`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`AGIS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT LLC, §
`
`
`
`
`
`
`§
`v.
`
`
`
`
`
`§
`
`
`
`
`
`
`§
`HMD GLOBAL, et al.
`
`
`§
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`________________________________________________________________________
`
`AGIS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT LLC, §
`
`
`
`
`
`
`§
`v.
`
`
`
`
`
`§
`
`
`
`
`
`
`§
`PANASONIC CORPORATION, et al.
`§
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case No. 2:22-cv-00443-JRG
`
` (Lead Case)
`
`
`
`Case No. 2:22-cv-00447-JRG
` (Member Case)
`
`ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR
`EXTENSION OF TIME IN WHICH TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE
`RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT
`
`Having considered the unopposed motion of defendants, Panasonic Holdings
`
`
`
`Corporation and Panasonic Corporation of North America, for extension of time in which
`
`to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint, the Court finds that good cause
`
`exists and the motion should be granted.
`
`It is, therefore, Ordered that defendants, Panasonic Holdings Corporation and
`
`Panasonic Corporation of North America, have through January 15, 2024 in which to
`
`answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint.
`
`
`
`
`