`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`
`AGIS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT
`LLC,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PANASONIC CORPORATION and
`PANASONIC CORPORATION OF
`NORTH AMERICA,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case No. 2:22-cv-447-JRG
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`DEFENDANTS’ NOTICE REGARDING ITC DETERMINATION
`
`Pursuant to the Court’s Order Granting Defendants’ Unopposed Motion to Stay Pending
`
`ITC Determination (Dkt. No. 13), Defendants, Panasonic Corporation and Panasonic
`
`Corporation of North America (collectively “Panasonic”), respectfully submit this notice
`
`regarding the termination of Plaintiff AGIS Software Development LLC’s (“AGIS”) ITC
`
`investigation against Panasonic.1
`
`On June 15, 2023, AGIS withdrew its complaint and moved to terminate its ITC
`
`investigation against Panasonic and other respondents. On June 20, 2023, Administrative Law
`
`Judge (“ALJ”) Moore issued an Initial Determination that AGIS’s motion to terminate be
`
`granted. On July 10, 2023, the ITC decided not to review ALJ Moore’s Initial Determination
`
`and terminated AGIS’s ITC investigation in its entirety. On July 13, 2023, a notice of the ITC’s
`
`decision was published in the Federal Register. Certain Location-Sharing Systems, 88 Fed. Reg.
`
`44,840 (July 13, 2023). A copy of the notice is attached hereto as Exhibit A.
`
`
`1 Panasonic requested AGIS’s position on this notice regarding ITC determination so that the parties could
`submit a joint notice pursuant to the Court’s stay Order; however, AGIS has not responded to this request.
`
`1
`
`
`
`Case 2:22-cv-00447-JRG Document 14 Filed 10/11/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 174
`
`Panasonic appears specially to file this notice because AGIS has not yet served process
`
`on Panasonic.
`
`Panasonic’s special appearance does not waive any of its objections and defenses to
`
`AGIS’s Complaint, including, but not limited to, any defenses based on lack of jurisdiction,
`
`improper venue, inconvenient venue, insufficiency of process, and insufficiency of service of
`
`process, and does not waive Panasonic’s right to seek appropriate relief, including dismissal of
`
`the Complaint or venue transfer. Panasonic expressly reserves all objections, defenses, and other
`
`rights in response to AGIS’s Complaint.
`
`Date: October 11, 2023
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Trey Yarbrough
`Trey Yarbrough
`Bar No. 22133500
`trey@yw-lawfirm.com
`YARBROUGH WILCOX, PLLC
`100 E. Ferguson, Suite 1015
`Tyler, Texas 75702
`903-595-3111 office
`903-595-0191 fax
`
`ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANTS
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that all counsel of record who are deemed to have
`
`consented to electronic service are being served with a copy of this document via the Court’s
`
`CM/ECF system per Local Rule CV-5(a)(3) on October 11, 2023.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Trey Yarbrough
`Trey Yarbrough
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
