`
`
`
`
`Exhibit 36
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 5:16-cv-00179-RWS Document 287-39 Filed 08/07/18 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 16923
`Case 5:16-cv-00178-RWS Document 375-1 Filed 05/24/18 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 25262
`
`Geoff Culbertson
`
`From:
`Sent:
`To:
`Cc:
`Subject:
`
`Geoff Culbertson
`Friday, May 18, 2018 7:03 PM
`BCraft@FindlayCraft.com; Eric Findlay
`Tripp Fussell
`Maxell v ZTE
`
`Dear Brian and Eric
`
`
`Maxell has moved for a continuance of the Huawei trial based on a pending motion for discovery
`sanctions. During a status conference with the Court today on the issue, Maxell proposed that the ZTE case
`proceed with trial on June 18 , with the Huawei trial to proceed thereafter to provide the parties in the Huawei
`case with additional time to prepare that case for trial. This proposal would obviously provide definite dates for
`the ZTE trial and assist the parties in other ways as well by having a date certain for the trial. The Court has
`asked that we reach out to you and get ZTE’s position on Maxell’s request. We would not expect ZTE to
`oppose, since ZTE’s trial date is set for June 18, as well, and the Court told Maxell and ZTE they should be
`ready for the ZTE trial on that date in case anything happened in the Huawei case. Please let us know whether
`ZTE opposes Maxell’s proposal and, if so, the bases for its opposition. Huawei and Maxell are to report back to
`the Court by Wednesday of next week in the form of a joint status report.
`
`
`Have a nice weekend. Feel free to call to discuss.
`
`
`Geoff
`
`
`
`
`Sent from my iPhone
`
`1
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
