throbber
Case 2:23-cv-00172-RWS-RSP Document 10-1 Filed 12/11/23 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 69
`Case 2:23-cv-00172-RWS-RSP Document 10-1 Filed 12/11/23 Page 1 of 4 PagelD#: 69
`
`EXHIBIT A
`EXHIBIT A
`
`

`

`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`
`
`
`SLYDE ANALYTICS, LLC.,
`
`Plaintiff
`aintirt,
`
`
`ZEPP HEALTH CORPORATION,
`
`Defendant.
`
`%
`
`Case No. 2:23-cv-00172-RWS-RSP
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`DECLARATION OF MIKE YAN YEUNG IN SUPPORT OF
`DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO TRANSFER
`
`I, Mike Yan Yeung,declare as follows:
`
`l.
`
`I am the Chief Operating Officer (“COO”) of Defendant Zepp Health Corporation
`
`(“ZHC”). Lam over twenty-one (21) years of age and reside in Fremont, CA. The statements herein
`
`reflect my personal knowledge and belief based on information already known to me and/or
`
`information learned from the investigation I conducted in connection with the preparation ofthis
`
`declaration. If called to testify as a witness, I could testify competently thereto.
`
`2.
`
`I have acted as COO of ZHCsince 2015. Through my work as COO of ZHC,I have
`
`developedfamiliarity and acquired knowledge regarding ZHC’s activities, as wellas the activities
`
`of ZHC’s varies subsidiaries and their respective employees. In addition, in connection with the
`
`preparation of this declaration, I reviewed documents and records of ZHC and interviewed some
`
`employees of certain ZHC subsidiaries.
`
`3.
`
`ZHCis incorporated in the Cayman Islands and has a registered address of P.O.
`
`Box 309, Ugland House, Grand Cayman, KY1-1104, CaymanIslands. ZHCis a holding company
`
`and does notitself engage in any commercialactivities.
`
`

`

`4.
`
`5.
`
`6.
`
`ZHCdoesnot have a place of business in Texas.
`
`ZHCdoes not have any employees in Texas.
`
`ZHC has two direct subsidiaries that are incorporated in the State of Delaware:
`
`Zepp,
`
`Inc.; and Zepp North America,
`
`Inc.
`
`(“ZNA”). ZNA is responsible for distribution,
`
`marketing, and sales in the United States of the smartwatch products accused of infringement by
`
`Slyde Analytics, LLC. Zepp, Inc. is involved in the design of the smartwatch products accused of
`
`infringement by Slyde Analytics, LLC.
`
`be
`
`Neither Zepp, Inc. nor ZNA hasa place of business in Texas. Zepp, Inc. and ZNA
`
`each haveoffices in California: Zepp Inc.hasits office in Milpitas, CA; and ZNAhasits office in
`
`Newport Beach, CA.
`
`8.
`
`ZNA does not have any employees in Texas. All of ZNA’s employeesreside in
`
`California.
`
`9.
`
`Zepp, Inc. has a single employee in Texas: Maher Sarraj. Mr. Sarraj resides in
`
`Dallas, Texas. Mr. Sarraj is a member of the Chip Division of Zepp, Inc. and he works on analog
`
`chip design. Mr. Sarraj has not been, and is not currently, involved in any work related to any of
`
`the smartwatch products accused of infringement by Slyde Analytics. LLC. All of Zepp, Inc.’s
`
`remaining employeesreside in California.
`
`10.
`Zepp, Inc. has also employed an independent contractor in Texas for work on IC
`layouts: Thomas Moore. Mr. Monte has not been,andis not currently, involved in any workrelated
`
`to any of the smartwatch products accused of infringement by Slyde Analytics, LLC.
`
`11.
`
`Most of the documents and records of ZHC are stored and maintained on the cloud.
`
`The individuals responsible for maintaining those documents and records are located in the
`
`People’s Republic of China. ZHC has no documents or records stored or maintained anywhere in
`
`

`

`the United States. The physical documents and records of ZHC,to the extent they exist, are stored
`
`and maintained in the Cayman Islands or the People’s Republic of China.
`
`12.
`
`Most of the documents and records of both ZNA and Zepp, Inc. are stored and
`
`maintained on the cloud. The individuals responsible for maintaining those documents and records
`
`are located in the People’s Republic of China. The physical documents and records of both ZNA
`
`and Zepp, Inc., to the extent they exist, are stored. and maintained in California.
`
`13.
`
`All of the smartwatch products accused of infringement by Slyde Analytics, LLC
`
`were designed and developed in the People’s Republic of China and/or in California.
`
`14._All of the smartwatch products accused of infringement by Slyde Analytics, LLC
`
`were manufactured in the People’s Republic of China. No manufacturing was conducted in the
`
`United States.
`
`15.
`
`[Thereby declarethat all statements made herein of my own knowledge are true and
`
`that all statements made on information and belief are believed to be true; and further that these
`
`statements were made with the knowledge that willful false statements and the like so made are
`
`punishable by fine or imprisonment, or both, under the laws of perjury of the United States,
`
`including Section 1001 of Title 18 of the United States Code.
`
`17.
`
`Executed this 10th day of December 2023, in Fremont, California.
`
`Md,
`
`Mike Yan Yeung
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket