`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`TOUCHSTREAM TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC., et
`al.,
`
`
`
`TOUCHSTREAM TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS,
`LLC d/b/a XFINITY, et al.,
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`
`CASE NO. 2:23-cv-00059-JRG
`(Lead Case)
`
`
`
`
`CASE NO. 2:23-cv-00062-JRG
`(Member Case)
`
` §
`
`
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`
`
` §
`
`
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`
`ORDER
`
`The Court issues this Order sua sponte. On July 23, 2024, Plaintiff Touchstream
`
`Technologies, Inc. (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, Comcast
`
`Corporation; Comcast Cable Communications Management, LLC; and Comcast of Houston, LLC
`
`(collectively, “Comcast”) submitted a Joint Notice Regarding Mediation, in which Plaintiff and
`
`Comcast stated that they “agree this case may benefit from mediation” but that they had not agreed
`
`on a mediator for the Court’s consideration. (Dkt. No. 79.) The following day, Plaintiff and
`
`Defendants Charter Communications, Inc., Charter Communications Operating, LLC, Spectrum
`
`Management Holding Company, LLC, Time Warner Cable Enterprises, LLC, Charter
`
`Communications, LLC and Spectrum Gulf Coast, LLC (collectively, “Charter” and with Comcast,
`
`“Defendants”) filed a substantively identical Joint Notice Regarding Mediation. (Dkt. No. 80.)
`
`Most recently, on August 8, 2024, Plaintiff and Defendants submitted a Joint Notice Regarding
`
`
`
`Case 2:23-cv-00059-JRG Document 158 Filed 08/28/24 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 9312
`
`Mediation. (Dkt. No. 96.) In this latest filing, the Parties still believe “that this case may benefit
`
`from mediation,” but they have failed to jointly select a mutually agreeable mediator. (Id. at 1.)
`
`In light of the Parties’ desire to mediate but inability to agree upon a mediator, the Court
`
`hereby appoints the Hon. David Folsom, Folsom ADR PLLC, 6002-B Summerfield Drive,
`
`Texarkana, Texas 75503, telephone number (903) 277-7303 Email: david@folsomadr.com, as
`
`mediator in the above-captioned Lead and Member Cases. Accordingly, the parties are
`
`ORDERED to mediate before the Hon. David Folsom as soon as reasonably practicable but in no
`
`event later than twenty-one (21) days from the entry of this Order. Mediation shall be in a format
`
`(in-person, virtual, or a combination thereof) as the mediator shall direct. His directives in such
`
`regard shall be binding on the parties and counsel.
`
`Mediation shall be governed by the Court-Annexed Mediation Plan, found at:
`
`hthttp://www.txed.uscourts.gov/?q=court-annexed-mediation-plan. In particular and without
`
`limitation, the Mediation Plan requires the presence at the mediation conference of all parties,
`
`corporate representatives, and any other required claims professionals (e.g., insurance adjusters,
`
`etc.) with full authority to negotiate a settlement. Exceptions to this requirement may be made only
`
`by the presiding judge in writing. Further, this Court’s Standing Order Regarding Participation of
`
`Local Counsel
`
`in Mediation Efforts
`
`(dated April 30, 2018
`
`and
`
`found
`
`at
`
`http://www.txed.uscourts.gov/?q=judge/chief-district-judge-rodney-gilstrap) shall be complied
`
`with wherever applicable. No one may leave or disengage from any mediation session without the
`
`prior express approval of the mediator. The mediator’s directives as to the corporate
`
`representatives and their level of authority shall also be controlling as to any mediation session
`
`undertaken pursuant to this Order.
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case 2:23-cv-00059-JRG Document 158 Filed 08/28/24 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 9313
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`So Ordered this
`Aug 28, 2024
`
`