`JCDECAUX NORTH AMERICA, INC. AND
`JCDECAUX NORTH AMERICA HOLDINGS INC.,
`
`
`v.
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 4:16-cv-00303-ALM Document 13 Filed 07/18/16 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 239
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`SHERMAN DIVISION
`
`
`T-REX PROPERTY AB,
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`CASE NO. 4:16-cv-303-ALM
`
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`
`
`DEFENDANT JCDECAUX NORTH AMERICA, INC.’S
`ANSWER AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT
`
`Defendant JCDecaux North America, Inc. (“JCDecaux”), by its attorneys of record,
`
`responds to the allegations of the Complaint for Patent Infringement (“Complaint”) filed in this
`
`action by Plaintiff T-Rex Property AB (“T-Rex” or “Plaintiff”) on May 9, 2016, as follows:
`
`NATURE OF THE ACTION
`
`1.
`
`JCDecaux admits that the Complaint purports to state a claim for patent
`
`infringement under the laws of the United States, and in particular 35 U.S.C. §§ 271, et seq.
`
`JCDecaux denies all of the remaining allegations in Paragraph 1, including any allegation that
`
`JCDecaux has infringed any asserted patent.
`
`2.
`
`JCDecaux lacks knowledge or information to form a belief as to the truth of the
`
`allegations in Paragraph 2 and therefore denies the same.
`
`3.
`
`JCDecaux admits that JCDecaux North America, Inc. is a Delaware corporation
`
`with an office located at 3 Park Avenue, 33 Floor, New York, NY 10016. JCDecaux also admits
`
`that The Corporation Trust Company is a registered agent for JCDecaux North America, Inc.
`
`NY 245948788v4
`
`1
`
`
`
`Case 4:16-cv-00303-ALM Document 13 Filed 07/18/16 Page 2 of 10 PageID #: 240
`
`
`JCDecaux lacks knowledge or information to form a belief as to the truth of the remaining
`
`allegations in Paragraph 3 and therefore denies the same.
`
`4.
`
`JCDecaux denies the allegations in Paragraph 4.
`
`JURISDICTION AND VENUE
`
`5.
`
`At this time, JCDecaux does not contest this Court’s subject matter jurisdiction
`
`over T-Rex’s claims.
`
`6.
`
`JCDecaux does not contest that the Court has personal jurisdiction over it.
`
`JCDecaux denies the remaining allegations in Paragraph 6.
`
`7.
`
`JCDecaux does not contest that the Court has personal jurisdiction over it.
`
`JCDecaux denies the remaining allegations in Paragraph 7.
`
`8.
`
`JCDecaux denies the allegations in Paragraph 8. JCDecaux incorporates by
`
`reference its Motion to Transfer Venue filed contemporaneously with this Answer.
`
`THE PATENTS-IN-SUIT
`
`9.
`
`JCDecaux incorporates by reference its responses to Paragraphs 1-8 as if fully
`
`stated herein.
`
`10.
`
`JCDecaux admits that a copy of the ‘470 Patent, entitled “Digital Information
`
`System,” appears to have been attached to the Complaint as Exhibit A. JCDecaux admits that
`
`the face of the ‘470 Patent indicates that the United States Patent and Trademark Office issued
`
`the ‘470 Patent on January 16, 2007. JCDecaux denies the remainder of the allegations in
`
`Paragraph 10, including that the ‘470 Patent was duly and legally issued.
`
`11.
`
`JCDecaux admits that the face of the ‘470 Patent indicates that it is a reissue of
`
`U.S. Patent No. 6,005,534. JCDecaux also admits that the face of the U.S. Patent No. 6,005,534
`
`indicates that it claims priority to U.S. Provisional App. No. 60/017,403 and Swedish
`
`NY 245948788v4
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case 4:16-cv-00303-ALM Document 13 Filed 07/18/16 Page 3 of 10 PageID #: 241
`
`
`Application No. 9601603. JCDecaux lacks knowledge or information to form a belief as to the
`
`truth of the remaining allegations in Paragraph 11 and therefore denies the same.
`
`12.
`
`JCDecaux admits that the quoted portions appear in the ’470 Patent but denies the
`
`remainder of the allegations in Paragraph 12.
`
`13.
`
`14.
`
`15.
`
`16.
`
`JCDecaux denies the allegations in Paragraph 13.
`
`JCDecaux denies the allegations in Paragraph 14.
`
`JCDecaux denies the allegations in Paragraph 15.
`
`JCDecaux admits that a copy of the ‘334 Patent, entitled “Digital Information
`
`System,” appears to have been attached to the Complaint as Exhibit B. JCDecaux admits that the
`
`face of the ‘334 Patent indicates that the United States Patent and Trademark Office issued the
`
`‘334 Patent on June 3, 2008. JCDecaux denies the remainder of the allegations in Paragraph 16,
`
`including that the ‘334 Patent was duly and legally issued.
`
`17.
`
`JCDecaux admits that the quoted portions appear in the ’334 Patent but denies the
`
`remainder of the allegations in Paragraph 17.
`
`18.
`
`19.
`
`20.
`
`21.
`
`JCDecaux denies the allegations in Paragraph 18.
`
`JCDecaux denies the allegations in Paragraph 19.
`
`JCDecaux denies the allegations in Paragraph 20.
`
`JCDecaux admits that a copy of the ‘603 Patent, entitled “System for Direct
`
`Placement of Commercial Advertising, Public Service Announcements and Other Content on
`
`Electronic Billboard Displays,” appears to have been attached to the Complaint as Exhibit C.
`
`JCDecaux admits that the face of the ‘603 Patent indicates that the United States Patent and
`
`Trademark Office issued the ‘603 Patent on August 6, 2002. JCDecaux denies the remainder of
`
`the allegations of Paragraph 21, including that the ‘603 Patent was duly and legally issued.
`
`NY 245948788v4
`
`3
`
`
`
`Case 4:16-cv-00303-ALM Document 13 Filed 07/18/16 Page 4 of 10 PageID #: 242
`
`
`22.
`
`JCDecaux admits that the quoted portions appear in the ’603 Patent but denies the
`
`remainder of the allegations in Paragraph 22.
`
`23.
`
`JCDecaux admits that the quoted portions appear in the ’603 Patent but denies the
`
`remainder of the allegations in Paragraph 23.
`
`24.
`
`JCDecaux admits that the quoted portions appear in the ’603 Patent but denies the
`
`remainder of the allegations in Paragraph 24.
`
`25.
`
`JCDecaux admits that the quoted portions appear in the ’603 Patent but denies the
`
`remainder of the allegations in Paragraph 25.
`
`26.
`
`JCDecaux lacks knowledge or information to form a belief as to the truth of the
`
`allegations in Paragraph 26 and therefore denies the same.
`
`COUNT I – ALLEGED INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. RE39,470
`
`27.
`
`JCDecaux incorporates by reference its responses to Paragraphs 1-26 as if fully
`
`stated herein.
`
`28.
`
`29.
`
`30.
`
`31.
`
`32.
`
`JCDecaux denies the allegations in Paragraph 28.
`
`JCDecaux denies the allegations in Paragraph 29.
`
`JCDecaux denies the allegations in Paragraph 30.
`
`JCDecaux denies the allegations in Paragraph 31.
`
`JCDecaux lacks knowledge or information to form a belief as to the truth of the
`
`allegations in Paragraph 32 and therefore denies the same.
`
`33.
`
`34.
`
`35.
`
`JCDecaux denies the allegations in Paragraph 33.
`
`JCDecaux denies the allegations in Paragraph 34.
`
`JCDecaux denies the allegations in Paragraph 35.
`
`NY 245948788v4
`
`4
`
`
`
`Case 4:16-cv-00303-ALM Document 13 Filed 07/18/16 Page 5 of 10 PageID #: 243
`
`
`36.
`
`JCDecaux admits that claim 25 of the ’470 Patent is worded differently than other
`
`claims, including claim 26. JCDecaux denies the remainder of the allegations in Paragraph 36.
`
`37.
`
`38.
`
`39.
`
`40.
`
`41.
`
`JCDecaux denies the allegations in Paragraph 37.
`
`JCDecaux denies the allegations in Paragraph 38.
`
`JCDecaux denies the allegations in Paragraph 39.
`
`JCDecaux denies the allegations in Paragraph 40.
`
`JCDecaux lacks knowledge or information to form a belief as to the truth of the
`
`allegations in Paragraph 41 and therefore denies those allegations.
`
`42.
`
`43.
`
`44.
`
`JCDecaux denies the allegations in Paragraph 42.
`
`JCDecaux denies the allegations in Paragraph 43.
`
`JCDecaux denies the allegations in Paragraph 44.
`
`COUNT II – ALLEGED INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 7,382,334
`
`45.
`
`JCDecaux incorporates by reference its responses to Paragraphs 1-44 as if fully
`
`stated herein.
`
`46.
`
`47.
`
`48.
`
`49.
`
`50.
`
`51.
`
`52.
`
`53.
`
`JCDecaux denies the allegations in Paragraph 46.
`
`JCDecaux denies the allegations in Paragraph 47.
`
`JCDecaux denies the allegations in Paragraph 48.
`
`JCDecaux denies the allegations in Paragraph 49.
`
`JCDecaux denies the allegations in Paragraph 50.
`
`JCDecaux denies the allegations in Paragraph 51.
`
`JCDecaux denies the allegations in Paragraph 52.
`
`JCDecaux admits that claim 22 of the ’334 Patent is worded differently than other
`
`claims, including claim 32. JCDecaux denies the remainder of the allegations in Paragraph 53.
`
`NY 245948788v4
`
`5
`
`
`
`Case 4:16-cv-00303-ALM Document 13 Filed 07/18/16 Page 6 of 10 PageID #: 244
`
`
`54.
`
`55.
`
`56.
`
`57.
`
`JCDecaux denies the allegations in Paragraph 54.
`
`JCDecaux denies the allegations in Paragraph 55.
`
`JCDecaux denies the allegations in Paragraph 56.
`
`JCDecaux admits that claim 32 of the ’334 Patent is worded differently than the
`
`claims of the ’470 Patent. JCDecaux denies the allegations in Paragraph 57.
`
`58.
`
`JCDecaux lacks knowledge or information to form a belief as to the truth of the
`
`allegations in Paragraph 58 and therefore denies the same.
`
`59.
`
`60.
`
`61.
`
`JCDecaux denies the allegations in Paragraph 59.
`
`JCDecaux denies the allegations in Paragraph 60.
`
`JCDecaux denies the allegations in Paragraph 61.
`
`COUNT III – ALLEGED INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 6,430,603
`
`62.
`
`JCDecaux incorporates by reference its responses to Paragraphs 1-61 as if fully
`
`stated herein.
`
`63.
`
`64.
`
`65.
`
`66.
`
`67.
`
`68.
`
`JCDecaux denies the allegations in Paragraph 63.
`
`JCDecaux denies the allegations in Paragraph 64.
`
`JCDecaux denies the allegations in Paragraph 65.
`
`JCDecaux denies the allegations in Paragraph 66.
`
`JCDecaux denies the allegations in Paragraph 67.
`
`JCDecaux admits that claim 42 of the ’603 Patent is worded differently than the
`
`claims of the ’334 Patent and the ’470 Patent. JCDecaux denies the allegations in Paragraph 68.
`
`69.
`
`70.
`
`71.
`
`JCDecaux denies the allegations in Paragraph 69.
`
`JCDecaux denies the allegations in Paragraph 70.
`
`JCDecaux denies the allegations in Paragraph 71.
`
`NY 245948788v4
`
`6
`
`
`
`Case 4:16-cv-00303-ALM Document 13 Filed 07/18/16 Page 7 of 10 PageID #: 245
`
`
`72.
`
`JCDecaux denies the allegations in Paragraph 72.
`
`JURY DEMAND
`
`JCDecaux admits that T-Rex has requested a trial by jury.
`
`ANSWER TO PRAYER FOR RELIEF
`
`JCDecaux incorporates by reference its responses to Paragraphs 1-72 of the Complaint
`
`and denies that T-Rex is entitled to any relief requested in Paragraphs (A)-(E) of T-Rex’s Prayer
`
`for Relief.
`
`DEFENSES
`
`
`
`Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(c), JCDecaux asserts the following
`
`defenses to the causes of action asserted in the Complaint, undertaking to prove only those
`
`defenses on which it bears the burden of proof under the applicable law:
`
`FIRST DEFENSE
`(No Infringement)
`
`1.
`
`JCDecaux has not and does not infringe, willfully or otherwise, any valid and
`
`enforceable claim of the ‘470, ‘334 or ‘603 Patents, either literally or under the doctrine of
`
`equivalents.
`
`SECOND DEFENSE
`(Invalidity, Unenforceability)
`
`2.
`
`The ‘470, ‘334 and ‘603 Patents, and each claim thereof, are invalid and/or
`
`unenforceable for failing to comply with one or more of the requirements of the Patent Act, 35
`
`U.S.C. § 1, et seq., including, but not limited to, 35 U.S.C. §§ 101, 102, 103, 112, and/or 282.
`
`For example, and without limitation, the claims of the patents are drawn to patent ineligible
`
`subject matter and are therefore invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 101.
`
`NY 245948788v4
`
`7
`
`
`
`Case 4:16-cv-00303-ALM Document 13 Filed 07/18/16 Page 8 of 10 PageID #: 246
`
`
`3.
`
`The ‘470, ‘334 and ‘603 Patents are unenforceable because T-Rex has misused
`
`these patents by attempting to enforce them despite knowing that they are invalid and/or not
`
`infringed.
`
`THIRD DEFENSE
`(Notice, Damages, and Costs)
`
`4.
`
`Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 286, any recovery by T-Rex is limited to any alleged
`
`infringement that occurred no more than six years prior to the filing of its Complaint against
`
`JCDecaux.
`
`5.
`
`To the extent T-Rex failed to comply with the notice provisions of 35 U.S.C. §
`
`287, T-Rex may not recover damages for alleged infringement of the ‘470, ‘334 and ‘603 Patents
`
`committed prior to the filing of its Complaint against JCDecaux.
`
`6.
`
`T-Rex is barred from recovering costs in connection with this action under 35
`
`U.S.C. § 288.
`
`FOURTH DEFENSE
`(Failure to State a Claim)
`
`7.
`
`The Complaint fails to state a claim against JCDecaux upon which relief can be
`
`granted, including without limitation because all of the claims in the ‘470, ‘334 and ‘603 Patents
`
`are invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 101 for being drawn to unpatentable subject matter.
`
`FIFTH DEFENSE
`(Not an Exceptional Case)
`
`8.
`
`T-Rex cannot prove that this is an exceptional case justifying an award of attorney
`
`fees against JCDecaux pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 285.
`
`NY 245948788v4
`
`8
`
`
`
`Case 4:16-cv-00303-ALM Document 13 Filed 07/18/16 Page 9 of 10 PageID #: 247
`
`
`SIXTH DEFENSE
`(No Injunctive Relief)
`
`9.
`
`T-Rex is not entitled to injunctive relief because, among other reasons, any
`
`alleged injury to T-Rex is not immediate or irreparable, and T-Rex has an adequate remedy at
`
`law.
`
`SEVENTH DEFENSE
`(Equitable Defenses)
`
`10.
`
`T-Rex’s claims are barred in whole or in part by waiver, laches, and equitable
`
`estoppel.
`
`11.
`
`T-Rex’s claims and/or the relief sought in the Complaint are barred by the
`
`doctrine of unclean hands.
`
`
`
`Dated: July 18, 2016
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP
`
`/s/ Amit M. Mahtani
`
`Scott J. Bornstein
`Joshua L. Raskin
`Amit M. Mahtani
`MetLife Building
`200 Park Avenue
`New York, NY 10166
`Telephone: 212.801.9200
`Facsimile: 212.801.6400
`
`Mary-Olga Lovett
`1000 Louisiana Street Suite 1700
`Houston, TX 77002
`Telephone: 713.374.3500
`Facsimile: 713.374.3505
`
`COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT
`JCDECAUX NORTH AMERICA,
`INC.
`
`NY 245948788v4
`
`9
`
`
`
`Case 4:16-cv-00303-ALM Document 13 Filed 07/18/16 Page 10 of 10 PageID #: 248
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that all counsel of record who are deemed to have consented to electronic
`service are being served with a copy of this document via the Court’s CM/ECF system per Local
`Rule CV-5(a) on this 18th day of July, 2016. Any other counsel of record will be served by
`facsimile transmission and/or electronic mail.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Amit M. Mahtani
` Amit M. Mahtani
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`NY 245948788v4
`
`10
`
`