Case 2:22-cv-00443-JRG Document 11-1 Filed 01/12/23 Page 1 of 87 PageID #: 66
`Case 2:22-cv-00443-JRG Document 11-1 Filed 01/12/23 Page 1 of 87 PagelD #: 66
`
`EXHIBIT A
`EXHIBIT A
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00443-JRG Document 11-1 Filed 01/12/23 Page 2 of 87 PageID #: 67
`
`UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
`WASHINGTON, D.C.
`
`
`
`Investigation No. 337-TA-____
`
`In the Matter of:
`
`CERTAIN LOCATION-SHARING
`SYSTEMS, RELATED SOFTWARE,
`COMPONENTS THEREOF, AND
`PRODUCTS CONTAINING SAME
`
`
`
`
`VERIFIED COMPLAINT UNDER SECTION 337
`OF THE TARIFF ACT OF 1930, AS AMENDED
`
`Complainants:
`
`Advanced Ground Information Systems, Inc.
`92 Lighthouse Dr.
`Jupiter, FL 33469
`Telephone: (561) 744-3213
`
`AGIS Software Development LLC
`100 West Houston Street
`Marshall, TX 75671
`Telephone: (903) 702-1954
`
`Counsel for Complainant:
`
`Evan H. Langdon
`FABRICANT LLP
`1101 Pennsylvania Avenue, Suite 300,
`Washington, DC 20004
`Telephone: (646) 797-4277
`E-mail: Agis_ITC@fabricantllp.com
`
`Alfred R. Fabricant
`Peter Lambrianakos
`Vincent J. Rubino, III
`Enrique W. Iturralde
`Justine Minseon Park
`FABRICANT LLP
`411 Theodore Fremd Avenue, Suite 206
`South Rye, New York 10580
`Telephone: (646) 797-4277
`E-mail: Agis_ITC@fabricantllp.com
`
`
`Proposed Respondents:
`
`Google LLC
`1600 Amphitheatre Parkway
`Mountain View, CA 94043
`Telephone: (650) 253-0000
`
`Samsung Electronics, Co., Ltd.
`12 Samsung-Ro
`Maetan-3dong, Yeongtong-gu
`Suwon, 443-742, South Korea
`Telephone: (822) 225-0114
`
`Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
`85 Challenger Rd.
`Ridgefield Park, New Jersey 07660
`Telephone: (201) 229-4000
`
`OnePlus Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.
`18F, Tairan Building, Block C
`Tairan 8th Road
`Chgongmiao, Futian District
`Shenzhen, Guangdong 518040, China
`
`TCL Technology Group Corporation
`22/F, TCL Technology Building, No. 17
`Huifeng 3rd Road
`Zhongkai High-Tech Development District
`Huizhou, Guangdong, China 516006
`
`TCL Electronics Holdings Limited
`7th Floor, Building 22E
`
`1
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00443-JRG Document 11-1 Filed 01/12/23 Page 3 of 87 PageID #: 68
`
`Matthew D. Aichele
`RUSS AUGUST & KABAT
`800 Maine Ave. SW, Suite 200
`Washington, DC 20024
`Telephone: (202) 664-0623
`E-mail: maichele@raklaw.com
`
`
`22 Science Park East Avenue
`Hong Kong Science Park
`Hong Kong
`
`TCL Communication Technology Holdings
`Limited
`5/F, Building 22E,
`22 Science Park East Avenue
`Hong Kong Science Park, Shatin,
`New Territories, Hong Kong
`
`TCT Mobile (US) Inc.
`25 Edelman, Suite 200
`Irvine, CA 92618
`Telephone: (949) 892-2990
`
`Lenovo Group Ltd.
`6 Chuang ye Road, Haidian District
`Beijing 100085, China
`Telephone: (852) 2590-0228
`
`Lenovo (United States) Inc.
`1009 Think Place, Building One
`Morrisville, NC 27560
`Telephone: (855) 253-6686
`
`Motorola Mobility LLC
`222 W Merchandise Mart Plaza, Suite 1800
`Chicago, IL 60654
`Telephone: (800) 668-6765
`
`HMD Global
`Karaportti 2, FIN-02610
`Espoo, Finland
`
`HMD Global OY
`Bertel Jungin aukio 9, 02600
`Espoo, Finland
`
`HMD America, Inc.
`1200 Brickell Ave., Suite 510
`Miami, FL 33131
`
`Sony Corporation
`1-7-1 Konan Minato-ku
`Tokyo, 108-0075, Japan
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00443-JRG Document 11-1 Filed 01/12/23 Page 4 of 87 PageID #: 69
`
`Telephone: 81-3-6748-2111
`
`Sony Mobile Communications, Inc.
`4-12-3 Higashi-Shinagawa, Shinagawa-ku
`Tokyo, 140-0002, Japan
`Telephone: (855) 806-8464
`
`ASUSTek Computer Inc.
`No. 15, Li-Te Rd.
`Beitou Dist., Taipei 112, Taiwan
`Telephone: (866) 2-2894-3447
`
`ASUS Computer International
`48720 Kato Rd.
`Fremont, CA 94538
`Telephone: (510) 739-3777
`
`Caterpillar Inc.
`100 NE Adams St.
`Peoria, IL 61629
`Telephone: (309) 675-2337
`
`BLU Products
`10814 NW 33rd Street
`Doral, FL 33172
`Telephone: (877) 639-6393
`
`Panasonic Corporation
`1006 Oaza Kadoma-shi
`Kadoma 571-8501
`Osaka, Japan
`Phone: +81-6-6908-1121
`Fax: +81-6-6908-2351
`
`Panasonic Corporation of North America
`1 Panasonic Way
`Secaucus, New Jersey 07094
`Phone: (201) 348-7000
`Fax: (201) 348-7016
`
`Kyocera Corporation
`6 Takeda Tobadono-cho, Fushmi-ku
`Kyoto, Japan 612-8501
`
`Xiaomi Corporation
`Maples Corporate Services Limited
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00443-JRG Document 11-1 Filed 01/12/23 Page 5 of 87 PageID #: 70
`
`P.O. Box 309
`Ugland House
`Grand Cayman, KY1-1104, Cayman Islands
`
`68 Qinghe Middle Street
`Haidian District
`Beijing, China 100085
`
`Xiaomi H.K. Ltd.
`Unit 806, Tower 2 8/F
`Cheung Sha Wan Plaza
`833 Cheung Sha Wan Road
`Kowloon City, Hong Kong
`
`Xiaomi Communications Co., Ltd.
`Xiaomi Office Building
`68 Qinghe Middle Street
`Haidian District
`Beijing, China 100085
`
`Xiaomi Inc.
`Xiaomi Office Building
`68 Qinghe Middle Street
`Haidian District
`Beijing, China 100085
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00443-JRG Document 11-1 Filed 01/12/23 Page 6 of 87 PageID #: 71
`
`
`I. 
`
`II. 
`
`TABLE OF CONTENTS
`
`Page(s)
`
`INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 16 
`
`THE PARTIES.................................................................................................................. 18 
`
`A. 
`
`B. 
`
`The Complainant ................................................................................................... 18 
`
`The Proposed Respondents ................................................................................... 20 
`
`1. 
`
`2. 
`
`3. 
`
`4. 
`
`5. 
`
`6. 
`
`7. 
`
`8. 
`
`9. 
`
`10. 
`
`11. 
`
`12. 
`
`13. 
`
`Google LLC .............................................................................................. 20 
`
`Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America,
`Inc. ............................................................................................................ 21 
`
`OnePlus Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. .............................................. 22 
`
`TCL Technology Group Corporation, TCL Communication
`Technology Holdings Limited, TCL Electronics Holdings Limited,
`and TCT Mobile (US) Inc. ........................................................................ 22 
`
`Lenovo Group Ltd., Lenovo (United States) Inc., and Motorola
`Mobility LLC ............................................................................................ 25 
`
`HMD Global, HMD Global OY, and HMD America, Inc. ...................... 26 
`
`Sony Corporation and Sony Mobile Communications, Inc. ..................... 27 
`
`ASUSTek Computer Inc. and ASUS Computer International .................. 27 
`
`Caterpillar Inc. .......................................................................................... 28 
`
`BLU Products, Inc. ................................................................................... 29 
`
`Panasonic Corporation and Panasonic Corporation of North
`America ..................................................................................................... 29 
`
`Kyocera Corporation ................................................................................. 30 
`
`Xiaomi Corporation, Xiaomi Communications Co., Ltd., Xiaomi
`H.K. Ltd., and Xiaomi Inc. ....................................................................... 30 
`
`III. 
`
`THE TECHNOLOGY AND PRODUCTS AT ISSUE .................................................... 32 
`
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00443-JRG Document 11-1 Filed 01/12/23 Page 7 of 87 PageID #: 72
`
`IV. 
`
`THE ASSERTED AGIS PATENTS ................................................................................. 33 
`
`A. 
`
`The ’970 Patent ..................................................................................................... 33 
`
`1. 
`
`2. 
`
`3. 
`
`4. 
`
`Identification of the Patent and Ownership .............................................. 33 
`
`Nontechnical Description of the Patent .................................................... 33 
`
`Foreign Counterparts of the Patent ........................................................... 34 
`
`Licensees ................................................................................................... 34 
`
`B. 
`
`The ’838 Patent ..................................................................................................... 35 
`
`1. 
`
`2. 
`
`3. 
`
`4. 
`
`Identification of the Patent and Ownership .............................................. 35 
`
`Nontechnical Description of the Patent .................................................... 35 
`
`Foreign Counterparts of the Patent ........................................................... 36 
`
`Licensees ................................................................................................... 37 
`
`C. 
`
`The ’251 Patent ..................................................................................................... 37 
`
`1. 
`
`2. 
`
`3. 
`
`4. 
`
`Identification of the Patent and Ownership .............................................. 37 
`
`Nontechnical Description of the Patent .................................................... 38 
`
`Foreign Counterparts of the Patent ........................................................... 38 
`
`Licensees ................................................................................................... 38 
`
`D. 
`
`The ’829 Patent ..................................................................................................... 38 
`
`1. 
`
`2. 
`
`3. 
`
`4. 
`
`Identification of the Patent and Ownership .............................................. 38 
`
`Nontechnical Description of the Patent .................................................... 39 
`
`Foreign Counterparts of the Patent ........................................................... 40 
`
`Licensees ................................................................................................... 40 
`
`E. 
`
`The ’123 Patent ..................................................................................................... 40 
`
`V. 
`
`SPECIFIC INSTANCES OF IMPORTATION AND SALE ........................................... 41 
`
`A. 
`
`B. 
`
`Google ................................................................................................................... 42 
`
`Samsung Respondents .......................................................................................... 42 
`
`6
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00443-JRG Document 11-1 Filed 01/12/23 Page 8 of 87 PageID #: 73
`
`C. 
`
`D. 
`
`E. 
`
`F. 
`
`G. 
`
`H. 
`
`I. 
`
`J. 
`
`K. 
`
`L. 
`
`M. 
`
`OnePlus ................................................................................................................. 43 
`
`TCL Respondents.................................................................................................. 43 
`
`Lenovo Respondents ............................................................................................. 44 
`
`HMD Respondents ................................................................................................ 44 
`
`Sony Respondents ................................................................................................. 45 
`
`ASUS Respondents ............................................................................................... 45 
`
`Caterpillar ............................................................................................................. 46 
`
`BLU....................................................................................................................... 46 
`
`Panasonic .............................................................................................................. 47 
`
`Kyocera ................................................................................................................. 47 
`
`Xiaomi................................................................................................................... 48 
`
`VI. 
`
`UNLAWFUL AND UNFAIR ACTS OF THE PROPOSED RESPONDENTS .............. 48 
`
`A. 
`
`B. 
`
`C. 
`
`D. 
`
`E. 
`
`F. 
`
`G. 
`
`H. 
`
`I. 
`
`J. 
`
`K. 
`
`L. 
`
`M. 
`
`Google ................................................................................................................... 51 
`
`Samsung Respondents .......................................................................................... 53 
`
`OnePlus ................................................................................................................. 56 
`
`TCL ....................................................................................................................... 58 
`
`Lenovo .................................................................................................................. 60 
`
`HMD ..................................................................................................................... 62 
`
`Sony ...................................................................................................................... 64 
`
`ASUS .................................................................................................................... 66 
`
`Caterpillar ............................................................................................................. 68 
`
`BLU....................................................................................................................... 70 
`
`Panasonic .............................................................................................................. 72 
`
`Kyocera ................................................................................................................. 74 
`
`Xiaomi................................................................................................................... 76 
`
`7
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00443-JRG Document 11-1 Filed 01/12/23 Page 9 of 87 PageID #: 74
`
`VII.  CLASSIFICATION OF THE ACCUSED PRODUCTS UNDER THE
`HARMONIZED TARIFF SCHEDULE ........................................................................... 77 
`
`VIII.  RELATED LITIGATION ................................................................................................ 78 
`
`IX. 
`
`THE DOMESTIC INDUSTRY ........................................................................................ 81 
`
`A. 
`
`B. 
`
`Technical Prong .................................................................................................... 81 
`
`Economic Prong .................................................................................................... 82 
`
`RELIEF REQUESTED ..................................................................................................... 83 
`
`X. 
`
`
`
`8
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00443-JRG Document 11-1 Filed 01/12/23 Page 10 of 87 PageID #: 75
`
`EXHIBIT & APPENDIX LIST
`
`Non-Confidential Exhibits
`Ex. No.
`Description
`1
`
`Copy of U.S. Patent No. 8,213,970
`2
`
`Copy of U.S. Patent No. 9,467,838
`3
`
`Copy of U.S. Patent No. 9,445,251
`4
`
`Copy of U.S. Patent No. 9,749,829
`5
`
`Copy of U.S. Patent No. 9,820,123
`6
`
`Representative Claim Chart Comparing Google Pixel 6 to the ’970 Patent
`7
`
`Representative Claim Chart Comparing Google Pixel 6 to the ’838 Patent
`8
`
`Representative Claim Chart Comparing Google Pixel 6 to the ’251 Patent
`9
`
`Representative Claim Chart Comparing Google Pixel 6 to the ’829 Patent
`10
`Representative Claim Chart Comparing Google Pixel 6 to the ’123 Patent
`11
`Representative Claim Chart Comparing Samsung Galaxy S22+ to the ’970
`Patent
`Representative Claim Chart Comparing Samsung Galaxy S22+ to the’838
`Patent
`Representative Claim Chart Comparing Samsung Galaxy S22+ to the ’251
`Patent
`Representative Claim Chart Comparing Samsung Galaxy S22+ to the ’829
`Patent
`Representative Claim Chart Comparing Samsung Galaxy S22+ to the ’123
`Patent
`Representative Claim Chart Comparing OnePlus 8T to the ’970 Patent
`Representative Claim Chart Comparing OnePlus 8T to the ’838 Patent
`Representative Claim Chart Comparing OnePlus 8T to the ’251 Patent
`Representative Claim Chart Comparing OnePlus 8T to the ’829 Patent
`Representative Claim Chart Comparing OnePlus 8T to the ’123 Patent
`Representative Claim Chart Comparing TCL 10L to the ’970 Patent 
`Representative Claim Chart Comparing TCL 10L to the ’838 Patent
`Representative Claim Chart Comparing TCL 10L to the ’251 Patent
`Representative Claim Chart Comparing TCL 10L to the ’829 Patent
`Representative Claim Chart Comparing TCL 10L to the ’123 Patent
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`9
`
`

`

`28
`
`29
`
`30
`
`Case 2:22-cv-00443-JRG Document 11-1 Filed 01/12/23 Page 11 of 87 PageID #: 76
`
`27
`
`Non-Confidential Exhibits
`Ex. No.
`Description
`26
`Representative Claim Chart Comparing Lenovo Motorola Edge (2021) to the
`’970 Patent
`Representative Claim Chart Comparing Lenovo Motorola Edge (2021) to the
`’838 Patent
`Representative Claim Chart Comparing Lenovo Motorola Edge (2021) to the
`’251 Patent
`Representative Claim Chart Comparing Lenovo Motorola Edge (2021) to the
`’829 Patent
`Representative Claim Chart Comparing Lenovo Motorola Edge (2021) to the
`’123 Patent
`Representative Claim Chart Comparing HMD Nokia G50 to the ’970 Patent
`Representative Claim Chart Comparing HMD Nokia G50 to the ’838 Patent
`Representative Claim Chart Comparing HMD Nokia G50 to the ’251 Patent
`Representative Claim Chart Comparing HMD Nokia G50 to the ’829 Patent
`Representative Claim Chart Comparing HMD Nokia G50 to the ’123 Patent
`Representative Claim Chart Comparing Sony Xperia 5 III to the ’970 Patent
`Representative Claim Chart Comparing Sony Xperia 5 III to the ’838 Patent
`Representative Claim Chart Comparing Sony Xperia 5 III to the ’251 Patent
`Representative Claim Chart Comparing Sony Xperia 5 III to the ’829 Patent
`Representative Claim Chart Comparing Sony Xperia 5 III to the ’123 Patent
`Representative Claim Chart Comparing ASUS ZenFone 8 to the ’970 Patent
`Representative Claim Chart Comparing ASUS ZenFone 8 to the ’838 Patent
`Representative Claim Chart Comparing ASUS ZenFone 8 to the ’251 Patent
`Representative Claim Chart Comparing ASUS ZenFone 8 to the ’829 Patent
`Representative Claim Chart Comparing ASUS ZenFone 8 to the ’123 Patent
`Representative Claim Chart Comparing Caterpillar S62 Pro to the ’970 Patent
`Representative Claim Chart Comparing Caterpillar S62 Pro to the ’838 Patent
`Representative Claim Chart Comparing Caterpillar S62 Pro to the ’251 Patent
`Representative Claim Chart Comparing Caterpillar S62 Pro to the ’829 Patent
`Representative Claim Chart Comparing Caterpillar S62 Pro to the ’123 Patent
`Representative Claim Chart Comparing BLU Bold N2 to the ’970 Patent
`
`31
`32
`33
`34
`35
`36
`37
`38
`39
`40
`41
`42
`43
`44
`45
`46
`47
`48
`49
`50
`51
`
`10
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00443-JRG Document 11-1 Filed 01/12/23 Page 12 of 87 PageID #: 77
`
`57
`
`58
`
`59
`
`60
`
`Non-Confidential Exhibits
`Ex. No.
`Description
`52
`Representative Claim Chart Comparing BLU Bold N2 to the ’838 Patent
`53
`Representative Claim Chart Comparing BLU Bold N2 to the ’251 Patent
`54
`Representative Claim Chart Comparing BLU Bold N2 to the ’829 Patent
`55
`Representative Claim Chart Comparing BLU Bold N2 to the ’123 Patent
`56
`Representative Claim Chart Comparing Panasonic Toughbook FZ-N1 to the
`’970 Patent
`Representative Claim Chart Comparing Panasonic Toughbook FZ-N1 to the
`’838 Patent
`Representative Claim Chart Comparing Panasonic Toughbook FZ-N1 to the
`’251 Patent
`Representative Claim Chart Comparing Panasonic Toughbook FZ-N1 to the
`’829 Patent
`Representative Claim Chart Comparing Panasonic Toughbook FZ-N1 to the
`’123 Patent
`Representative Claim Chart Comparing Kyocera Durasport Pro to the ’970
`Patent
`Representative Claim Chart Comparing Kyocera Durasport Pro to the ’838
`Patent
`Representative Claim Chart Comparing Kyocera Durasport Pro to the ’251
`Patent
`Representative Claim Chart Comparing Kyocera Durasport Pro to the ’829
`Patent
`Representative Claim Chart Comparing Kyocera Durasport Pro to the ’123
`Patent
`Representative Claim Chart Comparing Xiaomi 11T to the ’970 Patent
`Representative Claim Chart Comparing Xiaomi 11T to the ’838 Patent
`Representative Claim Chart Comparing Xiaomi 11T to the ’251 Patent
`Representative Claim Chart Comparing Xiaomi 11T to the ’829 Patent
`Representative Claim Chart Comparing Xiaomi 11T to the ’123 Patent
`Certified Copy of the Assignment Documents for the ’970 Patent
`Certified Copy of the Assignment Documents for the ’838 Patent
`Certified Copy of the Assignment Documents for the ’251 Patent
`Certified Copy of the Assignment Documents for the ’829 Patent
`
`66
`67
`68
`69
`70
`71
`72
`73
`74
`
`61
`
`62
`
`63
`
`64
`
`65
`
`11
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00443-JRG Document 11-1 Filed 01/12/23 Page 13 of 87 PageID #: 78
`
`Non-Confidential Exhibits
`Ex. No.
`Description
`75
`Certified Copy of the Assignment Documents for the ’123 Patent
`76
`Receipts for Representative Google Pixel 6 device
`77
`Photograph of Representative Google Pixel 6 device
`78
`Photograph of Representative Google Pixel 6 device
`79
`Photograph of Representative Google Pixel 6 device
`80
`Receipt for Representative Samsung Galaxy S22+ device
`81
`Photograph of Representative Samsung Galaxy S22+ device
`82
`Photograph of Representative Samsung Galaxy S22+ device
`83
`Receipt for Representative OnePlus 8T device
`84
`Photograph of Representative OnePlus 8T device
`85
`Photograph of Representative OnePlus 8T device
`86
`Photograph of Representative OnePlus 8T device
`87
`Photograph of Representative OnePlus 8T device
`88
`Receipt for Representative TCL 10L device
`89
`Receipt for Representative TCL 10L device
`90
`Photograph of Representative TCL 10L device
`91
`Photograph of Representative TCL 10L device
`92
`Photograph of Representative TCL 10L device
`93
`Photograph of Representative TCL 10L device
`94
`Photograph of Representative TCL 10L device
`95
`Receipt for Representative Lenovo Motorola Edge (2021) device
`96
`Photograph of Representative Lenovo Motorola Edge (2021) device
`97
`Photograph of Representative Lenovo Motorola Edge (2021) device
`98
`Photograph of Representative Lenovo Motorola Edge (2021) device
`99
`Photograph of Representative Lenovo Motorola Edge (2021) device
`100
`Photograph of Representative Lenovo Motorola Edge (2021) device
`101
`Receipt for Representative HMD G50 device
`102
`Photograph of Representative HMD G50 device
`103
`Photograph of Representative HMD G50 device
`
`12
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00443-JRG Document 11-1 Filed 01/12/23 Page 14 of 87 PageID #: 79
`
`Non-Confidential Exhibits
`Ex. No.
`Description
`104
`Photograph of Representative HMD G50 device
`105
`Receipts for Representative Sony Xperia 5 III device
`106
`Photograph of Representative Sony Xperia 5 III device
`107
`Photograph of Representative Sony Xperia 5 III device
`108
`Photograph of Representative Sony Xperia 5 III device
`109
`Photograph of Representative Sony Xperia 5 III device
`110
`Receipt for Representative ASUS ZenFone 8 device
`111
`Photograph of Representative ASUS ZenFone 8 device
`112
`Photograph of Representative ASUS ZenFone 8 device
`113
`Photograph of Representative ASUS ZenFone 8 device
`114
`Receipt for Representative Caterpillar S62 Pro device
`115
`Photograph of Representative Caterpillar S62 Pro device
`116
`Photograph of Representative Caterpillar S62 Pro device
`117
`Photograph of Representative Caterpillar S62 Pro device
`118
`Photograph of Representative Caterpillar S62 Pro device
`119
`Receipt for Representative BLU Bold N2 device
`120
`Photograph of Representative BLU Bold N2 device
`121
`Photograph of Representative BLU Bold N2 device
`122
`Receipt for Representative Panasonic Toughbook FZ-N1 device
`123
`Photograph of Representative Panasonic Toughbook FZ-N1 device
`124
`Photograph of Representative Panasonic Toughbook FZ-N1 device
`125
`Photograph of Representative Panasonic Toughbook FZ-N1 device
`126
`Photograph of Representative Panasonic Toughbook FZ-N1 device
`127
`Photograph of Representative Panasonic Toughbook FZ-N1 device
`128
`Photograph of Representative Panasonic Toughbook FZ-N1 device
`129
`Photograph of Representative Panasonic Toughbook FZ-N1 device
`130
`Receipt for Representative Kyocera DuraSport 5G device
`131
`Photograph of Representative Kyocera DuraSport 5G device
`132
`Photograph of Representative Kyocera DuraSport 5G device
`
`13
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00443-JRG Document 11-1 Filed 01/12/23 Page 15 of 87 PageID #: 80
`
`Non-Confidential Exhibits
`Ex. No.
`Description
`133
`Receipt for Representative Xiaomi 11T device
`134
`Photograph of Representative Xiaomi 11T device
`135
`Photograph of Representative Xiaomi 11T device
`
`
`138C
`
`139C
`
`140C
`
`141C
`
`Confidential Exhibits
`Ex. No.
`Description
`136C
`List of AGIS Software Licensees
`137C
`Exemplary Claim Chart Comparing the ’970 Patent to AGIS, Inc. LifeRing
`Products
`Exemplary Claim Chart Comparing the ’838 Patent to AGIS, Inc. LifeRing
`Products
`Exemplary Claim Chart Comparing the ’251 Patent to AGIS, Inc. LifeRing
`Products
`Exemplary Claim Chart Comparing the ’829 Patent to AGIS, Inc. LifeRing
`Products
`Exemplary Claim Chart Comparing the ’123 Patent to AGIS, Inc. LifeRing
`Products
`Agreement between AGIS, Inc. and AGIS Holdings, Inc.
`Agreement between AGIS Holdings, Inc. and AGIS Software Development
`LLC
`Declaration of Malcolm K. Beyer, Jr. in Support of the Complaint
`
`
`142C
`143C
`
`144C
`
`Appendices
`Appx. No.
`A1
`A2
`B1
`B2
`C1
`C2
`D1
`
`Description
`U.S. Patent No. 8,213,970 Prosecution History
`U.S. Patent No. 8,213,970 Technical References Cited in Prosecution History
`U.S. Patent No. 9,467,838 Prosecution History
`U.S. Patent No. 9,467,838 Technical References Cited in Prosecution History
`U.S. Patent No. 9,445,251 Prosecution History
`U.S. Patent No. 9,445,251 Technical References Cited in Prosecution History
`U.S. Patent No. 9,749,829 Prosecution History
`
`14
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00443-JRG Document 11-1 Filed 01/12/23 Page 16 of 87 PageID #: 81
`
`Appendices
`Appx. No.
`D2
`E1
`E2
`
`Description
`U.S. Patent No. 9,749,829 Technical References Cited in Prosecution History
`U.S. Patent No. 9,820,123 Prosecution History
`U.S. Patent No. 9,820,123 Technical References Cited in Prosecution History
`
`15
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00443-JRG Document 11-1 Filed 01/12/23 Page 17 of 87 PageID #: 82
`
`I.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`1.
`
`This Complaint is filed by AGIS Software Development LLC (“AGIS Software”)
`
`and Advanced Ground Information Systems, Inc. (“AGIS, Inc.”) (collectively, “AGIS” or
`
`“Complainants”), pursuant to Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. § 1337
`
`(“Section 337”), based on the unlawful offer for sale for importation into the United States, sale
`
`for importation into the United States, importation into the United States, and/or sale within the
`
`United States after importation of certain location-sharing systems, related software, components
`
`thereof, and products containing same (“Accused Products”) by proposed Respondents: Google
`
`LLC, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., OnePlus Technology
`
`(Shenzhen) Co., Ltd., TCL Technology Group Corporation, TCL Communication Technology
`
`Holdings Limited, TCL Electronics Holdings Limited, TCT Mobile (US), Inc., Lenovo Group
`
`Ltd., Lenovo (United States) Inc., Motorola Mobility LLC, HMD Global, HMD Global OY, HMD
`
`America, Inc., Sony Corporation, Sony Mobile Communications, Inc., ASUSTek Computer Inc.,
`
`ASUS Computer International, Caterpillar Inc., BLU Products, Inc., Panasonic Corporation,
`
`Panasonic Corporation of America, Kyocera Corporation, Xiaomi Corporation, Xiaomi H.K. Ltd.,
`
`Xiaomi Communications Co., Ltd., and Xiaomi Inc. (the “Proposed Respondents”).
`
`2.
`
`Proposed Respondents’ Accused Products infringe one or more claims of U.S.
`
`Patent Nos. 8,213,970 (“the ’970 Patent, attached as Ex. 1); 9,467,838 (“the ’838 patent,” attached
`
`as Ex. 2); 9,445,251 (“the ’251 patent,” attached as Ex. 3); 9,749,829 (“the ’829 patent,” attached
`
`as Ex. 4); and 9,820,123 (“the ’123 patent,” attached as Ex. 5) (collectively, “the Asserted AGIS
`
`Patents”), in violation of Section 337(a)(1)(B).
`
`3.
`
`The Accused Products infringe at least the following claims of the Asserted AGIS
`
`Patents in violation of Section 337(a)(1)(B)(i) and 35 U.S.C. §§ 271(a)-(c), either literally or under
`
`the doctrine of equivalents:
`
`16
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00443-JRG Document 11-1 Filed 01/12/23 Page 18 of 87 PageID #: 83
`
`Asserted Patent
`
`’970 Patent
`’838 Patent
`
`’251 Patent
`’829 Patent
`’123 Patent
`
`
`
`Asserted Independent
`Claims
`2, 10
`1, 54, 55, 84
`
`1, 24
`1, 34, 35, 68
`14, 36
`
`Asserted Dependent Claims
`
`11-13
`3, 5-10, 16, 19, 25, 38, 40, 56,
`61-64, 68, 71, 72, 80
`2, 5, 7, 8, 23, 25, 28-31, 35
`8, 41
`37, 38
`
`4.
`
`As required by Sections 337(a)(1)(A) and (2)-(3), an industry exists or is in the
`
`process of being established in the United States relating to Complainants’ LifeRing products and
`
`the Asserted AGIS Patents, which are practiced by Complainants’ LifeRing products (“LifeRing
`
`DI Products”). Complainants’ LifeRing DI Products sold domestically are designed, developed,
`
`engineered, tested, assembled, and supported in the United States. To design, develop, engineer,
`
`test, assemble, and support Complainants’ LifeRing DI Products, Complainants have made and
`
`continue to make significant investment in plant and equipment, has employed and continues to
`
`employ significant labor or capital, and has made and continues to make substantial investments
`
`in the exploitation in the Asserted AGIS Patents in the United States. Complainants’ current and
`
`future significant domestic investment in plant and equipment and significant domestic
`
`employment of labor or capital demonstrates that Complainants are growing the domestic industry
`
`for its LifeRing DI Products.
`
`5.
`
`Complainants seek an LEO barring from entry the Accused Products imported, sold
`
`for importation, or sold within the United States after importation by the Proposed Respondents in
`
`violation of Section 337.
`
`6.
`
`Complainants also seek, as relief, permanent cease and desist orders (“CDO”)
`
`against the Proposed Respondents prohibiting the sale, offer for sale, advertising, marketing,
`
`packaging, distribution, maintenance of inventory, or solicitation of any sale or imported Accused
`
`17
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00443-JRG Document 11-1 Filed 01/12/23 Page 19 of 87 PageID #: 84
`
`Products, whether through traditional “brick and mortar” retailers, distributors, the Internet, or
`
`other electronic means.
`
`II.
`
`THE PARTIES
`A.
`
`The Complainant
`
`7.
`
`Complainant AGIS Software Development LLC is a limited liability company
`
`organized and existing under the laws of the State of Texas and is registered to do business in
`
`Texas. AGIS Software Development LLC (“AGIS Software”) was formed in 2017 and has its
`
`principal place of business at 100 W. Houston Street, Marshall, Texas 75671. AGIS Software also
`
`has a data center located 1005 Stuart Lane, Marshall, Texas 75672.
`
`8.
`
`Complainant Advanced Ground Information Systems, Inc. (“AGIS, Inc.”) is a
`
`corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Florida and is registered to do
`
`business in Florida. AGIS, Inc. was formed in 2004 and has its principal place of business at 92
`
`Lighthouse Drive, Jupiter, Florida 33469. AGIS, Inc. utilizes the data center located at 1005 Stuart
`
`Lane, Marshall, Texas 75672.
`
`9.
`
`Complainants are innovators, designers, engineers, and distributors of location-
`
`sharing and messaging systems and software. Complainants invested significant labor and
`
`financial resources within the United States in connection with the research, design, development,
`
`engineering and testing of its location-sharing systems and software products, which are protected
`
`by the Asserted AGIS Patents. Complainants’ management and design team has extensive
`
`experience in the commercial location-sharing and messaging software industry. Complainants’
`
`LifeRing DI Products have been used throughout the United States, including by U.S. Government
`
`entities.
`
`10.
`
`The Chief Executive Officer of AGIS Software and AGIS, Inc., Malcolm K. Beyer,
`
`Jr., had a career in the U.S. Navy, graduating from the U.S. Naval Academy in 1962 and
`
`18
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-00443-JRG Document 11-1 Filed 01/12/23 Page 20 of 87 PageID #: 85
`
`commission as a Second Lieutenant in the U.S. Marine Corps. Mr. Beyer attended the U.S. Navy’s
`
`programming school and was the lead programmer for the first automated Marine Corps Tactical
`
`Operations Center Link-11 Navy Interface. After leaving active service, Mr. Beyer worked at a
`
`number of well-known technology companies, including System Development Corporation
`
`(considered the world’s first computer software company) and Litton Industries. Mr. Beyer the