Case 2:23-cv-00083-RWS-RSP Document 66-2 Filed 05/24/24 Page 1 of 15 PageID #: 519
`
`EXHIBIT B – Plaintiff Slyde’s Proposed Constructions and Identification of Evidence
`
`Exhibit B1: Slyde’s Proposed Constructions and Identification of Evidence for the ’033 Patent
`Patent/Claim(s
`Slyde’s Proposed
`Intrinsic
`Extrinsic Support
`)
`Construction
`Evidence
`’033 Patent
`Plain and ordinary
`’033 Patent at Fig.
`
`meaning
`4; 3:31-42; 8:14-
`Claim(s) 1, 16,
`38.
`17, 18
`
`’033 Patent
`
`Claim(s) 1
`
`
`Plain and ordinary
`meaning
`
`’033 Patent at Fig.
`4; 1:35-63; 2:34-
`4:36;
`6:47-61;
`8:28-39; 7:14-9:3;
`9:28-36.
`
`Plaintiff may rely on the expert testimony
`of Fabio Chiussi, Ph.D., regarding the
`proper construction of this term.
`
`Plaintiff may rely on the expert testimony
`of Fabio Chiussi, Ph.D., regarding the
`proper construction of this term.
`
`
`Term
`
`“gear train”
`
`a
`of
`“simulation
`watch
`mechanical
`movement comprising a
`gear
`train,
`said
`simulation being visible
`so as to indicate the
`time”
`a
`“a
`simulation of
`mechanical
`watch
`movement comprising a
`gear train visible so as to
`indicate the time”
`
`“an electronic display of
`a simulated mechanical
`watch
`movement
`comprising a gear train
`and of time indicators so
`as
`to
`simulate
`a
`mechanical watch”
`“mechanical watch”
`
`
`
`’033 Patent
`
`Claim(s) 16
`
`’033 Patent
`
`Claim(s) 17
`
`Plain and ordinary
`meaning
`
`Plain and ordinary
`meaning
`
`’033 Patent
`
`Claim(s) 1, 16,
`17
`
`Plain and ordinary
`meaning
`
`1
`
`’033 Patent at Fig.
`4; 1:35-63; 2:34-
`4:36;
`6:47-61;
`8:28-39; 7:14-9:3;
`9:28-36.
`
`’033 Patent at Fig.
`4; 1:35-63; 2:34-
`4:36;
`6:47-61;
`8:28-39; 7:14-9:3;
`9:28-36.
`
`’033 Patent at Fig.
`4; 1:35-63; 3:31-
`63; 4:7-26; 7:65-
`8:38.
`
`Plaintiff may rely on the expert testimony
`of Fabio Chiussi, Ph.D., regarding the
`proper construction of this term.
`
`
`Plaintiff may rely on the expert testimony
`of Fabio Chiussi, Ph.D., regarding the
`proper construction of this term.
`
`
`Plaintiff may rely on the expert testimony
`of Fabio Chiussi, Ph.D., regarding the
`proper construction of this term.
`
`

`

`Case 2:23-cv-00083-RWS-RSP Document 66-2 Filed 05/24/24 Page 2 of 15 PageID #: 520
`
`EXHIBIT B – Plaintiff Slyde’s Proposed Constructions and Identification of Evidence
`
`Term
`
`Patent/Claim(s
`)
`
`Slyde’s Proposed
`Construction
`
`Intrinsic
`Evidence
`
`Extrinsic Support
`
`
`
`the
`“synchronizing
`displayed time by said
`displayed mechanical
`movement with that of
`said quartz oscillator”
`“at least one of said
`elements
`of
`said
`movement”
`
`’033 Patent
`
`Claim(s) 1 and
`16
`
`’033 Patent
`
`Claim(s) 6
`
`Plain and ordinary
`meaning
`
`Plain and ordinary
`meaning
`
`at
`’033 Patent
`FIGS. 1 and 4;
`3:64-4:6;
`5:15-
`6:41; 7:46-8:56.
`
`Plaintiff may rely on the expert testimony
`of Fabio Chiussi, Ph.D., regarding the
`proper construction of this term.
`
`
`’033 Patent at Fig.
`4; 1:35-63; 3:31-
`63; 4:7-26; 6:15-
`19; 7:46-8:56.
`
`Calibre, Dictionary of Horology (2002),
`Federation of the Swiss Watch Industry
`FH,
`available
`at
`https://dictionary.fhs.swiss/?l=en.
`
`Calibers, Professional Watches, available
`at
`https://professionalwatches.com/calibers/
`
`Calibre, Watch Glossary, available at
`https://web.archive.org/web/2016030407
`2804/http://watchesokay.com/watch-
`glossary/.
`
`Christophe Roulet, How
`a
`does
`mechanical watch work?, Foundation
`Haute Horlogerie
`(Apr. 25, 2023),
`https://www.hautehorlogerie.org/en/watc
`hes-and-culture/library/how-does-a-
`mechanical-watch-work.
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 2:23-cv-00083-RWS-RSP Document 66-2 Filed 05/24/24 Page 3 of 15 PageID #: 521
`
`EXHIBIT B – Plaintiff Slyde’s Proposed Constructions and Identification of Evidence
`
`Term
`
`Patent/Claim(s
`)
`
`Slyde’s Proposed
`Construction
`
`Intrinsic
`Evidence
`
`Extrinsic Support
`
`Plaintiff may rely on the expert testimony
`of Fabio Chiussi, Ph.D., regarding the
`proper construction of this term.
`
`’033 Patent at Figs
`2, 3, 4, and 5; 3:31-
`63; 6:26-41; 7:14-
`8:64
`
`Plaintiff may rely on the expert testimony
`of Fabio Chiussi, Ph.D., regarding the
`proper construction of this term.
`
`
`“means for modifying
`the
`running of
`said
`displayed
`regulating
`organ according to the
`accelerations to which
`the watch is subjected”
`
`’033 Patent
`
`Claim(s) 10
`
`Not governed by 35
`U.S.C. § 112(6).
`
`In the alternative,
`to the extent the
`Court
`finds
`this
`term is governed by
`35 U.S.C. § 112(6):
`Function:
`the
`“modifying
`said
`running
`of
`displayed regulating
`organ according to
`the accelerations to
`which the watch is
`subjected”
`
`Structure:
`accelerometer,
`accelerometer
`combined with
`gyroscope
`to
`configured
`the
`implement
`algorithm disclosed
`in the, or equivalents
`thereof.
`
`or
`
`a
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case 2:23-cv-00083-RWS-RSP Document 66-2 Filed 05/24/24 Page 4 of 15 PageID #: 522
`
`EXHIBIT B – Plaintiff Slyde’s Proposed Constructions and Identification of Evidence
`
`Term
`
`“means for entering and
`executing a request for
`said synchronization by
`the user”
`
`Patent/Claim(s
`)
`’033 Patent
`
`Claim(s) 12
`
`’033 Patent
`
`Claim(s) 17
`
`“Method for displaying
`time in a wristwatch,
`comprising displaying
`on an electronic display
`a
`simulated
`of
`mechanical
`watch
`movement comprising a
`gear train and of time
`indicators
`so
`as
`to
`
`Slyde’s Proposed
`Construction
`Not governed by 35
`U.S.C. § 112(6).
`
`In the alternative,
`to the extent the
`Court
`finds
`this
`term is governed by
`35 U.S.C. § 112(6):
`Function: “entering
`and
`executing
`a
`request
`for
`said
`synchronization by
`the user”
`
`Structure:
`“a display associated
`with a touch sensor,”
`“one of the push-
`buttons or on
`the
`touch
`sensor”, or
`equivalents thereof
`Plain and ordinary
`meaning.
`
`Preamble
`limiting.
`
`not
`
`is
`
`Intrinsic
`Evidence
`’033 Patent at Figs
`2, 3, 4, and 5; 3:31-
`63; 5:42-63; 6:47-
`61; 7:14-8:64.
`
`Extrinsic Support
`
`Plaintiff may rely on the expert testimony
`of Fabio Chiussi, Ph.D., regarding the
`proper construction of this term.
`
`
`’033 Patent at Figs
`2, 3, 4, and 5; 2:59-
`3:63;
`5:42-63;
`6:47-61; 7:14-8:64.
`
`Plaintiff may rely on the expert testimony
`of Fabio Chiussi, Ph.D., regarding the
`proper construction of this term.
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`Case 2:23-cv-00083-RWS-RSP Document 66-2 Filed 05/24/24 Page 5 of 15 PageID #: 523
`
`EXHIBIT B – Plaintiff Slyde’s Proposed Constructions and Identification of Evidence
`
`Term
`
`simulate a mechanical
`watch”
`
`Patent/Claim(s
`)
`
`Slyde’s Proposed
`Construction
`
`Intrinsic
`Evidence
`
`Extrinsic Support
`
`
`
`5
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:23-cv-00083-RWS-RSP Document 66-2 Filed 05/24/24 Page 6 of 15 PageID #: 524
`
`EXHIBIT B – Plaintiff Slyde’s Proposed Constructions and Identification of Evidence
`
`Term
`
`Intrinsic Evidence
`
`Extrinsic Support
`
`Exhibit B2: Slyde’s Proposed Constructions and Identification of Evidence for the ’922 Patent
`Patent/Claim(s)
`Slyde’s
`Proposed
`Construction
`Plain
`and
`ordinary
`meaning
`
`“cause said several
`available cards
`to
`scroll past”
`
`’922 Patent
`
`Claim(s) 1 and 23
`
`’922 Patent at FIGS. 2, 3a, 3b, 3c,
`3d; 4:16-46; 5:1-11; 7:56-8:3;
`8:43-9:52.
`
`Plaintiff may rely on the expert
`testimony of Fabio Chiussi, Ph.D.,
`regarding the proper construction
`of this term.
`
`
`“scrolling on a digital
`matrix display of
`several
`available
`cards”
`
`’922 Patent
`
`Claim(s) 9
`
`and
`
`Plain
`ordinary
`meaning
`
`’922 Patent at FIGS. 2, 3a, 3b, 3c,
`3d; 4:16-46; 5:1-11; 7:56-8:3;
`8:43-9:52.
`
`“to cause cards to
`scroll past”
`
`’922 Patent
`
`Claim(s) 24
`
`and
`
`Plain
`ordinary
`meaning
`
`’922 Patent at FIGS. 2, 3a, 3b, 3c,
`3d; 4:16-46; 5:1-11; 7:56-8:3;
`8:43-9:52.
`
`’922 Patent
`
`Claim(s) 9
`
`for
`“A method
`replacing an initially
`displayed
`card
`by
`displayed
`a
`by
`wristwatch
`a
`replacement card, the
`method having the
`following steps:”
`
`and
`
`Plain
`ordinary
`meaning.
`
`Preamble is not
`limiting.
`
`’922 Patent at FIGS. 1, 2, 3a, 3b,
`3c, 3d, 4a, 4b, 4c; 4:16-46; 5:1-11;
`7:56-8:3; 8:43-9:52.
`
`Plaintiff may rely on the expert
`testimony of Fabio Chiussi, Ph.D.,
`regarding the proper construction
`of this term.
`
`
`Plaintiff may rely on the expert
`testimony of Fabio Chiussi, Ph.D.,
`regarding the proper construction
`of this term.
`
`
`Plaintiff may rely on the expert
`testimony of Fabio Chiussi, Ph.D.,
`regarding the proper construction
`of this term.
`
`
`
`
`6
`
`

`

`Case 2:23-cv-00083-RWS-RSP Document 66-2 Filed 05/24/24 Page 7 of 15 PageID #: 525
`
`EXHIBIT B – Plaintiff Slyde’s Proposed Constructions and Identification of Evidence
`
`Term
`
`Patent/Claim(s)
`
`“A wristwatch”
`
`’922 Patent
`
`Claim(s) 1, 23, 24
`
`
`
`Slyde’s
`Proposed
`Construction
`Plain
`and
`ordinary
`meaning.
`
`Preamble is not
`limiting.
`
`Intrinsic Evidence
`
`Extrinsic Support
`
`’922 Patent at FIGS. 1a, 1b, and 2;
`5:40-8:42.
`
`Plaintiff may rely on the expert
`testimony of Fabio Chiussi, Ph.D.,
`regarding the proper construction
`of this term.
`
`7
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:23-cv-00083-RWS-RSP Document 66-2 Filed 05/24/24 Page 8 of 15 PageID #: 526
`
`EXHIBIT B – Plaintiff Slyde’s Proposed Constructions and Identification of Evidence
`
`Exhibit B3: Slyde’s Proposed Constructions and Identification of Evidence for the ’678 Patent
`Patent/Claim(s)
`Slyde’s
`Proposed
`Construction
`Plain
`and
`ordinary
`meaning.
`
`Preamble is not
`limiting.
`
`Intrinsic Evidence
`
`Extrinsic Support
`
`’678 Patent at FIGS. 1b, 2, 3, 4, 5,
`7a, 7b, 7c; 2:43-3:11; 3:54-4:5;
`5:4-10:57.
`
`Plaintiff may rely on the expert
`testimony of Fabio Chiussi, Ph.D.,
`regarding the proper construction
`of this term.
`
`’678 Patent
`
`Claim(s) 1
`
`Term
`
`method
`“A
`gesture
`combining
`by
`an
`detection
`inertial sensor and
`gesture
`detection
`with a touch panel
`for
`switching
`a
`wristwatch from a
`first power mode to a
`second power mode,
`wherein the inertial
`sensor comprises an
`accelerometer and a
`processor
`and/or
`other
`processing
`means, and wherein
`the
`wristwatch
`comprises
`a
`microcontroller
`controlling a display
`of indication on a
`digital matrix display
`of the wristwatch and
`a touch controller for
`interpreting
`touch
`signal provided by a
`touch
`panel
`underneath a cover
`glass
`and
`for
`
`
`
`8
`
`

`

`Case 2:23-cv-00083-RWS-RSP Document 66-2 Filed 05/24/24 Page 9 of 15 PageID #: 527
`
`EXHIBIT B – Plaintiff Slyde’s Proposed Constructions and Identification of Evidence
`
`Intrinsic Evidence
`
`Extrinsic Support
`
`’678 Patent at FIGS. 1b, 2, 7a, 7b,
`7c; 3:61-4:5; 5:4-8:47, 9:29-
`10:57.
`
`Plaintiff may rely on the expert
`testimony of Fabio Chiussi, Ph.D.,
`regarding the proper construction
`of this term.
`
`
`Term
`
`Patent/Claim(s)
`
`’678 Patent
`
`Claim(s) 1
`
`said
`converting
`into
`signals
`command signal”
`“other
`processing
`means of the inertial
`sensor
`for
`discriminating
`between gesture and
`no gesture based on a
`direction
`of
`said
`acceleration
`signal
`and on a slope or
`frequency of
`said
`acceleration signal as
`measured by
`said
`accelerometer being
`a three dimensional
`accelerometer”
`
`Slyde’s
`Proposed
`Construction
`
`governed
`Not
`by 35 U.S.C. §
`112(6).
`
`the
`In
`alternative, to
`the extent the
`Court
`finds
`this
`term
`is
`governed by 35
`U.S.C.
`§
`112(6):
`Function:
`“discriminating
`between gesture
`and no gesture
`based
`on
`a
`direction of said
`acceleration
`signal and on a
`scope
`or
`frequency
`of
`said
`acceleration
`signal
`measured
`said
`
`as
`by
`
`
`
`9
`
`

`

`Case 2:23-cv-00083-RWS-RSP Document 66-2 Filed 05/24/24 Page 10 of 15 PageID #: 528
`
`EXHIBIT B – Plaintiff Slyde’s Proposed Constructions and Identification of Evidence
`
`Term
`
`Patent/Claim(s)
`
`’678 Patent
`
`Claim(s) 14
`
`processing
`being
`for
`
`“other
`means
`arranged
`discriminating
`between gesture and
`no gesture based on a
`direction
`of
`said
`acceleration signal as
`measured by
`said
`accelerometer being
`a three dimensional
`accelerometer,
`and
`on
`a
`slope
`or
`frequency of
`said
`
`
`
`Slyde’s
`Proposed
`Construction
`accelerometer
`being a
`three
`dimensional
`accelerometer”
`
`Structure:
`“inertial sensor,
`touch controller,
`microcontroller,
`dedicated
`circuit,
`processor or any
`combination
`thereof”
`equivalents
`thereof
`Not
`governed
`by 35 U.S.C. §
`112(6).
`
`the
`In
`alternative, to
`the extent the
`Court
`finds
`this
`term
`is
`governed by 35
`U.S.C.
`§
`112(6):
`Function:
`“discriminating
`
`or
`
`Intrinsic Evidence
`
`Extrinsic Support
`
`’678 Patent at FIGS. 1b, 2, 7a, 7b,
`7c; 3:61-4:5; 5:4-8:47, 9:29-
`10:57.
`
`Plaintiff may rely on the expert
`testimony of Fabio Chiussi, Ph.D.,
`regarding the proper construction
`of this term.
`
`
`10
`
`

`

`Case 2:23-cv-00083-RWS-RSP Document 66-2 Filed 05/24/24 Page 11 of 15 PageID #: 529
`
`EXHIBIT B – Plaintiff Slyde’s Proposed Constructions and Identification of Evidence
`
`Intrinsic Evidence
`
`Extrinsic Support
`
`Term
`
`Patent/Claim(s)
`
`signal,
`acceleration
`the
`while
`microcontroller and
`the touch controller
`are in a sleep power
`mode”
`
`as
`by
`
`Slyde’s
`Proposed
`Construction
`between gesture
`and no gesture
`on a direction of
`said
`acceleration
`signal
`measured
`said
`accelerometer
`being a
`three
`dimensional
`accelerometer,
`and on a slope
`or frequency of
`said
`acceleration
`signal, while the
`microcontroller
`and
`the
`touch
`controller are in
`a sleep power
`mode”
`
`Structure:
`“inertial sensor,
`touch controller,
`microcontroller,
`dedicated
`circuit,
`processor or any
`
`
`
`11
`
`

`

`Case 2:23-cv-00083-RWS-RSP Document 66-2 Filed 05/24/24 Page 12 of 15 PageID #: 530
`
`EXHIBIT B – Plaintiff Slyde’s Proposed Constructions and Identification of Evidence
`
`Term
`
`Patent/Claim(s)
`
`“discriminating
`between gesture and
`no gesture”
`
`’678 Patent
`
`Claim(s) 1, 4, 5,
`14
`
`Slyde’s
`Proposed
`Construction
`combination
`thereof”
`equivalents
`thereof
`Plain
`ordinary
`meaning
`
`and
`
`or
`
`Intrinsic Evidence
`
`Extrinsic Support
`
`’678 Patent at FIGS. 1b, 2, 7a, 7b,
`7c; 3:61-4:5; 5:4-8:47, 9:29-
`10:57.
`
`Plaintiff may rely on the expert
`testimony of Fabio Chiussi, Ph.D.,
`regarding the proper construction
`of this term.
`
`Plaintiff may rely on the expert
`testimony of Fabio Chiussi, Ph.D.,
`regarding the proper construction
`of this term.
`
`said
`for
`said
`for
`
`“using
`microcontroller
`detecting
`and
`gesture
`discriminating
`between gesture and
`no gesture based at
`least on signals from
`the touch panel”
`“said gesture being a
`tap or a double tap”
`
`“A wristwatch which
`can be operated in a
`plurality of power
`modes
`including a
`first power mode and
`a
`second
`power
`mode”
`
`
`
`’678 Patent
`
`Claim(s) 1
`
`and
`
`Plain
`ordinary
`meaning
`
`’678 Patent at FIGS. 1b, 2, 7a, 7b,
`7c; 3:61-4:5; 5:4-8:47, 9:29-
`10:57.
`
`’678 Patent
`
`Claim(s) 11
`
`’678 Patent
`
`Claim(s) 14
`
`and
`
`Plain
`ordinary
`meaning
`
`’678 Patent at FIGS. 3, 4, 5, 6, 7a,
`7b, 7c; 2:43-3:11; 3:54-60; 6:3-
`9:28.
`
`and
`
`Plain
`ordinary
`meaning.
`
`Preamble is not
`limiting.
`
`’678 Patent at Abstract; FIGS. 1b,
`2, 7a, 7b, 7c; 3:61-4:5; 5:4-8:47,
`9:29-10:57.
`
`Plaintiff may rely on the expert
`testimony of Fabio Chiussi, Ph.D.,
`regarding the proper construction
`of this term.
`
`Plaintiff may rely on the expert
`testimony of Fabio Chiussi, Ph.D.,
`regarding the proper construction
`of this term.
`
`12
`
`

`

`Case 2:23-cv-00083-RWS-RSP Document 66-2 Filed 05/24/24 Page 13 of 15 PageID #: 531
`
`EXHIBIT B – Plaintiff Slyde’s Proposed Constructions and Identification of Evidence
`
`Intrinsic Evidence
`
`Extrinsic Support
`
`’678 Patent at FIGS. 1b, 2, 7a, 7b,
`7c; 3:61-4:5; 5:4-8:47, 9:29-
`10:57.
`
`Plaintiff may rely on the expert
`testimony of Fabio Chiussi, Ph.D.,
`regarding the proper construction
`of this term.
`
`Term
`
`Patent/Claim(s)
`
`’678 Patent
`
`Claim(s) 15
`
`“powering means
`arranged
`for
`powering only a first
`subset of said touch
`area upon detection
`of a gesture by said
`accelerometer,
`and
`for powering a larger
`subset in said second
`power mode”
`
`Slyde’s
`Proposed
`Construction
`Not
`governed
`by 35 U.S.C. §
`112(6).
`
`the
`In
`alternative, to
`the extent the
`Court
`finds
`this
`term
`is
`governed by 35
`U.S.C.
`§
`112(6):
`Function:
`“powering only
`a first subset of
`said touch area
`upon detection
`of a gesture by
`said
`accelerometer,
`and
`for
`powering
`a
`larger subset in
`said
`second
`power mode”
`
`Structure:
`“power supply,
`inertial sensor,
`touch controller,
`
`
`
`13
`
`

`

`Case 2:23-cv-00083-RWS-RSP Document 66-2 Filed 05/24/24 Page 14 of 15 PageID #: 532
`
`EXHIBIT B – Plaintiff Slyde’s Proposed Constructions and Identification of Evidence
`
`Intrinsic Evidence
`
`Extrinsic Support
`
`Term
`
`Patent/Claim(s)
`
`
`
`Slyde’s
`Proposed
`Construction
`microcontroller,
`dedicated
`circuit,
`processor or any
`combination
`thereof” or any
`equivalents
`thereof
`
`
`14
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:23-cv-00083-RWS-RSP Document 66-2 Filed 05/24/24 Page 15 of 15 PageID #: 533
`
`EXHIBIT B – Plaintiff Slyde’s Proposed Constructions and Identification of Evidence
`
`Exhibit B4: Slyde’s Proposed Constructions and Identification of Evidence for the ’085 Patent
`Patent/Claim(s)
`Slyde’s
`Proposed
`Construction
`Plain
`and
`ordinary
`meaning.
`
`Preamble is not
`limiting.
`Plain
`ordinary
`meaning
`
`Intrinsic Evidence
`
`Extrinsic Support
`
`’085 Patent at Abstract, FIGS. 6,
`7a, 7b, 7c, 2:19-21; 2:28-3:19;
`6:3-8:47; 9:18-10:36.
`
`Plaintiff may rely on the expert
`testimony of Fabio Chiussi, Ph.D.,
`regarding the proper construction
`of this term.
`
`and
`
`’085 Patent at FIGS. 7a, 7b, 7c;
`9:48-10:36.
`
`Plaintiff may rely on the expert
`testimony of Fabio Chiussi, Ph.D.,
`regarding the proper construction
`of this term.
`
`Term
`
`for
`“A method
`a
`switching
`wristwatch from a
`first power mode to a
`second power mode”
`
`“a duration between
`the starting position
`and the final position
`is in a predefined
`range”
`
`’085 Patent
`
`Claim(s) 1
`
`’085 Patent
`
`Claim(s) 1
`
`
`
`
`
`15
`
`