throbber
Case 4:17-cv-00141-ALM Document 16 Filed 05/18/17 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 150
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`SHERMAN DIVISION
`
`
`C.A. NO. 4:17-CV-00141-ALM
`
`
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`
`PLECTRUM LLC,
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`v.
`
`
`ORACLE CORPORATION and
`ORACLE AMERICA, INC.,
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PLAINTIFF PLECTRUM LLC’S NOTICE THAT ITS
`FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT MOOTS DEFENDANTS ORACLE CORPORATION
`AND ORACLE AMERICA, INC.’S MOTION TO DISMISS
`
`Defendants Oracle Corporation and Oracle America, Inc. (collectively, “Oracle”) have
`
`moved to dismiss plaintiff Plectrum LLC’s (“Plectrum”) direct and indirect infringement claims,
`
`alleging pleading deficiencies in Plectrum’s Original Complaint. (Dkt. # 14). On May 17, 2017,
`
`Plectrum filed an amended complaint. (Dkt # 15). “An amended complaint supersedes the
`
`original complaint and renders it of no legal effect unless the amended complaint specifically
`
`refers to and adopts or incorporates by reference the earlier pleading.” King v. Dogan, 31 F.3d
`
`344, 346 (5th Cir. 1994). Thus, because the original complaint has been deprived of “legal
`
`effect,” Oracle’s motion to dismiss must therefore be denied as moot. See, Bank of N.Y. Mellon v.
`
`Maniscalco, No. 1:15-CV-35, 2015 WL 11111369, at *1 n. 2 (E.D. Tex. May 11, 2015)
`
`(dismissing defendant’s motion to dismiss original complaint as moot after plaintiff filed an
`
`amended complaint); Chaisson v. Grounds, No. 5:13CV54, 2014 WL 175329, at *4 (E.D. Tex.
`
`Jan. 14, 2014) (“The Fifth Circuit has stated that an amended complaint supersedes the original
`
`and becomes the operative pleading.”)
`
`
`
`1
`
`

`

`Case 4:17-cv-00141-ALM Document 16 Filed 05/18/17 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 151
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`/s/ Zachariah S. Harrington
`Matthew J. Antonelli
`Texas Bar No. 24068432
`matt@ahtlawfirm.com
`Zachariah S. Harrington
`Texas Bar No. 24057886
`zac@ahtlawfirm.com
`Larry D. Thompson, Jr.
`Texas Bar No. 24051428
`larry@ahtlawfirm.com
`Michael D. Ellis
`Texas Bar No. 24081586
`michael@ahtlawfirm.com
`
`ANTONELLI, HARRINGTON
`& THOMPSON LLP
`4306 Yoakum Blvd., Ste. 450
`Houston, TX 77006
`(713) 581-3000
`
`Stafford Davis
`State Bar No. 24054605
`THE STAFFORD DAVIS FIRM, PC
`The People's Petroleum Building
`102 N College Ave., 13th Floor
`Tyler, Texas 75702
`(903) 593-7000
`sdavis@stafforddavisfirm.com
`
`Attorneys for Plectrum LLC
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`Dated: May 18, 2017
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 4:17-cv-00141-ALM Document 16 Filed 05/18/17 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 152
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that on the 18th day of May, 2017, I electronically filed the foregoing
`
`with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification of such filing
`
`to all counsel of record.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Zachariah S. Harrington
`Zachariah S. Harrington
`
`3
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket