`6543
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`SHERMAN DIVISION
`
`
`
`R2 SOLUTIONS LLC,
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`DATABRICKS, INC.,
`
`
`Civil Action No. 4:23-cv-01147-ALM
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`Defendant.
`
`DECLARATION OF JESSICA M. KAMEPF IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT
`DATABRICKS, INC.’S SUR-REPLY TO PLAINTIFF R2 SOLUTIONS LLC’S MOTION
`TO COMPEL DISCOVERY AND AMEND THE SCHEDULING ORDER
`
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 4:23-cv-01147-ALM Document 98-1 Filed 02/27/25 Page 2 of 4 PageID #:
`6544
`
`
`
`I, Jessica M. Kaempf, declare as follows:
`
`1.
`
`I am an attorney admitted to this Court, and I am a partner of the law firm of
`
`Fenwick and West LLP, counsel of record for Defendant Databricks, Inc. (“Databricks”) in this
`
`action. I make this declaration in support of Defendant Databricks, Inc.’s Sur-Reply to Plaintiff
`
`R2 Solutions LLC’s Motion to Compel Discovery and Amend the Scheduling Order.
`
`2.
`
`During fact discovery and pursuant to the Protective Order entered on November
`
`12, 2024, Databricks made available for inspection the source code
`
`
`
` identified and accused in
`
`R2’s infringement contentions. On November 25, 2024 and November 26, 2024, R2’s technical
`
`expert inspected the produced source code and identified certain code files that are called and
`
`referenced in the produced source code but were not produced. R2 thereafter requested the
`
`additional production of such code files, including
`
` in a November 27, 2024
`
`letter (attached as Exhibit 9 to R2’s motion). R2 followed up
`
` in an
`
`email (attached as Exhibit K to Databricks’ opposition).
`
`3.
`
`Mr. Brooks represented in his declaration on February 5, 2024 that Databricks
`
`represented that
`
`R2 counsel, I represented that
`
`. This is incorrect. During a conference with
`
`
`
`4.
`
`At no point during that call or during this case did I represent that
`
`.
`
`//
`
`//
`
`
`
`.
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 4:23-cv-01147-ALM Document 98-1 Filed 02/27/25 Page 3 of 4 PageID #:
`6545
`
`
`
`I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that, to
`
`the best of my belief, the foregoing is true and correct, and that this Declaration was executed on
`
`February 20, 2025.
`
`/s/ Jessica M. Kaempf
`Jessica M. Kaempf
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 4:23-cv-01147-ALM Document 98-1 Filed 02/27/25 Page 4 of 4 PageID #:
`6546
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION TO SEAL
`
`Pursuant to Local Rule CV-5(a)(7)(B), I am authorized to file the foregoing document
`
`under seal pursuant to the Protective Order (Dkt. 61) because this document references Designated
`
`Material.
`
`Dated: February 20, 2025
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Jessica M. Kaempf
`Jessica M. Kaempf
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing
`
`document has been served on all counsel of record who are deemed to have consented to electronic
`
`service via the Court’s CM/ECF system. Additionally, I hereby certify that all counsel of record
`
`who have consented to electronic service are being served with a copy of these documents via
`
`electronic mail per Local Rule CV-5.
`
`Dated: February 20, 2025
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Jessica M. Kaempf
`Jessica M. Kaempf
`
`
`
`4
`
`
`
`
`
`

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ ChargeStill Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site