08/28/18 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 18716
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT K
`
`EXHIBIT K
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 5:16-cv-00179-RWS Document 291-12 Filed 08/28/18 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 18717
`Case 5:16-cv-00179-RWS Document 291-12 Filed 08/28/18 Page 2 of 3 PagelD #: 18717
`
`Miller, Tiffany A.
`From:
`
`gunninghgm, Dumas; figaber. Jamie B.; Fusseli. Triog
`To:
`
`CE: WWWI; MLIENT- HM--ZTE- Service; ZTE Hitachi; "Eric Findiafl,
`"Brian E raft"
`RE: Maxell, Ltd. v. ZTE Corporation at al., Case No. 5:16—cv-00179—RWS (ED. Tex.)
`Monday, May 21, 2013 1:45:36 PM
`image001.png
`mm
`
`Subject:
`Date:
`Attachments:
`
`Nicole,
`
`We agree to a mutual exchange for objections to rebuttal exhibits on Thursday.
`
`Regards,
`
`Tiffany
`
`
`
`[mailto:nicole.cunningham@pillsburylaw.com]
`3:39 PM
`
`r, Jamie B.,' Fusseli, Tripp
`
`exar ana aw. corn‘; 'kbt@texarkanalaw. com'; US-CLIENT-HM-ZTE-Service; ZTE_Hitachi; 'Eric
`.gpc
`Findlay'; 'Brian Craft'
`Subject: RE. Maxell, Ltd. v. ZTE Corporation et al., Case No. 5:16-cv-00179-RWS (ED. Tex.)
`
`Tiffany,
`
`change should be mutual. Please let us know it Maxell agrees.
`
`but our posmon Is that such a
`
`Best Regards,
`Nicole
`
`Nicole S. Cunningham | Partner
`
`Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
`
`501 West Broadway, Suite 1100 J San Diego, CA 92101—3575
`t 619.544.3123
`
`nicolecunningham@pillsburylawcom l websitejlio
`
`From: Miller, Tiffany A. <TMi|ler@mayerbrown.com>
`
`Sent: Monday, May 21, 2018 11:16 AM
`
`To: Cunningham, Nicole S. <nicoie.cunningham@pillsburylaw.com>; Beaber, Jamie B.
`
`

`

`Case 5:16-cv-00179-RWS Document 291-12 Filed 08/28/18 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 18718
`Case 5:16-cv-00179-RWS Document 291-12 Filed 08/28/18 Page 3 of 3 PagelD #: 18718
`
`<1Beaber@mayerbrown.com>; Fussell, Tripp <JFusseil@mayerbrown.com>
`
`CC:
`
`'gPC@texarkanalaw.com' <gpc@texarl<analaw.com>; 'kbt@texarkanalaw.com‘
`
`<l<bt@texarl<a nalaw.com>; US—CLIENT~HM-ZTE-Service <HM-ZTE-Sewicengmayerbrown.com>;
`
`ZTE_Hitachi <ZTEHitachi@PilIsbury|aw.com>; 'Eric Findlay' <EFindlay@FindlayCrait.com>; 'Brian
`
`Craft' <BCrait@FindlayCratt.com>
`
`Subject: RE: Maxell, Ltd. v. ZTE Corporation at al., Case No. 5:16-cv-00179-RWS (ED. Tex.)
`
`Nicole,
`
`Last week, at the Court’s urging, the parties met and conferred and came to agreement regarding
`
`significant and meaningful narrowing of exhibits. Now, ZTE has identified 200 additional rebuttal
`
`exhibits, notably doubling the total number of exhibits and exceeding the Court’s limit by 150
`
`exhibits. We do not view this latest exchange to be within the spirit of the parties’ agreement or the
`Court’s admonition.
`
`Please let us know whether ZTE will provide a narrowed list, exceeding no more than 50 exhibits,
`
`today. If ZTE is not so willing, Maxell requests until Thursday, May 24, to provide its objections to
`
`ZTE’s rebuttal exhibit list. Maxell further reserves its right to raise this issue with the Court.
`
`Regards,
`
`Tiffany
`
`From: Cunningham, Nicole S. [maiIto:ni;ole.;unningham@pi| shtimlawggm]
`Sent: Monday, May 21, 2018 6:34 AM
`To: Miller, Tiffany A.; Beaber, Jamie B.; Fussell, Tripp
`Cc: 'gpc@texarkanalaw.com'; 'kbt@texarkanalaw.com'; US—CLIENT-HM-ZTE-Service; ZTE_Hitachi; ‘Eric
`Findlay'; 'Brian Craft'
`Subject: Maxell, Ltd. v. ZTE Corporation et al., Case No. 5:16-cv-00179-RWS (ED. Tex.)
`
`Counsel,
`
`Please see the attached native version of ZTE USA’s rebuttal exhibit list.
`
`Best Regards,
`Nicole
`
`Nicole S. Cunningham | Partner
`
`Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
`
`501 West Broadway, Suite 1100 | San Diego, CA 92101—3575
`t619.544.3123
`
`nigglegunningham@pill5biirylam,ggm | Mbsiiibifl
`AEIJ Ier'JEil
`A LiSTlN
`E-E .l' NG
`[1 )3)“.
`-Dlv‘3 HUNG
`HC-"JE'Q-N
`-|.:=3\.DI'J=’\
`LOB :‘tNGELES
`VHN')‘
`V325“? _;
`.‘n’E'h‘n' ”0:3:
`Lill—.1 T—EQH HIRE Mi“:
`F‘MJV B-E-‘LCH
`SAC-"i.“«f‘JlEP-TCI
`SAN DiEGO Sufi“ DIEGC' \CR‘T“ C73 -l‘tTi'
`SAP. F2141 NCECCI
`5H“. NEH-1. Bibi-3'. 'Ia'i'v._E ‘r'
`TDl "'C:
`'fia'fnS-l-INGTCli-J DC
`
`
`pi shurq
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket